Saturday - April 17, 2010

THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN …….  and …. STUPID LEFT WING HONKEY IDIOTS

See now?  Here we are with an aggravating story that I’ve avoided all week. Can’t ignore it any longer and feel compelled to share this idiocy.

It’s exactly this type of verminous scum that someone like me would use the dreaded ‘N’ word about.  But then I have to make myself think a bit more.  Yeah, she’s still a nigger and there’s no doubt about that.  But who encouraged her?  Who taught her? Who put ideas into an otherwise empty but thick skull? Who?  I’ll tell ya.
Stupid white libtard jerks.  This whole civil and human rights thing has gotten so far out of hand, that a bitch like this can actually make a court case against the defense dept and the army based in part on one of the holy ‘isms.’ You know the one. Begins with R.

Whenever one of these life forms doesn’t get their way or decides they’ve been insulted, idiot white folks cave in so fast, anyone nearby gets pneumonia from the breeze they cause.  Lets be clear about one thing. It isn’t all black folks who think this way or act this way. I suspect they are damn well embarrassed by others of their color who do.

The charge of racism against the army was brought because ... are ya sitting down?

The service refused to fly her sister from another country to baby sit for her.
And so that little thing has been in the courts for a few years now.  Her fault? Nope. She is just playing the system for what she can gouge because she has been allowed to. Who by?  Stupid white people. Who else?  She has been led to believe that whatever her little black heart wants she can have because to deny her is .....  R A C I S M!  She’s been led to believe that but come on. Do you think she really does?  Course not. But she has been schooled and probably from childhood, to understand how frightened dumb honkey white liberals are when it comes to being accused of anti anything. Especially anti black.  Even when it isn’t true. And if it is true sometimes as we know it has to be, my money is on what I see as a provocation to be that way.  That is, anti-black. In other words, ppl like her and the silly white bastards who support and allow her actions and others like her, bring on the very thing that the left leaning uber liberal bleeding hearts are trying to avoid. They have managed to make racists out of many people who weren’t that way inclined.

Which brings us now to the other dreaded “ism.” S E X I S M !  Oh yeah. And sister sexual harassment. 

Her commanding officer told her that the Army was a ‘ war-fighting machine’ and ‘unsuitable for a single mother who couldn’t sort out her childcare arrangements’.

The panel awarded Miss DeBique £15,000 plus interest of £2,016 for hurt feelings after it earlier ruled she suffered sex and race discrimination.

OK I’ll get outta here and let you read the whole thing unedited by me. See what the idiot panel deemed race discrimination and harassment.
We can be thankful they didn’t allow her the full sum she was suing for.  Btw ... take a look at the photo here. This is what the woman thinks is sexy.
You couldn’t make it up.

Single mother soldier who claimed £1.1m over childcare left her baby for two years

By Dan Newling and Kathryn Knight
Last updated at 11:44 PM on 16th April 2010

Her demand for more than £1.1million from the Army for sex discrimination would have enabled single mother Tilern DeBique to return home to her poverty-stricken Caribbean village in triumph as a rich woman.

Yesterday, however, the former corporal was having to revise her plans after a tribunal ruled she should receive only £17,016.

The 28-year-old from St Vincent, who calls herself SexyT on the internet, was told she made ‘an error of judgment’ in refusing a job in a family-friendly base where there were childcare facilities.

Tilern DeBique, who is known as SexyT on the internet, claimed £1.1m over childcare, but a tribunal ruled she should receive only £17,016

Miss DeBique, whose daughter Tahlia is now four, had argued that she was forced to choose between a military career and her child.

Yet the Daily Mail has discovered that while portraying herself as a devoted single mother, she has in fact spent nearly two years apart from her daughter after dispatching her to the Caribbean to live with her sister.

Tahlia was just three months old when she was handed over to her aunt Sonia. It was almost a year before Sonia took the child back to the UK to

be with her mother. And less than a year after that, Tahlia was back in St Vincent.

So what is the true story of the woman who poses on MySpace in a see-through top suggesting: ‘Give me a shout sometime’, and became embroiled in a three-year legal battle with the Army which cost the taxpayer an estimated £100,000?

This is not a short read but I would urge all to please read the entire thing. Beside being informative and interesting, it’s also a sterling example of how far into the stupid well too many white folks have fallen into.

Here’s the link.
THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN. IN PERPETUITY

When you’re done with that, see this one.  The writer doesn’t have it all correct as she says the panel in the end showed “common sense” or like words. You tell me. Where did common sense come into this?

After all, how could the Ministry of Defence have the temerity to expect a single mother to appear on parade when she couldn’t find appropriate childcare?

And how could the Army refuse her modest request for her sister to fly halfway around the world to look after her daughter?

this ludicrous loophole (imposed by Europe)

Given the recent history of similar tribunal claims - for example the £484,000 paid to an RAF typist who injured her thumb - Ms DeBique had every reason to believe she’d hit the jackpot.

WHITE MAN’S BURDEN CONTINUED

Posted by peiper     on 04/17/2010 at 12:34 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (7) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner