Tuesday - October 16, 2012

riot suspect and drug offender feels violated. boo-hoo, sob,sob. cop uses ‘n’ word. cop on trial.

‘You’ll always be a nigger: What police officer allegedly told London riots suspect in back of police van

By Chris Greenwood

A policeman subjected a young black man to a racist tirade while he was under arrest during last summer’s riots, a court was told yesterday.

PC Alex MacFarlane, 53, was secretly recorded on a mobile phone telling Mauro Demetrio, ‘You will always be a nigger’ He also told the 21-year-old: ‘Don’t hide behind your colour.’

The two brief audio recordings were played to a jury at Southwark Crown Court as the veteran riot squad officer went on trial yesterday.

He admits using the language but denies causing racially aggravated intentional harassment, alarm or distress on the grounds it was not racist and did not upset Mr Demetrio.

Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson said the defendant was a serving police officer and obliged to remain ‘calm and professional’ despite being abused by Mr Demetrio.

He said: ‘Such words were designed to cause distress and insult. They were designed to suggest to Mr Demetrio he was inferior to the officer because of the colour of his skin.’

No yer dumb assed honor.  You have it wrong.  Stupid white judge of which there are way too many.
The officer didn’t suggest inferiority based on skin color.  But isn’t that how things go these days?
As I see it, the perp was what he was because of what he is guilty of. That’s what makes him a nigger. NOT his skin color.  He is inferior to the officer, as indeed he’d be inferior to another black but law abiding citizen.  But that’s too much for the politically correct judge and libtards to grasp.
Look what else they’re trying to dump on a good cop doing his impossible job. Not only does he have to put up with the dregs of society, nowadays there’s pc libtards to contend with as well.

Mr Demetrio was pulled over on suspicion of drug-driving at the tail end of the four days of disorder that swept the capital.

Officers handcuffed him when a radio check revealed he was wanted for drugs offences and skipping a magistrates’ court hearing.

So then, our little black sambo is wanted for drugs offenses, but he decides he can skip a court hearing. Oh right. The law doesn’t apply to all colors, just a select few.

Once inside the van Mr Demetrio began to record a foul-mouthed exchange with the officers as they drove to Forest Gate police station.

MacFarlane is heard telling the suspect he would die within five years before making crude references to having had sex with his mother.

When Mr Demetrio talks back, saying the officer will soon die of old age, MacFarlane says: ‘The problem with you is you will always be a nigger.’

He adds: ‘Don’t hide behind your colour, be proud of who you are.’ Mr Demetrio said other officers laughed at previous remarks but not that one.

Mr Demetrio told the court: ‘I really felt violated.’ Mr Atkinson said: ‘The defendant was well aware this was a word that could be deeply hurtful and demeaning and should not be used.’

The trial is expected to last two or three days.

source

Right. The darky felt “violated.” And they call him ‘mister’ in the article. Right again. Might feel violated if any other term were used. Like just his last name minus the respectful mister.
I think the cops should spread the word that he’s a grass among his peers. Let them take him out.

Posted by peiper     on 10/16/2012 at 11:39 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - October 15, 2012

reminds me of an old song as judge says rape may have been, a one off thing.

A one off?
All together now as we sing, “It was just one of those things.”

So this rotten piece of garbage rapes a woman after spending some time planning and stalking and texting her, then rapes her at knife point and the fucking judge says;

‘This could be a one-off piece of behaviour, which will never be repeated but I’m concerned this man does have an obsession with her and if he were to be released after an ordinary sentence, he might still harbour resentment.
‘I want to know more about him before I sentence him.
‘If it is the case he is a ticking timebomb, the sentence will be indefinite.’

Who gives a shit?  Oh that’s right. The victim might. Ya think?

Another idiot judge.  Who cares if it was a ‘one off thing?’ The rat bastard knew what he was doing, it was planned.

Will his next victim be a one off also because it might be the first time to rape her?

Animals like this need to have it cut off. Period. Then hang them. Not too quick however.  They need to experience the same fear and same dread as their victims do. There is too damn much of this be humane shit to people who are barely human themselves. 

Rapist armed with an eight-inch carving knife was snared after his victim tricked him back to her home for coffee

· Graham Kelly, 59, jumped over a fence armed with the kitchen blade and raped the woman in a stable in Driffield, near Hull, East Yorkshire
· She cried as a jury at Hull Crown Court on Friday took just 30 minutes to return a unanimous verdict, convicting Kelly of rape

By Matt Blake

Graham Kelly, 59, jumped over a fence armed with the kitchen blade and raped the woman in a stable in Driffield, near Hull, East Yorkshire, after stalking her for weeks.
But, in an attempt to save herself, the woman convinced Kelly she liked him and asked him back to her house so police could arrest him.
The victim, who can not be named for legal reasons, said: ‘It was coffee or kill me. I chose coffee.’

She cried as a jury at Hull Crown Court took just 30 minutes to return a unanimous verdict, convicting Kelly of rape on Friday.

During his trial, the woman told how ‘obsessive’ Kelly would wait for her in lay-bys, stalk her in supermarkets and ‘shower ‘ her with texts.
But when she spurned his advances, his lust turned to rage.

‘He left a letter saying he was going to end his life and he had chosen the tree where he was going to do it,’ she said.
And in a sinister twist, the woman knew Driffield murder victim Linda Merigo, the mother stabbed to death in front of her young son in September 2010, and she feared Kelly was going to kill her.

‘When he jumped over the fence with the knife in his hand, Linda Merigo flashed through my mind,’ she said. ‘I didn’t have time to think, I couldn’t get Linda off my mind.

‘I was going to bleed to death in a field and never see my children again.’

source for more

Not to worry darlin’.  It was merely a one off thing.

Posted by peiper     on 10/15/2012 at 01:09 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 12, 2012

no law but lots of disorder as idiot judge ruins a good cop

Just the sort of thing to make us see red.

I can’t see what the cop did wrong. The little shit asked for the treatment he got.  I’m sorry the officer didn’t break his face. Little creep.
This is what law enforcement has to deal with. Daily I guess.  I could never do their job in a hundred years.  Wouldn’t want to either. Besides, I’d get banged up for shooting dead some bit of grime like the punk in this article.  This is why the bad guys are winning. Cos courts and bleeding heart, wimpy hand wringers and idiot judges turn on cops doing their job.  Just wish some of these judges and other critics could see the punks up close and personal. As victims.  Why the hell do people go into police work these days?  Take a look at this.
I’ve deleted all my expletives. Howz that for self control?

Moment a policeman lost his temper. . . and his career: CCTV catches officer using ‘pain restraint’ to calm 15-year-old who refused to do as he was told
· PC Stephen Hudson quit his job after 12 years of service
· Officer ‘likely to be declared bankrupt and is a broken man’
· Teenager suffered nose bleed and bruised chest
By James Tozer and Nazia Parveen

This is the moment a police officer lost both his unblemished career and his reputation by losing his temper with a disruptive teenage tearaway.
PC Stephen Hudson bent the 15-year-old boy’s arm behind his back and lifted him off the ground after he refused to empty his pockets.
CCTV captured the 6ft 1in officer – who in a 12-year career suffered injuries including a suspected fractured skull, cracked rib and broken finger while tackling criminals – slam the 4ft 8in boy on to the counter, causing him to scream in pain.

The 43-year-old then pushed his face against the teenager’s ear and shouted: ‘You are not the big man. You might think you are but you’re not.’
However the divorced father-of-three was himself arrested after the boy – described in court as a ‘local nuisance’ who had repeatedly tried officers’ patience – complained of bruising and a nosebleed.

Hudson claimed to have been using an authorised police restraint technique called ‘pain compliance’ and said he himself had been assaulted by the youth.
The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had been arrested for a breach of bail.

He had been in the custody suite at Swinton police station in Greater Manchester ‘numerous times’ before and had previously kicked cell doors and refused to obey the rules, a court heard.

However a jury at Bolton Crown Court found the former officer, who worked at the suite, guilty of misconduct in a public office.
Hudson, who has quit his job, was given a nine-month jail term suspended for 18 months.

The court heard he had been left ‘a broken man’ facing bankruptcy, while his children had to be taken out of school as a result of bullying over the incident.
In addition, he faces being sued by the boy’s family.

But Judge Peter Davies accused Hudson, of Westhoughton, near Bolton, of ‘besmirching’ the reputation of a force which last month lost two female officers in a shooting by inflicting ‘deliberate degradation and humiliation’ on the teenager.

And he branded the laughter of three other watching officers, including a sergeant, ‘bullying of the worst form’ and said they ought to have been in the dock alongside Hudson.
The two PCs and a custody sergeant are now facing disciplinary action.
Judge Davies declared: ‘The overwhelming majority of police officers discharge the faith and trust invested in them by the public with diligence, courage and fortitude.
‘A tiny few, however, betray that trust, and I am afraid you have been found to be one of those few.’

Read and see more , Daily Mail source

Oh screw self control. Judge Davis, FUCK YOU. You are a major ass and so are all who buy your line of pap and bullshit.
Please drop dead soon and hopes for your nearest and dearest to do the same at the hands of a punk like this yob filth.

Little bastard is now 15. His family will sue no doubt, he’ll be a hero in his own tiny mind and grow into manhood a vile and violent creature of a limp wristed court and judge.  What a shit system and no better in the states either I’ll bet.

Posted by peiper     on 10/12/2012 at 05:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - September 26, 2012

say hello to the latest new headline.

Yesterday’s headline.  Brits happy to be rid of the filthy rotten rat bastard. This smelly lice ridden bag of shit.

a european court rules in favor of deporting hamza to america

But ....  That was yesterday.

Both Drew and Lyndon had some choice words on the subject in their comments.

Well .... here’s the newest headline.

H/T BBC News

Abu Hamza: High Court judge halts extradition to the US

A High Court judge has halted the extradition of Abu Hamza al-Masri to the US on terror charges after the cleric launched a last-ditch appeal.

An injunction temporarily stops the removal of the radical cleric and another suspect from the UK and is the latest move in a long legal battle.

The European Court of Human Rights had earlier rejected attempts to block them being sent for trial in the US.

The pair will outline their appeals at a hearing next Tuesday and Wednesday.

On Monday, the European court ruled that the men and three other suspects should stand trial in the US.

The Judicial Office confirmed Abu Hamza and Khaled Al-Fawwaz were “seeking injunctions preventing their removal from the UK”.

A spokesperson said: “A High Court judge has considered the applications on the papers and adjourned the cases to a hearing in open court.

“The judge has issued interim injunctions preventing their removal prior to those hearings. The judge has directed the hearings be fixed urgently.”

You know, it occurs to me that since the west isn’t capable of defending itself, do you need even more proof?  Maybe somehow, someway our attitudes need to change with regard to suicide bombings.  Look, if you’re old and ill anyway, what’s to lose?  I suppose it really isn’t a part of our thinking. Not in our DNA you might say.  But there has to be a way to pull the kind of verminous lawyers who work for someone like this Hamza creep, into line.  Maybe deleting members of their family?  Whatever it takes.  I am not suggesting that we adopt the very same sort of targets.  But selectively with the understanding that there could be unwanted collateral damage.  For example, if his lawyers had to be taken out and suicide was the only way, their bodyguards if they had any would of course suffer as well.  That isn’t wanted but .... if you come up with a better way to rid us of the traitors, the enablers, the 5th column, I’d sure like to know.
Vermin like Hamza and his ilk do NOT operate without help and money.  And lots of both.  There has to be an end to this crap.
I’d treat illegal immigrants in the same manner.  Immediate deletion and that would include any member of their family.
Just sick of all this BS. 

Posted by peiper     on 09/26/2012 at 11:57 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 25, 2012

a european court rules in favor of deporting hamza to america

The ECHR first ruled in April this year that Hamza and the others could be deported to America because “prisons there are more comfortable than those in Europe.”

It unanimously dismissed claims that conditions in American “supermax” jails were degrading, instead ruling that facilities such as televisions, telephones and arts and crafts actually “went beyond” what was provided in most European prisons.

ECHR is the European Court of Human Rights.  Rights. Even for those who aren’t actually human at all. Like this creep.

So, I take it it’s okay to deport him to America because; our prisons are more comfortable then those in Europe? 

This low form of life has sucked millions of dollars from the Brit purse yet refers to England as, “a toilet.” Some toilet.  Brits have supported this animal and his family since he got here. 

What worries me a lot is that now with deportation the cost to the USA will I’m sure run into more millions from our purse.  Apparently he doesn’t have the money to hire lawyers to argue his case.  But the tax base does and that’s where his legal support has come from while fighting deportation to America on charges of terrorism and murder all these years.

Here you see a perfect example of what I rag on about so often when I claim, with truth, that the west is lost because the west will just not defend itself with enough force. Make that deadly force.  He and his crew of vermin have been responsible for the murder of hundreds of folks whose major crime is, they weren’t approved muslims or were muslims friendly to the west or were satins helpers which is a euphemism for Americans and or Brits. 

Just as a reminder to Americans in case you’ve lost track of this scum.
Hamza tried to set up a jihad training camp in the state of Oregon. He was known as the preacher of hate, advocating the taking of western hostages.  The list is a long one and you can Google the bastard.

There are four other vermin who are expected to be deported to the USA within weeks.

That may prove to be one maddening yet interesting trial.  The purpose of which escapes me.  The bastard and his scummy friends are guilty and our guys have them dead to rights.  I hope we won’t waste too much more money on them.  Of course you do realize that they won’t get the death penalty no matter what they did, because the Euro-peons would never have approved deportation to a country where there was a chance of the death penalty. 

Then as well, don’t you find it interesting as well as anger inducing, that although the Brits duly arrested this guy, it had to go through a European high court.  And they in turn say to the Brits, okay. You have our permission to deport a wanted terrorist to the USA.

For more on the subject go to the Daily Mail UK. or The Telegraph. I’m sure it must be in the news already in the USA. ??

Posted by peiper     on 09/25/2012 at 12:17 PM   
Filed Under: • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • muslims • Terrorists •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 18, 2012

another killer that can’t be deported. how manys that make now?

Go ahead. See if you can work this one out. I’m too damn tired to try and must stay up another couple of hours in order to call the states.

Here’s the deal.  Guy is arrested but authorities can’t find a place to house him. So they re-arrest him and there’s hope of deportation.
Well, the re-arrest violated something or other and he put in a claim and collected £25,000. In American dollars that works out to $40,600 at the current rate of xchange.  Story is a bit short on some detail. The jury said he killed but was provoked. 
That’s it. There ain’t no more. ???  But Home Sec. wants him deported. After all, he gave the victim 40 whacks and when he saw what he had done, he strangled him.

I couldn’t make it rhyme. So here.  Oh, and he poses no serious threat to society say judges.  Glad to hear it but I don’t think I’d want to live next door to the guy. What if I provoked him without knowing I was doing that?  Scary.

BID TO DEPORT KILLER FAILS , as judges claim no serious threat to public

Home Secretary Theresa May’s hopes of deporting an Italian father-of-five who hit his flat-mate over the head with a hammer then strangled him with the flex of an iron have been dashed by senior judges.

The Court of Appeal concluded that the 54-year-old man should not be deported because he did not pose a “sufficiently serious threat to public security”.
Mrs May had challenged a similar earlier ruling by an Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

Lord Justice Pill, Lord Justice Aikens and Lady Justice Rafferty dismissed her appeal after a hearing in London. The man was not identified in the appeal judges’ written ruling - and the ruling did not explain why he was not identified.

Appeal judges said the man had been given an eight-year jail term in 2002 after being convicted of killing flat-mate Edward Mitchell.

Judges said the man had been convicted of manslaughter by a jury at the Old Bailey. They said he had struck Mr Mitchell “at least 20 blows to the head with weapons, including a hammer” before strangling him.

They added that jurors decided that “murder was reduced to manslaughter by reason of provocation”. They said the man had been released from prison to “hostel accommodation” in 2006 but, because no place was available, he had been re-arrested.

The man had subsequently received damages of £25,000 for the “unlawful imprisonment which followed”, judges said.

He also had convictions for “assault on police”, battery and “having a bladed article”, the appeal court heard.

A UK Border Agency spokesman said: “We are very disappointed that the court has ruled we cannot deport this individual. We have appealed against that decision and hope that we will be able to pursue his removal from the UK.”

source

“One has to wonder whether today’s society was worth the sacrifice.” (of WW2)

The alternative might have been much worse but .... we can see how one might come to that conclusion.

Posted by peiper     on 09/18/2012 at 12:00 PM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 11, 2012

add another one to the list of immigrant vermin to go free cos judge is sympathetic

I don’t recall ever having had a real epiphany before today.
I’m a slow learner.

Reading early morning papers and suddenly there it was.
An epiphany.

The problems we all bitch about and get angry over no matter it be high crimes or immigration or simply misdemeanors, the fault is less with the folks we normally don’t like anyway for very good reason. No. The fault is white people.

Yeah.  Who the hell else has trained up a cadre of morons who carry the word and actions over into courts and if you’re in the UK, the police too. I ask you. Who else?
White folks. And really STUPID ones at that.  Then too there are those who aren’t actually stupid at all.  They are the ones who call the shots and make the rules and dismantle civilizations, and are very cunning people indeed. But they still need useful fools and idiots who will buy their message and then go out and preach their poisoned gospel.  And there aren’t any exceptions as to what race they belong to.  The idiots are white who in turn find others of any color or race, who also buy into the liberal mindset and the doctrine that makes things so hard for most of the rest of us to come to grips with. 

For example, this bit of muzzie filth is an immigrant who came here and during last summers riots thought setting fire to a car and just general lawlessness would be a fun thing to do.  And after all, he was just following the instincts he was given at birth.
And just who enables all this stuff?
White libtards of ivory tower mentality.

H/T Casuals United Blog

So who will judges jail? After the burglar praised for ‘courage’, Afghan who hurled rocks at police is spared prison over violent childhood.

Judge Nigel Seed decided not to send a rioter to prison because he had a violent childhood.

A judge re-ignited the row over soft sentencing yesterday after allowing a rioter who hurled rocks at the police and helped to set a car ablaze to walk free.

Judge Nigel Seed said Nooragha Zadran had seen so much violence in his home country before moving to Britain that he should not be locked up.
The decision comes only days after another judge provoked an outcry by telling a burglar that it took ‘courage’ to break into somebody’s home.
Tory MPs said the latest ruling showed the huge challenge facing new Justice Secretary Chris Grayling to get a grip on the legal system and end the scandal of soft sentencing.
Zadran, 18, was found guilty of violent disorder and arson during the London riots last year.
But Judge Seed let him off with a fine after saying he had been used to witnessing violence every day and was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.
Zadran claims he was only five when both of his parents were killed in Afghanistan by a bomb which struck their home, a court heard yesterday. He was left to fend for his younger brother by begging on the streets, but, after leaving him in a playground, he found he had gone missing and was never found.
Zadran then managed to travel to the UK as a young boy, and has been in the care of social services. During the riots last August, he threw rocks at police and lit the rag that was used to set fire to a parked car in Lewisham, South-East London.
Judge Seed described his case as ‘exceptional’. He said: ‘No other defendant will have appeared in front of the courts in such circumstances, that is why you are not being sentenced to two to three years in prison,’ he said.

Don’t ya just love it when a judge tells the vermin what is wrong with them thus giving the scum more excuses to use in their plea for sympathy and of course a free pass.

The judge said: ‘I take into account the fact that at an early age you were living in war-torn Afghanistan. The family home was bombed and the explosion killed your mother and father, leaving you and your siblings orphans. You were left to beg because of your destitution.
‘You left your younger brother in a playground to try to beg, and he then disappeared, and all this happened before you were ten.
‘You suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, and a particularly complex form of post-traumatic stress disorder, which is very serious and makes you vulnerable to exploitation, and unable to think clearly.’
Zadran, of Rotherhithe, South-East London, was ordered to pay £2,000 to the owner of the car, and required to attend mental health treatment as part of his sentence. Other rioters have received immediate imprisonment.

Since Mr Grayling took over from Kenneth Clarke at the Justice Department last week, he has been left in no doubt of the challenges he faces getting a grip on the soft justice system.
Last week Judge Peter Bowers provoked an outcry when he told an offender who burgled three homes in five days: ‘It takes a huge amount of courage, as far as I can see, for somebody to burgle somebody’s house. I wouldn’t have the nerve.’

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/

Posted by peiper     on 09/11/2012 at 10:12 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • muslims • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - September 10, 2012

compensation culture. the gift that keep on screwing and brits do not thank us for it.

Gee. And to think we couldda sued.

Back in the dark ages when I was around 11 or 12, I ambushed my best friend in school. Little boy high jinks and horseplay. I snuck up and shouted boo or some such kid foolishness, scared the heck out of him and he immediately gave chase, both of us laughing our heads off running down a school corridor. I had books in my right hand and ran full tilt towards one of two doors with my left hand outstretched to open the one closed door.  A couple of other kids were coming in through the open door so I took the closed one never thinking it would have been locked.  Well it was and boy did that hurt. Broke my forearm I did, while my best pal was doubled over in hysterics as he thought it was too funny. I guess it was.

My mom’s reaction was, it served you right, and that was the end of it.

Except for my best friend who never let me forget and every once in a while would start to giggle at weird times which naturally set me off too.

For all that we have today to make our lives better, there is much that’s lacking and making things far more complicated then they need to be.

The article I ran across in the morning Telegraph is one of too many examples that tell me I’m right. Wish it weren’t so.

Compensation culture ‘putting curbs on school trips’

Growing numbers of schools are banning playground games and class trips as “ambulance chasing” solicitors swamp head teachers with compensation claims, according to research.

By Graeme Paton, Education Editor

The education system is being gripped by “excessive risk-aversion” because of concerns that schools will be sued if children are injured, it was claimed.

A study published by the Centre for Policy Studies warned that millions of pounds was being spent by schools and local authorities every year settling legal challenges.

It emerged that one council in Derbyshire was forced to pay £40,000 after a pupil broke a leg on a school trip. A further £30,000 was handed to a family in Cornwall after a pupil off a bench, £25,000 was paid out in Knowsley when a child fell out of a tree, a student in Medway was awarded £13,000 after being hit by a falling goalpost and £14,150 was paid out to a Plymouth pupil when a test tube shattered during a science experiment.

The study said the pay-outs underlined the extent to which the compensation culture was now “ingrained in the national psyche as a warped form of normal behaviour”.

Kent University’s School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, which carried out the study, said litigation was “bleeding the health and education services dry”.

Payouts by the NHS Litigation Authority alone have trebled in the last decade to £911m in 2010/11. The organisation’s potential liabilities now stand at £16.8bn, it emerged.

Professor Frank Furedi, the study’s co-author, said: “The increasing fear of litigation is extremely damaging to the professionalism of doctors, nurses and teachers. It erodes professional autonomy, stifles innovation, leads to defensive practices in both hospitals and schools and encourages greater bureaucracy.

“‘Best practice’ is now defined as having checked all the boxes in a quality assurance form rather than doing what is best for the patient or pupil.”

The report quoted a 2010 study that revealed as many as 10 children a week are securing pay-outs after suing schools and local councils for injuries picked up in classrooms, sports fields and playgrounds. In total, some £2.25m was awarded in just 12 months.

Researchers criticised a rise in the number of “bizarre and costly” claims made against schools.

In Doncaster, a pupil won £3,000 after suffering cuts from rose bushes, £2,500 was handed to a child in Bradford injured while cutting up fruit and in Brighton a £7,000 pay-out was made when a pupil fell through the roof of an air raid shelter after climbing to retrieve a ball.

The study – The Social Cost of Litigation – said that pay-outs have led to “excessive risk-aversion within schools”, particularly at a time of austerity when public money is already being squeezed.

“This has taken the form of banning playground games, or restricting school trips: to the point where some teachers have been taking their pupils on ‘trips’ in the school playground because of litigation fears,” said the report.

Prof Furedi called for new curbs to be placed on the “culture of litigation and litigation avoidance” in Britain.

“We need to look beyond ambulance-chasers and greedy lawyers to the cultural conditions that have allowed litigious sentiments to flourish as common sense,” he said. “In particular, we need to challenge the expectation that professional ‘best practice’ in the public sector should be measured by the absence of complaints or litigation.”

telegraph

Posted by peiper     on 09/10/2012 at 05:18 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - September 08, 2012

History On An I Beam

Yes, it’s a picture of a bit of a local bridge. One built in 1901 by the Dover Boiler Works actually. Just one of the dozens of pony Pratts we have around here. But that’s not important.

What is important is the company name. The people who built the steel that this bridge was made from. Jones & Laughlin. The extra “S” is for Steel Corporation.  Abbreviations were different in those days.

So what?



Jones & Laughlin had a steel mill out in western Pennsylvania, in Aliquippa. At the height of the Great Depression, 10 of their employees at that plant tried to unionize. J & L fired them.  The men sued.

The case went all the way to the US Supreme Court, where the justices ( at this time leveraged [co-opted] by FDR’s threat to add 3 or more robes to the bench until things started going his way ) decided that the new National Labor Relations Board Act of 1935 (aka the Wagner Act) was indeed constitutional, and by it the federal government had the ability to regulate IN STATE ACTIONS under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause -

which until this time had been known as the INTERSTATE Commerce Clause and had always been treated as such. But the SCOTUS upheld Wagner, Jones & Laughlin lost, and we have had an ever expanding, ever more powerful, ever more expensive federal government ever since, and we are now at the point where the latest generation of those same Supremes have decided that it is right and proper for the feds to regulate interstate commerce even when none exists: the Obamacare decision and the Court’s blanket statement that the power of the federal government to tax is unlimited ... not a line of that crap would have been possible if those judges back in 1935 would have stood up to the Democrat Tyrant just a little longer, and thrown NLRB vs Jones & Laughlin out and the Wagner Act along with it, as was (and still IS) right and proper.

History is all around you if you pay attention. Sometimes just noticing the words on a piece of steel can bring it all back.

Posted by Drew458     on 09/08/2012 at 11:59 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • History • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - August 24, 2012

Burn The Witch!! Burn The Witch!!

File this one under “damned if you do”

Armstrong faces lifetime ban, loss of 7 Tour titles after dropping doping charges fight

With stunning swiftness, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency said Thursday night it will strip Lance Armstrong of his unprecedented seven Tour de France titles after he dropped his fight against drug charges that threatened his legacy as one of the greatest cyclists of all time.

Travis Tygart, USADA’s chief executive, said Armstrong would also be hit with a lifetime ban on Friday. And under the World Anti-Doping Code, he would lose the bronze medal from the 2000 Olympics as well as any awards, event titles and cash earnings.

Armstrong, who retired last year, effectively dropped his fight by declining to enter USADA’s arbitration process—his last option—because he said he was weary of fighting accusations that have dogged him for years. He has consistently pointed to the hundreds of drug tests he passed as proof of his innocence while piling up Tour titles from 1999 to 2005.

“There comes a point in every man’s life when he has to say, `Enough is enough.’ For me, that time is now,” Armstrong said. He called the USADA investigation an “unconstitutional witch hunt.”

USADA reacted quickly and treated Armstrong’s decision as an admission of guilt, hanging the label of drug cheat on an athlete who was a hero to thousands for overcoming life-threatening testicular cancer and for his foundation’s support for cancer research.

“It is a sad day for all of us who love sport and athletes,” Tygart said. “It’s a heartbreaking example of win at all costs overtaking the fair and safe option. There’s no success in cheating to win.”

USADA maintains that Armstrong has used banned substances as far back as 1996, including the blood-booster EPO and steroids as well as blood transfusions—all to boost his performance.

...

“There is zero physical evidence to support (the) outlandish and heinous claims,” Armstrong said. “The only physical evidence here is the hundreds of (doping) controls I have passed with flying colors.”

Armstrong sued USADA in Austin, where he lives, in an attempt to block the case and was supported by the UCI. A judge threw out the case on Monday, siding with USADA despite questioning the agency’s pursuit of Armstrong in his retirement.

“USADA’s conduct raises serious questions about whether its real interest in charging Armstrong is to combat doping, or if it is acting according to less noble motives,” such as politics or publicity, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks wrote.

Posted by Drew458     on 08/24/2012 at 07:32 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Sports •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - August 21, 2012

When Girls Gone Wild Grow Up

Because anything can happen in a courtroom. This one doesn’t sound proper to me in the least.

CLEVELAND – An Ohio TV newswoman has won a lawsuit against Hustler over publication of a photograph showing her dancing naked in a wet T-shirt contest.

The Plain Dealer newspaper reports a federal jury Thursday sided with Catherine Bosley and her husband over an image taken at a Florida bar in 2003. The jury awarded them $135,000 plus attorney fees.

Bosley and her husband gained rights to her contest photos after a photographer posted them online. She resigned from WKBN-TV in Youngstown and now works at WOIO-TV in Cleveland.

Larry Flynt’s Hustler magazine printed one of the photos in 2006. The 2008 lawsuit claimed the publication failed to get Bosley’s permission to print the photo. Hustler’s attorneys argued they didn’t need permission.

It’s unclear if Hustler Inc. will appeal the decision.

This is just one of the many pictures of her in the process of getting naked - fully 100% starkers, smoothie and implants showing, AND LOVING IT in front of a crowd - in this so-called competition that can be found in milliseconds online. [ OOPS SORRY, PICTURE REDACTED UNDER THREAT OF LAWSUIT. ] ( WTF, get your hoo-hoo out for the world to see and to photograph, then go lawyer happy when everyone actually looks. Digitally. Give me a break. She didn’t look naked to me in the picture. Trashed, low class, mostly showing, but not your actual naked. And now the prude routine? Please.)

And she wasn’t underage when she did it, or even just 19 or in college. From what I’ve seen, the contest looks like some MILFy thing and she and the other women involved were in their mid 30s at least.  So what gives?

Somebody took pictures, then posted them online where they remain today ... then she “acquired” the rights to them ... after they were released into the public domain ... and then she sued a skin mag and won when they got published? EXCUSE ME. Nuh uh. Talk to the hand. Puh Leez. Once it’s out in the PD, you CAN"T own it. Sor-ree.

Hell, I think I should own the words “the” and “is”. Cuz I feel like it. Now everytime anyone says or writes those words, they owe me $1. Each. Oh hella yeah. Where is that jury???

If she wants to be suing someone, she should be suing her former employer that saw fit to fire her over this fully legal activity she took part in on her own time while not on the job. Personally, I think it’s about time the whole damn country learns to STEP OFF and STFU about a bit of skin. We all have some, down under the clothes. And lots of folks let lots of it ... sometimes all of it ... sometimes all of it in the most personal ways imaginable ... be seen in public. Or for profit. And you know what? It ain’t none of your damn business. None.

So the TV network firing her? The schools canning the pretty young teachers who flashed some titty online or in a sext message ... whether when they were employed as a teacher or not ... AIN’T NONE OF YOUR DAMN BUSINESS. People have their bodies and their sexuality and they have the right to express and exercise them however they feel like. As long as it isn’t illegal, and wasn’t forced ... then MYOB. It’s called freedom. And no one in this country should ever be punished for exercising freedom of any kind.

There, another fairly quick post with a debatable issue. You go Drew.

Posted by Drew458     on 08/21/2012 at 07:32 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Eye-Candy • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Sex •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - August 18, 2012

pretty bad as comedy but what else can it be? Oh right. The law.

Okay you try and figure the reasoning out.

Jeesh. Just love the judges here. If I ever get in trouble, which I will try and avoid you betcha, I’d want one of these softies. But I must admit, reading the defense lawyer here is really cringe worthy. 
Hey, do they actually believe this BS?  Surely not.

The only reason for this post is the defense statement and what the judge said.
It’s pretty bad comedy.

This teen girl (19) was in a relationship (lesbian) and was possessive and jealous and lost her temper and so stabbed her lover.
Her victim survived and she was arrested of course.
So now it’s court time and here’s where I join them for your amusement.
Not that stabbing anyone is amusing.

Ok so judgy dear takes the time cos he’s that kinda guy, to tell the stabber
what she did on that day.  Which of course the girl already knew as, well, she was there.  Makes sense. She ought to know. Right?  But I guess the judge wanted to make certain the girl knew what she did in case it was some other girl who happened to look like her. Well hell guys, that makes as much sense as the defense lawyer.

Jealous lesbian, 19, stabbed her girlfriend, 25, with a kitchen knife after accusing her of being unfaithful
· Kelly Furrugia left Kirsty Brown in a pool of blood and refused to call an ambulance despite her lover begging for help
· Miss Brown suffered two puncture wounds in her chest and Farrugia was jailed for five years
By EMILY ALLEN

A jealous teenage lesbian who twice stabbed her older lover with a six inch kitchen knife after accusing her of being unfaithful has been jailed for five years.
Possessive Kelly Farrugia, 19, brutally knifed Kirsty Brown, 25, after checking through her mobile phone as she slept.
Farrugia left Miss Brown in a pool of blood and refused to call an ambulance despite her lover begging her for help.

Alright now here come the part that made me post this.  Read this and tell me, please, am I mistaken or is this just so much bull shit plain and simple.
I find it even embarrassing to read because in my mind’s eye, I can imagine these two actually speaking. I don’t mean I hear voices. But it’s so dumb looking to read I can almost hear the nonsense.
See what you think.

James Dixon, defending, told the court that Farrugia had shown good qualities since she was arrested.

He said: ‘She has been working with her mother on a market stall three days a week.
‘This has meant getting up at 4.30am to get to the market. That shows she has a very positive future in terms of her conduct.
‘That demonstrates a lot in terms of her attitude.’

Judge Glenn said he agreed that the defendant had made some positive strides, but told her she would inevitably face a lengthy prison sentence.
He added: ‘I accept the view of the probation officer, that you pose a risk to future partners. But you are a person with good qualities.
‘I am impressed that you have continued to be industrious, despite having this hanging over you.’

SOURCE, THE LAW IS AN ASS

Oh I get it now.  She still a risk to others but is nonetheless a person with good qualities.  Those would include I suppose stabbing someone and then refusing to call for help.  An excellent quality we can all agree, should she decide to become a serial killer.
The law really is an ass.

Working three days a week is industrious!.. no wonder this country is in the state it. She refused to get her girlfriend medical help, that should of cost her a few more years.
- BD, Fed up of British justice system., 17/8/2012 17:52

To which I ask, what justice?

Posted by peiper     on 08/18/2012 at 07:00 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - August 09, 2012

how to deport scum without violating their human rights. it keeps getting dumber.

If ever a people and nation have been taken to the cleaners time and time again, and knowing all the time that they were, this nation and these people are it.
That old and much used expression, words fail, come to mind in sharing this bit of insanity. And there’s more then just this article, which is bad enough.
No more from me. Read this from the Daily Mail.

UK pays to refit foreign prisons: Taxpayers foot bill to revamp jails in Nigeria and Jamaica so criminals can be deported without breaching their human rights

UK jails house inmates from 156 countries, including 900 Jamaicans and 594 Nigerians

Government is spending £3million modernising foreign jails

By JAMES SLACK

British taxpayers are paying to make jails in Jamaica and Nigeria more comfortable in a desperate bid to persuade foreign criminals to serve their sentences at home.

Ministers have resorted to the tactic – designed to satisfy the human rights of inmates – after it emerged that the UK’s own prison system has turned into a ‘United Nations of crime’.

Research by the House of Commons library, seen by the Mail, reveals how our jails contain inmates from a staggering 156 countries – more than three out of every four member states of the UN.

Worryingly, the total number of foreign prisoners is rising – despite pledges by David Cameron to fix the mess.

By March this year, there were 11,127 behind bars, at an estimated cost to the UK public purse of more than £420million. This is up from 10,778 in 2011.

The group, which includes rapists, murderers and burglars, now makes up more than one in every eight convicts.

The figures were disclosed as the Prime Minister faced more criticism yesterday over his foreign aid commitments.

Mr Cameron was taking part in a radio phone-in when a pensioner called to tell him it was wrong that she was denied a cancer drug while billions were spent on overseas aid.

Meanwhile, it emerged that the dire need to create space in our packed jails has prompted ministers to take the extraordinary step of establishing a £3million annual pot to make it easier for convicts to serve their sentences back home.

Splashing money on prisons abroad is certain to prove controversial. But officials insist it will be cheaper in the long run than the annual £38,000 bill for keeping a single prisoner locked up here.

Currently, money is being spent in Jamaica to ‘assist Jamaican authorities in modernising their prison service and rehabilitation and reintegration activities’.

In Nigeria, one project supports the provision of ‘human rights training for prison officers’.

THE REST OF THIS STORY

“officials insist it will be cheaper in the long run than the annual £38,000 bill for keeping a single prisoner locked up here.”

Why has it not occurred to anyone that if they want to save money, a quick and very quiet deletion might be cheaper yet. Set up a lice removal service and bingo.  Problem solved. I guess tho they’d rather put up with this.

This island is filling up, it’s drowning in scum and to make matters worse, the courts and civil rights industry do not help matters. They add to the problem.

Posted by peiper     on 08/09/2012 at 08:37 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Insanity • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - August 03, 2012

clean living? dependable and smart. she might kill someone but hey, she’s clean living.

clean-living, dependable and smart

Sure thing and someday as a clean living and smart woman, she’ll most likely kill someone.  What can you say about a nut case like this?

Just shows ya doesn’t it, that some people smart as they may be just don’t care. And somewhere down the line some innocent will pay the price of a dad’s love and over indulgence.  I pity the poor slob who this girl marries. I can’t imagine what sort of hell that might turn out to be.
Stuff of books.

Stratford woman jailed for driving over foot of paramedic on 999 call

by Hayley Draper, Coventry Telegraph

A PARAMEDIC answering a 999 call was injured when a young woman drove over his foot – when he got out to speak to her after she had run into the back of his ambulance.

And a judge expressed disbelief when he heard Terri O’Brien had been bought her powerful ($46,754.00) Audi TT by her father, days after she got her licence back after a ban for dangerous driving.

In a previous driving offence, she deliberately ran a car into a group of young woman.

She was still subject to a suspended prison sentence for that when she injured the paramedic.

The 21-year-old, from Maidenhead Road, Stratford, had denied dangerous driving, but changed her plea to guilty on the day of her trial at Warwick Crown Court.
She was jailed for 24 weeks, consecutive to 38 weeks of the suspended sentence which she also has to serve, banned for three years and ordered to pay £1,450 costs.

Prosecutor Samantha Forsyth said that paramedic Bobby Qayum was responding to a 999 call involving an eight-day-old baby.
As he drove along the Solihull by-pass with his blue lights on, O’Brien refused to let him past, so he was forced onto the wrong side of the road to overtake.

She began to ‘tailgate’ the ambulance, driving into the back of it when Mr Qayum had to brake suddenly.

“Mr Qayum got out and stood in front of her vehicle, but she drove off, driving over his left foot as she did so,” said Miss Forsyth.

A member of the public noted her lic. plate and reported it to the police.

The injury has left him with the loss of sensation in two of his toes.

When O’Brien was traced by the police she denied knowing where the Audi was.

In August 2009 she had been given a suspended prison sentence and banned from driving for 12 months for an earlier offence of dangerous driving in which she had deliberately driven at three other young women outside a Solihull bar.

She had only passed her extended driving test to get her licence back 19 days before the incident with the ambulance.

Lee Marklew, defending, said: “She is, in all other respects of her life, clean-living, dependable and smart.

“Her father, who is now beside himself, bought her the high-performance Audi to cheer her up, given her previous difficulties.”
But Judge Marten Coates told her: “In 2010, you deliberately drove a car at three girls, causing thankfully only minor injury.
“You were very fortunate to have received a suspended sentence, but you were again driving dangerously within days of passing your extended driving test.

“I cannot begin to imagine what message your father was giving in buying you that car. It is quite clear you have learned nothing.”

Posted by peiper     on 08/03/2012 at 06:17 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner