Friday - November 18, 2011

Saudi women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover even them.

Hey .. have you folks seen the latest demand the Saudis, well some at least, are making of their women?
You’d think the rop had gone about as far as it could in their control of women.  Apparently not as some want more restrictions. Not the women of course.
Feel sorry for them.

Look at this.

Saudi women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover even them up, if resolution is passed

Islamic state fears effect of ‘tempting’ eyes on men

Says it ‘has the right’ to issue repressive edict

Women must already cover their hair and wear full-length black cloak

By LEON WATSON

Women with attractive eyes may be forced to cover them up under Saudi Arabia’s latest repressive measure, it was revealed today.

The ultra-conservative Islamic state has said it has the right to stop women revealing ‘tempting’ eyes in public.

A spokesperson for Saudi Arabia’s Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, Sheikh Motlab al Nabet, said a proposal to enshrine the measure in law has been tabled.

Women in Saudi Arabia already have to wear a long black cloak, called an abaya, cover their hair and, in some regions, conceal their faces while in public.

If they do not, they face punishments including fines and public floggings.

They are also banned from driving by religious edict and cannot travel without authorisation from their male guardians.

In September, a Saudi women sentenced to 10 lashes for defying the driving ban was only spared when King Abdullah stepped in to stop the public flogging.

Also in September, the king announced that women would be given the right to vote for the first time and run in the country’s 2015 local elections.

The CPVPV, which employs around 3,500 religious police, has repeatedly been accused of human rights violations.

Founded in 1940, its function is to ensure Islamic laws are not broken in public in Saudi Arabia.

In 2002 the committee refused to allow female students out of a burning school in Mecca because they were not wearing the correct head covering.

The decision contributed to the toll of 15 people who were killed in the fire.

source

Posted by peiper     on 11/18/2011 at 12:00 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims • RoPMA •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 15, 2011

kills wife and daughters and would do again as honor demands it

Animal shit murders wife and daughters in ‘honor’ killings and has this to say.  One was only 13 but hey, islam demands honor.

‘May the devil...(defecate) on their graves. Is that what a daughter should be? Would (a daughter) be such a whore?’
Mohammad Shafia

What the F*** is wrong with western culture? Why are these lower then bug life forms even allowed to settle in the west?  Most will never conform to western habit and beliefs. Yeah, maybe a few but damn few. 
I really can’t think of anything else to say. Anything I say will only be a string of swear words which won’t add to anything. 
And they want to bring their stone age thinking here and make it a state religion for us all to follow.

‘I would do it again 100 times’: Muslim father ‘murdered his THREE daughters in honour killing for dating wrong boys’

· Mohammad Shafia ‘spoke to second wife about “treacherous” daughters’
· Both standing trial in Ontario with son, charged with first degree murder
· Afghani father felt ‘ashamed’ that eldest daughter had married Pakistani boy

By RICHARD HARTLEY-PARKINSON and MARK DUELL

A Muslim father charged with murdering his three daughters in apparent honour killings has said he would do it again - even if they came back to life 100 times.
Mohammad Shafia, 58, cursed his daughters Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13, saying they were ‘treacherous’ as he likened them to prostitutes during a conversation that was recorded by police.

He is on trial for their murders after they were found dead in the family car along with their mother, Rona Amir, 50, in the Rideau Canal, located in the Kingston area of Ontario in Canada in 2009.

Shafia, who moved to Canada from Afghanistan with his family, is polygamous and after his arrest was heard telling his second wife, Tooba Yahya, that his daughters had brought shame on the family.

He said: ‘Even if, God forbid, they hoist us onto the gallows… we accept it wholeheartedly’, a day after his arrest.
The court heard the recordings in which Shafia talks about his daughters and the fact that they were dating while ranting about the family’s honour.
Zainab had married her boyfriend - a Pakistani man - angering Shafia and causing family turmoil.

here for the rest + photos

Posted by peiper     on 11/15/2011 at 01:42 PM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - November 11, 2011

a bit of stoning and regular killing. the taliban. just regular folks.

After reading this article I wasn’t sure if the killings were as the headline implies, or just another personal killing. Pretty bad whatever but what registered most was this statement and just a reminder please, these are the kind of people some in govt. believe we can “negotiate” with. Sure. They’re just folks like us.
Uh huh.

‘Anyone who knows about Islam knows that stoning is in the Koran, and that it is Islamic law.
‘There are people who call it inhuman - but in doing so they insult the Prophet. They want to bring foreign thinking to this country.’

Of course, not that those stone age grizzly bearded bastards don’t want to do that in the west. They wouldn’t be satisfied with simply bringing their thinking here, which they’ve managed in great measure to do already, they’re willing to do it at the point of a sword.  Or a suicide bomb.
Just regular folks.

Afghan mother and daughter stoned and shot dead after Taliban accused them of ‘moral deviation and adultery’

Last updated at 4:18 PM on 11th November 2011

Armed men stoned and shot dead a widow and her daughter in Aghanistan after the Taliban accused the women of ‘moral deviation and adultery’, according to reports.
The killing happened on Thursday in the Khawaja Hakim area of Ghazni city, the BBC reported, and two men have now been arrested.
Officials - who blamed the Taliban for the attack - told the Corporation that armed men went into the house where the two women lived, took them to the yard outside and they were stoned and then shot.
‘Neighbours did not help or inform the authorities on time,’ an official told the BBC.
A neighbour of the executed women told M&G.com he heard shots but was afraid to go out.
‘When the women in the neighbourhood washed the bodies of the killed women, they saw signs of stoning.

However, Ghazni provincial police chief Zilawar Zahid denied the reports that the women were stoned to death.
He told reporters: ‘They were killed inside their house.

An investigation is under way to find out why they were killed and Afghan police have arrested two men in connection with the case.’
Officials told the BBC that religious leaders had been issuing fatwas - edicts - asking for reports on anyone who was ‘involved in adultery’.
Earlier this year horrific video footage emerged of Taliban insurgents stoning a couple to death for alleged adultery in northern Afghanistan.
It took place in the district of Dashte Archi, in Kunduz, and was met with outrage in the West.

However, a Taliban spokesman defended the practice, saying: ‘Anyone who knows about Islam knows that stoning is in the Koran, and that it is Islamic law.
‘There are people who call it inhuman - but in doing so they insult the Prophet. They want to bring foreign thinking to this country.’

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 11/11/2011 at 01:53 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - November 07, 2011

they never run out of things to be offended by.

These are long articles and so I won’t post everything. Interesting material and but no surprises here.
People coming from places with stone age thinking demanding that the folks already here and native born, knuckle under to a foreign way of life.  That’s not even news anymore. Is it?

A Satire Draws Fire

FrontPage Magazine 7 November 2011
By Mark Tapson

Here we go again. Charlie Hebdo, a humor magazine in Paris which had produced a spoof issue “guest edited” by, as The New York Times and other media outlets refer to him, the “Prophet Mohammed?,” was firebombed early Wednesday just as the special edition was on its way to the newsstands. Hackers had also disrupted its website with a message in English and Turkish cursing the magazine: “You keep abusing Islam’s almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech.

The magazine had announced the special issue in satirical salute to the “Arab Spring” victory of an Islamist party in Tunisian elections: “Charlie Hebdo has asked Mohammed to be the special editor-in-chief of its next issue,” the magazine said in a statement. “The prophet of Islam didn’t have to be asked twice and we thank him for it.” It renamed itself Charia Hebdo, a pun on the word “shariah,” for the occasion, and featured an editorial by Mohammed entitled “Halal Aperitif” and a women’s supplement called “Madam Sharia.” On the cover was a cartoon of Mohammed announcing, “100 lashes if you don’t die of laughter.”

But Islamic law forbids depictions of its prophet, and as Iran’s glowering Ayatollah Khomeini? once famously remarked, “There is no fun in Islam.” Muslim fundamentalists were apparently not amused by the magazine’s mocking tone, and a Molotov cocktail was thrown through the window of Charlie Hebdo’s offices in the wee hours of the morning, devastating the premises.

Its editor, Stephane Charbonnier, said,

We can’t put out the magazine under these conditions. The stocks are burned, smoke is everywhere, the paste-up board is unusable, everything is melted, there’s no more electricity.

But the issue will appear as scheduled and the magazine’s website appears to have been restored.

read more here

Europe’s veil of fear

Ynetnews 7 November 2011
By Giulio Meotti

The office of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo was badly damaged by a firebomb on Wednesday, after it published a spoof issue “guest edited” by the Prophet Muhammad to salute the victory of the Islamist party in Tunisia’s elections.

The magazine had announced a special issue for publication, renamed “Charia Hebdo,” a play on the French word for Islamic law. The magazine’s website has also been hacked with a message in English and Turkish. The fatwa said: “You keep abusing Islam’s almighty Prophet with disgusting and disgraceful cartoons using excuses of freedom of speech. Be Allah’s curse upon you!”

Charlie Hebdo is the latest in a series of “blasphemous pencils” – European cartoonists, writers and journalists threatened with death for their criticism about Islam. They are people who need a level of personal protection unconceivable even in Israel, a country well-known for its attention to security. And it happens all over Europe.

Kurt Westergaard is the most famous of them. I spoke with him immediately after the attack in Paris. Westergaard is the Danish artist who created the controversial cartoon of the Prophet wearing a bomb in his turban: “Few days ago the police discovered another terrorist plan to attack my newspaper, the Jyllands Posten,” Westergaard said. “My house is protected as a bunker with cameras. I am always guarded by the policemen. Few months ago I had to attend a book presentation in Oslo. But the day before the Norwegian police asked me to cancel the event due to the terrorist threats.”

Five years after the publication of the cartoons, Westergaard still needs the same level of security of a Danish prime minister.

VEIL OF FEAR CONT.

I guess it may a bit harder for these stone age lunatics to get away with as much in the USA.

For Now.

Posted by peiper     on 11/07/2011 at 09:25 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - August 31, 2011

muslim anger in new york amuse park sparks fight. they always find a reason.

They always manage to find a reason and if that fails, they’ll make one up.

Muslims with American accents?  Well this group is still vermin.
The usual chant of police brutality.  Hell, cops aren’t really brutal enough where these lice are concerned.

Since NY is some five hours behind us, I suppose you’ve already seen this back home. Or maybe not.
Theme park refuses certain rides to muzzie females (I guess they are and they appear to be human but then looks are deceiving) due to their head scarves.
So naturally that’s all these members of that cult need to start a fight. Toss in the ‘r’ word and the old standby, islamaphobia.
And all because printed rules don’t apply to them. Course not.

This was just perhaps a mini riot. But it took place in NY. That is still an American city. Isn’t it?  Won’t be for long you betcha.

Mass brawl at theme park after Muslim women are banned from going on rides unless they remove their head scarves

15 people arrested at New York’s Rye Playland
Two parks rangers hospitalised after violence
Muslim visitors say police treated them ‘like animals’ (well doh. and why pray tell was that? Sniff,sniff. Oh right. Animal it is.)

By MARK DUELL and LAURIE WHITWELL
Last updated at 2:39 PM on 31st August 2011

A theme park was forced to shut its gates to visitors when a mass brawl broke out after Muslim women were banned from rides unless they removed their headscarves.

Two park rangers were injured and 15 people, including three women, were arrested in the scuffle at Rye Playland in New York yesterday. They have since been charged with disorderly conduct and assault.

Muslim visitors involved in the fight accused police of brutality and claimed they were treated ‘like animals’. One said: ‘It’s clear, this all happened because we’re Muslim.’

Right. The cops don’t see TV or read papers and are so insulated that they have no idea about the results of insulting or damning or abusing members of the rop. So they intentionally seek out this one group for discrimination and so did the park. Got it.  Poor,poor downtrodden muzzy filth. Gotta feel sorry for them.

‘[The guards] were beating down the girls, then they started beating down the guys as they came to their aid,’ Lola Ali, 16, of Queens, told the Journal News.

The incident started at around 2pm when the theme park was crowded with around 6,000 visitors. Roughly 3,000 were in a Muslim tour group celebrating a holiday at the end of Ramadan.

Trouble reportedly flared when women wearing Muslim hijab scarves tried to get on rides banning any head coverings.

The women were refused entry and offered refunds - but then male and female visitors started to argue among themselves, Westchester County officials said.

That apparently led to park guards stepping in, sparking the huge brawl. The park entrance was closed for two hours as the fighting escalated.

Ola Salem, 17, of Brooklyn, New York, was wearing a headscarf and said she was denied entry onto a ride with her eight-year-old sister.

‘They said no because my of my “headgear”,’ she told the New York Times. ‘I said: “It’s not my headgear, it’s my religion”.’

The Muslim American Society of New York had been ‘painstakingly’ advised of the rule many times before its tour took place, parks official Peter Tartaglia said.

He defended the policy against head coverings on rides for safety reasons and faulted the group for not ensuring visitors understood the policy.

Mr Tartaglia said the policy is for safety, as scarves can become entangled in mechanical parts, choke riders or fly off and land in a ride’s tracks.

‘We respect the religious purpose of wearing it, but we have several rides that you cannot go on with any sort of headgear,’ he said.

full unedited article here at source

“Muslim visitors say police treated them ‘like animals’” (well doh. and why pray tell was that? Sniff,sniff. Oh right. Animal it is.)

Posted by peiper     on 08/31/2011 at 10:45 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims • USA •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - August 30, 2011

some news from those wonderful folk who gave the world pol. corrrectness

They keep saying immigrants and keep referring to multi culture. But in one place someone slips and says what really is the issue. You’ll never guess.

This is the Netherlands, the folks who who gave us pc. This is their future and perhaps all of Europe as well.  It’s their country and their lives and that’s the bottom line.  But someday in the future, all this kind hearted multi-culture we are the world shit will come back on em hard.  And while it’s a long way in the future for us, I fear America will go that way too.  Would it make any difference as long as all were Americans?  Yeah, maybe.  Cos there are too many who unlike immigrants of another generation, want to bring more then the cuisine of their homeland to the west.  Too many hardly speak the language of their host country. They have names they won’t westernize that consist of a series of letters none but the scholars of language can get a tongue around. Too many want the host country to be more like what they left behind, and cater to their idea of culture.  No matter that it’s foreign to the host country.

Some of the young girls, like the few interviewed, will find that the Mr. Nice Guy they married have different ideas about a woman’s place, they didn’t reveal in courtship.  And when the kids come and a problem arises, try and get those kiddies back from a muslim country where daddy has taken them. Far fetched? No. Not a bit of it, according to the horror stories that have been published here over the years.

I’ve said it before. I confess to being a dinosaur.  I’m aware I could be wrong on everything.  If not tho, there’s a bumpy road ahead as more and more Dutch (and other Eurowhites) continue to dilute their race and nationality with a stone age religion and culture.  Of course, there are also other examples but I’ll leave those for another time.  So far at least, they aren’t bringing home any Somalis.

Dutch parents: mixed attitudes to mixed relationships

Nearly half the parents of underage children in the Netherlands are not eager to have a son-in-law or daughter-in-law of immigrant origin, according to a recent poll. RNW asked teenagers whether they share that sentimen

In the poll published by popular pedagogical magazine J/M, 600 native Dutch parents specified how frequent their contacts with children of other ethnic groups are. The mothers and fathers were also asked how they prepared their children for life in a multicultural society.

Most parents said they thought it beneficial for their child to be raised in a multicultural environment. But 43 percent of parents said they would not like it if a daughter brought home a boyfriend from an immigrant community. An immigrant girlfriend for their sons would be hard to accept for 38 percent of parents.

(rk)

VIDEO HERE AT SOURCE

A brief note to clarify something. The girls mentioned above aren’t married. But it’s the all embracing attitude they have been indoctrinated with from childhood, that will bring about the future I write about.

Posted by peiper     on 08/30/2011 at 10:32 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims • Racism and race relations •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - July 06, 2011

as everywhere else in the world, muslims cause unrest in australia

Well Drew ....

They may have to turn the lights off in Australia also.
Just another example of a country enabling their own take over by the mad mullahs and sub culture of these, these , ???  I can’t bring myself to refer to them as people, as that would imply they are actually human. They are altogether something else but the problem is not so much them as the pc left who allow it. And the conservative lites who go along or say nothing. None of our countries, none, seem able to just pull the plug on these, these, ???. 7th century zealots.

MULTICULTURALISM – BURQA, LAW, AUSTRALIA

Muslim woman Carnita Matthews escapes jail by remaining behind her burqa

Janet Fife-Yeomans and Paul Kent

Daily Telegraph [Australia]

The woman at the centre of the burqa row, Carnita Matthews, has a long record of driving offences and a history of not paying her fines.

Court documents have revealed that she had been fined seven times for traffic infringements before she was stopped by police in June last year for not displaying her P-plates in the incident that sparked the row that spilled over to the District Court yesterday. ...

After being stopped by police last year for not displaying her P-plates, Ms Matthews was ordered to pay $276 in fines and court costs.

She claimed on Channel Seven and allegedly in a statutory declaration to Campbelltown police that the officer who stopped her had attempted to tear the burqa off her face, a claim that was proven untrue by the police patrol car video camera.

A magistrate last year found her guilty of making a deliberately false statement and sentenced her to jail for six months. Ms Matthews appealed, saying there was no proof she was the person in the burqa making the statement and Judge Clive Jeffreys in the District Court yesterday upheld her appeal.

The news comes as women wearing a burqa may be ordered to remove it to identify themselves in the wake of the Carnita Matthews case.

Police Minister Mike Gallacher has revealed that police do not currently have the legal power to require women to show their face if the women refuse on religious or cultural grounds. ...

The government is also considering passing new laws requiring people who make complaints against police, or in the case of witnesses giving evidence, to have to provide at least one fingerprint and their signature.

This follows the finding by the judge that he could not be certain that it was Ms Matthews who made the statutory declaration complaining about the officer who stopped her car because the person who handed the document in to the police station wore a burqa. ...

Yesterday, Ms Matthews avoided jail because her identity could not be proven. ...

The absurdity of the law is that, to reach the level of proof of identity to make the case, Mrs Matthews would have been required to identify herself by lifting her burqa at the police station - what started the uproar in the first place.

More than a dozen Muslim supporters linked arms and began chanting “Allah Akbar” as they stormed out of Downing Centre Court with Mrs Matthews concealed behind them. ...

Mrs Matthew’s lawyer Stephen Hopper defended their actions saying: “They are obviously happy with the result and are expressing it in a way that is culturally appropriate to them.”

A LOT MORE TO READ HERE

Posted by peiper     on 07/06/2011 at 10:17 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - June 30, 2011

illegal immigrants heading for Europe

H/T Jihad Watch

Interesting piece but Mr. Sennels has it wrong with regard to building refugee camps.  Even outside Europe. Why?  How much more are the people who pay the taxes expected to shell out? For how long.  Seems like it could be forever.  Why?  Europe owes these life forms nothing at all.  The problem of mass immigration here as well as that in the states, is that the west in general seems loath to protect itself by any means necessary.  And the necessary in these cases isn’t making life comfortable for the illegals.  The necessary is making them grave yard dead.  That’s a message they can understand and anything short of that will not work. There is another alternative of course.  This one.

Illegal immigration: “We can no longer hold Europe’s southeast flank”
by Nicolai Sennels

The “Arab Spring” has unleashed an unprecedented wave of illegal immigrants heading for Europe. The fall or weakening of several dictators has resulted in loosened security, which allows people to flee the Islamic societies. Hundreds of thousands of Muslims have already entered the EU, and hundreds of thousands more are on their way.

In 2008, 80,000 illegal immigrants entered Greece. The Greek authorities cried out for help, saying that “the country can no longer handle the task of guarding the European Union’s southeast flank.” As a result, immigrant gangs have ravaged the historic center of Athens, “wielding swords, axes and machetes.” A new report published by Reuters tells us that illegal immigration is setting new records, as “Illegal immigration to Europe is now on track to surpass the peak hit in 2008. The IMO says about 42,000 migrants have already crossed into Italy and Malta alone, surpassing the 40,000 total for the two countries in all of 2008.”

The EU’s foremost job is to protect its citizens

The most important task above all others for the EU—now and for the coming years—will be to build and maintain an effective and well-guarded border fence at relevant stretches of the Union’s outer border. At the same time, the EU countries must work together at building and running refugee camps in areas outside Europe. In those cases where illegal immigrants cannot be sent back to their country of origin, they will receive shelter, food and medical care there.

According to the UNHCR, the cost of having one person in a refugee camp somewhere in Africa, for example, is 50 dollars / 33 euros per year. The price for having a refugee in a country like Denmark is 50,000 dollars / 33,000 euros. In other words, for every single refugee who is allowed to stay in Denmark, we can protect and feed one thousand refugees in a camp in an area where they understand the language and feel home in the culture.

Nicolai Sennels is a psychologist and author who writes from Denmark.

Posted by peiper     on 06/30/2011 at 01:12 PM   
Filed Under: • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - June 18, 2011

CONCESSION TO TERRORIST and the crime is we aren’t surprised

From Barking Moonbat to Barking Mad.  Maybe that should be howling mad. Whatever.

From the riots in Canada to the madness of this story, it’s clear that the western world has lost the thread. Brit public not too happy about this BUT, the story is now over, there aren’t any street protests, no riots and nobody even doing as much as with holding taxes. Which of course would only see em in jail.
I don’t understand how the barking-berk of a judge could see things in the way he did.  But perhaps as a lawyer he sees things in twisted ways the average person can not.  And from what some of you have written about some things in the USA, we aren’t too far behind the Brits in legalistic lunacy.

From where I view things, this is totally incomprehensible.  Did this terrorist scum bucket bring things on himself? Or maybe not. It was racism and islamophobia, right? Nothing at all to do with his very own actions, but the Brit public is responsible for his well being and the right to see family and have friends. Something the rat would happily deny anyone not of his pov on the world and religion.  Western democracy seems quite happy to keep the gun pointed at its own head.

Family of terror suspect given free travel tickets to visit him

By STEVE DOUGHTY

Taxpayers must pay train fares and taxi bills so that a terror suspect’s family can visit him after he was banned from the capital, a High Court judge has ordered.

Mr Justice Simon decided that because the Islamic extremist has been barred from London under anti-terror laws, he had lost his family life and had no friends.
To compensate for the breach of his human right to a family life, the Government should provide tickets when his wife and two children go to see him.

His judgment amounts to a further extension of the reach of Article 8 of the European Human Rights convention, which guarantees the right to private and family life.

Under Labour’s Human Rights Act, Article 8 has been used to free criminals, prevent deportations, allow assisted suicide and bring in a privacy law.

The ruling means that the family of the terrorist will get help from the Home Office to pay £40-a-trip coach or railway fares between Tottenham, North London, and the Midlands where he is exiled. Taxpayers must also meet taxi costs at both ends.

The concession to the terrorist, known only as CD, was disclosed by Home Secretary Theresa May in a statement to MPs on terrorist control orders.
The suspect, who has dual British and Nigerian nationality, was exiled under an order taken out in February.

MI5 has stated he is ‘the leading figure in a close group of Islamic extremists based in North London’. He had gone to meetings and a training camp organised by Mohammed Hamid, a terrorist instructor who called himself ‘Osama Bin London’.

The failed bombers who tried to attack the capital on July 21, 2005 were also at the camp in Cumbria. Hamid is now serving an indeterminate jail sentence.
The Security Services told the High Court that CD had three years of ‘extremist training’ in Syria. Back in London, he had made ‘several attempts to procure firearms for potential attack plans’.

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 06/18/2011 at 02:30 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - June 11, 2011

coming soon to an asylum near you? libya, civil war, the movie.

I caught this a few days ago and thought I was reading 1984.

The friend may become the enemy who remains the enemy unless he becomes a friend. Got it. That’s easy.  I know what they’re doing.  Clever people.
Britain is getting ready to make a keystone kops movie out of the civil war in Libya.
Now why can’t America be that inventive? 

Let me splain it to ya even though you may already know.

With us more or less in the background but still supportive, the Brits and French decided that the civilians in Libya suddenly had to be protected from that loon in Tripoli, MadMan Moo-a-Mar of Gaddifi.  So they gathered all the saints of NATO and embarked upon a brand new crusade. It’s called Saving Civilians.  A note if you please and even if you don’t.  There is to be no civilian saving in the home countries.
Those slaves are for the purpose of paying for this latest incursion in another country’s affairs, as well as being victims of crime which everyone knows nobody can do anything about anyway.

ALL protesters or so called “activists” or “Rebels” are now ‘The Good Guys’ and anyone shooting at them even if they are armed, are the bad guys.  All protesters who are protesting a govt. the west doesn’t like, are also ‘civilians’ and must be protected.
But a new twist announced this week makes for fairness in its game of moral high ground. 

Take a look.

Apparently the allies are worried that their newest best friends will or have, taken some revenge against Gadiffi civilians who actually support him and have no problem with the monster.  He’s their guy. Well of course. This is a very tribal country, innit?
So he’s bound to have some on his side. But the allies, whose motto over the past few months has become, Let’s go shelling, where they’re dwelling, have now warned their new best friends, the rebels, that they will turn their shells and missiles on them, should they muss up the hair of civilians on the other side. 

Hey, looks good. This is gonna be a great movie.  Already looking forward to the sequel. 

Here’s the rough draft so far.

Libya rebels warned that Nato will use force to stop revenge attacks

Britain has warned Libya’s rebels that Nato is prepared to used military force against the opposition if it wages armed attacks on civilians loyal to Col Muammar Gaddafi, officials said yesterday.

By Damien McElroy, Foreign Affairs Correspondent

Whitehall officials said that the “same assets” that are currently waging air strikes on Col Gaddafi’s regime and its forces would be unleashed on the rebels should they take revenge on towns and populations that have so far remained under Col Gaddafi’s control.

It is the most explicit warning yet that the international coalition enforcing United Nations 1973 resolution has not written a blank cheque to the rebels as they launch offensives against the regime in Misurata and eastern Libya. But officials said the National Transitional Council (NTC), which represents the rebel movements had given repeated assurances that they would not seek to punish government sympathisers in the aftermath of victory.

“We will protect civilians by all means necessary while the mandate is in force - that applies to everybody,” a government official said. “If the NTC was attacking civilians the mandate would give the international community the grounds to intervene. But we’ve seen no evidence that is likely to happen and the NTC has frequently address the need for reconciliation.”

Although Britain, its Nato allies and Gulf states are providing extensive support to the opposition, the resolution specifically bars deployment of troops alongside the rebels in what would effectively be taking sides in a civil war.

The government believes that Col Gaddafi’s regime is being steadily weakened after 10,000 bombing raids by fighter jets in three months. In a significant escalation, British Apache helicopter gunships and French Tigre equivalents have been deployed to attack Gaddafi’s troops on the frontline. Officials are convinced that Col Gaddafi will be ousted sooner rather than later. “He’s a trapped rat,” said one.

But as the opposition advances it is likely to be embroiled in clashes in civilian areas. As long as there is no convincing evidence that Gaddafi will fall without a fight, there is the prospect that Nato could be forced to turn on its allies. “The Nato operation has effectively mutated into regime change,” said David Hartwell, an analyst at IHS Global. “But clearly they don’t want to be caught on the hoof if Libya descended into internecine warfare”

A two-month stalemate between the rebels and the official army has frayed in recent days as rebels prepare to attack Gaddafite villages around the town of Misurata, which has successfully fought off a siege by the army. In eastern Libya preparations for an attack on the oil town of Brega are at an advanced stage and fighters are expanding their hold on the Western mountains along the Tunisian border.

A bid to convince the world that the TNC will establish a democratic government in a post-Gaddafi Libya will be made today at meeting of the 35-member Libya Contact Group in Abu Dhabi.

Leaders of the Benghazi-based body are to publish a blueprint for government alongside the official communique detailing international efforts to promote the downfall of Col Gaddafi’s regime.

Libyan rebels have accused of meting out arbitrary justice to captured Gaddafi troops and after the uprising allowing the slaughter of dozens of African migrants.
Activists yesterday accused the NTC of holding 330 civilians without trial, in conditions were many had suffered abuse.

source

Thinking a bit ahead, can you envision the total mess NATO and the west will be in, if they think they have to start aiming their gee whiz weaponry on the people they were originally helping.  Oh boy. Now that’s a blockbuster movie if ever there was one. If they decide to make it. Lets see.  Mostly muslim country, tribal, has a record of not feeling too warm and fuzzy about the west.  Oh yeah. Sure thing.  Lets all go in together and bomb both sides and see where that leads.
akbar snack bar, as Vilmar might say.

Posted by peiper     on 06/11/2011 at 05:33 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims • War-Stories •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - June 01, 2011

can’t keep tabs on freed Muslim terrorists warn security services.

Seems the more I read, the more frustrated and angry I become. And I can’t ignore this stuff friends. Especially as we are among the many who HAVE to fly from time to time.  So you read crap like this and can’t help but wonder. Why?  Why can’t the security services make scum like these guys just disappear?
No fanfare, no announcements or hoopla.  Just quietly gone.  Sure thing some left wing - bleeding heart - libtards will scream about human rights and all that bilge. So make them disappear as well.  How hard could it be?  The world won’t miss the muzzie terrorists or the hand wringers on the left either.

Really tired,tired tired of all the pc bs and the EU and their court of human rights, which does nothing to protect the innocent from harms way.
It isn’t as though these are innocents. Hell, they make their case very clear.  No double talk there.  They want to kill,kill,kill, and they figure correctly that if one of them can take out 10 of us, and more on plane, then they’re ahead of the game.  It isn’t a secret.  So why oh why are the powers that be so worried about their “rights?” Why do they have rights anyway?  Isn’t anything sacrificed on my part, if for example I make it clear that my intention is to kill you?  We aren’t speaking now of evidence that fairly can be questioned. Not talking about a case where there is a chance of mistaken identity.

Jeesh .... Western De(mock)racy seems intent on shooting itself in the head.  And please note. In this case, they aren’t even talking about deporting.

Take a look at this.

We can’t keep tabs on freed Muslim terrorists warn security services
By JASON GROVES
Last updated at 8:04 AM on 1st June 2011

Dozens of convicted Islamic terrorists are to be released from prison this year despite warnings it will be impossible to monitor them.

Ministers have been told that at least 45 terrorists – including several convicted of involvement in bomb plots designed to slaughter hundreds of people – are due to be released in the next 12 months.

They include Saajid Badat, who was sentenced to 13 years in 2005 for his involvement in the notorious shoe-bombing plot, and Moinul Abedin, who was sentenced to 20 years in 2002 for running a bomb factory in Birmingham.

Many of those due for freedom – after serving just half their sentence – are still deemed a threat.

Both the probation service and security services have warned ministers privately that the mass release threatens their ability to cope.

The revelation will intensify debate about Government plans to water down control orders, which are due to be debated by MPs next week.

Critics complain that the plans – championed by Nick Clegg – will make it harder for the security services to keep tabs on terror suspects.

Control orders: Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, has championed opposition to the controversial orders

Control orders were introduced in 2005 to deal with cases where individuals are suspected of involvement in terrorism but where there is not enough evidence to prosecute.

The planned reforms will end the virtual house arrest of those on control orders.

In future, suspects will be allowed greater access to the internet, allowed telephones and permitted to meet friends. They will be electronically tagged but able to leave their homes for part of each day.

Harry Fletcher, of the National Association of Probation Officers, said that as many as 70 al Qaeda terrorists could be released during the next 12 months, along with about 130 other criminals who have been radicalised in prison and are now classed as dangerous.

He said: ‘They are all deemed high risk, and in profile they are totally different from the rest of the criminals that we deal with.

‘They are more likely to have A-levels and been to college. Therefore, they have to be supervised by us and the police at a fairly intensive level.

‘My fear is that as cuts to the frontline cut deeper, we’re going to be unable to give them the close attention we have hitherto.

‘It’s a real concern that these men require maximum levels of supervision and we’re not going to be able to do it.

‘That will undermine public protection.’

Home Secretary Theresa May told MPs last month that the security services were ‘very conscious of the issues relating to the release of (terrorist) offenders who have completed their prison sentences’.

Labour’s home affairs spokesman Gerry Sutcliffe said cuts to the police and probation service had left them ‘overstretched’.

He also criticised the Coalition for giving in to the demands of Nick Clegg to water down the system of control orders.

Mr Sutcliffe said: ‘I would urge ministers to keep control orders in place until there is a better alternative.’

Tory MP Patrick Mercer said many people did not realise that terrorists, like other criminals, were eligible for release after serving just half their sentence.

Mr Mercer said this underlined ‘the need for a really effective system of control orders because many of these individuals will still be highly dangerous’.

A spokesman for the Probation Service said: ‘Public protection is one of our main priorities and any savings will look to retain frontline services which will ensure the public is protected and re-offending is reduced.

‘The Probation Service must, as with all other areas of Government, make savings.’

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 06/01/2011 at 07:11 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - May 13, 2011

Islamist groups have begun to dominate the political process. bye,bye blighty

If this is the future, and so far it sure seems that way, we gotta get outta here before we’re both too old and too sick to travel.
This is not a pretty picture of whats to come, if this vermin has its way.  And so far I see no real threat to the threat they pose. I don’t see them being stopped in their tracks while they are still a minority.  Instead, I see them reproducing themselves in greater numbers through births and through conversions.

Take a look ....

Tower Hamlets Taliban: Death threats to women who don’t wear veils.  And all in a borough at the heart of Britain’s capital...

By TOM RAWSTORNE

A Briton from Dorset who converted to Islam in 2009 and renamed himself Salahuddin (the son of teachers), Dart is one of several extremist Muslim preachers operating in the Tower Hamlets area of East London. 

This vocal minority, who are causing increasing concern in the area, have lent this corner of the capital a new nickname — the Islamic republic of Tower Hamlets.

Recently, it was reported that a 31-year-old Asian woman who works in a local chemist’s had received death threats for refusing to wear a veil, even though she’s not a practising Muslim. Four weeks ago, the woman’s boss was apparently approached by an Asian in his 40s who told him his employee must cover her head and wear longer robes.

‘If she keeps working here and continues to dress like that, we will boycott you because this is a Muslim area,’ the shop’s owner was told.

Subsequently another, younger, Asian man came into the pharmacy and started shouting at the employee.

‘He said: “If you keep doing these things, we will kill you,”’ recalls a Bangladeshi-born man who witnessed the scene.

It is not the first time such death threats have been issued, and nor are they confined to issues of dress and deportment. In behaviour that some have compared to that of the Taliban in Afghanistan, homophobic abuse and physical attacks against gay men and women are also on the increase.

Those familiar with life in Tower Hamlets are not surprised. They say that such attitudes are commonplace. Residents have grown used to the fact that the council-run libraries are stocked with books and DVDs containing the extremist rantings of banned Islamist preachers.

There is a Muslim faith school where girls as young as 11 have to wear face-covering veils. There are plans to spend hundreds of thousands of pounds of municipal money to build a set of Islamic arches — the so-called ‘hijab gates’, which would look like a veil — at either end of Brick Lane.

In October, Bangladeshi-born Lutfur Rahman became the first directly elected mayor of Tower Hamlets. He originally stood as the Labour candidate but was deselected by the party amid allegations about his links with an organisation known as the Islamic Forum of Europe (IFE).

The fundamentalist group believes in jihad and Islamic sharia law, and wants to turn Britain and other European countries into Islamic republics. Last year, a Labour minister said the organisation had infiltrated the Labour Party and accused it of ‘corrupting our politics’.

Leaders of the group want to impose hardline views on local communities. With bitter irony, it is said to have pocketed £10 million from the taxpayer by attracting state grants designed to ‘prevent violent extremism’.

Dumped by Labour, Mr Rahman ran as an independent (allegedly with the help of the IFE) and romped to victory in what the London Evening Standard described as ‘one of the nastiest campaigns in recent London political history’. Now in power, he has control over a £1.3 billion municipal budget.

‘You basically have a large umbrella Islamist group that appears to have almost a stranglehold over a major council in the East End of London,’ said one local resident.

‘The concern is that this Islamist group has an “us versus them” mentality. Their ideology is basically that Muslims are in the trenches, being assailed by the rest of the world. But they are convinced the Muslims will ultimately triumph. It may sound dramatic, but they are trying to impose Islam on Britain.’

What sets Tower Hamlets apart is the huge amount of political power wielded by the minority.

For several decades, Bangladeshis have been heavily involved in local politics, particularly in the ruling Labour Party. 

While democracy should be open to anyone who wants to be involved, concerns have grown recently that Islamist groups have begun to dominate the political process. The fear is that instead of governing in the interests of the whole community, power is being used to promote sectarian interests.

READ ALL THE REST HERE

Posted by peiper     on 05/13/2011 at 10:02 AM   
Filed Under: • muslims • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - May 04, 2011

europes future unless stopped, and what are the chances of that happening?

H/T To our bmews friend and sometimes councilor:

Lyndon B.

Lyndon sent me something days and days ago and I’m embarrassed that I’ve only just discovered the link he provided. Were I a a serious drinking man I’d bame it on that. But no.  The reason must be that I’m blind. Jeesh.

Sorry Lyndon and THANKS again.

I think this is my only post today cos I have to be away, and not too certain when we’re returning. Day out with wife and elderly auntie.

Anyway, I booted to check mail with no intention of posting anything. Have a few things to do before leaving in another hour, but found Lyndon’s very good link which brought me to this link,which you’d think I’d have been aware of since we do get the paper. Not only that, I’m on their site every day. So how’d I miss this?

Some days ago I mentioned immigrant and asylum seekers over running an Italian island.

Click the photo and that is my post for the day and take a look at what new horror Europe and ESPECIALLY the UK face.

Posted by peiper     on 05/04/2011 at 01:54 AM   
Filed Under: • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • muslims •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - May 03, 2011

obl is gone but his insects remain and they’re everywhere.

We’re all of us well damn pleased that the murderous bastard obl is no more.  I wish our govt. would release the videos of the whole thing. Especially when the SOB finally gets his.  Don’t guess we’ll even get to see his dead worthless corpse. Lets not fool ourselves though.
We face another new beginning.  There are warnings from the Brits and our own embassy, people generally believe with good reason, that attacks will be made and the worry here is that it could well be some lone wolf fanatic that isn’t yet on the radar. And don’t laugh guys but, if you’re walking around with an American accent, you could be a target. 

The monster in chief of AQ is gone but islam isn’t. These 7th century fugitives are here among us now. Have been for awhile.

There’s a site I visit from time to time called Family Security Matters.  I happen to be reading them today and found further interesting but mostly scary stuff. An update too on previous postings on the subject of muslim intrusion (some call it immigration) of the UK and Europe.
These life forms are very serious about taking over. There’s a couple of videos at the link. You may be interested.

Muslims Creating No-Go Areas in Europe

Will this happen in America?

FSM: Eurabia Watch, The Editor

France has a higher number of Muslims than any other country in Europe. Politically, President Sarkozy appears to recognize that overly high numbers of Muslims are not good for French social cohesion. Sarkozy is already trying to modify the Schengen rules of Europe to prevent the free movement of Tunisian refugees to France.

The Schengen agreement allows any resident of Europe to travel freely within 25 of the 27 European Union nations, without the need for border controls. Italy, whose island of Lampedusa was swamped with economic migrants from Tunisia, has granted six-month visas to thousands of the migrants, and France cannot sustain so many new arrivals. Many of these migrants are heading towards Britain, where a liberal welfare benefits culture awaits them.

The North African Muslim communities of Paris were the main instigators of riots that took place in the northern suburbs of Paris in the fall of 2005.

The riots began after three Muslim youths had run from police, and had tried to hide inside a turbine at an electricity substation. The youths were electrocuted, and two died. The riots then spread throughout Paris and Ile de Cite, with further outbreaks in other large cities with high Muslim populations, such as Lyons, Marseilles and Toulouse in the south.

One should not forget the manner in which such communities are run. The older generation of migrants from North Africa are often out of work, and the power in their fractured households is devolved to young males.

Samira Bellil broke the silence about the plight of young women in such households, where many girls who do not wear the veil and adopt Western attitudes are – at the command of these young tyrants - subjected to gang-rape. Young women who are forced to be raped in turn are called “tournantes.”

I documented the fast growth of Muslim-dominated gangs in Britain in a three-part article for FSM in 2008.  Such gangs have murdered non-Muslims who wandered onto their “turf”. The worst incidents of Muslim gang violence have involved a South London Muslim group called “The Muslim Boys,” who shot a young man called Adrian Marriott for failing to convert to their form of Islam, and an appalling case from Scotland. Kriss Donald, aged only 15, was abducted from a street by a Muslim gang simply because he was white and not Muslim. He had never met his attackers. Kriss was beaten, stabbed thirteen times, and set on fire. His body was found near a cycle track in Clydeside. Seventy percent of his body was covered with burns. There were rumors that he had been castrated.

While male Muslims take over streets of Europe, the plight of the women within such Islam-dominated segregated communities becomes worse. They are forced by their peers to wear veils and to become “submissives.” Those who do not comply with the prevailing veiling norms are then subjected to intimidation.

In London this month, a non-Muslim woman of Bangladeshi origin was told: “Wear a headscarf or be killed.” The woman lives in Whitechapel in East London, where a large proportion of women wear the veil.

Feminists in Britain blithely assume that wearing the veil is a lifestyle choice and ignore the evidence of coercion and compulsion.

In December, Nidra Poller discussed the problem of Muslims illegally taking over a street in Paris where they lay down carpets and pray in the road, completely blocking the thoroughfare.

The situation of Muslims in Italy engaging in prayer in the open (illegally taking over public spaces) really began in Bologna. Here the San Petronio cathedral in Bologna has had threats of bombing, because it contains a 600-year-old fresco inside, painted by Modena. This fresco, inspired by Canto 28 of Dante’s Inferno, shows Mohammed on a rock, with his body split and his bowels extruded. On several occasions in 2006, Muslims in Bologna decided to hold illegal prayers in the square outside the cathedral.

In Moscow too, Muslims engage in illegal occupation of a public street to pray.

H/T FAMILY MATTERS

Posted by peiper     on 05/03/2011 at 02:13 PM   
Filed Under: • muslims •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner