Friday - October 22, 2004

The Answer To The Question

The media finally admitted why they favor Kerry and why they will not pursue his record for the past thirty years nor demand complete release of his military records!

Peter Jennings seems to think media should pick sides and report based on how they believe and then color the news in a manner that reflects said beliefs.

Here. Straight from the horse’s ass:

“I’m a little concerned about this notion everybody wants us to be objective”

And people wonder why I do not trust these bastards!  You shouldn’t either!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/22/2004 at 06:29 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - October 18, 2004

Media Proves It Can’t Be Trusted

Thanks to one of our readers, BobF we get this transcript and associated information from when John O’Neill smoked Tom Brokaw’s ass in an interview last week.

You may remember that Brokaw interviewed O’Neill after ABC showed viewers footage of interviews ABC took with Vietnamese people regarding what Fuckface did during the war.  Recall, these people were considered the “Cong,” the “gooks,” the “enemy.” These are the same people whose government has a picture of Kerry in one of its government halls as a hero for helping them win a war.

Also remember ABC is the media arm of the Democractic party and you can only assume they are doing its bidding.  One need only read this memo by Mark Halperin which basically states the media must spend twice as much effort discrediting President Bush as it does Senator Fuckface.  They could just as easily have interviewed some of the couple of hundred AMERICAN vets about Kerry--something ABC has yet to do.

Don’t you find it amazing how our own media will take the word of a communist enemy over the word of its own decorated soldiers?

But go ahead and read the transcript.  It is a BEAUT!!!!  O’Neill cleans Brokaw’s clock.

Then read O’Neill’s statement after the interview.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/18/2004 at 05:27 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - October 17, 2004

Will Miracles Never Cease?

What is the world coming to? The notoriously far-left, liberal Chicago Tribune today announced it is endorsing George W. Bush for President (requires registration). It is a miracle! What is going on in the midwest? Has sanity returned while no one was looking? Have Chicagoans finally realized that Kerry is a total wanker? Inquiring minds want to know. Here is today’s editorial in it’s entirety ........

EDITORIAL

George W. Bush for president

Published October 17, 2004

One by one, Americans typically settle on a presidential candidate after weighing his, and his rival’s, views on the mosaic of issues that each of us finds important.

Some years, though, force vectors we didn’t anticipate turn some of our usual priorities--our pet causes, our own economic interest--into narcissistic luxuries. As Election Day nears, the new force vectors drive our decision-making.

This is one of those years--distinct in ways best framed by Sen. John McCain, perhaps this country’s most broadly respected politician. Seven weeks ago, McCain looked with chilling calm into TV cameras and told Americans, with our rich diversity of clashing worldviews, what is at stake for every one of us in the first presidential election since Sept. 11 of 2001:

“So it is, whether we wished it or not, that we have come to the test of our generation, to our rendezvous with destiny. ... All of us, despite the differences that enliven our politics, are united in the one big idea that freedom is our birthright and its defense is always our first responsibility. All other responsibilities come second.” If we waver, McCain said, “we will fail the one mission no American generation has ever failed--to provide to our children a stronger, better country than the one we were blessed to inherit.”

This year, each of us has the privilege of choosing between two major-party candidates whose integrity, intentions and abilities are exemplary.

One of those candidates, Sen. John Kerry, embraces an ongoing struggle against murderous terrorists, although with limited U.S. entanglements overseas. The other candidate, President George W. Bush, talks more freely about what is at risk for this country: the cold-eyed possibility that fresh attacks no better coordinated than those of Sept. 11--but with far deadlier weapons--could ravage American metropolises. Bush, then, embraces a bolder struggle not only with those who sow terror, but also with rogue governments that harbor, finance or arm them.

This was a radical strategy when the president articulated it in 2001, even as dust carrying the DNA of innocents wafted up from ground zero. And it is the unambiguous strategy that, as this page repeatedly has contended, is most likely to deliver the more secure future that John McCain wishes for our children.

A President Kerry certainly would punish those who want us dead. As he pledged, with cautiously calibrated words, in accepting his party’s nomination: “Any attack will be met with a swift and certain response.” Bush, by contrast, insists on taking the fight to terrorists, depriving them of oxygen by encouraging free and democratic governments in tough neighborhoods. As he stated in his National Security Strategy in 2002: “The United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. ... We cannot let our enemies strike first.”

Bush’s sense of a president’s duty to defend America is wider in scope than Kerry’s, more ambitious in its tactics, more prone, frankly, to yield both casualties and lasting results. This is the stark difference on which American voters should choose a president.

There is much the current president could have done differently over the last four years. There are lessons he needs to have learned. And there are reasons--apart from the global perils likely to dominate the next presidency--to recommend either of these two good candidates.

But for his resoluteness on the defining challenge of our age--a resoluteness John Kerry has not been able to demonstrate--the Chicago Tribune urges the re-election of George W. Bush as president of the United States.

- - -

Bush, his critics say, displays an arrogance that turns friends into foes. Spurned at the United Nations by “Old Europe"--France, Germany, Russia--he was too long in admitting he wanted their help in a war. He needs to acknowledge that his country’s future interests are best served by fixing frayed friendships. And if re-elected, he needs to accomplish that goal.

But that is not the whole story. Consider:

Bush has nurtured newer alliances with many nations such as Poland, Romania and Ukraine (combined population, close to 110 million) that want more than to be America’s friends: Having seized their liberty from tyrants, they are determined now to be on the right side of history.

Kerry is an internationalist, a man of conspicuous intellect. He is a keen student of world affairs and their impact at home.

But that is not the whole story. Consider:

On the most crucial issue of our time, Kerry has serially dodged for political advantage. Through much of the 2004 election cycle, he used his status as a war hero as an excuse not to have a coherent position on America’s national security. Even now, when Kerry grasps a microphone, it can be difficult to fathom who is speaking--the war hero, or the anti-war hero.

Kerry displays great faith in diplomacy as the way to solve virtually all problems. Diplomatic solutions should always be the goal. Yet that principle would be more compelling if the world had a better record of confronting true crises, whether proffered by the nuclear-crazed ayatollahs of Iran, the dark eccentrics of North Korea, the genocidal murderers of villagers in Sudan--or the Butcher of Baghdad.

In each of these cases, Bush has pursued multilateral strategies. In Iraq, when the UN refused to enforce its 17th stern resolution--the more we learn about the UN’s corrupt Oil-for-Food program, the more it’s clear the fix was in--Bush acted. He thus reminded many of the world’s governments why they dislike conservative and stubborn U.S. presidents (see Reagan, Ronald).

Bush has scored a great success in Afghanistan--not only by ousting the Taliban regime and nurturing a new democracy, but also by ignoring the chronic doubters who said a war there would be a quagmire. He and his administration provoked Libya to surrender its weapons program, turned Pakistan into an ally against terrorists (something Bill Clinton’s diplomats couldn’t do) and helped shut down A.Q. Khan, the world’s most menacing rogue nuclear proliferator.

Many of these cross-currents in Bush’s and Kerry’s worldviews collide in Iraq.

Bush arguably invaded with too few allies and not enough troops. He will go to his tomb defending his reliance on intelligence from agencies around the globe that turned out to be wrong. And he has refused to admit any errors.

Kerry, though, has lost his way. The now-professed anti-war candidate says he still would vote to authorize the war he didn’t vote to finance. He used the presidential debates to telegraph a policy of withdrawal. His Iraq plan essentially is Bush’s plan. All of which perplexes many.

Worse, it plainly perplexes Kerry. ("I do believe Saddam Hussein was a threat,” he said Oct. 8, adding that Bush was preoccupied with Iraq, “where there wasn’t a threat.") What’s not debatable is that Kerry did nothing to oppose White House policy on Iraq until he trailed the dovish Howard Dean in the race for his party’s nomination. Also haunting Kerry: his Senate vote against the Persian Gulf war--driven by faith that, yes, more diplomacy could end Saddam Hussein’s rape of Kuwait.

- - -

On domestic issues, the choice is also clear. In critical areas such as public education and health care, Bush’s emphasis is on greater competition. His No Child Left Behind Act has flaws, but its requirements have created a new climate of expectation and accountability. On both of these important fronts, but especially with his expensive health-care plan, Kerry primarily sees a need to raise and spend more money.

The failure of either candidate to offer spending and taxation proposals that remotely approach balancing the federal budget is an embarrassment to both. The non-partisan Concord Coalition calculates the 10-year impact of Bush’s proposals as a negative $1.33 trillion; the impact of Kerry’s is a nearly identical $1.27 trillion. Kerry correctly cites the disturbingly expensive legacy of Bush’s tax cuts--while, in the same breath, promising new tax cuts of his own.

This is a genre of American fiction that Bush, if he is re-elected, cannot perpetuate. To Bush’s credit, his tax policies have had the aggregate effect of pushing Americans toward more savings and investment--the capital with which the world’s strongest economy generates jobs. But he has not shown the necessary discipline on discretionary spending. Two particularly egregious examples: Medicare prescription drug coverage and an enormously expensive farm subsidy bill, both signed by Bush.

This country’s paramount issue, though, remains the threat to its national security.

John Kerry has been a discerning critic of where Bush has erred. But Kerry’s message--a more restrained assault on global threats, earnest comfort with the international community’s noble inaction--suggests what many voters sense: After 20 years in the Senate, the moral certitude Kerry once displayed has evaporated. There is no landmark Kennedy-Kerry Education Act, no Kerry-Frist Health Bill. Today’s Kerry is more about plans and process than solutions. He is better suited to analysis than to action. He has not delivered a compelling blueprint for change.

For three years, Bush has kept Americans, and their government, focused--effectively--on this nation’s security. The experience, dating from Sept. 11, 2001, has readied him for the next four years, a period that could prove as pivotal in this nation’s history as were the four years of World War II.

That demonstrated ability, and that crucible of experience, argue for the re-election of President George W. Bush. He has the steadfastness, and the strength, to execute the one mission no American generation has ever failed.

Copyright © 2004, Chicago Tribune

Posted by The Skipper     on 10/17/2004 at 01:00 PM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 15, 2004

Freedom is Not Free!!

The Ditzie Shits found this out the hard way as did Bruce Springsteen (who had to give away tickets to his gig!)

Now the publisher of the editor in the Crawford paper that supported Fuckface for Preisdent is finding it out, too.  He expected a bit of a backlash.  He’d found out the backlash comes with a cat o’ nine tails.

Hiwever, for the life of me I can not understand why the author of this piece had to mention that the editor was:

wearing a decade-old knit tie

WTF,O?

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/15/2004 at 06:44 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - October 12, 2004

Your Friends at the Media

Remember how the media was salivating all over itself and wetting its collective pants because opposition candidates in Afghanistan had boycotted the election?

Remember also that the media puts into practice the following philosophy: “if it’s good news for Bush, don’t publish it but if it’s bad news for Bush, run it over and over and over in an effort to sway people’s opinions and convince them he’s a failure.”

Well, I wonder how many TV stations, mainstream papers and other news services will be as eager to report that most all the opposition has now STOPPED their boycott?

I guess that falls under the “good news for Bush so let’s not get into it” category, huh?

Media Bias?  WHAT Media Bias?

Not only do we have See-B.S. and NBC donating disproportionately larger amounts to Dummycraps than Republicans, now Fox News enters the fray doing the same thing.

I guess the media truly IS the lap dog of the socialist moonbats in this country.

Hang on, I’m not done yet.

Isn’t it amazing the levels the media will stoop to and the distortions it creates in order to favor one person over another as president?  Does anyone know what that’s called?

(repeat after me:  BIAS!!!!!)

Michael Reagan has done a great job digging up some reporting that ABC did back in the late 90s in support of President Clinton which tied Osama bin Laden to Saddam Hussein.

So why is it ABC won’t talk about that now with President Bush in office?

That’s right!  BIAS!!!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/12/2004 at 02:23 PM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 08, 2004

WHAT Media Bias?  Where?  I Don’t See it!!

Read This and if you’re a Republican you’ll immediately be aware of what I am about to launch into.  If you are a Democrat, then allow me to explain in a manner that will not overload your feebly incapacitated brain:

Go ahead, read the article.  Completely.

Now tell me how long it took for the paper to identify the perpetrator as a Democrat.  Then explain to me why it is the Republicans were immediately identified as such by an (R) after their names as if THEY were the ones who committed the slur.

Then explain to me why there is no seeming outcry from the homosexual community for the use of the terminloogy the Dummycrap Senator employed.

Lastly, if you have any capacity to be intellectually honest, try and convince me that if the tables were turned this individual wouldn’t have been ridden out of town on the rails.

Go on!  I dare you!

OK, you liberal wankers can go away now.

For the rest of you, check this out.  It’s a comment made by one of the homosexuals to whom this Vince Fumo asswipe apologized:

“Vince is the kind of guy, when he gets angry colorful things come out of his mouth,” said Segal, who considers himself a friend of Fumo’s. “But he is also the No. 1 supporter of gay and lesbian issues in the Pennsylvania Senate ... and deeds speak louder than words.”

You gotta love the blatant hypocrisy!!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/08/2004 at 02:39 PM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

It’s Time The Attorney General Stepped In

This is getting ridiculous.  In the same county where we had all those voter problems in 2000 and 2002 (run by Democrats, populated by Democrats and where stupid Democrats couldn’t figure out a ballot or use the new voting machines) we now have another brewing scandal.

After doors closed for new voter registration, an individual comes to the door 15 minutes late and demands Theresa LePore (the supervisor of elections) to have his paperwork taken (OBTW:  all of it was from Muslims against Bush!) SURPRISE!!!!!!! (not!)

He sneaks in anyway and starts yelling “disenfranchisement!!!” She refuses the box (she says) but admits to allowing people individually inside until 6.

WHY THE FUCK DO WE HAVE RULES IF THESE FUCKTARDS ARE ALLOWED TO BREAK THEM AT THEIR DISCRETION AND WHEN IT SUITS THEM???????

The same thing happened in 2000 and caused the courts to come in and tell these morons they had to obey the law.  Because of that the mantra became, Bush was selected, not elected.” If these sons of bitches follow the rule of law there never would have been any problems.

And if you read this more in-depth article by the Palm Beach Post you will see how the issue easily slides from blatant violation of laws regarding voter registration to 527 groups and who they represent.

No mention is made of LePore’s law breaking by allowing additional people in until 6 PM.

And it goes without saying that whereas the Democrats break the law AT WILL, it’s the Republicans who disenfranchise voters.  Who tear up voter applications.  Who change polling stations without telling anyone.

One last thing:  Am I the only one who wants to know how many of those “hundreds of thousands” of last minute voter registrations submitted in the last week were from people wanting to register as Democrats or “republicans” claiming to change party affiliation?  Do you smell the same fraud I do?  Do you smell the setup that’s coming and lawsuits waiting to be filed claiming disenfranchisement?

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/08/2004 at 06:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

The Coalition of the Bribed

Funny how the press just LOVES to make headlines about the UN Weapons Inspector who just filed a report saying Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction.  Yet they overlook the damning facts about Saddam’s Oil-For-Food program and how he skimmed about $11 BILLION and bought off countries with his oil money.

The list cited names from France, Russia and China, all permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, which supervised the program.  Read the rest here.

This piece goes into detail about how the scumbag cheese eating surrender monkeys ("the French” for those of you in Rio Linda and all other Democrats reading this) profited from this corruption with the understanding they’d:

“influence the French to oppose U.S. initiatives at the United Nations and to work to lift sanctions. ”

I brought all this up in earlier posts (here) (here) and (here) which had basically the same information regarding who got how many contracts, what governments they were with, etc. but it seems no one is too eager to investigate.  Must be hitting too close to home, huh?

A blow-by-blow can be found here.

Even the British are getting into the act by writing an article about Dutch and French inspectors who were supposed to keep this sort of stuff from happening yet they themselves took over $100,000 in bribe money from the Iraqis.

Some great allies we have in the French, Germans and Russians, wouldn’t you say?  They find nothing ethically wrong in dealing with a barbaric dictator, taking bribes, skimming billions from the people of Iraq and giving no second thoughts to the misery they’ve created.  Yet all the while they prefer to keep this evil bastard in power and refuse to support the one country that has bailed them out of world wars and rebuilt their economies.

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/08/2004 at 05:12 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 07, 2004

Start Writing!

If you follow the Best of the Web series you’d have noticed that over the past couple of days they have been running commentary about Dummycrap tactics of saturating newspapers with letters from people claiming to be fence sitters.  They write to say they changed their minds because Edwards beat Cheney so badly in the debates or because Edwards was so much more eloquent.

The only problem is that these people are SO FUCKING STUPID (after all they ARE Democrats!) that they sent their letters in HOURS before the debates even started!!!  Some papers were sdmart enough to have caught on and NOT published the letters.

Of course, for the most part, though, the mainstream media does not even mention this brazen attempt to sway voters with false information (until Republicans counter with a mass emailings AFTER the debates to say Cheney had won!)

Well, considering all that has happened recently and given all this Dummycrap propaganda I decided to write both local papers (St Pete Times and Tampa Tribune) with the following.  I urge you to do the same to your local papers.  You CAN make a difference.

Editor:

Let’s review a bit first:

In Orlando the Republican HQs gets stormed by about 150 union thugs who repeatedly beat a volunteer’s head against a plate glass window and break the wrist of another

In Seattle, Bush/Cheney Hqs broken into and computers stolen last week

In Knoxville, Bush/Cheney campaign headquarters have shots fired at it the day before yesterday

In Huntington, WV in early September the Republican HQ had shots fired at it

In NY City, an elderly woman attacks a Bush supporter in an apartment building

And earlier this week Bush/Cheney Hqs were stormed in Milwaukee and a fire in the shape of a swastika was set on the front lawn of a Bush supporter

What did all these attacks have in common?  They were perpetrated by John Kerry and John Edwards’ Democratic party supporters who:

-- are forever saying we should all get along

-- say we should exercise more tolerance of each others’ differences

-- want to take away our rights to possess firearms

--decry violence of any kind

--demand we negotiate and talk and discuss and do everything possible to avoid shooting and bloodshed

--are against war and violence

And then REPUBLICANS are the ones the media portrays as mean spirited, bigoted, and hate filled?  Does anyone else see the irony and hypocrisy of this sorry excuse for a political party called “DEMOCRATS?”

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/07/2004 at 06:08 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 06, 2004

Guess Who’s Found Jesus?

Yep!  Fuckface is now going around talking about his faith!

I’ve not seen much in the press but this morning NPR was coming as close to a media orgasm over Kerry’s faith as anything I’ve seen.  They gushed over his ability to speak for 5 minutes---WITHOUT NOTES--- about Jesus!  They mentioned how he carries a rosary and how he attends mass regularly.  WOW!!! That ought to convince a lot of people.  And considering the sheeple out there, I’m sure they’ll easily be hoodwinked by Fuckface’s lies.

And then they interviewed all these DNC officials who verbally ejaculated about how important it is for people to know that faith matters to Democrats.

WHAT BULLSHIT!!

Stay tuned, roll up your pants, put in the nose plugs.  The shit storm of Dummycrap religious faith starts soon!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/06/2004 at 05:24 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - October 05, 2004

Inventing Stories From Thin Air

You’d think the New York TImes would have enough to write about given everything that’s going on in the world but I think they are trying to pull a C-B.S. on its readers by inventing stories out of thin air. 

Take a look at this one. At first blush you read through it and think, “hmmmm, a personal interest story.” But when you get to the middle and find out the owner does not reveal names nor does he want to, you begin to wonder, “hey!  how the hell did the Times make the conclusive leap and infer these guys are dead?” But it continues to do so for the last half of the article.

How convenient that they gloss over the possibility these soldiers just abandoned their uniforms.  It’s easy enough to do:  drop off uniforms, go on exercise, get stationed to Iraq, return and forget all about them.  Hell, for all we know the soldiers got RE-ASSIGNED to a different post.

Yet the Times thinks that a man’s inability to make a phone call to the phone number on the tag or to call the post enquiring about the men, or to compare the names against a deceased list is ABSOLUTELY good enough to launch an anti-war story.  No investigations.  Nothing.  Just take it at face value and run with it.

Jayson Blair, numerous other scandals, and Blather-gate STILL have not taught the Gray Lady any manners.  I urge all conservatives to NEVER buy a New York Times or Washington Post.  Or LA Times.  Or Seattle Post-Intelligencer..  It’s the only way these fucktards will get the message.

Thanks to Best of the Web for the link!

Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler     on 10/05/2004 at 03:42 PM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - October 03, 2004

Duck Soup

In a scene from their latest movie, the Marxist Brothers are shown here hamming it up for the audience. Groucho (right) is explaining to Chico (left) and Harpo (center) their latest scam.

Brokaw blasted what he called an attempt to “demonize” CBS and Rather on the Internet, where complaints about the report first surfaced. He said the criticism “goes well beyond any factual information.” “What I think is highly inappropriate is what going on across the Internet, a kind of political jihad ... that is quite outrageous,” the NBC anchor said at a panel on which all three men spoke.

Rather declined to comment, saying news executives had asked him not to talk about the report while an investigation was under way.

“I don’t think you ever judge a man by only one event in his career,” said Jennings, anchor on ABC.

Sincerely,
The Pajamahedeen

Posted by The Skipper     on 10/03/2004 at 12:08 PM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(1)  Permalink •  

The Fellowship Of The Blogosphere

“Suddenly he felt the Eye. There was an Eye in the Dark Tower that did not sleep. He knew that it had become aware of his gaze. A fierce eager will was there. It leapt toward him; almost like a finger he felt it, searching for him.”

“The Eye: that horrible growing sense of a hostile will that strove with a great power to pierce all shadows of cloud, and earth, and flesh, and to see you: pin you under it’s deadly gaze, naked, immovable. So thin, so frail and thin, the veils were become that still warded it off.”

Posted by The Skipper     on 10/03/2004 at 11:38 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - September 29, 2004

RatherGate, Part Duh!

CBS News and Dan Rather just aren’t satisfied having put their foot in their mouth. Now, they want to insert the other foot and most of both legs. Their latest muckadoo occurred on last night’s Evening News broadcast. They broadcast a story trying to scare everyone into believing there is a secret plan to re-institute the draft. What did they base the story on? An e-mail they received that began with this text ....

From: “(name removed for privacy)@usdoj.gov”
Subject: Military Draft expected to start July 15, 2005
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004

Someone I know forwarded this to me, it was forwarded to them from someone they know who has a friend that works in the dept of defense, I thought that you all would appreciate knowing about this also ..

Memo to Dan Ra^ther: ROFLMAO!

Go read the rest at RatherBised.Com. They’ve been doing a smash-up job of covering the latest hijinks at See-BS.

Puh-leeze! This is ridiculous. Believe it or not, that is the actual text above from the e-mail that CBS ACTUALLY SHOWED on TV as corroborating their story. Raise your hands if you read the above and thought, “Gee! This sounds legitimate”. That’s what I thought. I think Dan Ra^ther needs to quietly go into retirement before he gets into real trouble and ends up in jail for slander and fraud.

Update: RatherBiased.com’s servers are indeed down. We hope they’ll be back up later. It has to be a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy!

Posted by The Skipper     on 09/29/2004 at 08:41 AM   
Filed Under: • Media-Bias •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner