Tuesday - May 24, 2011

law and disorder but damn little justice

Things never change except the lame excuses.  And a jury that can be so dumb as to buy the argument of diminished responsibility.

There’s a couple of bothersome stories left over from a day ago.

In one case a 15 year old thick lipped jungle bunny stone cold killer, who blew away a young woman for £200 and also to impress da boyz in de hood. Typical I guess. Another case of the white man’s burden cept there’s a gang of the brutish sub human black bastards.  Given life which is doubtful what he’ll serve, the judge referred to him a child. Child? At 15, even in my far off innocent days 15 was no child. Yeah I know. In the eyes of the law yadda,yadda.  We all know the law’s pretty much an ass.

The other story is really one for the books though. This concerns a white killer who isn’t any better then the black gang mentioned above.
Here’s another creep who planned the killing of his wife.  He’d already threatened her with a knife, and she was frightened enough to hire a bodyguard and start divorce proceedings.
Well, he decided he had to kill her and so went out and went to the trouble of digging a grave AND, even going so far as to make a coffin lined with heavy plastic so it wouldn’t leak.  He buried her in a place authorities say nobody but he would ever find. And it was only found because he led the cops there.
Now that’s a lot of planning folks.  Seems to me he knew exactly what he was doing. Ah but the jury in their infinite stupidity or else naive beyond belief, bought into the old manslaughter due to diminished responsibility ploy.  He didn’t use the knife after all btw.  He decided on a hammer instead. 

The article doesn’t state where the bodyguard was or if she’d dispensed with the service. Read all the story for yourself.
Diminished responsibility indeed. In a pig’s eye. Another killer with another excuse to justify a cold blooded killing. At some point you all know damn well some shrink will declare that his shrunken mental state is restored to normal and his responsibility is clear to go.  What he deserves is a death in the very same manner he gave his wife.  No hope of that however.

British Airways pilot who dug grave in park cleared of murdering his wife

Robert Brown, a British Airways pilot who dug a grave in a park weeks before killing his wife Joanna was today cleared of her murder.

By Victoria Ward, Nigel Bunyan and Andrew Hough 11:39AM BST 24 May 2011

Brown, 47, killed his wife in a hammer attack on the doorstep of her sprawling, mock-Tudor mansion near Ascot, following a costly divorce battle.
He wrapped her blood-soaked body in plastic sheeting and buried her in a carefully constructed plastic coffin he had lowered into a quiet corner of a park several weeks earlier.

Yesterday, a jury cleared Brown of murder. He had earlier admitted manslaughter by means of diminshed responsibility claiming he was suffering extreme stress during the divorce. He was also convicted of preventing a coroner from holding an inquest by disposing of a body.

During his eight-day trial, Reading Crown Court heard claims that the airline captain had become consumed with greed, desperate to win a large slice of his wife’s fortune, despite having signed a pre-nuptial agreement which prevented him from doing so.
It was claimed he had dismissed Mrs Brown’s offer of a £500,000 settlement and wanted her £3 million house in Ascot, Berks.

READ ALL THE STORY HERE

And then we have the sad case of bongo-bongo- bongo I don’t wanna leave the Congo and we all wish your ancestors hadn’t.
This is the worst part about slavery.  We’re now stuck with them. Millions of em just breeding like fuckin flies.

Teenage hitman, 15, who was caught on CCTV gunning down innocent mother is jailed for life
Last updated at 12:21 PM on 24th May 2011

* Half-brother convicted of murder of lawyer Tom ap Rhys Pryce in 2006
* Cousin given life sentence over shooting of Lee Subaran in 2004
* Judge lifts order granting him anonymity

A teenage hitman who was caught on CCTV shooting a young mother dead was jailed for life with a minimum term of 20 years at the Old Bailey today.

Santre Sanchez Gayle, 15, was paid just £200 to carry out the murder of Gulistan Subasi – a fee he used to buy a gold Dolce and Gabbana beanie hat.

The boy, known by the street name Riot, will spend at least two decades behind bars after being convicted of the cold-blooded murder, described by a Judge Stephen Kramer as ‘an efficient, ruthless and calculated execution’.

There was sobbing from the public gallery as the killers were taken down to begin their sentences.
Judge told Gayle that his ‘youth and immaturity’ were factors in the crime.

But he added: ‘Anyone seeing the short but telling CCTV clip of the shooting cannot but be struck by the chillingly deliberate and cold-blooded way in which you went about your business.’

The judge described Gayle as a low-level cannabis dealer who expected to be paid £2,000 for the murder but was short-changed and only paid £200.

‘You were an easily-led, immature youngster, who, if money was involved, was capable of violence out of loyalty, having cynically been used by others.

‘You shot and killed Gulistan for money, and at the bidding of an older man who you were trying to impress.’

The judge said it was not possible to say who was behind the killing or who recruited Billy to find someone to carry it out.

Miss Subasi had been staying with her mother at the time and was about to celebrate the birthday of her young child.

The judge told her killers: ‘You have deprived a mother of a much-loved daughter and a son of his mother.’

ALL THE REST HERE

Idiot judges just love the sound of their own voices. Why is he telling these darkies what they already know? Does he think they have the capacity to care?
In yesterday’s edition of this article, the 15 yr old was bragging about what he’d done, and telling friends that he left no telling evidence behind. And as for ‘youngster,’ I don’t think that has anything to do with it.  At any age this thug was merely reverting to type. I shouldn’t say reverting cos that infers he may not have always been that way. But of course he was. You only have to look at he and his sub species friends to see that. Their natural habitat is not the streets of a civilized country but running half naked through a jungle somewhere eating raw meat. 

There’s yet another story of a father and son stabbed while trying to help someone being attacked by a gang, but I’ll leave things with this tired subject that’s much beloved by critics of the American penal system, and why the hell do they care anyway?

What I have posted here is very much edited. The original article has more to do with things relating to the UK then the USA.
But the subject of America jailing it’s citizens as though every single miscreant were actually an American is maddening.  I think these ppl paint if not an incorrect picture then certainly one that is slanted. Read her for yourself and see.

The Right has learnt to play the game of magpie politics

As Barack Obama lands in Britain, on both sides of the Atlantic traditional Left-wing issues are being hijacked , says Mary Riddell.

Today, the leader of the free world will sweep into London behind the twin shield of a bomb-proofed Cadillac and the aura of glory conferred on him by Osama bin Laden’s execution. As Barack Obama told the American people after the killing: “We can do these things not just because of wealth and power, but because of who we are: one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

Mr Obama’s discussions with David Cameron will centre on how that prospectus can prevail across the planet. Back in the US, however, the president’s claims to be the guardian of universal liberty strike a hollow note. As the 2.4 million citizens serving time could testify, the land of the free is the most punitive developed nation on Earth.

One American adult in 100 is behind bars, rising to one in nine among young black men. The quadrupling of incarceration since 1970 cannot be explained by the brutishness of Americans, who are marginally less criminally inclined, though slightly more homicidal, than the English, or by the success of harsh sentencing: violent offences have risen for four decades.

Newt Gingrich, the former speaker of the House of Representatives and a presidential hopeful. It would be hardly more startling to discover that Attila the Hun was an early advocate of the Human Rights Act than to learn that Mr Gingrich is now the US’s leading prison reformer. Among the other campaigners who bear no discernible resemblance to Elizabeth Fry is Grover Norquist, an architect of thumb-in-your-eye Republicanism who wants the state “shrunk down to the size where we can drown it in the bathtub”.

The US’s radical Rightists have not transmogrified into angels of mercy. Their fiscally driven mission is based on the $68 billion cost of maintaining a corrections system where inmate numbers are increasing 13 times faster than the general population. As Mr Gingrich wrote recently: “These facts should trouble every American.” More imprisonment, as he added, does not mean less crime. Those states, such as New York, that have jailed fewer people have also seen offences drop. With the majority of convicts reoffending, it is time, in Mr Gingrich’s opinion, to shut some prisons and rely on “more humane, effective alternatives”.

Barack Obama will this week visit a Europe where the Left is on the run. Its leading figures have sleepwalked to obliteration – or perp-walked, in the case of Dominique Strauss-Kahn – and their resurrection will be made harder by today’s magpie politics, in which the Right steals the traditional causes of the Left.
Last week, Henry Kissinger, a Cold War veteran, flew into Britain to make the case for global nuclear disarmament. As Dr Kissinger told me, he is “confident” of progress on an issue on which the parliamentary Left, which long ago burnt its CND cards, has little to say.

unedited version here

No matter what the lady says here, seems to me that the UK can do with a few more prisons if they aren’t gonna bring back the rack and rope.

Posted by peiper     on 05/24/2011 at 08:13 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner