Sunday - January 08, 2012
Empathy? Who has any?
Emperor Misha I has ranted…
The “Empathy” of the Loony Left
Posted by Emperor Misha I on January 7, 2012It’s Saturday, so it’s time for Steyn, who this weeks talks about the strange version of “empathy” the Prognazis employ.
You know, the kind of “empathy” that extends only to the “right” of pregnant women to exterminate their “fetuses”, but certainly not to the parents of children who died before or immediately after birth. Witness Prognazi Alan Colmes, that throwback to the darkest ages of knuckle-dragging barbarism, who had a jolly old time mocking the Santorums for “taking home their dead infant to ‘play’ with it”, followed by the equally morally repugnant stinking swine Eugene Robinson who stated that this “proved” that Santorum was not “merely” weird, but really weird.
We’ll let Steyn say it (and you really ought to go read the whole thing):
But needs must, and victory by any means necessary. In 2008, the Left gleefully mocked Sarah Palin’s live baby. It was only a matter of time before they moved on to a dead one.
We haven’t ever had to face the horror of having a child die but, as Steyn says, there but for the Grace of G-d.
The thing is, even though we’ve never had to deal with an experience and horrible as that, we still somehow manage to scrape up enough humanity and actual empathy not to piss on somebody who has gone through it. It must be that cold, indifferent, self-sufficient right wing nuttism in us, unlike the true humanitarians in the Prognazi Party who, like that lizard-faced freak mutation, Alan Colmes, couldn’t find it in himself to even apologize for something he shouldn’t have said in the first place until he’d reduced Mrs. Santorum to tears with his callous, cruel, subhuman mockery.
May Almighty G-d have mercy on his shriveled, black soul, because we won’t. He’s dead to us.
But such is the “empathy” of the Prognazis that they forever brag about and use as a contrast to us evil, indifferent, hatey haters of the right.
Where’s their empathy for the citizens living in dangrous neighborhoods who can’t defend themselves thanks to the Prognazis’ insistence that only criminals ought to be armed? Where’s their empathy with the families of victims of violent crime when they do everything they can to make sure the criminal is let out quickly to murder, maim and rape again? Where’s their empathy with poor families who will soon be unable to pay their electric bills thanks to their fascist Ogabe EPA’s war on energy production? Where’s their empathy with the millions of Americans who have lost everything, not only their jobs, thanks to their war on business?
Where’s their empathy with the coming generations of Americans who will be born with an overcharged national credit card, a debt they’ll never be able to repay, just so the Prognazis could keep on living high on the hog and charge their vote-buying, nepotistic schemes to generations not even born yet?
Yet we’re the Evil Ones.
Well, if what the Prognazis have been exhibiting for everybody to see for as long as they’ve been around is “empathy”, then they can fucking well have it. We’ll stick with our “hateful” ways and be proud of them too.
Fuck them sideways with the Shimmering, Shit-encrusted, Splintered Shillelagh of Sodom (+4 against Socialist Shits), may they be humped viciously for all eternity by the Many-headed Monster Cock of Moloch until their shredded innards run down their legs and may G-d, in his mercy, grant us all the blessing of amnesia that we may, one day, forget our sinful negligence in suffering them to walk among us unmolested.
Thatisall.
You gotta love his way with words and alliteration.
Shimmering, Shit-encrusted, Splintered Shillelagh of Sodom (+4 against Socialist Shits)
Why is it I think he misspent part of his youth playing D&D?
Posted by Christopher
on 01/08/2012 at 12:11 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials • Humor • Media-Bias •
• Comments (10)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - December 13, 2011
Back from the doctor…
Guess I’m not dying today.
One of the things I like about my doctor is that he doesn’t relegate vitals to the nurses. He takes them himself. My blood pressure was back to normal (120/80) Unlike when I was in the hospital when it ran 180/? Too high, is all I can say. It was just frakking too high!
I’m sure I’m gonna die, but it won’t be today.
Posted by Christopher
on 12/13/2011 at 11:29 AM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - December 01, 2011
Didn’t even know I was gone did you?
I spent the weekend in the hospital. Again. Apparently just another panic/anxiety attack. While I was obviously in distress, they couldn’t find anything wrong. My heart is fine. My cholesterol is fine. My blood pressure, once I calmed down, is fine. When admitted it was 180/100. It dropped back down to my usual 122/80. And I’m still not diabetic.
But I really got to get a grip on these panic attacks. Read up on panic attacks on Wikipedia. Exactly what I was experiencing when I called 911. I don’t know what causes them.
The fun part is yet to come. I’m unemployed, and uninsured. I filled out all kinds of financial assistance forms. But, if necessary, I’ll raid my retirement funds. Which may cost me taxes and penalties for early withdrawal.
Oh well, I’m alive. And money can be replaced.
Posted by Christopher
on 12/01/2011 at 12:19 AM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - November 16, 2011
england as sparta, but the line isn’t being held
H/T British Freedom
This reminded me of something ongoing with regard to border control and immigration here in the UK.
Sorry I haven’t all the facts right at hand but generally, govt. ordered a curb on immigration and unknown to the powers that be, the guy who was supposed to be in charge ignored the order and allowed in thousands telling immigration to stand down and allow immigrants in. Many turned out to be criminals whose whereabouts at the moment are unknown. They’re here somewhere for sure. So there has been this big bru-haha with charges and counter charges going back and forth. The official in question was sacked (as I understand it) and might face charges of some kind. I’m just not clear on all the ABCs of it all and am buried under a bunch of other things. Well anyway .... I happened to catch this at the Brit Freedom site and thought it was well argued and worth sharing.
But as we all know ... it comes a bit late in the day. England is flooded with people who barley speak the language and don’t want to anyway. There are criminals from Europe and especially eastern Europe, who are here in droves due to the open borders of the EU. I know we have a problem in the USA with our borders, but these folks are really a lot worse off here. Many Brits want out of the EU. I don’t think it’ll happen in my lifetime. The lure of easy benefits and the welfare state attract them in large numbers. The average Brit is at the mercy of his or her own govt. as well as the dictates of the EU and the insane policies followed by the previous govt for 13 years. Of course, all the blame isn’t theirs either and the problems started even before the previous government.
I get the feeling that folks here have been brain washed, if I can get away with that expression, cos I do run into so many well meaning not altogether bad people but dupes none the less. LyndonB puts it way better then I do, but I can’t talk him into writing something up here.
So here .... from Brit Freedom.
THIS IS SPARTA
by: Simon Bennett
Immigration criteria? Why is immigration into Europe tolerated at all? Let’s look at the logic of accepting immigrants. One of the favourite excuses proffered is to attract ‘skilled’ or ‘wealthy’ immigrants who will boost the economy – really? Let us suppose we are facing a shortage of brain surgeons, what to do? There are two obvious choices; either train our own people to do the job or import ‘skilled’ foreigners.
The training of our own people would involve no importation of racial or cultural differences, and would benefit the indigenous population who actually voted in the clowns running the government. Who benefits? The people.
The importation of foreigners would bring many social problems, which would need solving – lots of ‘agencies’ and a boom time for the paper industry following the inevitable tsunami of legislation to stop people from voicing the obvious. But in the short term – i.e. before the next election – it would solve the little dilemma. Incidentally, the importation of these aliens would also remove lucrative and prestigious positions from the market thus depriving the indigenous population of opportunities within their own economy and society. Who benefits? The politicians and state bureaucracy.
The second most common excuse for importing aliens is to pay taxes that will support us rapidly disappearing indigenous natives in our dotage. Apparently we are no longer reproducing. There are two points to be made concerning these claims. Firstly the net financial balance to the state from our ocean of mostly Muslim immigrants is firmly in the red. They are not contributing; they are a fiscal drain on the national purse – a not unsurprising discovery once one takes a perusal of the basket case economies from which they originally scuttled. They do, however, consume vast amounts of government funds and public services.
The point regarding our reproduction rates is a very hot potato. It is not that we Europeans are failing to procreate, for we do and at a rate which would guarantee our population base. Unfortunately we are also destroying our own offspring via industrial scale abortion – frankly it’s little short of infanticide on a Biblical scale. Notice, not a peep from the docile MSM.
This mass extermination in turn gives our reptilian political classes the excuse for further mass immigration. Hopefully the dreary pattern has become fairly obvious; we the native people are the milch cows of the parasitic state bureaucracy. This apparatus is not designed for the benefit of those who pay the bills; it is an extension of the political machinery and operates as such. Whatever democracy may have meant to the ancient Athenians its modern approximation has little if any interest in the wishes of the people.
Finally one notices that the other postings here discuss Canada and New Zealand. Britain is an ancient European country; the disturbing fact that we are being compared to such countries is of itself an indication of how bad things are. We are genuine indigenous peoples, not imports from the four corners looking for an easy berth in somebody else’s backyard. This mindset is utterly wrong and incongruous with traditional European mores and customs – stop comparing your own people to New World colonialists or antipodean interlopers. We are natives, and as Hollywood’s Leonidas succinctly asserted, this is Sparta.
Posted by peiper
on 11/16/2011 at 11:52 AM
Filed Under: • Border Security • Editorials • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - November 13, 2011
Obamacare and the Commerce Clause
Obama is justifying His takeover of medical insurance under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
The Commerce Clause only covers interstate commerce: My doctor is only 1.5 miles from me… my hospital is only 1.5 miles from me… By law, I cannot buy medical insurance outside of the state…(unlike life, auto, home insurance) NONE of my medical commerce crosses state lines.
Under what perverted interpretation of the Commerce Clause does the Clown-in-Chief assume…wait, he IS more an ass…
Posted by Christopher
on 11/13/2011 at 08:56 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - November 06, 2011
Unemployed, and uninsured
Just an update on being uninsured vis unemployed.
My experience so far just shows the need for medical savings account coupled with a high deductible catastrophic insurance account.
First example: I broke a tooth, my dentist did repair work for $198. Granted, and I agree, I can afford it, I need a crown on that tooth. That’ more ‘iffy’. Granted that if I was employed at all, I’d have had the crown done.
Anyway, the dentist did what he could to keep the tooth from falling apart until a crown is set. Cost: $300. Remind you that most insurance don’t cover dental. Certainly doesn’t cover crowns.
Next up: I had an appointment with my regular internist. No insurance? No problem. I paid $60 for an office visit that I would have paid $20 for anyway. $20 being my copay. No insurance.
My point? Give me a medical savings account, and I’ll shop around for catastrophic health insurances. Decouple from my employer.
Posted by Christopher
on 11/06/2011 at 11:15 AM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - October 30, 2011
Wardmama, you’re a mean, nasty woman…
Yes, mean, nasty, I like it like that.
You gave me a Rodney Atkins video when I posted about my baby niece getting married. That was wonderful. But, I had to check out other Rodney Atkins songs. He did the ‘Farmer’s Daughter’. Well, at least he married her.
Posted by Christopher
on 10/30/2011 at 09:05 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - October 29, 2011
Oh F@uck!
The good news: peiper is expected back from vacation.
The bad news: Drew is taking a well-deserved vacation. South Seas, Islands, sunny beaches, hot and cold running naked girls. Ooops! Wasn’t supposed to mention that. Now his wife will know. Sorry ‘bout that Drew.
Anyway, Drew is going on vacation; peiper may or may not be posting. The bad news: you’ll have to digest Christopher until Drew gets back.
Posted by Christopher
on 10/29/2011 at 12:54 AM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - October 28, 2011
Dedicated to wardmama
wardmama brought this up in the comments. Here’s to you wardmama.
Drew, I still think wardmama should be made an admin. I remember when Mr. Christian opened it up. I know, Oldcatman got banned the first time.
Posted by Christopher
on 10/28/2011 at 01:28 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - October 27, 2011
Monster Ballads
Poking around once again on Ricochet.com. This one is from the ‘member feed’, ie, you have to be a member to get there. I’d long ago given up on music. Everything seemed to be vulgar ‘hip hop’, ‘cop killer’, rape the whore/slut/sister. No one could sing, so they ‘rapped’. Couldn’t play an instrument so they did a heavy bass drum beat. Anyone can do that. So I’ve just been listening to the classics: Simon & Garfunkel, Mozart, etc, for the last twenty years.
So I was jazzed when somebody on Ricochet posted this video of Josh Ritter. I’ll be looking for him next time I’m at my favorite music store…
The music industry claims they’re losing money due to internet piracy. I claim they’re losing money because they publish trash like ‘rap’, ‘hip hop’, etc. This guy is good! But I have a problem: my favorite music store went out of business for lack of music. (sigh)
Posted by Christopher
on 10/27/2011 at 09:21 AM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Editorials • Music •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - October 26, 2011
A Good Question
So I was poking around on Ricochet.com and came across this post: What is ‘Conservatism?”
A very decent question. Especially when proposed by a self-proclaimed ‘squishy RINO’.
Anyway, open it up for discussion on BMEWS. Take a look at the Ricochet post, read the comments, and let me know what your opinion is. I’m going to base my next Toastmasters speech on this question. If I use your opinion, I’ll certainly cite the source…(and there was much raucous laughter!)
Posted by Christopher
on 10/26/2011 at 11:22 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - October 14, 2011
Think and Grow Rich
Some of you know that I’ve been unemployed since April. I quit. Voluntarily. Which means I’m not eligible for unemployment welfare. I quit knowing that. I also knew I had savings to fall back on. And, ultimately, I can cash-out my retirement funds. Sure I’ll take a tax penalty for early withdrawal. But under Obamanomics, seems like the lesser evil in view of the massive inflation Obamanomics is already causing. Not to mention that Democrats are already considering seizing retirement accounts (401(k), IRAs, etc) to bolster Social Security. Take the money I saved and run!
Meanwhile, between jobs I’ve been rereading the classic Think and Grow Rich by Napoleon Hill. If you haven’t read it, I highly recommend it to you. Back when I was a dance teacher, the boss started off each day by having us read, out loud, passages from Think and Grow Rich. It’s a highly motivating book. Especially useful in the demotivating Obama misAdministration.
I’d just like to offer this quote from the book:
During the first World War, a Chicago newspaper published certain editorials in which, among other statements, Henry Ford was called “an ignorant pacifist.” Mr. Ford objected to the statements, and brought suit against the paper for libeling him. When the suit was tried in the courts, the attorneys for the paper pleaded justification, and placed Mr. Ford on the witness stand for the purpose of proving to the jury that he was ignorant. The attorneys asked Mr. Ford a great variety of questions, all of them intended to prove that while he might possess considerable specialized knowledge pertaining to the manufacture of automobiles, he was, in the main, ignorant.
Mr. Ford was plied with such questions as the following: “Who was Benedict Arnold?” and “How many soldiers did the British send over to America to put down the Rebellion of 1776?” In answer to the last question, Mr. Ford replied, “I do not know the exact number of soldiers the British sent over, but I have heard that it was a considerably larger number than ever went back.”
Finally Mr. Ford became tired of this line of questioning, and in reply to a particualrly offensive question, he leaned over, pointed his finger at the lawyer who had asked the question and said, “If I should really want to answer the foolish question you have just asked, or any of the other questions you have been asking me, let me remind you that I have a row of electric push-buttons on my desk, and by pushing the right button, I can summon to my aid men who can answer any question I desire to ask concerning the business to which I am devoting most of my efforts. Now, will you kindly tell me, why I should clutter up my mind with general knowledge, for the purpose of being able to answer questions, when I have men around me who can supply any knowledge I require?”
There is certainly was good logic to that reply.
That answer floored the lawyer. Every person in the courtroom realized it was the answer, not of an ignorant man, but of a man of education. Any man is educated who knows where to get knowledge when he needs it…
Being between jobs, I’m reading this again for uplifting motivation. Books like this tell me that–to coin a phrase–Yes, I can! Apologies, I know it’s close to a slogan our misAdministrator-in-Chief used. But note the difference: ‘I can’ vs ‘We can’. I’m taking responsibility if I fail. Those that follow the ‘We’ model will point fingers at others when they fail. See the current Occupy (insert city) protests.
Posted by Christopher
on 10/14/2011 at 11:08 AM
Filed Under: • Editorials • Literature • Personal •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - August 11, 2011
Who’s picking your berries?
I have to fault Drudge for the headline:
6 YEAR OLDS CAUGHT WORKING ON FARMS
Imagine the horror! Six-year-olds actually being taught to work for money. Cesar Chavez is upset. Well, he’s dead, but his union is upset that six-year-olds would actually work on the family farm during the summer. Therefore taking jobs away from his unionized illegal alien union. Typical union crap. Typical ‘Drive-by Media’ story. They never support family, family farms, etc.
I wasn’t six, I was twelve the first time I had an opportunity to work on a farm. It was a summer job, I was supposed to ‘detassel’ corn. But to get the job, I had to have a Social Security Number. Mom said if I wanted the job, I got to call and apply for one.
Yes, I was twelve before I even had an SSN number. I’ve often wondered how my life would be different if I’d never made that call. Nowadays they assign you one at birth.
Anyway, I’ve no problem with six-year-olds picking berries. They are currently out of school, and they are closer to the ground. Educate them that work is good, unlike some rioters in Britain.
Posted by Christopher
on 08/11/2011 at 04:24 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - July 21, 2011
a worthy read
Rich K. sent me something reported to be funny. I guess in some ways it might be but frankly, I find it scary. Scary because so many Americans actually buy into this, scary because I know for certain that kids here in the UK are being fed left wing obnoxious doctrine as a way of life and belief.
This really is a coincidence since I have had an article by one of my favorite conservatives, Melanie Phillips. I’ve been very much occupied lately and have not been posting much for which I apologize. Unfortunately, there will be a few more days when I won’t be here full time.
Well then … Here’s what I got from Rich and he got it by reading – gasp –
The San Francisco Chronicle. And in particular, a fellow named Deepak Choprta, whose article is entitled;
A critical moment: Why we need President Obama
One of the virtues of being on the liberal side of politics is that total obedience isn’t required. There are no hidden agendas. Ideology doesn’t lead to unreason.
the prevailing sanity of President Obama
Liberal politics is based on a non-regimented, all-inclusive approach to democracy. Freedom of thought is paramount.
progressive tradition has been severely undermined, dating back to Nixon’s “Southern strategy” (coddle the racists) and Ronald Reagan’s smiling reactionary agenda (AIDS victims deserve what they get), through the first President Bush’s Willie Horton strategy (another boost for racism)
(oh never mind that the killer/rapist was coddled by that silly looking jerk governor in a tank re. Horton. Being critical of that move is automatically race related.) (I have forgotten that govs name. ?)It was such a relief to return to humane, non-ideological governance when President Obama won in 2008 that we underestimated the debasing effect that two generations of right-wing indoctrination has had.
I have obviously chopped up his editorial merely to give you an example.
You can read it all unedited HERE and I think you should.
No doubt the hacking scandal here is making some news in America since now we read that the wind bags in the senate are soon to initiate an investigation into possible illegal behavior in America, by the Murdoch group.
Again, this article has been edited. I have posted her rant against the left but the thrust of her editorial while anti-left is an attack on the BBC & the left leaning media.
Monopoly of the BBC and the Left-wing intelligentsia.
Melanie PhillipsMurdoch’s real crime in the eyes of the Left-wing intelligentsia is simply that he has stood in the way of their total capture of the culture.
The dominance of Left-wing ideas has been such that even among so-called conservatives, many of them have become accepted as mainstream. And one of the most powerful architects of that shift has been the BBC.Even its own executives have sometimes been forced to admit that, far from the objectivity required by its public service remit, the BBC generally subscribes to a Left-wing ‘group-think’ which dictates the agenda both in its journalism and entertainment programmes.
With some honourable exceptions, whether in its drama, comedy, news reporting or current affairs, the BBC’s output rests upon certain articles of faith.
For example, traditional Christians are all fundamentalist bigots; the science of man-made global warming is settled; opponents of mass immigration are racist; Eurosceptics are swivel-eyed fanatics; and all who oppose these opinions and more are Right-wing extremists.And then to add insult to injury, the BBC forces people to pay for the privilege of being told day in, day out that their own views are stupid or prejudiced.
What’s more, such is the enormous power and influence of the BBC through its reputation for trustworthiness and fairness that it has arguably moved the very centre of political gravity in Britain to the Left.By contrast, Murdoch’s popular papers have tended mainly to follow public opinion once voters’ minds are made up. So they respond to and then amplify what people already think.
But for the Left that is anathema, because nothing can be allowed to disrupt the great project to tell people what to think and shut down all opinion to the contrary.Murdoch’s empire has acted as at least a partial antidote to that agenda by defending America, Israel and the interests of the West.
Which is why he provokes near-apoplexy on the Left.And which is why they are all slavering at the prospect of bringing down a media organisation which provided an element of competition to the true monopoly of the BBC and the Left-wing intelligentsia.
The great irony, of course, is that for all those years while this scandal was taking place, the Labour Party fawned over Murdoch and his lieutenants. While he was riding high, none of them saw fit to challenge the power they now purport to find so unacceptable.
Only now Murdoch is lying bleeding on the ropes does Miliband flex his puny muscles. And they call that leadership.
And then there was the Telegraph’s Janet Daley who is an American expat married to a Brit and living here since 1965.
Again, she makes comments with regard to the liberal biased BBC but the following says it all. And again, I would encourage you read all of her. She has lots to say about American news and cable TV and compares how news is presented in both countries.
She is on the money and you will get an education reading her.
JANET DALEY Comment on Janet Daley’s view at » telegraph.co.uk/janetdaley
The Left really thinks the Right is evil incarnate
Those of us on the Right are inclined to believe that our antagonists on the Left are simply wrong-headed – sometimes well-intentioned, sometimes malevolent but basically just mistaken. Whereas the Left believes that we are evil incarnate. Their demonic view of people who express even mildly Right-of-centre opinions (that lower taxes or less state control might be desirable, for example) would be risible if it were not so pernicious.
The Left does not want a debate or an open market in ideas. It wants to extirpate its opponents – to remove them from the field. It actually seems to believe that it is justified in snuffing out any possibility of our arguments reaching the impressionable masses – and bizarrely, it defends this stance in the name of fairness.
The problem is that Fox’s audience share is enormous, by far the largest of any cable news channel, whereas MSNBC’s is tiny, the smallest of any cable news channel. People are voting with their remotes for the kind of opinions they want to hear and the result is infuriating for the Left-liberal axis – and particularly for the Obama White House, which has made no secret of its desire to shut Fox News down.
There is, incidentally – contrary to the conjectures of some excitable commentators – no possibility of the “Murdoch empire” spawning a British version of Fox News. By law, broadcast news in Britain must be impartial. That is why all television news organisations in this country subscribe to pretty much the same soft-Left rendition of neutral reporting (in which Euroscepticism was, until very recently, treated as a lunatic fringe irrelevance, etc). And just the sort of liberal received opinion that now dominates television news.
Posted by peiper
on 07/21/2011 at 01:42 PM
Filed Under: • Editorials •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
LAAR She Blows! Part One
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Planes Ideas Blog
[...] CABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEB [...]
On: 07/12/11 01:57
The Tactical Cowboy
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Sights Service Blog
[...] E LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE [...]
On: 07/10/11 08:30
Nasty Dirty Money
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Money Reviews Blog
[...] ONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLES [...]
On: 06/17/11 08:31
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
