Wednesday - June 17, 2009

WE SHOULD HAVE HAD HER RAPED SAYS A GIRL GANG MEMBER ABOUT ANOTHER GIRL.

Today’s yoot? Hope not. But it’s apparently the norm for this , ah .. how shall I put it? Well, this group. Sorry, no on line photos.

How in the world can any female wish this on another?  What the heck has happened?  Can’t find words so won’t try but things are really in the toilet and that isn’t funny. It can only get worse.

A generation of vipers!

‘We should have had victim raped,’ said girl gang thug after stripping and whipping teen, 16, in street

By STEPHEN WRIGHT
Last updated at 1:46 PM on 17th June 2009

A teenage girl was stripped naked and beaten by members of a notorious girl gang.  The 16-year-old victim was humiliated by a gang known as ‘Girls over Men’ because she had supposedly ‘disrespected’ the leader’s mother.

Later, one of the attackers said she wished the gang could have got a man to rape their victim.

The teenager was abducted at knifepoint as she walked with a friend in daylight in Stratford, East London, a court heard. Five gang members took her to an alley where her jeans, T-shirt and knickers were slashed from her body. 

The girl was whipped with buckled belts before another girl arrived and snapped the traumatised victim on her mobile phone, texting the images to friends.

The gang fled the alley, leaving the injured girl to wander naked through the streets. A judge described the attack as ‘ferocious, deliberate and chilling’.

He jailed the 17-year-old gang leader for four and a half years and a 16-year-old member for three years.

A third gang member, Sophia Austin, 18, who took the mobile phone pictures, received six months in a young offenders’ institution, suspended for one year.

Paris Gentile, 18, who was accused of ‘egging on’ the beating, was cleared by jurors following a direction from the judge.

Jurors at Snaresbrook Crown Court were shown photos of the girl’s injuries.

‘They clearly show the indentations of the buckle or motif that was on the belt,’ said prosecutor Jonathan Dunne.

He said that while on remand the 16-year-old gang member had bragged to fellow inmates about the attack.

Terror scene: The 16-year-old had her clothes slashed from her body and pictures taken of her naked in Waddington Street, Stratford - she was told if she ran she’d be killed

She was overheard by a member of staff telling girls at the Oakhill secure training centre in Milton Keynes that she wished the gang could have got a man to rape their victim.

‘She said that photos had been taken and if she could have got one of her boys down, she would have made her have sex,’ said Mr Dunne.

The 16-year-old pleaded guilty to causing grievous bodily harm with intent while Austin, of Stratford, admitted causing the girl actual bodily harm. The 17-year-old denied assaulting and stripping the girl, telling police the youngster had taken off her own clothes ‘like a flash’.

Giving evidence, she admitted intimidating and pulling the victim’s hair but denied kicking, punching or lashing her. She was convicted of kidnapping and actual bodily harm with intent.

Judge William Kennedy said: ‘This was a premeditated group attack in daylight in a public place where the vulnerable victim, like you a young woman, suffered a number of injuries which were in totality serious enough to amount to grievous bodily harm.

‘She is left with scars and psychological trauma.  ‘She offered neither provocation nor much resistance, you degraded her by the forced removal of her clothes, the assault was with belts which came to hand at the scene.’

The victim’s mother said her daughter, who cannot be named for legal reasons, will live with the horror of the attack for the rest of her life.

The 38-year-old said: ‘Every time she closes her eyes she sees what happened. ‘My girl was not in a gang, she was an innocent victim.

‘We are trying to move away from here. We need a fresh start. The whole family has been affected by this. It is very rough around here. There are lots of gangs and the kids have to be streetwise to survive.’

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 06/17/2009 at 07:56 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner