Wednesday - November 28, 2012

judge demands to know which genius decided to prosecute householder holding knife

Been sitting here for a minute or so trying to find a new way to say the law is an ass.  ??  Can’t think of one.
At least the judge was on top of things even if the idiot prosecutors weren’t. However, here’s another damn case where any of us might have reacted in the same way, says he was wrong. Says sorry. What’s with that?  I’ve been away for too long so tell me.  Do Americans say sorry as often as I report Brits saying sorry?
Jeesh.  Can’t anyone simply say hey. I was confronted with a situation and I saw no other way at the time. Sorry?  Fuck no I’m not sorry. I wish I could killed the bastards. It’s what they would have deserved. Now they will simply go off and do the same to someone else.  And that ain’t justice and it isn’t right. So no, I’m not sorry.  I want someone to say that or something like that, because we all know most people and especially any who have ever been victims, would say that.
But no. People must satisfy courts and tender hearted libtards and hand wringers with words of sorrow and remorse when in fact, there is nothing to be remorseful about. 

Take a look at this one.
Good judge. Idiots for prosecutors.

Judge attacks ‘genius’ prosecutors after householder confronts yobs with knife

A senior judge demanded to know which “genius” decided to charge a householder for holding knife while protecting his home despite none of the armed yobs being arrested.

By Andrew Hough

David Beeley, 44, decided to confront a gang of drunken teenagers who attacked his home with metal weapons in the middle of the night last summer.

He grabbed a cooking knife to defend himself as they shouted that they planned to kill him. But although none of the gang was prosecuted, Mr Beeley was charged with possession of a knife.

Today, prosecutors came under fire from judge, Michael Stokes, QC, who was highly critical of the decision to charge the logistics manager.

Describing the householder as being of “good character”, the Recorder of Nottingham asked: “Which genius thought it was in the public interest to prosecute this defendant?”

Mr Beeley had admitted one count of “having an article with a blade in a public place”, to avoid the stress of a trial, Nottingham Crown Court heard.

But the judge sentenced him to a six month conditional discharge, meaning Mr Beeley will not face any punishment.

Tonight, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) defended their decision to pursue the case, insisting that officials had properly “considered the evidence in the case and the public interest”.

He was also charged with a “summary offence” of “using threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause fear or provoke violence”.

Outside court Mr Beeley admitted he had made a “bad decision” and should not have confronted the gang with a knife.

“I was a little bit rankled because of the aggression I received, but I shouldn’t have done that, it was a bad decision,” he said.

“I just want to put it behind me really. It went on for months, and I had to go to court several times.”

It is understood that none of the youths, a group of squatters who were armed with “metal implements”, have been prosecuted.

“I was a little bit disappointed by that because you wonder whether they will go on to do something else,” Mr Beeley added.

“I’m disappointed with the reaction of the police that night. And I agree with what the judge said. It was nice to see a judge with a sense of humour.”

Andrew Tanser, prosecuting, had earlier told the court that the defendant was asleep at 11.30pm on August 13 when he was awoken by several drunken teenagers shouting outside his front door.

After yelling at the gang to be quiet, the yobs, who were “rowdy and clearly in drink”, shouted at Mr Beeley before later returning with weapons and banged on the door to his home, a large Victorian detached house in which has been divided into flats.

Mr Beeley, lives alone in a second floor apartment, went downstairs, picked up an “ordinary kitchen knife”, he had used to cook dinner earlier that night, and went out to confront the gang, who later fled.

Police were called and Mr Beeley, from Mapperley Park, a suburb in the city’s north-east, was arrested and charged.

James Whiting, 29, a friend and neighbour, said he was stunned when police arrived and arrested Mr Beeley but took no action against the gang.

Mr Whiting said: “It was unbelievable. There was about four or five of them. They were squatting up the road, and we had no end of trouble with them.

“They would just hang around outside. They wouldn’t move and stopped me coming in. They were just yobs.”

He said they were taking “running kicks” at this door, shouting they would “kill Dave, and that he couldn’t hide in there”. He said Mr Beeley was just waving the knife around to “scare them off”.

Tonight, a CPS spokesman defended the charges, insisting that the unnamed prosecutor had “considered the evidence in the case and the public interest”.

THERE’S MORE TO READ HERE

Posted by peiper     on 11/28/2012 at 12:29 PM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 27, 2012

Libtards don’t have enough brain cells to think about the victims.

Yet another example of the “rights” industry hard at work undermining the right to be safe from vermin.
Yawn. Yes I know it’s same old, same old.  Thing is, the ppl who make this kind of thing possible, and no doubt at all lawyers, keep coming up with new twists and strategies for these same old stories.  Haven’t a clue what it may cost to the treasury, but we can surely sus out what it means to the sovereignty of this country if the Brits don ‘t ditch this worthless court.  Some of you might already know but for those who don’t, many of the so called judges have no background in law to begin with.  I am certain as I can be that when the Brits signed on to the idea of uniting with Europe, most had no idea it might come to this.
Also, the demand these creeps are making could be nothing more than an outlet for their boredom. But at what cost?

Libtards don’t have enough brain cells to think about the victims at the same time they are whining about the rights of the perpetrators.
- ItsNotSocietyItsYou , Righteous Indignation, United Kingdom,

Killers’ plea to Euro judges means Britain could be stripped of powers to hand out ‘life means life’ sentences

Killers set to insist European Court of Human Rights allows them right to demand release from jail
Roll call of evil, and includes Rose West, Peter Sutcliffe, Levi Bellfield and Steven Wright could benefit from move
Former policing and justice minister Nick Herbert calls for withdrawal from the court

By Jack Doyle, Home Affairs Correspondent

Britain could be stripped of the power to give serial killers ‘life means life’ jail terms in a new showdown with Strasbourg.

A group of killers will insist the European Court of Human Rights grants them the right to demand their release from jail.

If the court rules in their favour, ministers will be forced to give 43 of the most dangerous serial killers and rapists behind bars in this country the right to apply to get out of prison early.

The list of those who would benefit is a roll call of evil, and includes Rose West, Peter Sutcliffe, Levi Bellfield and Steven Wright, all of whom have been given a ‘whole life’ sentence, meaning they will die behind bars.

Each would be granted a new ‘human right’ to have their case put before the Parole Board to argue that they had reformed and should be let out.

The case is brought by killers Jeremy Bamber, Peter Moore and Douglas Vinter, all of whom were given whole life terms because of the seriousness of their crimes.

It comes before the Strasbourg court tomorrow, with a judgment expected in weeks, at a time when relations between it and the Government are at a historic low.

Writing in the Mail today, former policing and justice minister Nick Herbert advocates withdrawal from the court, which he says has contributed to the spread of a ‘rights contagion’ in which ‘everyone knows their rights, yet few admit their responsibilities’.

Strasbourg first ruled against the three killers in January by a knife-edge vote of four judges to three, and the court has allowed an appeal to its Grand Chamber.

The dissenting judges said denying a parole hearing amounted to ‘cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment’.

Were the court to rule in the killers’ favour, as some Strasbourg observers predict, it would be a direct challenge to the authority of Parliament to decide the law – and of our courts to rule on it.

source for article

Posted by peiper     on 11/27/2012 at 12:09 PM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - November 15, 2012

man gets 5 years in the slammer for not being pretty. see the link, you’ll understand.

Here one hell of a problem story and ppl arguing both sides.

Pretty 16 year old girl out partying with friends and as usual for these times, the kid gets stoned and is three sheets to the wind.
She also had some kind of drug in her system.  But it’s all the fault of a guard with 20 years experience under his belt.

Her friends board a subway train, she’s left outside (see the link below) and is leaning against the carriage. 
The train is about to leave but the silly girl is seen leaning against the train’s car.

Now it’s my assumption that anyone seeing her would have assumed that as soon as the girl saw the train moving, she would back away. But she didn’t.
And so she died.

But, it’s the fault of the train guard who gave the signal to the driver to start.
And so the guard gets five years in the slammer as the judge comes down on him like a ton of bricks.
I think the judge is an idiot but unfortunately for the poor hapless guard, the only opinion that counts here is the opinion of an idiot in the form of a judge.
People have killed other people while driving drunk and often do not even go to jail. Or else they get no more than this guard did. Let me tell you what the guard’s crime was. And he is surely guilty as sin on this score.

The poor man is NOT photogenic!  His image is NOT media friendly.

See him at the link and you’ll understand.  He is guilty okay. Of looking goofy.
Meanwhile, the grieving mother says, “Georgia was my entire family.”
Well mom, your entire family was dead drunk at 16.
Of course, that was solely the fault of a guard who isn’t pretty. 

‘An appalling disregard for safety’: Railway guard jailed for five years over death of teenage girl who fell under carriage

Georgia Varley died after falling between a train and the platform on a night out in Liverpool

Train guard Christopher McGee, 45, gave the signal for the driver to depart as the 16-year-old was leaning against the carriage

McGee was sentenced to five years in prison today after being found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence

The teenager’s heartbroken mother said: ‘Georgia was my entire family’

‘She paid for your criminal negligence with her life’ a judge said

By Jaya Narain and Sam Webb

A railway guard found guilty of manslaughter following the death of a teenage girl who fell under a train was jailed for five years today.

Christopher McGee, 45, took a ‘terrible risk’ by giving the signal for the driver to depart as Georgia Varley, 16, was leaning against the carriage, a judge said.

The sixth-form college student, who was drunk on a night out in Liverpool with friends, fell between the train and the platform at the city’s James Street station in October last year as a result of McGee’s ‘appalling disregard for her safety’, a court heard.

Georgia, who was leaning against the train when the railway guard gave the signal for it to leave, was seen to stagger and fall into the gap as it moved away from the platform.

McGee was found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence following a two week trial at Liverpool Crown Court.

Jailing McGee for five years today, Mr Justice Holroyde said: ‘You did not intend to kill or even injure her, but you displayed an appalling disregard for her safety and she paid for your criminal negligence with her life.’

No you fuckin idiot! You and the dim jury. She paid with her life for being drunk and stupid!  And stoned on drugs as reported here.
And anyway, why should a subway train full of people with no tie to her be inconvenienced just because she was stoned?  Lets take another look at sweet 16.

Passing sentence, the judge said: ‘In my judgement, the CCTV footage is unequivocal, Georgia Varley was not moving away and she was not showing any sign of moving away.

‘She only moved when the movement of the train deprived her of support and caused her to lose balance and fall to her death.

‘I am satisfied that you merely hoped and assumed she would get out of the way when the train began to move, and on that wholly inadequate basis you took a terrible risk,’ he added.

‘You must have known that a passenger who falls between the train and the platform is likely to be killed,’ he told the defendant.

‘As the guard of the train, you were in complete control of the movement of the train. That control carries with it the direct and personal responsibility for the safety of passengers.’

Georgia, from Moreton, Wirral, had gone into Liverpool for a night out with her friends when the incident happened on October 22 last year.

A blood analysis following her death showed she had 236mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood in her system - the legal driving limit is 80mg.

She also had 0.083mg of the drug mephedrone, or Mcat, in her system at the time of her death.

And here’s a thought. Good thing she wasn’t a muzzie or he’d have gotten life without parole.

A LOT MORE TO THIS ARTICLE AND MORE PHOTOS HERE

Posted by peiper     on 11/15/2012 at 11:07 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK • work and the workplace •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 14, 2012

one of the penalties of being a member of the european union. time to leave?

Take serious note of this article, and be thankful if you’re reading this in America.
This is the typical kind of crap that the Brits have to put up with on an almost daily basis.

If anyone in the USA of any political party should ever seriously suggest that the USA should join a union of some kind with Europe, the kind of treaty or document the Brits signed onto, anything that in any way might bond or tie us to anything even remotely similar, than I would hope that some patriotic American would grab a gun and kill whoever suggested the tie. And to be on the certain side of things, kill the family as well to send a message that it would never be tolerated.  Not ever.  And don’t smugly kid yourselves that nobody in the USA thinks along the lines the jerks here do.  We have em okay. 
They think the euros are way civilized what with the death penalty banned and all, and would welcome courts and the same system that operate the European Court of Human Rights.

I have said this a few times and I’ll keep saying it cos I know it to be true.  There are agencies of the EU that actively fund things in the USA, usually to do with their version of what civil and human rights ought to be. They actively support and have funded anti death penalty groups in the states that still have it. That should bother you. It should piss you off. 

Take a good look and read the court’s take on this case.  Piss ant libtards.  Why are they still breathing?

Take a look at this. 

Illegal immigrant and failed asylum seeker handed £24,000 by Human Rights judges after ‘British law failed to protect her from slavery’ ( $37,248 )

An investigation by police officers found she was NOT a victim of slavery and was a criminal

A British judge also cast doubt on her credibility and described her story as ‘implausible’

By Steve Doughty

A failed asylum-seeker was handed thousands of pounds in compensation yesterday by European judges who claimed British law had failed to protect her from being treated as a slave.

The Ugandan came to Britain illegally on a false passport, became a care worker and was free to leave the house where she worked, the European Court of Human Rights heard.

Police investigating the 33-year-old’s case decided she was a criminal and a British judge cast doubt on her credibility, describing her story as ‘implausible’.

But the Strasbourg judges ruled that the woman, whose identity they shielded, suffered a breach of her rights as there was no UK law at the time specifically banning slavery. They ordered the Government to pay her £23,500, made up of £7,000 in compensation and £16,500 in expenses and costs.

The judgment marks another case in which Britain has been told that Acts of Parliament and common law have been inadequate to meet European demands.

Since then, the 2009 Coroners and Justice Act has been passed which specifically outlaws slavery.

However, Prime Minister David Cameron remains at odds with Strasbourg over the human rights judges’ demand that Britain allows convicted prisoners to vote.

The woman in the slavery case – identified only as CN – came to this country in 2002 on a false passport and visa provided by her uncle, identified only as PS.

He set her up as a care worker for an Iraqi couple in Leeds and £1,600 a month was paid for the work.

But, the woman alleged, the money was given to her uncle and she was never paid more than £20 or £40 when she was given an afternoon off each month.

She did not complain until 2006, four years later, when she collapsed in a bank and was treated in hospital after it was discovered she was HIV positive.

CN was given a flat by her local council, but her application for asylum, on the grounds she had fled sexual and physical violence in Uganda, failed.

Police investigations ended in 2009 following two inquiries into the woman’s complaints that she was held as a slave. A report from the Metropolitan Police Human Trafficking Team noted that she had been refused legitimate entry into Britain and had come in with a false passport and forged visa.

The woman had been paid through her relative ‘in order to hide from the authorities the fact that the victim did not have a national insurance number’.

The report went on: ‘If money was paid to her, then she would have had to pay tax and her false identity would have come to the notice of the tax office. This would then lead to her arrest and eviction from the UK.

‘There is no evidence to show that this female is a victim of slavery or forced labour. She willingly worked and was paid but she chose that the money should go to her uncle to conceal being in the UK. It is basically a situation that one criminal, her uncle, has taken all the proceeds of their crime.’

The British judge who heard CN’s asylum appeal ‘expressed serious concerns about the applicant’s credibility and found much of her account to be implausible’, the Strasbourg court heard.

But the European judges said that, because police investigated the complaints, they could not have been considered implausible. They insisted that the woman’s complaints were credible.

The court added that the inquiry should not have been carried out by a police unit dealing with human trafficking rather than slavery.

Britain was also obliged to prosecute any act aimed at enforcing slavery. The country’s law was ‘inadequate’ for the purpose, the European judges declared.

source

Posted by peiper     on 11/14/2012 at 01:40 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • EUro-peons • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • International • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK • USA •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 13, 2012

another pig ignorant brit judge says fuck you to his country as common sense takes holiday

Here is a PRIME example of what belonging to a foreign union in writing brings a nation to. But as bad or worse yet, the home grown liberal ass-wipe pig ignorant and insane judges who make decisions that will impact a nation.

Here is an example America, of a western country looking at itself in a mirror and with raised middle finger saying to it’s image,
“Fuck You.” And so far, this damn fool piece of pig shit judge has done just that. And all in the name of the new religion foisted on the west by, it own damn and stupid self.  The religion of human rights in whose name all manner of insanity and illogical actions are now taken.

Here’s another example.
Of 11,000 foreign prisoners, many with records of violence, only 62 have been booted out of this country in the last few years.
Killers have been allowed to remain because they have a ‘RIGHT’ to a family life. Or they might be ill treated if returned to their home country. 
It insanity and it has truly run amok.
So who is seeing to the rights of the law abiding citizen to justice when preyed upon by the filth that infests society?
It sure as hell is isn’t any judge. And especially not the responsibility of defense council.

There honestly are some people who really should not be breathing.  Like the crud who broke into an old man’s home this week past and stabbed him to death. Wasn’t enough he broke in to rob the house. He had to kill the poor guy while his wife upstairs and recovering from surgery, heard his screams.
If and when they catch the guy who did it, I’m sure all of his rights both real (if any) and imagined (of which there will be loads) will be strictly looked after.

The system stinks to high heaven.  Justice is a joke told by a very bad self appointed comedian usually referred to as a judge.

Abu Qatada back on the streets within hours

Abu Qatada, the extremist cleric, will be back on the streets of Britain today and allowed to roam free for eight hours a day after a court ruled he cannot be deported.

By Tom Whitehead, Security Editor

The decision means that the security services and police will now have to watch him around the clock in a surveillance operation that is likely to cost the taxpayer more than £5 million a year.

The terror suspect was granted bail by a senior immigration judge yesterday after ruling that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, had failed to satisfy him that he would face a fair trial in Jordan. “ We are absolutely determined to see this man get on a plane and go back to Jordan, he does not belong here. “

“He should not be in this country, he is a dangerous person. He wanted to inflict harm on our country and this coalition Government is going to do everything we can to challenge this every step of the way to make sure that he is deported to Jordan.”

Mr Justice Mitting then ordered Qatada be released from a high-security prison and imposed bail conditions that only placed him under a 16-hour curfew.

Conservative MP Peter Bone told ITV’s Daybreak today that the interests of the public should be put before the European Court.

He said: “Enough is enough - put this terrorist on a plane and send him home and worry about the European Court afterwards.

“There are times when we need to put the public interest in front of the European Court and this is one of them.

“The highest court in this land, our Supreme Court, has said he can go back. Now, if the highest court in this land says he can go back, then he can go back.

“We should not be kow-towing to this ‘Mickey Mouse’ European court.”

“The Supreme Court should be the ultimate court.”

The ruling by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) is a humiliating blow for Mrs May, who personally travelled to Jordan to obtain assurances that Qatada would face a fair trial.

She sought guarantees after the European Court of Human Rights ruled earlier this year that he could not be deported because there was a risk he would face evidence obtained by torture. But yesterday Siac dismissed those assurances and allowed Qatada’s appeal against deportation.

It is the latest twist in a legal battle that has run for more than a decade and cost the taxpayer more than £1 million in legal fees and benefits.

Qatada, who was once described by a Spanish judge as Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe, will now be under less stringent bail conditions than when he was last released earlier this year, when he was required to stay at home for 22 hours a day.

Under the new conditions he will be allowed his freedom between 8am and 4pm, although he will be tagged and restricted on whom he can meet.

Security and police sources are concerned over the level of monitoring that will now be required. It would be hugely damaging if Qatada gained access to the internet or video facilities to send out a message of hate or to inspire others to act, even if it meant him being returned to prison.

The Home Office plans to appeal against the decision but if it fails Qatada could remain here indefinitely, with increasingly lenient restrictions on his movements.

Qatada’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald QC, said there was “no justification for continuing to deprive Mr Othman [Qatada’s real name] of his liberty”.

LIBERTY TRUMPS PUBLIC SAFETY

Oh btw bmews.  Just to let ya know.  This dirt bag isn’t any old run of the mill mad mullah. Oh no.

His hate videos were found among the belongings of one of the 9/11 hijackers who flew into the WTC.  But his lawyers take no note of that and neither did this shit faced judge.  He and others are soooooo worried his trial wouldn’t be a fair one if returned to Jordan.  And of course he’s really innocent. Makes ya wanna grab a gun. Or toss something at him that goes boom. Pity nobody around who can do that.

Posted by peiper     on 11/13/2012 at 07:29 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims • Stoopid-People • Terrorists •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 07, 2012

punches cop and then says, you can’t do anything to me.  the usual thing.

The teenager already has a string of convictions, including several assaults dating back to 2008.

Oh gosh. How is that possible?  After all, this version of a white man’s burden attended a, “Young Offender’s Institute.” Surely to goodness that should have straightened the slut out. Yeah. Like it does the others who pass through the gates.  They all become so frightened of the law that they all become model citizens.

The really sad and bad that comes out of this article, is that society couldn’t be rid of her in an accident after this latest stunt.  She and the future curse she’s carrying.

Oh well, all she did this time was punch a cop in the face.  Probably his fault. Right?  You know, maybe he was doing his job.  What was he thinking?  She has rights, especially as she’s a member of a favored group.  Fat & ugly slag.

Typical. As some have asked here at bmews before.  What’s it take for judges to actually jail lice like this skank? 

Five months pregnant teenager, 18, ran along electrified Tube lines to dodge her fare after punching policeman in the face

Elesha Proud-Miles, narrowly avoided being hit by train
Dashed across the rails at Finsbury Park Station, in north London
Punched a police officer in the face during a foul-mouthed tirade
Five months pregnant and already has a string of convictions

By Jill Reilly

A pregnant teenager who risked her unborn child’s life by running along electrified tube lines to dodge her fare was spared jail today.

Five months pregnant Elesha Proud-Miles, 18, punched a police officer in the face and taunted ‘I’m pregnant, you can’t do anything to me’, before running across the rails at Finsbury Park Station.

The jobless teen narrowly avoided being hit by a train as she dashed across the rails at Finsbury Park Station, in north London, bringing rush hour Tube trains to a standstill for almost an hour.

Several trains had to be evacuate as the Victoria Line was brought to a standstill.

Sparing her jail at Blackfriars Crown Court today and ordering her to attend anger managements classes Judge John Hillen said: ‘You caused enormous disruption, described as undoubtable chaos, and that was due to your act.’

‘I’m pregnant, you can’t do anything to me’

He should have used his club or whatever they carry, and rammed it into her gut.  But of course, as you see, she has it right. Apparently nobody can do anything to her.  Maybe society will get lucky and she’ll become a statistic of gang violence.

see the slag here and read more

Posted by peiper     on 11/07/2012 at 12:13 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

update to earlier story, boy walks mostly free after assault on 4 yr old girl

Sometimes reading the comments that usually follow a story that relates to the USA, (THIS ONE DOES NOT) there are always people usually on the left I suspect, that in a manner of speaking ask why we can not be like the civilized ppl of Britain and Europe.  Which is gag inducing and not from laughter.
Right, we really wanna start thinking this way.

This is an update to an earlier article regarding the assault of a four year old baby.  They are still babes at 4, aren’t they?
Pretty damned disgusting and the law and the judge and whatever powers that be who don’t burn the bastard’s balls off are as rotten as the kid in the story is.  And the excuses made for him are sickening too.
I think the parents of the little girl should take things into their own hands, break every single bone in his body, then cut off his dick.  They can always claim diminished responsibility due to extreme mental stress. And, they can probably get the very same professionals as those here.

Professionals who dealt with the sick teen advised the Attorney General that the best way of addressing his behavior was by educating him within the community.

Well hell, the parents can be “sick” too. No? 

The same “professionals” are probably overjoyed that America re-elected Obama. Dumb shits!

Parents of girl, four, raped by babysitter, 14, who was never sent to prison fail in appeal bid to see him jailed

The teenager blindfolded her with a Hello Kitty apron and used chocolate to lure her into the sex attack

He was let off with a community order as the judge blamed ‘the world and society’ for his porn addiction

The child’s parents appealed to the Attorney General who says,

A new hearing will not be allowed because the case was ‘difficult to sentence’

By Martin Robinson

The parents of a four-year-old girl raped by a teenage babysitter who was never sent to jail for his crime are in despair after their appeal against his paltry sentence was blocked.

The unnamed mother and father had demanded a tougher sentence for the 14-year-old who tricked their little girl into being abused when he was meant to be looking after her.

During the sickening attack he blindfolded their daughter with a Hello Kitty apron and promised her a ‘chocolate’ but then raped her.

The teenager walked free from Cambridge Crown Court earlier this year and still lives a few doors away from the poor child he abused.

The victim’s parents understood he would receive a three-year custodial sentence – but he was let off with a community order instead after a judge blamed ‘the world and society’ for his porn addiction.

Judge Gareth Hawkesworth sparked outrage by deciding he should not go to prison, instead giving the rapist a three-year community order.

The girl’s devastated parents claimed the judge’s comments had ‘cheapened’ their daughter’s ordeal and said they would appeal.

But the Attorney General has now confirmed the appeal will not be allowed to go ahead because the case was ‘difficult to sentence’.

It concluded that the Court of Appeal would not regard the sentence as ‘unduly lenient’ and the case will not progress further.

The victim’s mother - who cannot be named for legal reasons- said they are ‘angry’ and ‘disappointed’.

She said: ‘It is coming up the anniversary of the attack we don’t wish to drag it all up again.

‘Now the decision has been made, we can not appeal, we are now going to move on with our lives.

‘It is disappointing, but as ever our priority is our little girl and her happiness - we just have to move on.

‘We want to keep her life normal, we don’t want to reinforce the memory and we want her to remain as content as she is now.

‘We hope it doesn’t effect her relationships in later life.’

The abuse took place at the girl’s Cambridgeshire home in December last year - the first time her parents had let the teenager babysit the girl alone.

They trusted him to watch her for a couple of hours in return for £10 pocket money and said he was a quiet but ‘normal kid’ who they completely trusted.

But when they got home the victim’s Dad was getting her ready for bed when she revealed the babysitter had played a game, promising to reward her with chocolates.

She explained how he had covered her eyes with her Hello Kitty apron and ‘put his willy in her mouth’.

The victim’s tearful mum blasted Cambridge Crown Court for letting the attacker walk free - when he lives just a matter of doors from their family home.

Professionals who dealt with the sick teen advised the Attorney General that the best way of addressing his behaviour was by educating him within the community.

His progress and whereabouts will continue to be monitored by police for the next two and a half years.

A sex offences prevention order was also made for five years, stating he must not access or seek to access pornography of any kind and must not use any mobile devices or computer without suitable filters to prevent the viewing of pornography.

The offender - who at the time of the case appeared in the dock in his school uniform - was told he had only been spared six-and-a-half years in jail because he was still a minor.

The Solicitor General may have concluded against appeal but he did promise that the babysitter’s period of supervision will be ‘tough’ and ‘challenging’ and will ‘force him to address his behaviour’.

A spokesman for the AGO said: ‘Following complaints from the victim’s family as well as members of the public, the former Solicitor General, Edward Garnier QC MP asked the Crown Prosecution Service to send the case papers to him for review.

‘After very careful consideration of all the factors in the case, he decided not to refer it to the Court of Appeal as he did not believe they would increase the sentence.’

SEE IDIOT JUDGE HERE AT THE SORCE

I think it’s rubbish. What do you think? Am I wrong?
Come on.  Any boy of even 12 or 11 would know better.  Any youngster reaching 10 knows right from wrong and sure as hell a boy of 13 or 14 knows well the difference between right and evil and assault.  How many of you have ever assaulted a baby because you saw a good looking woman in a bikini? Or even porn for that matter.  This little creep simply got away with what he did with help of stupid do-gooders. 

Posted by peiper     on 11/07/2012 at 09:05 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - November 04, 2012

latest score from the roman coliseum.  queers 1, christians zero.

Just to show you how twisted and biased they are, look at this headline I found at the BBC news page.

Gay Star News

Catholics lose fight to stop gays from adopting

Now people, that is NOT true.  Nobody even tried to stop queers from adopting.

Not at all. But the way these ppl have it here, you’d never know it.  All depends on the headline. 

What actually happened was this. 

Catholic Care loses gay adoption fight

A Roman Catholic adoption agency has been told it cannot turn away gay couples if it wants to keep its charitable status.

Catholic Care, run by the Diocese of Leeds, wanted its adoption service to be made exempt from equality laws.

A judge has ruled the charity had failed to give convincing reasons why it should be allowed to do so.

Catholic Care said it would consider its position but could have to end the service as it would lose funding.

The charity - which has been placing children with adoptive parents for more than 100 years - was among 12 Catholic agencies in England and Wales forced to change their policy towards homosexual people due to equality laws passed in 2007.

Others have since closed or cut their ties with the Church.
Appeals rejected

Catholic Care had tried to change its constitution so that it would be committed to following Catholic teaching and placing children only with heterosexual parents.

The agency, which serves the dioceses of Leeds, Middlesbrough, and Hallam in South Yorkshire, had argued the Equality Act went against the Catholic Church’s teachings on marriage and family life.

The latest ruling by a judge in the Upper Tribunal, which is the equivalent of the High Court in the administrative justice system, follows rejections of the charity’s case in the High Court and by the Charity Commission and the Charity Tribunal.

In its judgement, the tribunal said Catholic Care had not provided sufficient evidence that its funding would dry up and it would be forced to close, and some potential adopters would then not come forward.

In a statement, Catholic Care said: “Without the constitutional restriction for which it applied, Catholic Care will be forced to close its adoption service.

“The reason for this is that the service permitted by the current constitution is in conflict with the aims of the charity.

“It is Catholic Care’s view that this will reduce the number of adoptive parents available and the number of children left waiting for adoptive parents will continue to increase.

“Catholic Care will now take time to consider the decision in detail and decide on its next steps.”

BBC NEWS

Anyone placing any bets on what sort of reaction and outcome there might be, had the adoption agency belonged to another religion?
Oh, lets see.  Hmmmm. How about those those wonderful folks at the ROP?
Yeah right. 

Posted by peiper     on 11/04/2012 at 01:58 PM   
Filed Under: • Gay Gay Gay! • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 31, 2012

it really never ever ends. nobody learns anything, especially the wanker judges here.idiots!

Just another very sorry example of a totally fucked up (sorry about the language but) lack of justice system I’ve ever seen.  Not that I have seen a lot mind you.  But we’ve all read a lot about this kind of judicial screwing of the victim, by letting off the perp. Three of them in this case actually. See the video at the link.

So here’s another idiot judge with a word to the scum. He is telling her;

‘Your record is terrible for violence given that you are 26 years of age.”

So the slut has a violent record already. Not the first time she’s had problems and is known to the authorities.

But now the wanker judge says,

‘People have been killed and maimed through being kicked in the head.’

The conviction is her fourth in six years. The three defendants have 21 previous convictions between them.

They were also given a 12-month sentence each, suspended for two years, and a community order.
Here’s how serious this group takes .... Community Orders.

However, the court heard that Wray had not complied with previous community orders.

Now then, since one of the group is this young mommy of three,

pram-pushing mother, 26, repeatedly stamps on innocent man’s head in racist attack in front of her two children

Amanda Lowe spared prison by judge at Manchester Crown Court
Lowe left baby girl and eight-year-old daughter to attack Khuram Nisar
Baby’s father Wesley Earls and Lowe’s cousin Daniel Wray also threw punches during the unprovoked assault in Piccadilly Gardens
Group have 21 previous convictions between them

By Helen Lawson

But despite the shocking violence, she walked free from Manchester Crown Court on Friday.

Judge Lindsey Kushner QC told Lowe, of Rochdale Road, Blackley, Manchester, that she had been spared jail because of the impact on her children.

see the complete article and photos here

Spared because of the impact on her children?
Wouldn’t you think that being brought up by a slag like that would be worse?  How long before this criminal scum kills someone?
How old will her offspring be when they commit their first crime? 

Her kids should be taken away for their protection as well as that of society. And she should be permanently sterilized.
Might be a good idea to have someone stomp on her head too, just so she knows what it feels like.  That goes as well for all involved in this. Jeesh. Conviction after conviction and they’re out and about.
Hope the judge is their next victim. What a fool.

Posted by peiper     on 10/31/2012 at 01:27 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - October 29, 2012

VICTIM BEATEN UP BY A GREMLIN AND THEN SCREWED BY THE COURT. SO MUCH FOR JUSTICE

Now this is one hell of an outrageous article.
What kind of a justice system says it is unfair to a defendant to reschedule a trial for assault, because changing things would be unfair to him?
A totally screwed up system and court. That’s what. 
And get ready ... it was all for just THIRTY DAMN MINUTES.

Meanwhile, the leaches in government and various spokesmen and women perhaps, continue to talk tough and promise stern measures against miscreants like this guy who, at the moment must be laughing his head off.  And why not?  Look what he got away with and all due to a mistake made by the prosecution. Was it a mistake of evidence?  DNA? A bad witness? A missing witness? 
Yes to the last. The witness being in this case , the victim.
But she didn’t skip court.  The prosecution gave her an incorrect time for court, and so she missed the court where she was supposed to be.
So instead of the court coming down on the whoever who screwed things up, the court screws the victim.
AGAIN!

WTF is wrong with ppl?  If he had wanted to hit someone, why didn’t he pick a fight with another bodybuilder?  At least that would have been one hell of a challenge.

Take a look at this.

Bodybuilder ‘who beat girlfriend black and blue’ walks free from court when she fails to give evidence (because blundering CPS told her wrong time to appear)

Harriet Atkinson, 22, was wrongly told to attend court in the afternoon for the morning trial of fitness trainer Lewis Rookyard

Magistrates thought it would be unfair to the accused to reschedule, so dropped the case because she failed to turn up

By Martin Robinson

A young woman whose boyfriend allegedly beat her ‘black and blue’ says she has been denied justice after he walked free from court because of a Crown Prosecution Service blunder.

Harriet Atkinson, 22, was wrongly told to attend court in the afternoon for the trial of fitness trainer Lewis Rookyard who denied a charge of assault by beating.

But unknown to her, the trial where she was due to give evidence against her former lover had been fixed to start in the morning at South East Suffolk magistrates court in Ipswich.

Officials realised she had been given the wrong time when she did not appear at 10am and a police car was sent to pick her up.

The prosecutor applied for the case to be postponed for 30 minutes, pointing out that Miss Atkinson was on her way and was in no way to blame.

But magistrates rejected the application and dismissed the case due to her non-attendance.

Miss Atkinson, who works in the fashion industry, said: ‘It was the fault of the CPS that I was given the wrong time for the trial to start - but it was just a case of human error which I can understand.

‘What I am really angry about is that the magistrates threw the case out even when they were told that I was not at fault for being given the wrong time and I was on my way.

HERE FOR THE PHOTOS AND MORE TO READ

Posted by peiper     on 10/29/2012 at 11:17 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 25, 2012

england’s atty general wants to cede sovereignty to europe

Oh the joy of being part of a coming one world government.
Just think.  You won’t have to worry about unnecessary items like, sovereignty.
Way too much trouble. No. Simply allow others in a foreign country who aren’t elected in the home country, to decide on just how things in your country should be. Or be fined. Nice huh?

Well, in a sense that’s almost what the govt. here faces. A fine of I don’t know how much, because the Prime Minister says flat out that he will not have prisoners given the vote, no matter what the court in the EU says.
End of story?  Not quite.

Yesterday the Atty. General spoke out and put hoof in mouth by suggesting that England would be wrong to go against the court in Europe and it would damage England’s international reputation.  Whoa.  I guess the Prime Minister didn’t check with his atty gen. first, to see if it would be okay to act as a sovereign nation on the matter of prisoner votes.

Be interesting to see how this one plays out. 

The headline today read;

PM’s war with his law chief on prisoner votes

· European Court of Human Rights ruled prisoners should be enfranchised
· Prime Minister tells MPs that Britain will not capitulate to demands
· Comments seen as swift slapdown for Attorney General Dominic Grieve
· Mr Grieve claims Britain’s reputation will be damaged if it defies Europe
By Matt Chorley and Jason Groves
Attorney General Dominic Grieve was said to be ‘furious’ with the Prime Minister’s stance.
Last night there was speculation that Mr Grieve could even resign his Government role if the Prime Minister fails to respect the ‘rule of law’ and do as he wishes.

So that’s the background, now visit the link for the entire story.
And get a load of that last comment about failing to respect the “rule of law.” The rule laid down in Brussels, not London.  Can you see how dangerous this is. Here’s an Englishman, an attorney general, a powerful man he is, and how easily he is willing to surrender his country’s sovereignty to the EU.

READ ALL OF IT HERE

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2012 at 01:11 PM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • EUro-peons • Government • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • UK •  
• Comments (4) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - October 24, 2012

lots of law, lots of disorder, not much justice, in fact, maybe none.

There is so god damned much evil in our world, and the powers that be seem to make it that much worse.  Excuses for the vermin who commit crime after crime for years with little consequence.  Early release even for violent low lifes.
Men abusing women or threatening violence given orders to stay away.  Oh right. Harsh words from a court are really going to put the frighteners on the scum.
And how many times are we going to hear that some miserable rat bastard is released early or else given bail, and immediately goes out and kills the person who has been granted a restraining order.  It’s sickening.  Nobody wants to see an innocent person convicted of any kind of crime.  No one would condone the death penalty given an innocent man or woman.  But good grief, there are criminals out there who all but advertise their careers in crime.  If the state doesn’t want to end the worthless life of killers and other overly violent people, then they should be put away for life and given no perks and all rights forfeited.  After all, what rights of their victims were honoured?  True justice would also demand an eye for an eye in the most literal sense.

Not long ago a young man who it is said was mentally unbalanced, tore the eyes out of his former girl friend.  It is highly doubtful he will spend the rest of his life in jail.
I’d say don’t jail the SOB. Rip his eyes out and ask him how it feels and how he likes it. 

The cards are stacked against the law abiding public.  The public I think knows it, and the bad guys definitely know it.  Btw, with regard to the guy who blinded that young woman.  Might be a great idea to treat his defense attorney to the same. See how he likes it, and then ask him to be your defense council.

But no. The public will continue to be at the mercy of not just the criminal community, but their civil right and no justice system enablers.
A pox on all those Mo**********rs.

So here’s the latest.  See the link for a bit more. The frighteners I believe have been put on the public, but not as we see, on the criminal.

A murder by a criminal on bail is committed every ten days, and the real number could be even higher

By Daniel Martin

A murder is committed every ten days by offenders out on bail, according to figures released yesterday.

At least 37 criminals were convicted of murder while on bail for another offence in 2011 – around three every month.

Over the past 12 years, 436 murders have been committed by people granted their freedom while under investigation for a variety of crimes in England and Wales.
The total could be even higher because the fact that a murderer has been on bail is not always recorded by police, the Ministry of Justice admits.

Overall, around 180 crimes are committed every day by someone who had been granted bail. The official statistics – released on the day David
Cameron made a speech pledging to be ‘tough and intelligent’ on crime – will re-ignite the debate over soft justice.

Last night the chairman of the home affairs select committee called for a review of the bail rules, saying those who are dangerous should always be remanded in custody.

Keith Vaz, who obtained the information following a parliamentary question, told the Daily Mail: ‘We need to review our bail laws. I am shocked by these figures.
‘Judges must consider very carefully applications for bail. These criminals have already been identified by the justice system as potentially dangerous, and we must use that knowledge to keep our communities safe.’

Critics said the pressure to reduce the prison population means that judges are granting bail to more and more dangerous offenders.

The statistics show that 436 offenders were convicted of a murder committed while they were on bail between 2000 and 2011.

Over the course of past decade, the total has been generally rising, from 25 in 2002 to 37 last year. A high point of 50 was reached in 2007. Justice minister Helen Grant admitted the total could be an underestimate.

‘The recording of information on whether or not the offence was committed while the offender was on bail is known to be incomplete,’ she said.
‘This is because the police have a number of ways of recording the bail status of an offender.’

She added: ‘The information held does not indicate the nature of the earlier offence for which the bail was granted but it is likely that most of the offences summarised in the table will have been committed while the offender was on bail for a less serious offence.’

David Green, from the Civitas think tank, said the justice system was ‘giving the benefit of the doubt to people who don’t deserve the benefit of the doubt’ by allowing them bail.

SEE ALL OF IT AND PIX HERE

Posted by peiper     on 10/24/2012 at 05:18 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - October 20, 2012

good cop fair bust undone by dumb rules as cop faces inquiry but killer’s ‘rights’ protected

It’s things like this that drive me nuts.
Yes. I recognize there are rules in place regarding police procedure that are meant to protect us.  No, I don’t want a police state even if I often appear to favor the opposite. I just get very frustrated at the insanity and blow off steam but to tell the honest truth, I always tend to believe and trust the cops. Even when I know better from personal experience.  I suppose it could be my generation or I’m just stupid. Or both.

Shouldn’t there be exceptions made when the circumstances are exceptional?

If I commit a crime in full view of a 100 people, or take the police to where I buried the latest missing body, isn’t the fact that I robbed that bank or knew where the body was incriminating enough?  So what if the cop didn’t read me the rights.  That’s BS anyway as far as I am concerned.  Is there anyone anywhere in the UK or the USA who is unaware of that card cops must read?  And if I killed someone and brought the police to where the body has been for ten freeking years, why aren’t “rights” suspended? 

That’s what happened in this latest story.  Maddening.

In the last day or so I exchanged an email or two with Drew.  In which I said that I was born into the wrong time period. Or words to mean that.  I said I was so sick of this pc driven world, that I should have been born in time to enjoy the Jazz Age, be in the audience for the Goodman Carnegie Hall concert in 1938, and be gone and forgotten by 1950. 
Don’t take me too liberally but you get the feeling I hope.  Nothing seems to follow logic anymore.  There are a million (it feels like it) agencies or govt. bodies that cater to a million different ethnic or religious or lifestyle choices.  And everyone must toe a pc line or else be branded with some new word that ends in either ‘phobia’ or else ‘ism.’ Sometimes both.

This miserable excuse for a human murdered a young woman.
Cops had a suspect, a taxi driver, who showed up on a security camera.  Yeah. One of things that people seem to resent as they see so many as intrusions.  Big deal.  But for that camera and there are other examples of their advantage, the cops might still be looking for a body.  He took the lead detective to where the body was. He didn’t even bury her. Just dumped her body like a sack of rubbish.
Well, as long as he was talking, the perp asked the cop if he could confess something.
He then took the police to where he’d hidden the body of a young woman, TEN YEARS AGO.  And for 10 years believe it or not, nobody knew she was dead. How’s this for a case?  One paper says 10 yrs another says 8 years. Take your pick. The girl is still dead.

OK, enough of that.  Here’s what happened, and here’s one of the many headlines that greeted us this morning.

I fail to see any disgrace attached to the officer.  The full unedited version of this is at the link below.

DETECTIVE’S BID TO CRACK CASE LED TO A BODY-AND DISGRACE

Close surveillance, set up in the hope that he would lead the Wiltshire police team to where she had been hidden, had proved fruitless. So the last hope for Det Supt Fulcher was that Halliwell would talk after his arrest in a supermarket car park. When he snatched up the phone to speak to his colleagues, he learned that he had refused to comment.

Those were the facts facing Det Supt Fulcher when he took the remarkable decision to order Halliwell to be taken to an isolated hilltop where he took personal charge of his questioning.

Over four extraordinary hours, the experienced policeman and the suspect embarked on a tour of rural southwest England. Halliwell first led the detective to the site where he had dumped Ms O’Callaghan’s body.

And then in a remarkable unburdening of past wrongs, he took him to a field where he had dumped another body some eight years earlier. Until then, nobody had even known that Rebecca Godden-Edwards was dead.
But the detective’s unconventional tactics were “serious and irretrievable” breaches of the rules surrounding police questioning and meant that Halliwell could not stand trial for Ms Godden-Edwards murder. And it ensured that Det Supt Fulcher now faces an independent police watchdog inquiry into his actions.

Accompanied only by a civilian note-taker, Det Supt Fulcher led Halliwell 50 yards from the police cars and conducted a nine-minute interview. With the murder of Joanna Yeates in Bristol still fresh in the memory, the detective warned the suspect that he would be vilified if he did not tell him where she was.

According to the notes, Halliwell first told the detective: “I don’t know anything” and repeatedly asked to see a solicitor. “You think I did it,” he told the detective. “I know you did it,” came the response. By the end of the interview, Halliwell told the officer: “Have you got a car – we’ll go.”
They continued to speak in the back of a police car for 45 minutes until they reached Uffington, the site of the medieval horse etched into the hillside. Halliwell gave enough information for specialist search teams to find the body later that afternoon.

It was at this point, when Det Supt Fulcher prepared to have him charged with murder, that Halliwell told him: “We need to have a chat.”
They drove a short distance, sat down together on the grass and had a cigarette. Halliwell became more candid, saying that he was a “sick f***er” and asking the detective if he wanted “another one”.

They drove 30 miles into south Gloucestershire where Halliwell pointed to an area in a 40-acre field where he said he had buried another woman between 2003 and 2005.

The story emerged in February but can only now be made public. Halliwell’s team insisted the way the evidence was gathered breached the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, which gives any suspect the right to legal advice and to be questioned without oppression. It was “an assault on the integrity of the legal system,” said Ian Latham QC, for Halliwell.

When asked to justify his tactics, Det Supt Fulcher told the court: “I did think it was utterly ridiculous that someone who took me, 12 people and a surveillance helicopter to the deposition sites of two bodies would then seek to find some loophole or quirk in the law to get away from the fact that he was a multiple murderer.”

He was backed by senior colleagues including the deputy chief constable, Patrick Geenty, who called it a “gutsy decision”. However, the trial judge, Mrs Justice Cox, ruled that none of the evidence gathered during the four-hour period could be used in a trial. With no other evidence linking Halliwell to the murder, prosecutors were forced to drop the charge.
So now, he has been given life with 25 years minimum.  He could conceivably be out at some point.  Probably not but hey, there’s always a chance. Isn’t there? But he could only be charged with one killing due to the actions of the head officer.

The trial judge, Mrs Justice Cox, ruled that none of the evidence gathered during the four-hour period could be used in a trial. With no other evidence linking Halliwell to the murder, prosecutors were forced to drop the charge.

No evidence?  He knew where the body was cos he buried it.  Why isn’t that evidence?
Cos the law and regulations and even the judge, are as fucked up as a soup sandwich.

What a screwed up world.

SEE ALL OF THE ARTICLE HERE

Posted by peiper     on 10/20/2012 at 05:29 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 19, 2012

the odd couple win broken heart lotto boo-hoo and a bit of eye candy for the hell of it

Well don’t they look adorable?

The happy couple are now even happier as a court awarded them in the neighborhood of $5,777.00 because, their dear, thweet feelings were given a boo-boo. 
So they cried a river.
Yes folks, that’s the price for hurting someone’s feelings these days.

I reported on this story recently and this is an update seeing as how the loving (but odd) couple have just won the “hurt feelings” lottery.  Btw, you do not have to be qu odd to win that lottery.  Not at all. In fact, now there’s a red light special in isle (pick your favorite number) on extradition to other countries when you’re accused of a crime in that country. Yeah. All you now have to do is convince some shrinks and a court that you will kill yourself if you’re extradited. Most especially to America.  And shrinks are not a all that hard to fool being mostly fools themselves, considering some cases where they judged someone safe who later commits another violent crime.

So then class.  Two things to remember to get along and have things as you want em.

1) My feelings were hurt and I have less self esteem because ( just make something up. It’ll be accepted.)

2) If you extradite me to that country I will kill myself. Just ask my mumsy. 

Ok so back to my post and updated story.

A couple who own a B&B refused due to their Christian beliefs, one bed for two guys.  If memory serves me correctly, the lady owner said that a room with two beds would be okay. Now I might be mistaken on that point. I just think I read that a couple of months ago. She also says that due to her religious beliefs, she would not let a room with one bed to a heterosexual couple who were not married.  Not having read the bible, I would have no way to judge if that behavior is addressed in anyone’s bible, Jewish or Christian.  Or is it something that religious people just assumed was not right or moral?  She claimed her home was private and she had a right to her rules based on her religious belief.  Well if that’s really the case, then she and her husband should have opened a Christian B&B and let folks know up front what the rules of the house are.  BUT, a B&B is not private no matter what she says.  It’s a business and it’s open to the public.

I am not supporting the queer guys but heck, I don’t think the couple here are entirely honest either.  I think both parties are being a bit disingenuous. 

The couple claim they’d turn down a single hetro couple. Really?  How would she know, unless she asked them?  “Are you married?” If the answer is yes, does she think people walk around carrying their marriage certificates with them?  Does she ask people who call for a room booking if they are married or not?  Does she tell people on the phone what the house rules are, so they don’t make a trip there and only find when checking in that they are not qualified?  And there’s another issue here.
She says she’ll allow twin beds. That’s my understanding.  Well if that is true and I do not have it all wrong, then what’s to stop a couple from using one twin for their tryst?

As for the odd couple, they were being funded by a pressure group called Liberty. So what does that tell us? Tells me they knew from the start what the B&B couple were all about and they were determined to make it an issue.
And these ppl don’t know why they are so disliked.

Here’s a bit of a side story.
Nick Griffin, shown below in an unflattering image, is head of the BNP.  The British National Party is considered to be extremis. Here at BMEWS, LyndonB isn’t at all happy with these folks and is no fan of Mr. Griffin.  That’s good enough for me to be honest.  I trust Lyndon on these matters and after all, it’s his country and he is quite well informed on these things. However, no matter if Griffin isn’t a boy scout, seems to me the media play into his hands by publishing a photo like this.  Have to wonder why they didn’t photoshop horns as well.

What Griffin did was to go on Twitter and publish the address of the weird and vomit inducing looking homosexual couple, and asked supporters to picket their home as a show of support for the Christian couple.  Well as you will imagine, the left was up in arms shouting for his tar and feathering and arrest etc., etc.  Never mind how many times the left over time, has done exactly that sort of thing to anyone with an opinion not shared and approved by them.
I hate to say it but, in this case I think Griffin was wrong because now it just opens the door for more of the same for lots of other ppl innocent as well as guilty.  And oh by the way. 
The entire membership list of the BNP was published some time ago and was done in much the same way AND, addresses of BNP members were published with invitations to people to go and picket their homes.
There were never any arrests or “probes” about that.  The authorities didn’t seem to care.  Oh but when it’s an out of favor group like the BNP it’s open season I take it.

Police probe after BNP leader Nick Griffin post address of gay couple in B&B row on Twitter and threatens to bring ‘drama’ to their door

In 2010 gay couple Michael Black and John Morgan were turned away from a Berkshire B&B because of the beliefs of the devout Christian owner
They went to court under equality legislation, claiming they had been discriminated against by Susanne Wilkinson
They have been awarded £3,600 in compensation after a court hearing
Cambridgeshire Police reveal that are looking into complaints about Griffin after he tweeted their address
He wrote: ‘A British Justice team will come up & give you a bit of drama by way of reminding you that an English couple’s home is their castle’
Couple hit back saying Griffin is an ‘idiot’ with no public support

By Martin Robinson

read and see all here

ROSAMOND PIKE just because

Posted by peiper     on 10/19/2012 at 09:42 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Gay Gay Gay! • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner