Tuesday - August 11, 2009

Injuries included a broken back and eight broken ribs. And that’s just to start. This is beyond sick

I was aware and very disturbed by this story months ago when it was first made public. I wasn’t alone. Disturbed? More then that. Anger, frustration and all sorts of gloomy feelings reading about this poor kid.  How in the freeken world can a mother be party to this? How can any adult do these things to a helpless child?
And why oh why can’t those who commit some particularly horrific crimes be hung immediately.  No wait. Why can’t the same treatment be given them.

I didn’t post this at the time it first came out. It’s just too damn sickening.  But today there’s even more information and graphics and I thought originally I couldn’t hate these sub humans any more. They are disgusting scum of the worst order.

How can people torture a helpless baby of 17 months and live with themselves?
And how does a state now decide that due to the nature of the crime and publicity, the perps will get round the clock protection at the taxpayers expense. FOR LIFE.  Oh yeah. I forgot to mention it.  The mother will be out in a few years.  I am really trying very hard to keep my language clean.  While writing this I think I’ve even made up some new swear words even I never heard.

How does this grab you BMEWS?

At the autopsy they found some of his teeth in his stomach.
One of his abusers already had a record for the rape of a two year old girl.  In fact, he and his brother attacked their grandmother, beat her and locked her in a closet demanding that she rewrite her will leaving whatever she had to them.  She died some months later.  And still… the $£!!"£%$&&* bastards were out walking free. There’s no such fuckin thing as a god damned justice system! Forget about it. It’s a gd myth.

The killers of Baby Peter will be given new identities at taxpayers’ expense and lifetime protection from the threat of exposure after being named publicly for the first time as Tracey Connelly and Steven Barker.

By Caroline Gammell and Martin Beckford

The 17-month-old boy suffered an agonising death in their squalid home after months of abuse. The pair subjected him to an appalling ordeal that left him with 50 injuries, including a broken back.

Connelly, 28, who admitted causing or allowing Baby Peter’s death, could be released from jail in as little as three years.

She has already been placed in solitary accommodation in prison to protect her from fellow prisoners, such is the level of the notoriety she has gained since full details of her son’s treatment were disclosed.

It is almost certain that under human rights laws she will be granted lifelong anonymity once she is freed.

By claiming that she had the right to a life free from vigilante attacks or intrusion by the media, she would be given a new name, moved to a home equipped with panic buttons and provided with round-the-clock police protection for the rest of her life at an estimated cost to the taxpayer of £1 million a year.

The same protection may also be given to Barker, 33, who could be free in 12 years.

It can be disclosed today that he is the brother of Jason Owen, 37 — Connelly’s lodger, who was also convicted over Peter’s death. He was the only one of the three accused to be publicly named at the end of their trial last November.

Protection orders are often granted to those who become notorious for crimes they commit against children. These include Mary Bell, who killed two boys when she was 11; Maxine Carr, who provided a false alibi for Ian Huntley after he murdered the Soham schoolgirls; and the schoolboy killers of James Bulger.

Philip Davies, the Conservative MP for Shipley, was angered by the public cost of protecting Connelly in the future. “She had absolutely no concern for the human rights of Baby P, so it’s a bit much to expect anyone to fall over themselves protecting her rights,” he said.

“It will probably stick in the throat of most taxpayers to stump up cash for her. What she did was hideous and she should face the consequences of that.

“It’s a prime example of how human rights of criminals are put before those of victims — in this case a defenceless baby.”

Claude Knights, the director of Kidscape, a children’s charity, said the killers had “destroyed faith in humanity”.

“I don’t feel society should spend the hundreds and thousands it would cost [to give them new identities],” he said. “I would prefer it to be spent on child protection.”

TELEGRAPH

We aren’t done yet ... I want you to PLEASE see this version at the Daily Mail and see all the photos. Look at this filth that was allowed to be free and the system that has failed and failed miserably.  How the damn hell could the doctors have missed his injuries for so long?  How could the social services ppl have missed the filth and squalor this kid was in. And btw ... HE WAS NOT ALONE in that home!

This version in The Daily Mail is a very long one and so I’m only posting this excerpt. See the link below for all of it.
I can’t imagine any one of you who won’t come away angry.

Evil mother who stood by as son was tortured… and the neo-Nazi boyfriend who abused him

By Vanessa Allen, Colin Fernandez and Lucy Ballinger
Last updated at 2:06 PM on 11th August 2009

Such was Connelly’s lack of thought for her own child that in the final week of Peter’s life, when eight of his ribs were broken and his spine snapped, leaving him semi-paralysed, she claimed she had not noticed his injuries.

And when paramedics were called to the house on August 3, 2007, to find Peter blue and cold in his blood-spattered cot, they were horrified when his mother kept the ambulance waiting while she searched for her cigarettes.

She was pregnant with Barker’s child - a girl born while she was on remand in Holloway Prison.

Social workers initially asked to leave the baby with her to ‘bond’ but were overruled.

Connelly applied to meet her surviving children during her trial, but has been told she will never see them again.She whined to the trial judge that she cried every day and punished herself for allowing Peter’s abuse, but her jail letters rarely mention her children.

Instead she moaned of missing sex, writing: ‘I’ve been obsessed lately about it. I need sex like a heroin addict needs a fix.’

HERE FOR ALL THE PHOTOS AND THE REST OF THE STORY

Posted by peiper     on 08/11/2009 at 01:32 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Outrageous • UK •  
• Comments (9) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner