Friday - March 13, 2009

Put these Toytown Talibandits on the first flight home.

What could I possibly add?
Right.
So I won’t even try.

Toytown Talibandits
By Richard Littlejohn
13th March 2009

You couldn’t make it up. One of the Muslim headbangers screeching hatred at British troops this week turns out to be employed as a baggage handler at Luton Airport.

So let’s get this straight: a fanatical supporter of a global jihadist movement best known for blowing up planes and crashing them into buildings is considered a fit and proper person to be given an air-side pass, which could potentially afford him the chance to plant a bomb?

Jalal Ahmed’s job involves loading bags onto aircraft. I’m sure you find that reassuring as you plan your next sunshine break.

His employers say he has passed all criminal record and security checks and works only part time and during peak periods, when the airport is busiest. So that’s all right, then. Best to avoid Luton at Bank Holidays and half-term, though, just to be on the safe side.

Airport officials insist: ‘He would be in a supervised environment at all times.’

Somehow, I doubt that’s the kind of ‘supervised environment’ most of us would like to see him in. That would involve orange jumpsuits, armed guards, razor-wire and large dogs.

A spokesman added that the airport authorities had no idea that one of their employees was involved in the demonstration. I don’t suppose they did, especially as they had no idea, either, that Jalal Ahmed is connected to an illegal Islamist organisation which supports international terrorism and wants to impose Sharia law in Britain.

My guess is that not only didn’t they know, they didn’t want to know and made no effort to find out, lest they be accused of committing the mortal sin of ‘racial profiling’.

It’s the same warped mindset which sees groups of young Muslim men, accompanied by faceless women in burqas, waved through airport security without so much as a cursory glance, while old-age pensioners from Tunbridge Wells on their way to a long weekend in Madeira are subjected to the full Spanish Inquisition and a humiliating strip search.

The authorities are terrified of anything which might lead to charges of ‘Islamophobia’ being levelled against them. In that respect, the powers-that-be at Luton Airport are only following the official policy of this Government and its various agencies.

Appeasement and indulgence are the order of the day when it comes to dealing with Muslim extremism. Speak softly, and on no account carry a big stick.

Only yesterday we learned that even Boris Johnson, the Tory Mayor of London, has just doled out £30,000 of taxpayers’ money to some dubious front organisation run by a prominent al Qaeda cheerleader, who encourages the killing of British soldiers in Iraq.

That’s just a round of drinks in relation to the £90 million the Government shovels in the direction of assorted Islamist extremists. The belief seems to be that if we put them on the payroll and keep them sweet, they’ll agree not to blow us up.

This official line extends through the police and the BBC. At this week’s march-past by the Royal Anglians in Luton, the dopey bird covering it for Radio 4’s PM program saw no reason to mention the ethnicity of the demonstrators, although she did make a point of identifying those confronting them as ‘hard-core, young white males’. No racism there, then.

On the day, the Old Bill seem to have got it into their head that their job was to protect the right of Islamist nutjobs to accuse British soldiers of rape and baby-killing in a deliberate attempt to goad otherwise law-abiding people into committing a breach of the peace.

The only arrests made were of supporters of the troops, who had turned out to watch the parade and were provoked beyond outrage at these vile slurs.

One of those arrested has been charged with a ‘racially aggravated’ offence, just to prove the police’s even-handedness. Another diversity box ticked for the annual report.

None of the young Muslim men inciting hatred were arrested. Nor were any of the sinister, masked women taking photos at the parade.

LITTLEJOHN

Posted by peiper     on 03/13/2009 at 01:01 PM   
Filed Under: • Editorials • RoPMA • Terrorists • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner