Thursday - March 05, 2009

Killers go to jail.  Killers set free.  Killers kill again. ( do ya wonder I’m dizzy with it all?)

I read stuff like this and come unglued every time.  I think they (newspapers) maybe do it just to annoy me.

I just can not understand ppl who are against the death penalty where there is clear evidence of guilt.  I don’t mean yeah maybe he/she did it.
I mean like caught on camera or caught in the act.

It just seems like a never ending story.  Oh dear me, jails are full so lets release a few killers.  They gave their word they’d be nice from now on.
Some thug with a looooooooooooong record of violent crime gets caught again and gets out early because he’s a model prisoner or whatever.

I sometimes hear some of these dreamy folks on interviews talking about rehab.  And how wrong it is to take a life blah,blah.
It never occurs to these folks living on a fluffy cloud just how off kilter their arguments are.  And btw, why on earth give violent criminals chance after chance when the evidence is clear what they’re made of?  Some people really are evil.  Like this sickening individual.  Why should he not have been terminated at the first sign of what he is.  But no. 

I wonder if the way it actually works is like this.
Guy is violent but soft culture wants to help him and give him a break.  So ... the authorities come up with a magic victim figure.  They say, okay. So Mr. Monster attacked this girl (or boy or anyone for any one of various crimes) but it’s only his first offense.  Lets not lock him up until he’s attacked victim number ... hey, anyone have a favorite or a lucky number?  Come on, we need a number.  Five?  Fine. Five it is.
So when Mr.Monster does in his 5th vic. then we’ll have a serious talk with him and maybe even punish him.  But we let him have five.
Done. 

Hey people ... crowded jails?  Solution.  The rope, the chair, the gas chamber.  If the crime was vicious enough, all three. No regrets.

Scores of killers released from life sentences have gone on to commit serious crimes over the past decade, including murder and rape, the Government has admitted.

By Christopher Hope, Whitehall Editor
Last Updated: 7:14AM GMT 05 Mar 2009

Stephen Ayre, photo here , 45, was convicted of raping a 10 month-old boy in 2006 after being given parole on a life sentence for the murder of a woman in West Yorkshire in 1984.

Mandatory life sentences are only given to offenders convicted of murder. However hundreds of convicted killers have been released over the past decade.

Ministry of Justice figures show that, since 1997, 65 prisoners who were released after serving a mandatory life sentences were recalled and found guilty of a further offence.

The offences include two murders, a suspected murder, one attempted murder, three rapes and two instances of grievous bodily harm.

Other offences committed by prisoners released on life licence include burglary, robbery, drugs and firearms offences, threats to kill, indecent assault and violence against the person.

In one instance, Glyn Dix received a life sentence in the 1970s for shooting dead Pia Overbury. He was in prison at least as late as 1999 when he met his wife.

After his release he murdered her in a row over what to watch on television and cut her body into 16 pieces with a hacksaw and scissors.

In another case, Stephen Ayre, 45, was convicted of raping a 10 month-old boy in 2006 after being given parole on a life sentence for the murder of a woman in West Yorkshire in 1984.

Both criminals were sent back to prison for life on an indeterminate sentence.

Edward Garnier, shadow justice minister, said: “Life-sentenced prisoners should not be released where there is a dangerous of further serious offending, and those who are judged suitable for release should be subject to the utmost supervision for the rest of their lives.”

Last year it emerged that more than 300 murderers, rapists and other serious offenders who had been handed life sentences were already back on the streets.

A total of 304 criminals jailed since January 1997 served fewer than 10 years despite being handed the maximum term, the Ministry of Justice admitted yesterday.

In most cases, the courts would have set a minimum tariff of fewer than 10 years for the sentence. The Parole Board would subsequently have agreed to release them.

I honestly get the feeling that while the conversations relating to these monsters goes on among the people who decide these things, NONE of them are thinking about the public at large.  They can’t be.  Or they would say screw the EU, bring back the rope.

Posted by peiper     on 03/05/2009 at 10:40 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner