Wednesday - March 07, 2012
a very bad day among many bad days for brits, and for afghan women
This is a crappy war that could be won with the liberal use of nukes. It’s that or just get the hell out.
It’s so easy playing armchair Fieldmarshal at a keyboard but truth to tell, I’m just frustrated like all of you.
I never thought much of Karzai and now think even less. But then, it’s his country and those savages prefer the dark ages. It’s what they are used to and generations of contact with the west hasn’t much improved them. Screw em. There isn’t one worth the life of a Brit or American or any Nato grunt in that god forsaken place. Now there’s news that six Brit soldiers were killed after their armoured vehicle was blown up.
Karzai’s backing of strict Islamic code (that allows men to beat their wives) ‘is a giant step back for women’s rights in Afghanistan’
Activists worried women’s rights being used as bargaining chip in negotiations with the Taliban
New code promotes segregation of the sexes
By DAMIEN GAYLEActivists have accused the Afghan president of reversing improvements in women’s rights after he endorsed a strict ‘code of conduct’ issued by clerics.
Hamid Karzai yesterday backed a document issued by the Ullema Council which promotes segregation of the sexes and allows husbands to beat wives in certain circumstances.
The move is seen as part of his attempts to reach out to the Taliban in the lead up to the planned withdrawal of Nato troops from the Afghanistan in 2014.
But activists are furious that gains made in women’s rights since the 2001 invasion and ensuing occupation are being used as a bargaining chip with Islamic extremists.
Prior to the 2001 U.S. invasion, girls were banned from going to school and women forced to wear burkas to conceal them from head to toe.
Women were also banned from venturing from their homes being escorted by a male relative.
Similarly, the new ‘code of conduct’ says women should not travel without a male companion and they should not mingle with men in places like schools, markets or offices.
Wife-beating is only prohibited if there is no ‘Shariah-compliant reason’, it said.
AND THEN THERE’S THIS. SOME OF THE FALLEN.
There’s more HERE. ALL 400 OF THEM.
Posted by peiper
on 03/07/2012 at 01:16 PM
Filed Under: • Military • muslims • UK • War-Stories •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - March 04, 2012
a few of the libyans brits liberated last year
Last year when the PM (Brit) went on his save the civilians crusade in Libya, I thought then and still do that the word “civilians” was much overused.
But as Churchill said at the start of WW2, “England, leading France by the hand” etc,ect.
Well, the present Prime Minister is no Churchill. Not a hope in hell of ever being either.
So the UK and the French and to a lesser degree the USA who gave background support, got to play policeman. Instead of “Napoleon we are here” or “We’ll fight them on the beaches” we got speeches about civilians in harm’s way. Never mind it was an armed insurrection. News releases were made as tho the RAF and the French had just engaged the Luftwaffe and the entire reserected German army.
Now we’re hearing the same bleating about civilians re. Syria, except they may not be the pushover that Gaddafi was.
Now then, the govt. in Libya such as it is, does NOT sanction or approve of what’s happening here. I’m simply bringing to your attention the kind of folks (and there are many ovem) who are very much anti west and especially anti American, anti Jews, anti Christian and anti Brit. Mostly anti modernity and 20th century. Never mind the 21st.
Take a look at the photos at the link and more of the story.
VIDEO AND LOTS OF STILL PIX HERE. SOURCE, SUNDAY MAIL
Video of Churchill’s Desert Rats’ graves being smashed to rubble… by the Libyans we helped liberate
· Headstones torn down and crucifixes smashed with hammers by extremists
· More than 150 graves of British serviceman systematically desecrated
· Attack carried out over two days with footage posted online
· Members of mob heard repeatedly calling dead servicemen ‘dogs’By IAN GALLAGHER and MARTIN DELGADO
A year ago they begged for Britain’s help when Colonel Gaddafi’s tanks encircled their city, threatening annihilation.
Now former Libyan rebels in Benghazi – liberated with the aid of the RAF last March – have systematically desecrated the graves of more than 150 British servicemen killed in North Africa 70 years ago.
Headstones at the Benghazi War Cemetery have been torn down and crucifixes smashed with hammers by a mob of extremists, some carrying guns and dressed in combat fatigues.
More than 1,000 soldiers and airmen who lost their lives in the desert wars of Montgomery and Rommel are buried at the site in Eastern Libya.
Many were members of the famed 7th Armoured Division, known as the Desert Rats, who played a crucial role in the see-saw battle for control of Libya and Egypt between 1941 and 1943.
Graves of RAF pilots were among those shattered by the thugs. It was their job to fly bombing raids – just as the RAF did last year – to assist Lieutenant General Montgomery’s Eighth Army and support commandos clearing routes for tanks.
Sickeningly, the attack, which was carried out over two days last week and appeared highly organised, was filmed by one of the men involved and posted on the internet.
As they rampage among the graves, members of the mob are heard to repeatedly say of the dead servicemen: ‘They are dogs, they are dogs.’
Posted by peiper
on 03/04/2012 at 10:26 AM
Filed Under: • muslims •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - February 26, 2012
detained at airport for veil comment at security gate for possible offense to the usual creeps
It’s now come to this. What a sorry freekin thing to happen. It’s getting so that every little comment or joke no matter how mild, can be twisted into whatever the listener decides it is.
This is petty beyond belief, but it’s what happens every day when you live in a pc dictatorship. I do not see it getting better in my lifetime. Unfortunately.
It has been argued for years that a confession under torture or any kind of duress should not be accepted, because a person might say whatever was expected to make the discomfort go away.
Then why do pin heads in authority demand apologies under threats. Surely they must have enough brains, even tho it doesn’t take much, to know that a forced apology is meaningless.
It just plain pisses me off no end.
Detained and branded racist for innocent burqa joke at airport security
By Jason Lewis, Investigations Editor
As David Jones arrived at the security gates at Gatwick airport, he was looking forward to getting through swiftly so he could enjoy lunch with his daughters before their flight.
Placing his belongings, including a scarf, into a tray to pass through the X-ray scanner he spotted a Muslim woman in hijab pass through the area without showing her face.
In a light-hearted aside to a security official who had been assisting him, he said: “If I was wearing this scarf over my face, I wonder what would happen.”
The quip proved to be a mistake. After passing through the gates, he was confronted by staff and accused of racism.
As his daughters, who had passed through security, waited in the departure lounge wondering where he was, he was subjected to a one hour stand-off as officials tried to force him to apologise.Mr Jones, 67, who is the creator of the popular children’s character Fireman Sam, said: “Something like George Orwell’s 1984 now seems to have arrived in Gatwick airport.
“I feel that my rights as an individual have been violated. What I underwent amounts to intimidation and detention. I was humiliated and degraded in full public view.YOU AREN’T ALLOWED TO SAY THAT
“I am a 67-year-old pensioner and have lived my life within the law. I do not have even one point on my driving licence.”
He said that when he made his initial remark the security guard had appeared to agree with him, saying: “I know what you mean, but we have our rules, and you aren’t allowed to say that.”As he went through the metal detecting arch, his artificial hip set off the alarm, prompting a full search from a guard. It was after this, and as he prepared to rejoin his two grown-up daughters, that he was confronted by another guard who said he was being detained because he had made an offensive remark.
“I repeated to her what I had said and told her that I had said nothing racist,” he said. “She took my passport and boarding pass and I was then escorted back through the security zone into the outer area. Here the female security guard proceeded to question me further, inferring many things that I had not said.
“It was impossible to get her to listen to reason. We were then joined by a second female security guard who stated that she was Muslim and was deeply distressed by my comment.
“I again stated that I had not made a racist remark but purely an observation that we were in a maximum security situation being searched thoroughly whilst a woman with her face covered walked through. I made no reference to race or religion. I did not swear or raise my voice.”
According to Mr Jones, who was due to board a British Airways flight to Portugal, where he now lives and runs a restaurant on the Algarve, the British Airways duty manager was then called in and sided with the security staff.He continued: “I had now been detained for some time and my daughters were worried, calling me on my phone asking what was happening. We were going around in circles. I maintained that I had said nothing offensive and the security guard was continuing to accuse me. This had taken about 15-20 minutes and looked as though it was not going to be resolved.
“I asked the security guard if she was going to charge me to which she said no but I could not leave until I had apologised to the Muslim guard.
“At this point I asked for the attendance of a police officer. After some time he arrived but it was also plainly evident that he was keeping to the politically correct code. I told him that if there was a case then he should arrest me.“I was told that we now live in a different time and some things are not to be said. They decided again that I would only be allowed to continue on my journey if I were to apologise to the Muslim guard. My reply was that as I had not made a racist remark it would be impossible for me to apologise.”
Mr Jones, a former member of the Household Cavalry and retired fireman, added: “I felt that I made a logical observation. That while everyone was being subjected to an invasive search it was illogical that someone should be let through with their face covered. I am not opposed to having this level of security but it must be equal for all.”
Eventually, Mr Jones said, the BA manager suggested that he should agree that what he had said “could” be considered offensive by a Muslim guard.
With his flight departure time now fast approaching Mr Jones agreed to the compromise. Escorted by the police officer, he was taken through security where he was again subjected to a full search after his hip replacement set off the metal detector alarms.Mr Jones said he intended to complain formally to the Gatwick airport authorities and British Airways about the incident last Sunday.
Department for Transport rules do not prevent people covering their faces at UK airports for religious reasons.However, all passengers must show their faces to UK Borders officials when they pass through passport control. Muslim women who wear hijabs can request that their identity is checked by a female immigration officer and they can also ask that they be taken to a private room before they remove their head wear.
A spokesman for Gatwick airport said: “The security team are examining the incident to ensure that the issue was managed in the right way.
“They are talking to the people involved to understand what the issue was and how it came to have the police involved.”
Posted by peiper
on 02/26/2012 at 09:08 AM
Filed Under: • Jack Booted Thugs • muslims • Politically Correct B.S. • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - February 24, 2012
muslim judge in USA upholds sharia …
H/T Doc Jeff and thanks for the heads up to the Gates of Vienna link.
Doc sent along a few items and it is timely indeed, since I also received the latest Pat Condell video on islam as cultural terrorism.
There is not a thing for me to add to Condell. He’s always right on this subject.
The link Doc Jeff sent is quite interesting. Seems a judge with a very American name who is muslim, has given the nod of approval to sharia law not so much in words as in actual deed. There is a video at the Gates ov Vienna.
Take a look at this. A good look.
If you do, you’ll find out that laws against assault no longer apply to any offended Muslim who might physically attack you.
There’s a word for this, and I think we all know it: Sharia.
Muslim Admits to Attacking Atheist; Muslim Judge Dismisses Case
By Al Stefanelli
The Pennsylvania State Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope, Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.
The defendant is an immigrant and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.
The case went to trial, and as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim. What transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant, but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country, he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included,
“Having had the benefit of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things. Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a little bit more about it makes you look like a dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in their society.
Judge Martin then offered a lesson in Islam, stating,
“Islam is not just a religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence their very being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca to be a good Muslim, before you die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can not because you are too ill too elderly, whatever but you must make the attempt. Their greetings wa-laikum as-Salâm (is answered by voice) may god be with you. Whenever, it’s very common when speaking to each other it’s very common for them to say uh this will happen it’s it they are so immersed in it.
Judge Martin further complicates the issue by not only abrogating the First Amendment, but completely misunderstanding it when he said,
“Then what you have done is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very very very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right, but you’re way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what, and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries. when we go to other countries it’s not uncommon for people to refer to us as ugly Americans this is why we are referred to as ugly Americans, because we are so concerned about our own rights we don’t care about other people’s rights as long as we get our say but we don’t care about the other people’s say”
Posted by peiper
on 02/24/2012 at 11:40 AM
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • muslims • PAT CONDELL • RoPMA •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - February 22, 2012
a cartoon from the netherlands
Posted by peiper
on 02/22/2012 at 09:49 AM
Filed Under: • International • muslims •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Can torture be morally right? Don’t really care. Anyone else or am I the lone ranger?
I have run somewhat out of time today. Too much more to do at the house with things that should have been taken care of long ago. My bad I guess.
Started yesterday and made great headway. Plan now is to keep up with things better then I have in the past. And I think I can do it. Just a matter of not being so damn lazy about some things need doing. And one thing needs doing is sharing this article.
I’m even late posting it now.
Can torture be morally right?
By TONY RENNELL
yes and anyway, who cares that counts? See the entire article before answering that.
Both sides were defiant and unrepentant. When President George W. Bush was asked for permission to ‘waterboard’ the Al Qaeda terrorist and 9/11 mastermind, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, to obtain vital information, his thoughts turned not only to the thousands who died in the Twin Towers but also to Daniel Pearl, the kidnapped American journalist whose head Khalid admitted hacking off with his own hand.
‘Damn right! Get on with it!’ Bush said. Writing later about his duty to protect the United States from another terror attack, he said: ‘And I’d do it again.’
Meanwhile, behind bars in Guantanamo Bay, the U.S. detention centre for terror suspects, the fanatical (and egotistical) Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was equally impenitent.
He was happy to admit his part as ‘principal planner’ of 9/11 and to link his name to almost every terrorist outrage in recent years, as if trying to prove himself a bigger threat than his nominal chief, Osama Bin Laden.
And would the self-confessed killer do it all again, if given the chance? The answer was an unqualified ‘yes’ — as part of his jihad (‘holy war’) against America and all the infidel nation stood for.
Unlike Bush, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed wallowed in his brutality. When Daniel Pearl was killed, the process of cutting off his head with a knife was halted after it had begun because the video camera (recording the slaughter for dissemination round the world) wasn’t working.
Once it was fixed, the gruesome task resumed. Who knows what pain the American suffered before he died, but waterboarding (a simulation of drowning that produces panic and pain) must have been almost benign by comparison.
Here, in a nutshell, is the crucial battleground of the 21st century. How far can a nation stretch its own hard-won traditions of law and justice in order to combat terrorism that knows no boundaries, either geographical or ethical, in its hate-driven crusade to wipe its supposed enemies off the face of the earth?
This uncomfortable moral dilemma — perhaps the most pressing of our troubled times — is tackled in a new book by the British writer and journalist William Shawcross.
In Bush’s words, ‘they represent no nation, defend no territory, and wear no uniform. They do not mass armies on borders, or flotillas of warships on the high seas.
‘They operate in the shadows of society; they send small teams of operatives to infiltrate free nations; they live quietly among their victims; they conspire in secret; and then they strike without warning.’
Despite this threat, the West is emphatically not entitled to respond in kind. The sort of disregard for human life that characterised U.S. actions in Vietnam cannot be repeated. But, if the Al Qaeda threat is to be successfully countered, the gloves have to be eased off a little.
BULLSHIT!!! Ease off? Ease? No freekin way. Mass kill the bastards the same way you’d spray a wasp’s nest or a roach infestation.
It’s a good article and a book review and thought provoking. I suppose my problem is a lack of patience. I just want us to bomb where they live and stuff collateral damage. I don’t really care.
Posted by peiper
on 02/22/2012 at 09:23 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists • War On Terror •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 13, 2012
unhappy/happy muslims
They’re not happy in Egypt .
They’re not happy in Libya .
They’re not happy in Morocco .
They’re not happy in Iran .
They’re not happy in Iraq .
They’re not happy in Yemen .
They’re not happy in Afghanistan .
They’re not happy in Pakistan .
They’re not happy in Syria .
They’re not happy in Lebanon .
They’re happy in France .
They’re happy in Italy .
They’re happy in Germany .
They’re happy in Sweden .
They’re happy in the USA .
They’re happy in Norway .
They’re happy in Canada .
They’re happy in Holland .
They’re happy in Denmark .
Darned if THIS isn’t true! Never really thought about it from this perspective…
it’s just plain TRUE
H/T Jim Miller
Posted by peiper
on 02/13/2012 at 10:48 AM
Filed Under: • muslims •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 09, 2012
some comments from other places to provoke thought and responses
Received my usual newsletter relating to Europe and things affecting all who live here and as usual clicked on a link.
It had to do with yet another example of those lovers of free speech so long as it theirs (muzzies) while shouting down speakers at a public forum. So typical of them and their lefty liberal lap dogs.
So I clicked and as I say, just the usual and might not have bothered with it until I started reading some of the comments. Which I found to be interesting.
Brussels: University debate disturbed by Muslim fundamentalistsIslam in Europe 9 February 2012
Yesterday ULB university organized a debate between French journalist Caroline Fourest and Hervé Hasquin on the extreme right. The debate was heckled by niqab-wearing activists who shouted “Burqa, bla bla bla” and accused Fourest of Islamophobia.
The activists were mobilized by Souhail Chichah, an economics researcher and assistant at the university, who is known for his extremist views. The debate moderator, Guy Haarscher, urged him to come on stage to speak. According to Le Soir, Souhail Chichah had called for ‘Burqa pride” on social networks, which was dedicated to the ‘stoning of Caroline Fourest’.http://islamineurope.blogspot.com/2012/02/brussels-university-debate-disturbed-by.html
There’s a video but it’s in a foreign language so unless you speak French .... But you will hear the attempted disruption. And lets face it, that isn’t even news anymore. Never mind that they haven’t a coherent argument themselves. Their reason for being is simply to impeded others from speaking.
But as mentioned, I was more interested in the comment section. Here’s a few examples. Which btw covered another subject which had to do with muzzies and dogs. I guess what I’m trying to show is that there is resistance to the plague of islam all over Europe. It just isn’t well enough organized, and I have my doubts it ever will be because the right keeps attacking the wrong targets.
Here. See what you think.
Dude, here in Sweden the prime minister is suggesting raising the retirement age to 75, allowing those over 54 to qualify for ‘student loans’ (apparently they don’t as it stands) so they can LEARN A NEW TRADE. This is in a country that has a 25% consumer purchase tax on everything & brings retarded Somalians & asylum seeking Afghani’s by the THOUSANDS. And what do they do once they are here? WELL besides mass gang rape, murder, child molestation, drugs, robbery, assault & driving drunk without a license, NOTHING!! Except live on the dole, continue to rain kids down upon us & complain that their free sh*t isn’t good enough or big enough.
I just read one 23 yr old Afghan asylum seeker has already been jailed for assault 4 times (including against a cop) driving no license twice, drunk driving once, drug dealer of steroids, heroin, pills, threatened to kill a 15 yr old girl if she did not sell drugs for him AND was one of 12 men arrested for the gang rape of a 29 year old Swedish mother of 2 at the asylum housing center. They beat her very badly & she was raped by at least a dozen men, him being one. And he has not even been offered up for DEPORTATION! He will never work, and has never worked - he is violent and poses a threat to humanity here, yet WE support him !! Apparently Swedes will have to work until they DIE in their tracks to support a fat hog somalian woman with 10 kids that follow her in a row like ducklings each one 4 inches taller than the last. I saw this one lady, my god, her kids looked like clones of each other - fat cow buying 100 rolls of toilet paper at the store (even though muzzies always say they don’t use toilet paper) and 20 gallons of oil, while I can afford only 1 litre of cooking oil at a time for my family of 5. Because WE WORK.
Nobody can convince me this isn’t premeditated destruction of our cultures, our countries, and our way of life. By our own governments.
They cannot achieve what they desire until all countries and cultures are the same, and since they cannot raise the rest of the world up to our level, they will bring us down to the rest of the worlds.
Islamonausea, not Islamophobia
Our language needs a term that describes what many critically thinking people feel about Islam according to their own terms, not according to what Muslims wish us to feel or what the PC establishment diagnoses to scare us into allowing more voters for the Left into our countries. We need a term that simultaneously invites Muslims to realize what they need to change about their behavior and religion if they wish to advance from an embarrassing last place in the evolution of civilizations and to earn some real respect among the world community.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2012/01/islamonausea-not-islamophobia.html
Islamonausea deserves its own article on Wikipedia. Help get Islamonausea into our dictionaries by using the word on blogs, in articles and in Letters to the Editor, and in everyday speech.
I kind of favor that. It does have a ring to it but might not be acceptable to the left here. I’d bet it would become another word branded as, “hate speech.”
If the Dutch have to choose between keeping dogs in their country and keeping Moslems, I hope they have the sense to keep the dogs.
How many Dutch have been killed by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many Dutch have been raped by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many Dutch have been mugged by dogs? How many by Moslems?
How many arsons in the Netherlands have been set by dogs? How many by Moslems?
I think the answers are clear: the Moslems out-score the dogs by ratios of hundreds to one.
However here’s a question where the scores are probaby about equal:
How many Dutch have been bitten by dogs? How many by Moslems?The Dutch should not have to be made to choose.
1) Muslims come to their new country
2) Muslims bring their culture...some are stupid, some are idiotic, most are repulsive. (from the hair cover to honor killings)
3) Its not the muslim that changes to suit OUR culkture and traditions,
4) The muslim DEMANDS WE change our culture and traditions to suit them.5) ..and finally. We grow some balls to tell the muslims “either accept OUR culture and traditions, or get out of the country.
http://www.infideltaskforce.com
Yesterday a hellish day.
Went into town on errands overdue. Wife fell when she tripped on a part of paving stone (sidewalk) that was not level. I guess the cold had lifted a small corner and it was her luck to catch it. I only came on the scene after it happened as she’d gone to a market while I continued to the bank.
Nothing broken but banged up a bit. Fell in an odd way and hit one side of her face but fortunately not full on. Landed on her left hand. It being very,very cold, she had lots of layers of clothing. I think they saved her from doing worse.
I don’t know how she managed to drive us home. (I don’t drive here) So anyway, I’m playing caregiver but feel bad that I wasn’t right on the spot to catch her or help. Had to cancel the monthly visit with friends for coffee morning. Just not up to it today.
Posted by peiper
on 02/09/2012 at 10:06 AM
Filed Under: • International • muslims •
• Comments (12)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 07, 2012
muslim activists seek restriction on how press reports on muslims and islam.
Not that anyone is surprised.
H/T Stonegate
British Muslims Try to Ban Negative Reporting of IslamHudson New York 7 February 2012
By Soeren KernA Muslim activist group with links to the Muslim Brotherhood has asked the British government to restrict the way the British media reports about Muslims and Islam. The effort to silence criticism of Islam comes amid an ongoing public inquiry into British press standards following a phone-hacking scandal involving the News of the World and other British newspapers.
The Leveson Inquiry, established by British Prime Minister David Cameron in July 2011, is currently considering how to increase government oversight of the British media.
But in a move that many worry will result in government regulation of the Internet, Lord Justice Leveson, a British judge who serves as Chairman of the inquiry, now says he wants to include Internet bloggers into any system of press regulation that he proposes.
Observers say the Leveson Inquiry’s effort to regulate blogging, combined with the Muslim attempt to ban negative reporting about Islam, poses a clear threat to free speech in Britain.
Appearing before the Leveson Inquiry on January 24, Muslim activist Inayat Bunglawala said the amount of negative stories about Muslims in Britain is “demonizing” Islam and fuelling a “false narrative.” He called on the government to do all it can to “ensure a fairer portrayal, a more balanced portrayal of the faith of Islam” in the British media.
In a separate written submission, Bunglawala complained about the “enormous impact of coverage that is proven to be inaccurate, inflammatory, prejudicial and detrimental” to the representation of Islam in Britain.
He continued: “British Muslims as a social group collectively suffer from poor media practices, whether this be the excessive attention granted to fringe Muslim groups, like Muslims Against Crusades, by the media or poor fact-checking prior to publication. Improving media practices and media responsibility on portraying and reporting fairly on Islam and British Muslims, without bias or discrimination or intent to incite anti-Muslim prejudice, is an urgent concern.”
British Muslims as a social group collectively suffer from poor media practices
Oh right. No bout adoubt it.
Like when some grizzly bearded scummy creeps carry signs saying, “Behead those who mock islam.” Or that by now brilliant classic, “To hell with democracy.”
Or issuing death threats to writers of books that most muzzies never even read for themselves. Death threats against cartoonists. Threats against the very culture and countries where they settle and accept benefits. Poor media practices. Right. Like reporting on the ban on Rushdie just recently in India, which prevented him from attending a book fair due only to fear of muslim reaction. With good cause one might say because his life was threatened if he tried to attend. Yeah, all that bad press is unfair. Why, those mean and nasty Brit newspapers reporting on the muslim gangs targeting white girls for forced prostitution. (Eastern European mostly gypos do the same and recently have been found to be taking homeless off streets and shippling them to eastern europe and placed in forced servitude.)
Forget that what they do produces the kind of coverage given the vermin.
Anyway, it’s all Bush’s fault. Or the Jews and their Christian friends.
Meanwhile, most ppl have already given up on the hope (misplaced) that there might be a large moderate muslim protest rally against the terrorists.
There could be hope of course as it’s rumored that one moderate muzzie was found hiding under a bed. The location is secret as death threats have already been reported and protest posters being prepared in the event this moderate is found. Alive.
OH! And let us not forget the twisted thinking that produces ‘honor killings’ as a normal way of dealing with family issues. Or in fact, sees honor in murder.
Lets not report all that as it might create the correct impression of a stone age religion and way of life that militant islamists will force on the globe if allowed.
Posted by peiper
on 02/07/2012 at 10:38 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 06, 2012
some vermin, their history and their human (?) rights
The links are provided should anyone want to read the full stories. You’d think we’d all be tired of this kind of thing by now. Well, yes. It is about the same old same old. But ..... it’s happening right here and it’s on going. Emotions run the gamut from concern to fright to downright anger. And of course frustration.
Lots and lots of that. Seem Europa and it’s union and too many Brit lawyers and civil rights types, are very concerned about the rights of the vermin shown here and less about the right to life of the many victims these bastards would enjoy taking away. And in the most horrific manner they could arrange.
Terrorists may be mad dogs, they may want to return to the dark ages, they are filthy, grubby and unwashed looking creeps.
But they most certainly are not stupid. Well not all of them are. But even the dumbest among them doesn’t require a degree to turn himself into a flaming bomb at the behest of these scum. They know how the west works (and doesn’t work) and how to use the western system against itself. They are smart enough for that. And those who aren’t have smart lawyers clearing a path for them. And not only that. How’s this strike you?
Here’s a story regarding a group of MPs (Members of Parliament).
MPs visit Abu Hamza at Belmarsh to canvass his views for a report. He is referred to respectfully throughout as ‘Mr Abu Hamza’ Here’s a guy who says that it’s perfectly okay to kill anyone for no other reason then they aren’t muslims.
These animals shouldn’t be given refuge anywhere and when caught should be deleted with extreme prejudice. And fuck the ass-wipes at the Euro-pee-on court of human rights. Deleting them might not be a bad idea either.
Here’s some quick snaps for you to look at and think about. You should you know. After all, you are all on their murder list. And these vermin are only three.
SubHuman Vermin #1 for your consideration.
Abu Hamza
It took years to jail him, but now MPs visit Abu Hamza at Belmarsh to canvass his views· Al Qaeda is trying to recruit female suicide bombers in Britain, MPs warn
· Internet often to blame for radicalising extremists, report warns
· Select committee blasted by family of 7/7 victim for interviewing hate preacher Abu Hamza
By JACK DOYLE
A group of MPs who visited hate-preacher Abu Hamza in his jail cell have published his views in an official report.
Members of the home affairs select committee went to high-security Belmarsh prison to interview the cleric who was jailed after telling his followers that the murder of non-Muslims was justified ‘even if there is no reason’.
Their report on violent radicalism is published today and includes an uncritical summary of Hamza’s comments. He is referred to respectfully throughout as ‘Mr Abu Hamza’.Families of terror attack victims condemned the committee and its chairman, Labour MP Keith Vaz. Graham Foulkes, whose 22-year-old son David was murdered in the Edgware Road bombing on July 7, 2005, said the visit was ‘deeply inappropriate’.
He said: ‘I think what they are doing by visiting him in jail is legitimising his claims and his beliefs, which are to kill and maim men and women and to destroy our society.
‘The worrying thing is that as a result Hamza will tell his followers, “Look, they are taking me seriously”.’‘A substantial number of terrorist attacks at home and abroad have happened because of Abu Hamza.
Vermin #2
Saajid Badat
‘Shoe-bomb’ terrorist to be released from jail on opening day of the Olympic GamesBy EMMA REYNOLDS
The notorious terrorist who plotted a shoe-bomb attack on a plane is to be freed from jail just hours before the Olympic Games begin.
Saajid Badat’s release will only add to security fears at the high-profile event in London, which opens on July 27.
The 32-year-old was jailed for 13 years in 2005 after conspiring with two other radical Muslims to blow up a passenger jet - but he will be released after serving just eight years and eight months.
The religious teacher from Gloucester admitted to conspiring with Brit Richard Reid and Belgian terrorist Nizar Trabelsi to blow up flights to the U.S. in 2001.
But now he is due to be freed two-thirds of the way through his sentenceon the official opening day of the biggest sporting event in the world, according to the Daily Mirror.
People are furious this guy is being released on that day but it’s just a quirk of fate,’ said a security source.He had even booked a ticket for a flight from Amsterdam to the U.S., but he had a last-minute change of heart and never boarded the plane.
His fellow plotter Reid was overpowered by fellow passengers on a flight from Paris to Miami while trying to detonate the bomb in his shoes, and is now serving a life sentence in America.
and our last subhuman of this group.
Vermin #3
Abu Qatada
Osama Bin Laden’s ‘right-hand man in Europe’ Abu Qatada could walk from prison today despite being ‘extraordinarily dangerous’
Lawyers are arguing he should be released on bail after being held for six and a half years
By CHARLES WALFORD
Hate preacher Abu Qatada could today walk free from prison to a life on benefits with his wife and five children.
Qatada, who has cost the UK taxpayer more than £1million in benefits, prison and legal fees, is currently being held at Long Lartin high security prison in Worcestershire after breaching previous bail terms.
British diplomats continue to seek assurances from the Jordanian authorities that evidence gained through torture would not be used against him.
The issue was the key reason why Qatada won an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights last month.
The judges ruled that sending Qatada back to face terror charges without such assurances would deny him his right to a fair trial and be a ‘flagrant denial of justice’.
Mrs May vowed that Qatada, who has been held for six and a half years, would be kept behind bars while she considered all legal options to send him back and the Home Office said he ‘poses a real risk to national security’.
But Qatada’s defence team convinced an immigration judge to release him at a hearing in central London.
Abu Qatada read all of it here
Posted by peiper
on 02/06/2012 at 10:23 AM
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • EUro-peons • muslims • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 04, 2012
muslim prayers
Some of our regulars may recall the stories and photos of muslims taking over streets in Paris to pray.
Last year I posted photos like this one taken in France.
It was one of several areas in Paris where streets are often blocked.
Since then, it is my understanding that the French passed a law last year making it illegal to do this. Folks who aren’t muslims but who may for circumstances out of their control and who live in these areas, find it impossible to get around or into their own homes at times. That is what they claim but then it’s probably just islamophobia. Anyway, the muzzies said that they would just ignore the ban and continue as usual. I haven’t checked for any updates to that original story.
But this photo is current.
And it isn’t Paris, France.
The Mecca of the city: In a London street, the faithful find a way to pray as their mosque overflowsBy DAILY MAIL REPORTER
In the shadow of the glass and steel skyscrapers of London’s Square Mile, hundreds of Muslims kneel in the street for Friday prayers.
Yesterday’s hour-long service a stone’s throw from the heart of the financial district proved so popular that worshippers filled the streets around the tiny community mosque.
City workers in pinstripe suits mixed with Muslims from the local Bangladeshi community, cramming into the streets beside a Bentley and other parked cars.
The Brune Street mosque, in Spitalfields, East London, is the nearest mosque for Friday prayers for many City workers and others from Brick Lane and Whitechapel.
It is a one-room community mosque with a maximum capacity of 100, so when some 300 turn up for Friday midday prayers locals have become accustomed to seeing worshippers kneeling in the surrounding streets, all facing Mecca.
One worshipper said: ‘It’s grown and grown in recent years. It started off as just one room in the mosque, but now people come from all over the City and there just isn’t the room for them in the building.
That’s how it starts okay. You see one insect inside your house and you hafta know there’s millions more just waiting to come out.
Posted by peiper
on 02/04/2012 at 12:46 PM
Filed Under: • muslims •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 02, 2012
a plot inspired by al-Qaeda but conceived entirely on British soil.
Police have broken up a terrorist ring. But damn it, these filthy sub human muslim scum can be out and free in 6 years. Why? Because .... well here.
Read it yourself.
Some of these sub humans are Brit born. Some would say they’re actually British as well as human. Well some would be mistaken.
Interesting however. How times and attitudes change with the help of the weepy eyed left.
After WW2, the Brits murdered a fellow known as Lord Haw-Haw. OK, They executed him then, for treason. Thing is though, he was not a Brit nor was he a Brit citizen, having accepted German citizenship. He was in fact, an American originally. But the victors in any war require blood revenge and so they killed him.
In actual fact btw, his wife was closer to committing treason as she was Brit born and raised. I guess her role working for the Germans was lesser. ??
He made propaganda broadcasts that most Brits laughed at, they were usually so bizarre.
So fast forward to 2012 and guys who were plotting to kill on a grand scale and support foreign terrorists though born here, go to jail for a few years and then will be free. I guess what these vermin were planning wasn’t treason. ??????
My take? After the war the left wanted Haw-Haw dead. Today the left wants to keep these scum alive cos killing them might violate some sort of rights issue.
Big Ben bomb gang out in six years: Outrage as terror plotters plead guilty in turn for light sentencesThe conspiracy involved nine Muslim defendants
They were all British, living in London, Cardiff and Stoke-on-Trent
Al-Qaeda inspired radicals arrested FOUR days before they planned to plant bombs in London Stock Exchange toilets
By REBECCA CAMBERA terror gang who planned a Mumbai-style bomb blitz in London could walk free in less than six years after striking an extraordinary 11th-hour plea bargain.
The four Muslim fanatics intended to unleash a Christmas campaign of atrocities with targets including the Stock Exchange, Big Ben, Westminster Abbey, the Palace of Westminster and the London Eye.
They and five others had been facing a five-month trial at Woolwich Crown Court and could have expected sentences of 20 years.But at the 11th hour they decided to plead guilty after a judge indicated they would receive lesser sentences for admitting the plot.
The Crown wanted to avoid both the estimated £2.5million cost of a high-security trial and the possibility of acquittals.
So a rare so-called ‘Goodyear’ direction hearing was arranged in which defence barristers receive guidance from the judge about how long he plans to jail those accused if they admit their guilt.
In this case, Mr Justice Wilkie suggested ringleader Mohammed Chowdhury, 21, would receive no more than 13½ years and his 28-year-old accomplice, Shah Rahman, 12 years.
He said the case did not merit an indefinite imprisonment for public protection because their plans were not developed, and he took account of Chowdhury’s youth.
Chowdhury is likely to spend less than half of his sentence behind bars owing to time already served on remand, while Rahman can expect to be out in five years.
Following the Goodyear hearing, others who had lesser roles in the plot swiftly pleaded guilty knowing that they would attract even more lenient jail terms when they are sentenced next week.
Tory MP Patrick Mercer said a term of five or six years ‘does not seem particularly serious’ for acts of terrorism which could have killed many innocent people.
MORE TO SEE AND READ HERE. DAILY MAIL , VIDEO REPORT
IN DEPTH SAME STORY IN THE TELEGRAPH
Posted by peiper
on 02/02/2012 at 02:40 PM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - January 25, 2012
REMEMBERING DANIEL PEARL
Lest we forget, and honestly I never did. I lifted this from Front Page today. I don’t know what I can say that would add anything. I think the article says it all.
I thought I should share it and I think you should read it. The rest is as usual, at the link.
The Unlearned Lessons of Daniel Pearl’s Murder
Bruce Thornton
Ten years ago this week, Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan, after he had been lured into what he thought was an interview with Sheikh Mubarak Ali Gilani about the links between al Qaeda and the “shoe bomber” Richard Reid. The shadowy Pakistani group that kidnapped Pearl accused him of being a spy for the CIA, and made several demands, including the release of Pakistani detainees from Guantanamo. Nine days later, Pearl was murdered and beheaded, and on February 21, a video was released called “The Slaughter of the Spy-Journalist, the Jew Daniel Pearl.”
The footage showed Pearl’s “confession” and brutal decapitation, interspersed with images of dead Muslims, George Bush shaking hands with Ariel Sharon, and Palestinians allegedly killed by Israeli Defense Forces, including 12-year-old Muhammad al-Dura, whose death was later exposed as a Palestinian fabrication. Later, captured 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would brag to interrogators that he personally had beheaded Pearl. As for his abductor, Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, though tried and condemned to death, still lives in a Pakistani jail cell, from which according to some reports he has planned other terrorist attacks.
The killing of Pearl concentrated much of what Andrew McCarthy calls the “willful blindness” of many in the West to the Islamic roots of the perpetrators’ violence. At the time, most of the media mainly decried Pearl’s death because he was a reporter. Worse yet were the comments that scolded the terrorists for not understanding that American journalists are neutral observers whose impartiality could help them get their story out. As a New York Times editorial put it,
“The terrible irony of Mr. Pearl’s murder is that he and other independent journalists have been trying to present a detailed and informed portrait of the mindset, motives and grievances of the Islamic fundamentalists in the wake of the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 and the war in Afghanistan. That work will continue despite the killing, but the kidnappers have only undermined their cause by their acts.”The professional corruption of the mainstream-media was revealed in this statement, with its claims that journalists are objective (mostly false) and have no loyalties to their own country and people (mostly true), and that the murderers had a legitimate “cause” and “grievances” (moral idiocy and cowardice).
Posted by peiper
on 01/25/2012 at 11:53 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - January 22, 2012
Taliban executes 15 Pakistani soldiers.
Nose buried in weekend papers and mags but this article comes from the net. No surprise. Less then an hour ago.
These are the folks our troops are ordered to treat ‘humanely.’
I don’t normally like to simply post an article and let it go. But heck. What can I say? The photos alone speak for themselves. I have one posted here but there are 6 more at the link below if you need that many to show what these vermin are like.
Handcuffed, blindfolded and shot in the back of the head: Taliban releases horrific video of executions of 15 Pakistani soldiers
The paramilitary troops were abducted on December 23
‘God is greatest’ the Taliban yelled as they fired AK-47 rifles
Horrific video has been copied and distributed in street marketsBy JILL REILLY
A video showing fifteen Pakistani soldiers being lined up and shot dead by a firing squad has been released by the Taliban.
The paramilitary troops were abducted on December 23 in what the terror group described as an operation to avenge the deaths of insurgents in Pakistan.
The release of the horrific video is intended to serve as a warning to Pakistan’s 600,000-member army, which has failed to break the back of the insurgents despite superior firepower and a series of offensives against their strongholds in mountain regions.
The abducted soldiers were stood blindfolded, handcuffed to each other on a barren hilltop as one of their bearded Taliban captors held an AK-47 rifle and spoke with fury about revenge.
‘Twelve of our comrades were besieged and mercilessly martyred in the Khyber Agency (area),’ said the militant.
‘Our pious women were also targeted. To avenge those comrades, we will kill these men. We warn the government of Pakistan that if the killing of our friends is not halted, this will be the fate of you all.’
Before death, one of the men described how dozens of Taliban fighters stormed their fort in the northwestern Tank district and kidnapped the soldiers.
‘They attacked us with rockets, killed a sentry. One ran away. The Taliban entered the fort and captured us with our weapons,’ he said, sitting in rows with other soldiers with their arms folded and legs crossed in front of Taliban banners.
‘They tied our hands, put us in a Datsun and took us away.’
Posted by peiper
on 01/22/2012 at 11:49 AM
Filed Under: • muslims • Terrorists • War-Stories •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Once Again, The One And Only Post
(4 total trackbacks)
Tracked at iHaan.org
Thｅ advantage to having a guide with you is thɑt an expert will haѵe very first hand experience dealing and navigating the river with гegional wildlife. Tһomas, there are great…
On: 07/28/23 10:37
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We've Been Waiting For
(3 total trackbacks)
Tracked at head to the Momarms site
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We’ve Been Waiting For
On: 03/14/23 11:20
Vietnam Homecoming
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at 广告专题配音 专业从事中文配音跟外文配音制造，北京名传天下配音公司
专业从事中文配音和外文配音制作，北京名传天下配音公司 北京名传天下专业配音公司成破于2006年12月，是专业从事中 中文配音 文配音跟外文配音的音频制造公司，幻想飞腾配音网领 配音制作 有海内外优良专业配音职员已达500多位，可供给一流的外语配音，长年服务于国内中心级各大媒体、各省市电台电视台，能满意不同客户的各种需要。电话：010-83265555 北京名传天下专业配音公司…
On: 03/20/21 07:00
meaningless marching orders for a thousand travellers ... strife ahead ..
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Casual Blog
[...] RTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPL [...]
On: 07/17/17 04:28
a small explanation
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at yerba mate gourd
Find here top quality how to prepare yerba mate without a gourd that's available in addition at the best price. Get it now!
On: 07/09/17 03:07
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
