Monday - November 22, 2010

the screwing of britain a bit at a time … part one

I alluded to this in a previous post. Makes ya wonder why the powers that be don’t use forced sterilization. The will really isn’t there to stop this kind of thing, even though the state says it’s going to.
Much of what you see in a post like this one, is the result of years of Labour Party rule. But the conservatives can’t be held totally blameless either.
It’s a kind of mindset and it’s been going on for so darn long that it’s become a way of life.  It’s your right. One of many.
So here the damn slag is, (photo at link) publicly telling authorities what her plans are.
You will notice her current live in boy friend is identified as a, Jamaican asylum seeker. WTH People are looking for asylum from Jamaica now? I guess he’s on benefits as well.  The ones hurt most beside the taxpayer, are those who honestly are in need of help. Through no fault of their own, or perhaps a mistake that anyone could make, they find themselves in dire need. It could be health, crime or an accident and they need help. I’ve even read about old folks in need who were too proud to go begging. Belonging to another generation, they couldn’t bring themselves to “go on the dole.”

So here’s more of the Screwing of Britain ....  And it’s damn sad.

This is from an editorial in the morning paper. A 5 a day veggie coordinator? huh? 

Milking the motorist
By Daily Mail Comment
Fat-cat officials paid more than the Prime Minister ... Millions squandered on five-a-day vegetable co-coordinators and politically correct non-jobs ... The wastefulness of our Town Halls is legendary.
Yet, when they are asked to find economies in their budgets, in line with the rest of the public sector, how do they react?
By trying to clobber the motorist so they can carry on spending, of course.
The demand by six local authorities for fines for minor parking infringements to almost double, from £70 to £120, has nothing to do with deterring drivers from flouting the law.
It’s a covert tax on a public already facing an increase in VAT, and reduced council services.

But this one takes the prize for nerve and blackmail and fraud and whatever else you can think of.  People like this need to be sterilized permanently. No civil rights, no lawyers, no cash. No nothin.’ Well, maybe a firing squad. She’s worthless, she’s useless, she’s an intentional drain on the public purse.

Pregnant again, the mother with five children in care who vows to keep having babies until she gets a council house
By Andy Dolan

An unemployed benefits claimant whose five children were all taken into care has vowed to continue having babies until she is granted a council house.
Lavine Samma, 27, is now pregnant with her sixth child by three different men and fully expects the baby to be taken from her by social services at birth, just like the last three infants.

Since 2002, the feckless mother has given birth to three boys and two girls and doesn’t even know who the father is of one.
She does not work and rakes in around £600 a month in benefits.

But Miss Samma claimed yesterday that it was her ‘human right as a woman to have children’ and vowed to continue falling pregnant until the local authority moved her from her 16th floor inner-city council flat to a ‘proper council house’.

When the Daily Mail called just before 11am yesterday Miss Samma was just about awake but still in bed.  Nevertheless, she quickly warmed to her theme.
‘I’m not a priority for a house because I don’t have children with me, but if I had children in my care I would be’, she said.
‘If they keep taking them away from me I will just keep having them. Again and again and again!’

Miss Samma, who lives in a tower block in Newtown, Birmingham, with Jamaican asylum-seeker boyfriend Damien Sewell, lost her first two children - a girl and a boy - in March 2006, when social services were tipped off that she had been neglecting the elder child, then aged three and a half.
Bruises and scratches were discovered on the girl’s back and the following year the mother was found guilty of neglect.
She was jailed for a year and released on licence after six months.

The girl’s father left her after the birth and the couple divorced. When the second child was born in 2005, Miss Samma believed Mr Sewell was the father, but a DNA test revealed he was not. The children are now in the custody of a relative.
Since then, the couple have had three children together. All have been removed within hours or days of their birth by social services.
Miss Samma said she admitted neglecting her first two children but claimed that should not stop her from having more children in the future

.
She said her ultimate aim was to ‘be a mum - which is my right’, rather than to simply get a council house.
But she admitted that being rehoused as a result would be a ‘happy side-effect’ of being allowed to parent a child.
She claims £96.72 a fortnight in Jobseekers’ Allowance and £87 per week housing benefit.

But although she claims to be looking for work, she said she struggles because of depression, as well as the fact that she is pregnant.
She met Mr Sewell, 31, in 2002 when he came to England on a holiday visa and later claimed asylum.  The couple said he is unable to claim benefits but refused to comment further on his immigration status. It is thought he is still waiting for a final decision on his claim. Miss Samma has lived in her one-bedroom council flat since she was 18.

But she said she is determined to leave the property because it is riddled with mold.  Mr Sewell said: ‘The whole system is corrupt’, he moaned. ‘The courts and the council, they are all against us. ‘I know they will try and take this latest baby from us, but that won’t stop us having more.’

Last night a spokesman for the TaxPayers’ Alliance said the case ‘shows why our welfare system needs so desperately to be reformed’.
He added: ‘This woman has little incentive to go and find work, to get on in life, or to pay for her own housing, because the state is providing all of this for her.
The real losers in this sorry tale are the children...but it is unfair for taxpayers to be asked to support people who have large numbers of children, and no intention of providing for them.’

ANOTHER USELESS SLAG ON THE DOLE

Posted by peiper     on 11/22/2010 at 09:45 AM   
Filed Under: • Miscellaneous •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner