Saturday - January 28, 2012

man helps store security …. man being sued

This is nothing new. It happens all the time and all the time it remains of some maddening interest.  Happens in the USA as well so this isn’t unique to the UK.

The bad guy in this case is represented by the law firm of Hype, Con and Hustle.

I hate the term so much used by Brits. “Have a go hero.” I’m sure in many cases they are that okay but the phrase to my ear somehow diminishes what really is a brave act. Have a go. Oh go on. Just one cigar. Have a go. Take a puff. Kinda like that.

Shop hero who wrestled with ‘thief’s accomplice’ is sued for compensation

By ALISON SMITH SQUIRE

A have-a-go hero who intervened when a suspected shoplifting incident turned nasty has found himself on the receiving end of a compensation claim.

The drama began when a former heroin addict with two knives in his waistband was stopped by a security guard after setting off the alarms as he left a busy branch of Boots.

As he was being taken back into the store, he became aggressive. At the same time, a second man seemed to be rushing to join him.

It was then shopper Reginald Wharton went to the aid of the outnumbered security guard, trying to calm the second man – who was feared to be an accomplice – before wrestling him to the ground.

Police arrested the suspected shoplifter and accomplice, and the Boots manager thanked Mr Wharton for his bravery.

But more than a year after the incident Mr Wharton faces a legal nightmare after receiving a lawyer’s letter seeking compensation for an injured elbow from the man he wrestled to the floor.

Mr Wharton, 31, said: ‘If I hadn’t stepped in someone could have been stabbed. I can’t believe the justice system in our country allows anyone to sue like this. I face the devastating possibility of being sued for thousands of pounds.’

He was in Boots in Torquay, Devon, with his four-year-old twins in November 2010 when recovering heroin addict Justin Birt, 30, was detained for shoplifting.

It was when he began arguing with the security guard that the man assumed to be his accomplice, Phillip McCarthy, became involved.

‘The man [Birt] became aggressive, and at the same time a man I took to be his accomplice appeared from nowhere and roughly grabbed hold of the security guard by his left arm.

‘The store was packed with shoppers, mostly families with young children, and the apparent accomplice was swearing loudly at the security guard. Instinctively I stepped in front of the man and asked him to calm down.’

But he said the man began shouting more and eventually he had to grapple him to the floor. ‘I’ve worked as trained security guard myself and have learnt the proper way to put someone on the ground without hurting them,’ he said.

Birt, 30, later pleaded guilty to possession of two knives, a serrated bread knife and a meat knife. He was not charged with shoplifting.  Mr McCarthy was arrested for a public order offence and questioned. He was not charged.

Mr Wharton believed that was the end of the matter. But last week he received a letter from personal injury lawyers Almy & Thomas saying that under a no-win, no-fee agreement they had been instructed by Mr McCarthy to sue for damages and costs. The letter said he had injured his left elbow, which needed treatment at the police station.

PHOTOS AND MORE TO READ

Posted by peiper     on 01/28/2012 at 04:41 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - January 27, 2012

criminals tell lies and the system sucks

Some newspapers have reported that half the guys who sneak into your home and rob things, are repeat offenders.  Oh. Now that’s a surprise.  And I bet they all promised to behave if freed.  I guess they all lied. And that’s a surprise too.

Guy with record and warm hearted judge plus uman rights laws.

I believe I posted a story weeks ago about a burglar who was let off because he has five kids he has to care for. Remember that one?  Appeal judges ruled he had a right to a family life. That’s part of the EU court system which the Brits are trying to dump, as they have and have had for hundreds of years, their own set of laws. Which does not in the least impress the europeeons.

His original sentence was only 8 months and already had a record for other offences. When he was freed he said at that time that he was surprised, as he never expected to be freed.  Yeah well, it didn’t surprise the public at all.

His wife works some kind of split shift and isn’t home, as I understand it. Or isn’t for the period she’s working. And he is unemployed.  Figures. 

Well, four weeks after his release he was in trouble again.  He and his bouncer brother attacked some guy in a market in full view of shoppers.  While his brother held the guy in a headlock, our hero proceeded to punch his face.  Beat the heck out of the guy, customers fleeing in all directions and all caught on CCTV security cameras.

Cops come, he refuses to talk, ends up back in court (along with his bruiser brother) where both deny doing what dozens witnessed plus what was caught on camera.

So he’s out on bail at the moment but ………….

His lawyer says they plan on using the kids to avoid jail again, on account of they are his clients responsibility.

Hey, what great legal thinking.
And what a great system. 
Jeesh.
What a bad joke the system is.

Posted by peiper     on 01/27/2012 at 01:17 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - January 12, 2012

law without justice as killers walk free but bored.

It’s 11:19 and this damn cold has settled into a raging cough. So I came downstairs and booted to see what tomorrows headlines will be.
This bit of soft justice (justice? where?) immediately caught my eye.  I guess it was meant to.
It’s this kind of thing that makes ppl see red and causes so much frustration and anger.  There really, really should be vigilantes at work here to settle the hash of vermin like these thugs.  But what gets everyone up in arms are the light jail times for an act like this.
Meanwhile, a few days ago someone was given seven years for stealing £7,000.
There is no way to make sense of that. Oh I forget. Except among lawyers.
Here. Take a look.

Thug who killed for kicks released after just two years… and whines that he’s BORED

Attack by Warren Crago and two mates ‘worst case of mob violence imaginable’

Leaves pitiful message on Facebook: ‘nuthin to do out in the big world for me’
Also spouts hatred of police and threatens to punch ‘black boys’
Victim’s father: ‘These thugs have evidently not learned their lesson’

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

What lesson?  What they have learned is simply that they can easily get away with it and will more then likely do it again.

A sick thug who killed a Big Issue seller for kicks has been released from his custodial sentence after just two years and has taken to Facebook to tell of his ‘boredom’.

Warren Crago was 16 when he and two teenage friends beat homeless man Ralph Millward, 41, to death after finding him asleep on a pavement in Westbourne, Bournemouth.

Although a judge described the brutal attack as the ‘worst case of mob violence imaginable’, Crago and accomplice Craig Real were jailed for four years.

But after serving half of their sentence they are now back on the streets.

Crago, now 18, has gone on Facebook to write about being bored after getting out of ‘pen’. He is even using his police mugshot photo as his profile picture.

Mr Millward’s grieving father Ken, 78, said he was sickened by the teenagers’ conduct.
He said: ‘I would have hanged them. I have always believed in life for a life.

The victim suffered 10 broken ribs, a ruptured spleen and bleeding on the brain. His injuries were said to have been consistent with being involved in a car crash.

The teenage trio were found guilty of manslaughter at Winchester Crown Court last year.

read all here

Posted by peiper     on 01/12/2012 at 06:18 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - December 15, 2011

a justice (?) system in the toilet. well hell. no wonder it stinks. and it damn well does.

Ever have your eyes opened for the first time?
But late in life rather then early?

It isn’t that I’ve never been sceptical about the law or the injustice system.  It’s more like I hadn’t discovered just how unjust it can be.  Until late in life.

So I’m up all night reading a book impossible to put down called “The Color of Law.”
There is a line, one among many, that stands out and strikes a chord.

It reads as follows.

The law is just a business, a game we play with other people’s lives and money.

Another line says

Check your conscience at the door each morning or you won’t last long in the law.

Coincidence that I’ve read the book at about the same time as the tilt against justice was made in a court last week, and which was reported on here as well as many other blogs.  You may recall I posted a story about four black muslim slags who beat the heck out of a white girl while calling her racial names.  For those of you who missed the article, although I can’t see how, the judge in the case decided that since the four were drunk for the first time (they claimed), then he would not jail the sluts because as muslimes, they were clearly not used to drinking and so acted contrary to their normal behavior.  So they got a get out of jail card.  Now any white that in anger or not would use the ‘N’ word would definitely find themselves in a cell and fined heavily since words do more harm then a severe kicking and beating. 

Well as the old song went, “The Beat Goes On.” and “Ain’t That a Shame?”

This old man, age 79, was hit with what you see him holding. It was thrown by the vermin shown here on the right.

Of course, it was just all in fun and yoot being yoot. It was done by this piece of worthless shit who had this to say after appearing in court.
“HaHa, Got off with a tag.” In other words, he was spared jail time by the system in place here.

He was part of a gang of feral youths that threw a 40lb paving slab at the old man shown, leaving him writhing on the ground in agony.
Ryan Girdlestone walked free from court with a curfew and an electronic tag after his lawyer convinced magistrates the 18-year-old was full of remorse for the incident that ended with Bernard O’Donnell, 79, with a suspected broken leg.

But that is not how he appeared just minutes later, as Girdlestone boasted on his Facebook page: ‘Jus got out off court wiv a 4 mouths [sic] tag hahahha d**ks!!!’

Last night, his victim, a retired deputy head teacher, said: ‘Clearly he has no care for the damage he has caused. If they are laughing at the consequences then it’s hardly a deterrent.’

source,more

So why should this miserable thug worry about the law?  There’s no teeth to bite the bastard with.

And there’s this insane example of justice not done. Another case of fuck the victim.
Maybe it’s almost well that guns are hard to come by here. I have a feeling that otherwise there’s be running gun battles in the streets with 12 year olds armed to the teeth.  On the other hand, the feral shits already own the streets.  The law abiding should be armed with permission to shoot to kill. 
Here, take a look at this dumbo ruling.

‘Only a tyrant would tag someone on their 21st birthday’: Judge spares man caught with keys to stolen car so he can celebrate his birthday

· Corey Brown, 20, who was caught with the keys to a £30k car, repeatedly failed to turn up for unpaid work
· Recorder David Hall refuses to give him an electronic tag - and instead adds an extra seven hours to his community punishment
· Brown says he saw punishment as a ‘bit of a joke’
By KATHERINE FAULKNER

Corey Brown had been ordered to do 150 hours of community service for his role in the theft of a pensioner’s car, but when he failed to turn up for the work sessions five times he was hauled back into court to be given a curfew and an electronic tag.
But he was spared after complaining that the punishment would ruin his plans for a night out on his 21st birthday.

Turning to Brown– who had sat smirking throughout the hearing at Warwick Crown Court – Recorder Hall then said: ‘If I give you seven more hours [of community service] to do, and you keep out of trouble, is that a fair deal?’
Brown, from Bedworth, Warwickshire, simply nodded, and then walked free from court.

And Brown – who has already been to prison three times – admitted that even he was surprised he had been let off.
He said: ‘I was expecting to get a tag for missing my probation dates. Technically, they should have activated my prison sentence. But the judge told me I’d done well so far. He said he didn’t see the point.
‘Thanks to the judge, I can enjoy a few drinks for my birthday, instead of being stuck in with my gran or in prison.’
When asked why he had not turned up to do his community service, he replied: ‘I don’t know; just didn’t think about it. I didn’t care.
‘I suppose I did see the whole thing as a bit of a joke.’
As he prepared to celebrate his 21st birthday yesterday, Brown added: ‘I’ve been to jail three times and I haven’t learned a thing.

more at the source

Well of course he sees it as a joke.  Because it freekin well is a joke. Not a very funny one either but it proves my constant point.
Nobody will fear laws and punishments with no teeth. No one will have a reason to fear being caught for any kind of crime. There will always be a lawyer ready to play the game. And judges and magistrates with no common sense and less brains then god gave a tennis ball aren’t a big help.

Since liberals have achieved a choke hold on the criminal injustice system world wide, we can all look forward to more of the same.
I’m sure by now you have all been made aware of the killings in Belgium over the last 24 hours. Drew posted the story.  Here was a man, another scum sucking bit of worthless flesh with a record. A violent one.  What was he doing out on the streets?  Oh right.  His human rights.

The papers said he came from a North African immigrant background, also had convictions for drug dealing, handling stolen goods and sex abuse.  An immigrant background?  Does that mean he was born of immigrant parents, or that he was himself an immigrant?  Because here in Britain, there are thousands of criminal immigrants and so far, no way or no will to deport them.

For example:

Rapist asylum seeker who dumped victim on rubbish tip is released after being TWO hours away from deportation
· Alphonse Semo, 54, was allowed by judge to marry girlfriend so can stay in Britain
· Father-of-five was jailed for eight years for rape in 2002
By ROB COOPER

An asylum seeker who raped a woman and dumped her on a rubbish tip when he was ‘finished’ has been freed despite Home Office attempts to deport him.
Alphonse Semo, 54, was jailed for eight years for the rape and at the end of his term was due to be sent back to the Congo.
However two hours before his flight he was given permission to marry his girlfriend and stay in the country.
Now a judge has allowed the father-of-five to be released from an immigration detention centre.

read more here

And btw, for a crime of this sort where there is no doubt about guilt, why was the sentence so small?  A crime like rape deserves the death penalty after first ripping off the rapists parts or burning them off.  Wanna bet this non human bit of shit will be on benefits?

In Italy, a man opened fire on some Senegalese merchants killing two.
He was described as being a Fascist and belonged to a right wing Fascist party.
Not that killing a couple of innocent merchants is justified. Ever. But I keep waiting for the violent backlash against the liberals who have brought us to this state. The guy in Italy was angered by immigration and I suppose (no supposing about it ) he was acting on race based ill will.  But if he had to kill anyone, why not the liberals who are responsible for the situation that led to his anger and hate.

Can’t anyone on the far right with violent intent ever get it right?  There’s loads of lawyers for example, on the left, who specialize in civil rights cases. There are so many legitimate targets to choose from but no.  They always seem to shoot the visible result of liberal policy, instead of the liberal ‘activists’ who are the cause. 

Machine-gun thug killed ‘blameless’ pair in a row over parking

By COLIN FERNANDEZ
An argument over parking led to a ‘completely good and blameless’ businessman and his nephew being machine-gunned to death by a drug dealer.

Khan, who has previous convictions for robbery and possession of crack cocaine with intent to supply, looked ‘furious’ as he drove away. About ten minutes later three Asian men returned and started to damage the van which had blocked the road. One pulled out a gun from a bag and opened fire, killing both Amarjit and Rajinder.

Harjinder Tiwana watched in horror as the gunman aimed the gun at her, before the gang fled with hoods pulled over their faces. In February 2004 she identified Khan as the gunman. She told the court: ‘I will never forget the face of the man who murdered my father.’

Mobile phone evidence revealed that after leaving the scene Khan repeatedly phoned another man, Abu Bakr Mansha Khan – who was later jailed for six years in 2006 for plotting to kill a decorated British soldier, Corporal Mark Byles.

Jurors heard that Abu Bakr Mansha Khan was arrested in September 2003 but released and has not stood trial in relation to this incident. It also emerged that the MAC-10 gun used in the murders had been used in another shooting that year, in Coventry.

Prosecutor Nicholas Hilliard said: ‘Nobody hearing about this case could have been anything other than horrified. Two good, blameless men shot dead in broad daylight with a machine gun. It raises a whole host of issues that people feel strongly about – the availability of firearms,

more to read and see

Seems to me they should worry more about criminals who can’t be deported and the abuse of the human rights industry by civil rights lawyers and a too soft approach to punishment.  When there’s any of that, that means anything.  Firearms are NOT easily available to the law abiding, and those who don’t abide don’t care.  What is it they (officialdumb) don’t understand?  If you read the comment by Brits it’s pretty clear they are tired of all the BS.  But the powers that be just are not listening enough.  They are letting technicalities and loopholes put the law abiding in ever more danger with no hope.

If I’ve bored the readers here with all this, it hasn’t been intentional. I’m just so damn sick of seeing this kind of thing so often, and so often the criminals getting off lightly and laughing their way out of court. And if you think the little bit I have posted here is all of it, you’d think wrong.  These are just a few examples of a justice injustice system that is broken.
And here’s the last bit of proof of that.  This is fuckin sick and it isn’t even the very worst of what I’ve seen over the last 7 years. But it’s damn well bad enough.

Gang of nine who beat autistic teenager so badly she was off school for 10 months escape without ANY punishment
· Sophie Russell, 16, was punched about 20 times in the face
· Four girls and five boys let off and police handed just one of the mob a caution
By EMILY ALLEN

Sophie Russell, 16, was attacked by the teenage yobs who left her seriously injured with a broken nose and shattered face at her school in February. 

The teenager from Market Rasen, Lincolnshire, had to have facial surgery and was forced to take 10 months off school to overcome traumatic panic attacks and rebuild her life. 
Her mother Helen, who owns a heating ventilation company with husband Iain, 45, in Louth, Lincolnshire, has criticised police for not prosecuting the youths, saying ‘there has been no justice.’
Sophie, who has Asperger’s syndrome, said: ‘What I went through was really traumatic and ripped the family to bits. I was just walking to my boyfriend’s house and wasn’t expecting to be attacked.

‘Because they are juveniles they have got away with it. If the main offender does it again she will end up in front of a judge, but why give them a chance to do it again?’

A Lincolnshire Police spokesman said the case was passed to the Youth Offending Team who decided not to press charges but to give a caution for common assault.

read and see more

Gee, if this is a “common assault” I’d sure hate to see what they regard as uncommon.  See the link and read the comments. She’s been patched up and is a pretty girl. But inside the damage will last a lifetime.  And the punks walk away free.  Justice would demand that the very same thing be done to them, as they did to her. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/15/2011 at 11:55 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - December 10, 2011

the new religion of human rights rules the day

From time to time when reading comments on line from various newspapers here in the UK, there will always be someone and this is a fact writ in stone, who will say that America has become a laughing stock all over the world.  Sometimes they will say merely in the civilized world, but always the phrase, ‘laughingstock.’ It’s used anytime we make a mistake of some kind, or when something is really seriously out of order.  Or it may be the latest gun crime. 
Of course I think they’re just on the bash the USA bandwagon which is popular in every generation except for the 2nd war. And even then many point a finger of (unfair) accusation that we arrived a bit late in the show.  Others accuse us of overcharging for the second hand equipment supplied before we did get in. They say we led Britain to financial ruin by insisting we get paid for things sent.  Seems like a very Bolshie attitude to me.

So anyway … this is not about lend lease and WW2. My mind just drifted there momentarily.  No.
This is all about being a laughing stock. Which we are not but that doesn’t matter at this moment. The question is … does this story make Britain itself a laughing stock?
Could this story ever appear in an American newspaper? Would the USA be this stupid on our very worst of days?  The correct answer is no to both.  I just can not bring myself to believe we’d ever do this to ourselves.  Of course, I need to be careful in my predictions.  I wasn’t thinking of America’s 5th column on the left when I wrote that line.

Since I started writing this, I’ve had a change of heart and mind.  No. On second thought Britain isn’t a laughing stock, even with this not very funny article.

Talk about times that try.  Try getting your head around this one dear reader.

Home Office told to bring asylum family back to UK – but they may again deport them. (and pay them thousands)

A judge has ordered the Home Office to bring back a family of asylum seekers it removed nearly six years ago – even though they may then be deported a second time.

By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Editor

The family of five Sri Lankans were removed in 2006 but the High Court ruled they were unlawfully detained during the process and demanded they be brought back.
The court made the judgment even though it accepted it was uncertain once they had been returned and dealt with appropriately that they would be allowed to stay in the UK.

As well as the cost of returning the family, who are currently living in Germany, the Home Office was also ordered to pay £37,000 in compensation.
One critic last night said it was like something out of Alice in Wonderland.
The case echoes a ruling in 2006 when the High Court said the Home Office must return a family it had already removed because it had not fully dealt with one member’s appeal.

In the latest ruling, Mr Justice Cranston said the Sri Lankan families rights had been violated in the way they had been dealt with.
Manjit Gill QC, representing the family in court, said they were taken from their beds and flown out of the country after being denied access to legal advice.
The QC said the family, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, had their north London home raided at about 2am on January 10, 2006 by immigration and police officers.

A few hours after being detained, they were put on a 7.50am flight to Germany.  The Home Office has now accepted they were unlawfully detained and the court said they must be brought back.
The judge said the violation of the rights of the husband, his mentally-ill wife and their son and two daughters, now aged between 14 and 23, entitled them to return to the UK, if they so wished.

But he added that the issue of whether they are then allowed to stay was not a matter for the court.
The family were flown to Germany because that was the first EU country they arrived in.

Under a policy known as the Dublin Agreement, member states can require the first country of entry of an asylum seeker to deal with their claim.
It is possible that even when the family is brought back to the UK that it will still be decided Germany is the appropriate country to handle the claim for shelter, meaning the family will be sent back there.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: “This is straight out of Alice in Wonderland but at enormous cost to the British taxpayer.
“This family must be detained strictly in accordance with the law and removed again to Germany which had an obligation to deal with the case.”

Lawyers for the family said today the ruling was “a tremendous relief” to the family, and they would be returning to the UK – “which is something they have been longing for for nearly six years”.

Mr Gill said their treatment was all the more outrageous because, had the correct procedures been adopted, it was inevitable that they would have been able to make an application to remain in the country on human rights grounds.

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “We are disappointed with this decision and will be looking carefully at our next steps.
“We cannot comment on the details of the individual case for legal reasons.”

source

Posted by peiper     on 12/10/2011 at 04:57 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - December 07, 2011

One rule for them, different one for us

Further to my earlier posting of that attack on the white girl by a gang of (we are told) muslim girls.

Paul Weston over at The Gates of Vienna has an editorial on the subject and more.  A couple of items I overlooked or was unaware of.
For example, I wasn’t aware of the wording with regard to hate or race crimes. He’s worth seeing and so I’ll just copy a sample here and let you read the rest at

H/T Gates of Vienna

One Rule for Them, One Rule for Us
by Paul Weston

Someone holding governmental authority badly needs to tell the British public why there appears to be one rule for them, and one rule for us, when it comes to racially aggravated crime and murder.

Today’s article about Rhea Page is a case in point. Kicked unconscious by a girl gang of drunken Somali Muslims, screaming ‘kill the white slag’: one would have thought this would be labelled a racist incident. Ms Page stated: ‘I honestly think they attacked me just because I was white. I can’t think of any other reason.’

But no, in the eyes of the perverse British judiciary this is not a racial incident, of course. Even worse: Judge Robert Brown allowed them to walk free because he accepted that as Muslims they were unused to drinking… Judge Brown also thought the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Ms Page’s partner Lewis Moore, 23, who tried to defend her from the attack.

In the wake of the terrible Stephen Lawrence murder, the Macpherson Report defined a racial incident very clearly: “A racist incident is any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person.” Is it not a little odd that such a straightforward statement, eagerly embraced by the British police, is open to question only when the victim is white? Ms Page clearly believes this was a racial incident, so why don’t the police or the judiciary?

And this is not a solitary case. Only last week 19-year-old Danny O’Shea had his throat slashed by a gang of black youths outside his mother’s front door in Newham, east London. The police are not treating this as racist murder. Why not?

That last is only one of a growing list. See the link above. I hadn’t realized it was so long.

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2011 at 10:41 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

girl gang attack white woman, gang a protected group and go free. SEE THE IDIOT REASONING by judge

You will no doubt recall a post from a week ago with regard to a racist rant in public by a white woman.

She should have known better.  White folks do NOT have a right to express publicly what many think.  That white woman is going to spend Christmas in jail for her own protection, as she’s received death threats, and her home address has been posted to Facebook and Twitter. And all not for what she did, but for what she said.

A woman accused of launching a vile racist rant on a tram is to spend Christmas behind bars after she was remanded in custody for her own safety.
Magistrates took the decision to refuse Emma West’s bail application after they heard she had received death threats and that her address had been circulated on social networking sites Facebook and Twitter.
There were outbursts from supporters of Miss West, who shouted ‘treason’ as she was denied bail at Croydon Magistrates’ Court.

‘Woman on a tram’ to spend Christmas behind bars

And the only reason I am bringing up her case now and here again, is because of the action of four filthy Somali niggers who beat hell out of a white woman, calling her white slags, and suggested killing her.  Of course, we are not surprised and expect this sort of thing from this particular group of life forms, as in general they are not capable of the thinking and feelings of a more civilized world.  You can dress a pig up in a tux, call him friend and invite him into your house but .... it will still be a pig. Won’t it?

The young women who are all muslims it is claimed, were drunk. Take a look at the defense these filthy black and brown sluts put up and the fuckin idiot judge who one can only hope becomes the victim (hopefully a close family member as icing on the race cake as well) of some drunk black muslim. We can only hope.
And yeah, I am pissed.  Imagine how the victim must feel.

Here’s a statement from the stupid idiot mof***er judge about the boy friend trying to defend his girlfriend. PLEASE see the video bmews. What’s it look like to you?

he accepted the women may have felt they were the victims of unreasonable force from Mr Moore as he tried to defend his girlfriend, and handed the defendants a suspended sentence.

Everybody is now the victim.

EXCEPT THE VICTIM!

Girl gang who kicked woman in the head while yelling ‘kill the white slag’ freed after judge hears ‘they weren’t used to drinking because they’re Muslims’

· Yobs ripped lump of hair from Rhea Page’s head during High Street attack

· Three sisters and cousin escape with six-month suspended sentences

· Maximum term for assault occasioning actual bodily harm is five years’ jail

· Judge: ‘Those who knock someone to the ground and kick them in the head can expect to go inside, but I’m going to suspend the sentence’

By ANDY DOLAN and KATHERINE FAULKNER

A gang of Muslim women who attacked a passer-by in a city centre walked free from court after a judge heard they were ‘not used to being drunk’ because of their religion.

The group – three sisters and a cousin – allegedly screamed ‘kill the white slag’ as they set upon Rhea Page as she waited for a taxi with her boyfriend.
Miss Page, 22, was left with a bald patch where her hair was pulled out in the attack and was left ‘black and blue’ after suffering a flurry of kicks to the head, back, arms and legs while motionless on the pavement.

Ambaro Maxamed, 24, students Ayan Maxamed, 28, and Hibo Maxamed, 24, and their 28-year-old cousin Ifrah Nur each admitted actual bodily harm, which carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment.

But Judge Robert Brown gave them suspended jail terms after hearing mitigation that as Muslims, the women were not used to being drunk. The Koran prohibits Muslims from consuming alcohol, although Islamic teachings permit its use for medicinal purposes.

After the sentencing, Ambaro Maxamed wrote on her Twitter account: ‘Happy happy happy!’, ‘I’m so going out’, and ‘Today has been such a great day’.

Yesterday Miss Page, a care worker, called the sentence ‘disgusting’ and said the gang deserved ‘immediate custody’.

free pass for black muslim scum because of who they are. pix and video and more to read.

And here’s a bit of afterthought from one of the gang of sluts.

‘I’m not proud of it, it’s not something I want to talk about. I just want to get on with my life.’

When asked if she wanted to apologise, she replied: ‘What, to the public? I really don’t care.‘

A couple of years ago I posted an article about a fellow who grew tired, frustrated and finally very angry with his black neighbor. At issue was the neighbor blocking his driveway on a number of occasions.  He complained but that got him nowhere.  Well, one day the black bastard parked across the driveway, the white guy couldn’t get out until he got him to come out and move it and losing his temper, referred to his neighbor in terms that accurately described exactly what he was.  Namely, a black bastard.
He was arrested and charged with anti-social behavior and race hate. He was fined a goodly sum although I don’t now recall how much.
I only mention it here as one example of I’m certain many more, where one set of sub-human life forms seem to have the judges and the law on their side.
And I’d apply that equally to white criminal scum as well.

Everybody is now the victim, except the victim. 

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2011 at 07:50 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 29, 2011

human rights again trumps common sense and national well being.

Different thug but same old story as Britain continues on path to national suicide.
How much more can I say?  Not much. I think this article pretty well covers it.

Drug dealer Andre James jailed for gun crime wins ‘human rights’ case

Foreign drug-dealer and gun criminal Andre James has been allowed to stay in Britain partly because he would return to a life of crime if he was deported.

By David Barrett and Ben Leach

Andre James convinced judges that deporting him to Jamaica would make him more likely to re-offend - even though the Home Secretary wanted him removed from the country after he was jailed for five years in 2007 for possessing a revolver and ammunition, supplying Class A drugs, carrying a blade in public and being in possession of criminal property.

He was also allowed to stay on the grounds that his human right to a “family life” would be infringed by being forcibly returned, because he has two children in Britain. One of them was fathered while he appealed against his deportation.

The case highlights growing concerns over the use of human rights legislation by foreign criminals to frustrate legislation which makes clear that anyone serving more than a year in prison should be automatically deported.

Coalition ministers have launched a review of the way the crucial element of the law, the controversial Article 8 of the Convention on Human Rights - which guarantees a “right to a private and family life” - is being used.

READ ALL OF IT HERE

Is being used did he say?  Should that not be abused?  And it’s been going on for a very,very long time.
There really must be something in the water here.

Posted by peiper     on 11/29/2011 at 12:56 PM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 25, 2011

more young black men are in prison than attending the country’s leading universities.

Here’s a headline that caught my attention.
Gee. What a surprise.  Who could have thought such was possible after so many, many years of white guilt driven monies being poured into inner cities and programs to get em out of the gutter.

Hundreds more young black men are in prison than at leading universities

Hundreds more young black men are in prison than attending the country’s leading universities, the Deputy Prime Minister will warn today, as he issues a fresh call to end racial discrimination.
By Robert Winnett, Political Editor

it’s all whitey’s fault

Well now. I wonder why that is?
Right … it’s all down to “discrimination” and not enough programs and not enough money. Got it.

Nick Clegg will say that the “next frontier for race equality” is opening up economic opportunities to ethnic minorities.

The Liberal Democrat leader will indicate that positive discrimination is operating in the public sector, saying that men from ethnic minorities now earn more than their white counterparts. But he will point out that ethnic minority workers typically earn significantly less than whites in the private sector.

Sure. Ppl from favored minorities can earn more in the public sector as long as those in charge continue to pay and pay and sometimes pay some folks well above their capabilities.  Not saying discrimination doesn’t exist at all.  But lets face the truth which is;
Much in the private sector is image and to a degree pc. You must be seen to be anti racist and anti discrimination and so will think more then 2wice before firing a minority member.  And if you do, chances are pretty good you’ll have to defend that action in court. Because it is never but never the fault of a person getting the sack. No. It’s always the ‘D’ word.

Mr Clegg will also cite professional football, where a quarter of players are black but there is not a single black manager in the Premier League.

Good point Mr. Clegg. Why is that? And oh btw.  How many blacks are there in high or leadership positions within your own party?  Come, come. Don’t be shy.  Surely it can not be due to lack of interest or dare I say it?  There may not any with the qualifications to fill the posts.  Maybe discrimination? 

Meanwhile, in the real world and on the streets and in the courts, and no matter which civilized country they call home, they always make up the majority of prisoners doing time.  I wonder why that is? 

Out in just TWO years: ‘Soft’ sentence for serial teen offender caught on camera fleeing after brazen stabbing of a young man in broad daylight

Junior Henry, 17, was part of gang that stabbed man to death in 2009 but was not locked up because of his age

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

A teenage thug photographed stabbing a man during the Notting Hill Carnival has been jailed for four and a half years… and could be out in just two years.
Junior Henry, 17, was caught on camera as he tried to flee the scene after plunging a knife into the abdomen of Rio Andre as the carnival drew to its conclusion on August 29.

Valentine Simatchenko, a Russian bystander who witnessed the attack, was dubbed a ‘hero’ after attempting to trip up Henry as he ran from the scene while police officers stood motionless.

Today campaigners have expressed their outrage at the relatively light sentence.

Jean Taylor, of Families for Justice, said she was shocked the thug was not locked up earlier.

She told the Daily Mirror: ‘This yob we be out in two years if he behaves himself. The police must be so frustrated when all their hard work ends in sentences like this.’

Following the sentencing it was revealed that Henry was acquitted of the murder of a pharmaceutical student in a trial at the Old Bailey during 2009.

He was found guilty of conspiracy to cause GBH and violent disorder but was spared prison by The Recorder of London, Judge Peter Beaumont QC.

Instead he was given a supervision order but it was reported that he had broken that many times, including after being given a ‘final warning’ by Judge Beaumont.

blk boy and his knife. togetherness.

Posted by peiper     on 11/25/2011 at 09:12 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - November 21, 2011

foul language in public is not shocking. no. but it’s still offensive.

This is the subject referred to briefly in another post.

There have been times here at BMEWS, when angry at some outrage or so totally frustrated I could not find proper words, that I may have let fly with a word or two.  Sometimes cussing really does act as a valve of sorts.  But still, I know it isn’t the best way to express myself.  The judge may have a valid point however in that it’s so common place now, that nobody is really shocked. But I’d also say that I bet lots of folks who aren’t shocked, still find foul language in public on the offensive side.  Of course, since the acceptance of the ‘F’ word in place of the punch line in jokes on stage in public over the years, what else would one expect?
Even in a major newspaper I recently caught one columnist either quoting or referring to something as, s**t.  Now that did surprise me a lot cos I had not seen that word used in newspaper before.  Not even the less offensive and milder term, crap. Which these days can also be used to describe something as junk, as worthless and even, unbelievable.

Is the world a better place because bad language is an acceptable mode of communication?
Kinda doubt it.

Licence to swear: Profanity is so common that it can’t be offensive, judge rules

By REBECCA CAMBER

Yobs should not be punished for hurling obscenities in public – because swear words are now so common that they no longer cause distress, a High Court judge has ruled.

In a landmark judgment, Mr Justice Bean upheld the appeal of a foul-mouthed thug who was convicted for repeatedly using the f-word while being searched by police.

The ruling paves the way for scores of other louts to challenge their convictions for public order offences – and could force police to pay them compensation for wrongful arrest.

The decision, which provoked outrage among police, comes just weeks after the London Mayor Boris Johnson and Britain’s most senior policeman called for a zero-tolerance crackdown on those who abuse officers.

The case was brought by Denzel Harvey, who was fined £50 at Thames Youth Court for repeatedly swearing at officers while he was being searched for cannabis in 2009. The High Court heard that the 20-year-old launched into a tirade of abuse when he was stopped by two police officers in the street in Hackney, east London, telling them: ‘***k this, man. I ain’t been smoking nothing.’

When no drugs were found following a search, he continued: ‘Told you you wouldn’t find ***k all.’ After being asked whether he had a middle name, the surly yob replied: ‘No – I’ve already ****ing told you so.’

Mr Harvey was arrested for the outburst, and magistrates found him guilty of a public order offence after hearing that the expletives were uttered in a public area while a group of teenage bystanders gathered round.

But the conviction was quashed at the High Court, with Mr Justice Bean saying the ‘rather commonplace’ expletive is heard ‘all too frequently’

He claimed it was ‘quite impossible to infer that the group of young people who were in the vicinity were likely to have experienced alarm or distress at hearing these rather commonplace swear words used’.

Simon Reed, vice chairman of the Police Federation, said yesterday: ‘It’s astounding that you can use every swear word to abuse a police officer and they have got to accept it just because it is common.

‘This gives the green light for everyone to swear and use disorderly behaviour with police.’

The ruling is likely to reignite the row between Mr Johnson and the Justice Secretary, Ken Clarke, over swearing at police. 

Mr Harvey was charged under section five of the Public Order Act 1986, which makes it an offence to ‘use threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby’.

But in June it emerged that officers had been advised not to arrest those who verbally abuse police, with guidance stating that courts ‘do not accept’ that swearing at officers results in ‘harassment, alarm or distress’.

Last month Mr Johnson said he agreed with the new Metropolitan Police commissioner, Bernard Hogan-Howe, that that guidance should be scrapped.

‘Public servants are not there to be abused,’ Mr Johnson said. ‘They are there to serve society and society must respect them.

‘How can a copper cope with the job if the public are allowed to insult them with impunity?’

Mr Johnson wants a new offence of ‘swearing at or abusing a police officer acting in the execution of his or her duty’.

He told the Conservative Party conference: ‘If people swear at the police, they must expect to be arrested.

‘Not just because it’s wrong to expect officers to endure profanities, but also because of the experience of the culprits.

‘If people feel there are no boundaries and no retribution, then I’m afraid they will go on to commit worse crimes.’

your right to cuss in public

Posted by peiper     on 11/21/2011 at 12:40 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - November 20, 2011

protecting the law abiding.  well, not quite. maybe not at all.

One of the many self inflicted wounds as the result of a country giving away it’s sovereignty. Maddening. And that’s putting it mildly. Notice please how I’ve controlled my bad language. 

The link to this no longer is available. Doesn’t matter. It happened. The sub human gave so many false names no wonder the authorities held on to him for longer then usual. Of course, another idiot judge see criminal rights as more important then the rights and the safety of the citizens here. 

Stowaway illegal immigrant who committed 20 offences is awarded £17,000 compensation after being ‘unlawfully’ jailed for four months
By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

An illegal immigrant who arrived in the UK as a stowaway and then committed around 20 offences has thanked a judge after being awarded more than £17,000 compensation for being falsely imprisoned by Home Office officials for four months.

Judge Stephen Stewart QC concluded that 28-year-old Joseph Mjemer - who had used at least five aliases and claimed to be from four different countries - should be freed and paid damages by the Home Office for ‘loss of liberty’.

And yet another case of a country that doesn’t seem able to protect itself from low life animal scum.

The problem has been that creeps with long records have no deterrent.  How many times do innocent ppl have to suffer before the system takes steps to put scum like this away forever?  He should have been put away after he killed that woman in 91.But no … sub humans like this always survive. It’s the innocent victim that pays the price.  And it won’t stop. Ever. And that’s a crime in itself.
Maybe western civilization has a death wish. Ya think?

Too sick to serve time: Killer motorist with 50 convictions spared jail after judge says his hands ‘are tied’ because criminal wouldn’t get care he needs

By JAYA NARAIN

He once killed a mother of two while speeding.

Yet the tragic consequences of his actions meant nothing to Kevin Bracken.
In the subsequent 20 years, he has racked up more than 50 driving offences.

But even now he will not face the full force of the law after a judge said he could not jail him because his local prison would not provide the round-the-clock care he needs for his physical and mental disabilities.

His latest offence came in January this year when the 46-year-old led police on a terrifying chase on the wrong side of a dual carriageway.
He had already totted up five convictions for dangerous driving, 29 for driving while disqualified, and 15 for taking a vehicle or allowing himself to be carried in a vehicle that had been taken.

Judge William Morris said that Bracken had ‘a complete disregard for the law’ and ‘deserved’ to go to prison for 19 months for his sixth dangerous driving offence, close to the two-year maximum sentence.

‘This is a shocking case of dangerous driving – how many times has that been said to you by judges?’ he asked.
‘I have never seen a record so bad for driving offences. You deserve to go to prison and you know it.’

However, having receiving guidance from Forest Bank prison in Salford, the judge admitted: ‘My hands are tied. I have had a letter from the prison to say that the medical services there simply could not cope with you, so what can I do?’

so what can I do?
simple. let the bastard die so others might not.

see more

Posted by peiper     on 11/20/2011 at 12:14 PM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

idiot judge sides with anarchist activists, says all united in decency. does that tell you something

In a statement read out outside court by protester Oliver Pope, 20, the group said: ‘Today, the ten of us who were on trial have been found guilty of taking part in a protest - a protest that was dubbed ‘sensible’ by the senior police officer at the scene.
‘We were standing up, or more accurately sitting down, against our government making harsh cuts to public services, whilst letting big companies get away with dodging a total of tens of billions of pounds of tax every year.
‘Then we are put on trial, whilst it’s clear the real criminals are the tax dodgers, the politicians and the bankers who caused this financial crisis and who continue to profit.
‘We are supposed to have a democratic right to protest yet people like us, exercising that right and expressing our discontent feel the force of the law and receive harsh and disproportionate sentences.
‘We will, of course, continue to fight this and will be appealing the judgement.’

Well now, lets see how this democratic crowd of high minded anarchists expressed their discontent.

First of all, the so called tax evaders have avoided, legally, they have not evaded their taxes. It’s one thing to insist ppl pay more if you want to insist on that. But these jerks didn’t seem to have a clue that companies they were ranting about, broke no tax laws.
Furthermore, the store these unwashed creeps out for fun and never mind their false claim, invaded and broke up a store that donates part of all their sales to charity. Something these yahoos never learned ahead of time.
They are filth, they all deserved to be put against a wall and shot. Because next time there’s rioting in London and elsewhere, it’ll be the very same crowd doing the same thing.

Now then …. one thing that makes this thing really maddening, is the idiot judge who praised them and called them ‘decent’ protesters. And that has cause quite a stir as you’ll imaging. But hey, with jerk judges like that, it’s like a get out of jail card for the likes of the so called protesters.  Who have proven that generally, they make it up as they go along. The photos tell the story though.

And here’s the idiot judge. Just the very thing to reassure the public. What an ignorant ass. But then, that’s what the law is. Innit?

Outcry as judge praises the ‘decent’ protesters who invaded Fortnum’s

By CHRIS GREENWOOD
A judge provoked anger by praising the ‘common sense of decency’ of a gang of protesters who invaded Fortnum & Mason.
They were among more than 130 people who stormed into the Queen’s grocer after splitting off from a huge TUC march through London.

The activists caused damage and loss of business estimated at more than £100,000 as they terrorised staff and customers.

But District Judge Michael Snow said the protest was ‘ill-judged’ rather than malicious as he handed conditional discharges to ten defendants. He also declined to award Fortnum & Mason any compensation.

He said: ‘Civil disobedience has a long and entirely peaceful history in this country.

History often vindicates those involved in such acts. I’ve read a series of glowing references on behalf of every one of you. You are united by a common sense of decency.’

The ten were convicted of aggravated trespass with intent to intimidate after a six-day trial at Westminster magistrates’ court.
They are the latest protesters involved in disruptive economic and environmental demonstrations to receive lenient treatment from the courts.

Earlier this year activists who tried to shut down a coal-fired power station near Nottingham were spared jail after a judge declared they acted with the ‘highest possible motives’

see the high minded innocent public minded left at work

This country is overpopulated with idiot judges.

Posted by peiper     on 11/20/2011 at 11:30 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 18, 2011

senior conservatives calls for ‘permanent, universal opt-out’ from European laws

If there is one things Europeans and most especially Germans do not want, it’s for the Brits to have any kind of referendum on any of this.
Cos it isn’t any closely held state secret that if given a clear choice .... I truly believe the majority of Brits would tell the Euros to, ‘Drop Dead.’
Well, not exactly.  Most Brits polite and would put it another way but heck, a rose by any other name .....

Merkel’s plot to scupper OUR referendum with ‘limited’ treaty change… as German colleague claims Britain will scrap the Pound and join the sinking Euro

Finance minister’s astonishing claim comes despite deepening crisis that threatens the existence of the single currency

Cameron and Merkel ignore disagreements over eurozone solution as they describe their ‘strong friendship’

German Chancellor says EU needs ‘limited treaty change’ which won’t trigger a referendum in Britain

PM was in Berlin today to discuss repatriation of EU powers

UK is pressuring Germany to allow euro bank to print more money

Senior Tory calls for ‘permanent, universal opt-out’ from European laws

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

Germany’s Chancellor today denied the British people the chance for an EU referendum as as she said the eurozone crisis would be resolved without the UK’s involvement.

Angela Merkel called for a ‘limited treaty change’ for further eurozone integration - exactly as spelled out in a leaked German memo which outlines an attempt to prevent a British referendum that could lead to powers being clawed back from Brussels.

Her extraordinary announcement came on the day that finance minister Wolfgang Schäuble predicted that the UK will have to adopt the euro ‘faster than people think’, despite the ongoing crisis in the single currency.

Germany’s attempts to impose EU control on Britain, and the minister’s astonishing outburst, will have increased the tensions between David Cameron and Mrs Merkel as they met in Berlin this morning.

The leaders are have clashed over German plans for a new tax on bank transactions and treaty change to shore up eurozone finances.

But at a press conference this afternoon, the pair ignored their differences and insisted that Britain and Germany will work together in a spirit of ‘strong friendship’.

The leaders steered clear of most areas of disagreement and insisted they had had ‘very good discussions between very good friends’, but could not stop some evidence of discord slipping out.

When asked whether the European Central Bank should start printing money to guarantee eurozone debts, Mr Cameron said officials should ‘do what is necessary’ to defend the euro.

But Mrs Merkel warned that Europe’s resources were not infinite as she insisted: ‘One should not pretend to be more powerful than one really is.’

And when the pair were asked about the arguments over a European financial transactions tax, the German leader admitted they ‘did not make any progress’ on the issue.

In a blow to British hopes of a referendum on repatriating powers from Brussels, she also said that any move towards closer economic union in the eurozone would take place through ‘a limited treaty change, only for the members of the eurozone’.

This would mean that Mr Cameron could avoid fulfilling his pledge to hold a referendum on EU powers the next time Britain is required to sign up to a new treaty, and will outrage Tory backbenchers hoping to claw back sovereignty from Europe.

WHY NO REFERENDUM?
The Conservatives have long promised a referendum on repatriating powers from the EU, but have not yet delivered one.

Angela Merkel’s comments today make a referendum less likely, as her ‘limited treaty change’ will not have to be approved by countries outside the euro, including the UK.

The Coalition’s ‘referendum lock’ commits the Government to holding a public vote the next time Britain is supposed to sign up to a new treaty which would hand more power to Brussels.

But if the eurozone countries try to solve the debt crisis by closer economic integration, the UK will have no say - even though this could have a massive impact on Britain.

Although no referendum will be held, there is nothing to stop the Government from trying to repatriate powers by itself, but without a popular mandate it will be taken less seriously by other EU countries

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 11/18/2011 at 11:35 AM   
Filed Under: • Economics • EUro-peons • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 15, 2011

victim stabbed 56 times and killer let out to attend event after two years. law and disorder

So ya think injustice rules in the USA with regard to the Criminal Justice System?
Ha.  Take a look at this bit of lunatic asylum thinking on the part of authorities here.

If you take the time to read the comments after the article at the link, you will see more evidence of how little public opinion and desire are thought of. And this isn’t new. It’s only the latest in a long line of outrages. And yet many here (on the left of course) still go on and on about the large number of citizens who are “incarcerated” in the USA.  Ignoring that many are not citizens at all. Still though ... this really does beat all.
Is it now okay to say, Only in England?  But then, that wouldn’t be entirely true either. Would it?

I will never, ever understand this kind of thing.

Tough justice? Killer who stabbed love rival 56 times is let out for wedding and a half marathon just two and a half years after being jailed

Karla Biddle, 34, jailed for seven years in 2009 after she killed her ex-fiancé’s new girlfriend
Friend of victim’s family: ‘They are struggling to cope as it is. To see pictures of her enjoying herself so soon after being sentenced for a brutal crime is devastating’

By RICK DEWSBURY
Last updated at 5:23 PM on 15th November 2011

A killer who stabbed her love rival 56 times was at the centre of a prison investigation today after being photographed at a wedding and running a half-marathon.

Karla Biddle, now 34, was jailed for seven years in 2009 after she knifed her ex-fiancé’s new girlfriend Emma Bradshaw in a frenzied attack the previous year.

The family of Miss Bradshaw condemned the sentence earlier this month when it emerged that Biddle is due to be released from prison this week after serving just two years and eight months inside.

But the latest pictures are sure to pile fresh hurt on the grieving family.

They show a smiling Biddle posing in a pink party dress at a wedding in Co Sligo, Ireland, this September. The killer looks on as other guests enjoy a chocolate fountain.

Biddle has also been photographed grinning while running the Birmingham half marathon and joining a Race For Life charity run.

The prison service is now investigating whether Biddle, from Yardley, Birmingham, breached her licence by attending a wedding in the Irish Republic.

Prisoners are not normally given permission to travel overseas while on licence.

If she has been found to have breached the conditions of her licence she would be sent back to prison to continue serving her sentence.

After seeing photos of the killer at the wedding and running events a Prison Service spokesman said: ‘We do not comment on individual prisoners, but if prisoners breach their licence in any way, they will be subject to disciplinary proceedings and are likely to be moved to closed conditions.’

The victim’s devastated family said they were ‘disgusted’ by the photos.

more here with photos and comments from readers

Posted by peiper     on 11/15/2011 at 12:53 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner