Monday - November 26, 2012

a one sided suicide pact

I’m looking for words again. They just won’t come to me.  When I see something like this, I really believe it’s possible for the sky to fall.
If ever Germany and the west needed some backbone you’d think it might be now. But no.
If it weren’t for those damned mistaken fools in the 1930s, we would not be seeing this kind of thing today.
This is depressing.

A One-Sided Suicide Pact

by EDWARD CLINE

Soeren Kern, writing for the Gatestone Institute in his November 16th article, “IslamNeeds a Fair Chance in Germany,” reported a significant development in Germany that portends dire consequences for that benighted nation and for all of Europe: the city of Hamburg signed a “treaty” with organizations representing its Islamic population.

The “treaty” features a series of concessions, not by the Muslims to secular authority, but by the secular government of Hamburg to the Muslims. The “treaty,” which requires ratification by the city’s Parliament, grants Muslims “rights” and “privileges” enjoyed by no other religious group there.

The November 13 agreement, signed by Hamburg’s Socialist Mayor Olaf Scholz and the leaders of four Muslim umbrella groups, is being praised by the proponents of multiculturalism for putting the northern port city’s estimated 200,000 Muslims on an equal footing with Christian residents....

The most controversial part of the accord involves a commitment by the city government to promote the teaching of Islam in the Hamburg public school system. The agreement grants the leaders of Hamburg’s Muslim communities a determinative say in what will be taught by allowing them to develop the teaching curriculum for Islamic studies.

Moreover, Muslim officials will also be able to determine who will (and who will not) be allowed to teach courses about Islam in city schools. In practice, this means that only Muslims will be allowed to teach Islam and that pupils will not be exposed to any critical perspectives about the religious, social and political ideology of Islam.

It is noteworthy that all the concessions will be paid by non-Muslim Germans as a form of jizya, or “protection” tax. Germans will not “retaliate” against Islamic aggression, for political correctness will silence them for fear of being accused of racism or bigotry.

Islam, however, is first and foremost, from top to bottom, a totalitarian ideology. Its doctrine requires that Muslims and their spokesmen advocate Islam’s own kind of racism and bigotry.

Islam is a nihilist ideology, as well. It is the enemy of all human values. In exchange for submission to it, it promises a paradise after death. Life on earth is merely transitory and not important. The Hamburg “treaty” is an extension of that nihilism; it requires its secular signers to aid and abet the piecemeal annihilation of their values and their culture. The Islamists know what they are doing. Their secular cosigners do not. It seems the “right” thing to do, per a Kantian categorical imperative to pursue an end regardless of, but especially because of, its selfless nature, in the name of what Mayor Scholz called “the strengthening the societal foundation” of Hamburg.

Which is tantamount to injecting the bubonic plague pathogen into a human body in order to “strengthen an individual’s well-being.”

Do the opponents of the treaty take a principled stand against it? No. They remain as clueless about the implications as Mayor Scholz.

t is noteworthy that all non-Muslim school children attending public schools will be indoctrinated in Islam by Islamic teachers. This is necessary to forestall any future opposition to Islam’s incremental takeover of Hamburg, and then Bremen, and then all of Germany.

full and unedited version here

Posted by peiper     on 11/26/2012 at 02:56 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • muslims • OBITITUARIES • Outrageous • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - November 21, 2012

some stuff never changes except pc stupidity. that keeps getting stupider

In the news today.

What do ya do if you’re a loser and out of work and have no family as in wife and kids?  What if you have a brother that has a wife and four kids and owns a highly successful restaurant?
What do you do?  What Do You Do?

Well, if you happen to be from Bangladesh and your name is Foyez Ahmed, the answer is obvious to you if nobody else.

You murder your sister-in-law by cutting her throat.

And that is exactly what the ass-wipe did. 
I suppose his lawyer will claim mental stress due to being a failure in life and everything else.  Except murder.
They really need to ditch the EU and bring back the rope here.
-30-

Meanwhile, while the above monster was doing his worst, another fellow named Kasid Hussain was employed and working as a taxi driver.
With a twist that now makes me wonder about the use of taxis in future, what Mr. Hussain did is quite thought provoking.
He was tipping off friends so that they could burgle the homes of the fares after he’d picked them up.
He relayed info to the gang on 10 occasions before being caught.
-30-

Help parents or go to jail teen is told by judge
Howz this for punishment? This’ll lay on the frighteners.
This teen had committed a couple of burglaries and was caught. Goes to court and the judge gives him home time instead of jail time. Instructs the teen (18) he can avoid jail if he helps his mom around the house and does dishes and keeps his room neat and clean etc.  Oh yeah, he has to make his bed every day, has 120 hrs of unpaid community work and 6 months drug rehab.
The kid says he should have been jailed but plans to go straight after this and have no more trouble.  I guess we can hope he sticks to that.
-30-

This country really, really needs to get things together. They have gone completely mad I tell you, what with all this rubbish about racial abuse and here’s an example of total stupid.  Honest, I don’t see how it can get much dumber.

Two women are in an argument and one is obviously three sheets to the wind.
So in anger, she calls her neighbor “A stupid fat Australian.” Result?

Neighbour guilty of racially abusing New Zealand-born woman by calling her a ‘stupid fat Australian’

That’s the headline. I am not posting the story. Here’s a link tho if you want to read it.

pc just never stops being stupid and this is a good example.fined £110 for racially aggravated public disorder

Posted by peiper     on 11/21/2012 at 11:08 AM   
Filed Under: • News-Briefs • Politically Correct B.S. • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 17, 2012

THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES FOR FREE SPEECH, BUT ONLY IF UR CHRISTIAN

Just to show you, as if you need proof, what a weird world we live in.
Four or five words on a personal blog and the man is demoted and gets a reduction in salary.
Hey, you wanna voice Christian thoughts in public?  Then be prepared for the consequences.  Free thought and speech?  Sure thing.  But not if you just happen to belong to a politically incorrect religion.  Or one that doesn’t have race and minority privilege. 

Take a look at this.

Vindicated - but ruined: In a historic victory, a Christian demoted at work after writing on Facebook that he opposed gay marriage in church tells how his battle has come at a terrible price

By Andrew Pierce.

Adrian Smith was disturbed to read a report that gay marriages may be permitted in church.
So he went onto his Facebook page and posted four words summarising his own position.

‘An equality too far,’ he wrote.

But those four words, even though they were seen by only a few dozen friends and work colleagues, triggered a major battle over freedom of speech which finally ended yesterday.
Mr Smith, a tireless charity supporter who works for Trafford Housing Trust, had become a victim of the increasingly aggressive war against so-called hate crimes.

After a work colleague complained that his comment was offensive (despite having not seen the post), Mr Smith, a family man and lifelong Labour voter, was disciplined, had his job downgraded and his salary cut by £14,000. But yesterday, after a bitter and protracted court fight to overturn the decision, the married father-of-two won a landmark victory.

His triumph comes in the wake of a series of recent claims by Christians that they have been discriminated against for expressing their beliefs.
In Mr Smith’s case, his employers claimed he broke their code of conduct by expressing religious or political views which might upset co-workers.

But Mr Justice Briggs, in London’s High Court, yesterday ruled that the housing trust did not have a right to demote Mr Smith as his Facebook postings did not amount to misconduct.

He said the comment about gays marrying in church was not — viewed objectively — judgmental, disrespectful or liable to cause upset or offence, and was expressed in moderate language.
As for the content, it was a widely held view frequently heard on radio and television, or read in the newspapers.

source

The thing that actually surprises me most is that our victim here has been, the article states, a life long supporter of the Labour Party. Which as most of you might know, is left. Some are very left.  I have not seen any conservative call for the public hanging, in a manner of speaking, for people who reject religion.  But it seems to be the case that the left willingly plays the race and offence card whenever possible.  One whack job took offence at a few words and look at the cost to this man.  The nutter who complained would surely NOT have been a conservative.
Maybe Mr. Smith should start looking at another political party to support tho lord knows, most of them are bananas in one way or another.

>

Posted by peiper     on 11/17/2012 at 08:11 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Stoopid-People • UK • work and the workplace •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 13, 2012

another pig ignorant brit judge says fuck you to his country as common sense takes holiday

Here is a PRIME example of what belonging to a foreign union in writing brings a nation to. But as bad or worse yet, the home grown liberal ass-wipe pig ignorant and insane judges who make decisions that will impact a nation.

Here is an example America, of a western country looking at itself in a mirror and with raised middle finger saying to it’s image,
“Fuck You.” And so far, this damn fool piece of pig shit judge has done just that. And all in the name of the new religion foisted on the west by, it own damn and stupid self.  The religion of human rights in whose name all manner of insanity and illogical actions are now taken.

Here’s another example.
Of 11,000 foreign prisoners, many with records of violence, only 62 have been booted out of this country in the last few years.
Killers have been allowed to remain because they have a ‘RIGHT’ to a family life. Or they might be ill treated if returned to their home country. 
It insanity and it has truly run amok.
So who is seeing to the rights of the law abiding citizen to justice when preyed upon by the filth that infests society?
It sure as hell is isn’t any judge. And especially not the responsibility of defense council.

There honestly are some people who really should not be breathing.  Like the crud who broke into an old man’s home this week past and stabbed him to death. Wasn’t enough he broke in to rob the house. He had to kill the poor guy while his wife upstairs and recovering from surgery, heard his screams.
If and when they catch the guy who did it, I’m sure all of his rights both real (if any) and imagined (of which there will be loads) will be strictly looked after.

The system stinks to high heaven.  Justice is a joke told by a very bad self appointed comedian usually referred to as a judge.

Abu Qatada back on the streets within hours

Abu Qatada, the extremist cleric, will be back on the streets of Britain today and allowed to roam free for eight hours a day after a court ruled he cannot be deported.

By Tom Whitehead, Security Editor

The decision means that the security services and police will now have to watch him around the clock in a surveillance operation that is likely to cost the taxpayer more than £5 million a year.

The terror suspect was granted bail by a senior immigration judge yesterday after ruling that Theresa May, the Home Secretary, had failed to satisfy him that he would face a fair trial in Jordan. “ We are absolutely determined to see this man get on a plane and go back to Jordan, he does not belong here. “

“He should not be in this country, he is a dangerous person. He wanted to inflict harm on our country and this coalition Government is going to do everything we can to challenge this every step of the way to make sure that he is deported to Jordan.”

Mr Justice Mitting then ordered Qatada be released from a high-security prison and imposed bail conditions that only placed him under a 16-hour curfew.

Conservative MP Peter Bone told ITV’s Daybreak today that the interests of the public should be put before the European Court.

He said: “Enough is enough - put this terrorist on a plane and send him home and worry about the European Court afterwards.

“There are times when we need to put the public interest in front of the European Court and this is one of them.

“The highest court in this land, our Supreme Court, has said he can go back. Now, if the highest court in this land says he can go back, then he can go back.

“We should not be kow-towing to this ‘Mickey Mouse’ European court.”

“The Supreme Court should be the ultimate court.”

The ruling by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) is a humiliating blow for Mrs May, who personally travelled to Jordan to obtain assurances that Qatada would face a fair trial.

She sought guarantees after the European Court of Human Rights ruled earlier this year that he could not be deported because there was a risk he would face evidence obtained by torture. But yesterday Siac dismissed those assurances and allowed Qatada’s appeal against deportation.

It is the latest twist in a legal battle that has run for more than a decade and cost the taxpayer more than £1 million in legal fees and benefits.

Qatada, who was once described by a Spanish judge as Osama bin Laden’s right-hand man in Europe, will now be under less stringent bail conditions than when he was last released earlier this year, when he was required to stay at home for 22 hours a day.

Under the new conditions he will be allowed his freedom between 8am and 4pm, although he will be tagged and restricted on whom he can meet.

Security and police sources are concerned over the level of monitoring that will now be required. It would be hugely damaging if Qatada gained access to the internet or video facilities to send out a message of hate or to inspire others to act, even if it meant him being returned to prison.

The Home Office plans to appeal against the decision but if it fails Qatada could remain here indefinitely, with increasingly lenient restrictions on his movements.

Qatada’s lawyer, Edward Fitzgerald QC, said there was “no justification for continuing to deprive Mr Othman [Qatada’s real name] of his liberty”.

LIBERTY TRUMPS PUBLIC SAFETY

Oh btw bmews.  Just to let ya know.  This dirt bag isn’t any old run of the mill mad mullah. Oh no.

His hate videos were found among the belongings of one of the 9/11 hijackers who flew into the WTC.  But his lawyers take no note of that and neither did this shit faced judge.  He and others are soooooo worried his trial wouldn’t be a fair one if returned to Jordan.  And of course he’s really innocent. Makes ya wanna grab a gun. Or toss something at him that goes boom. Pity nobody around who can do that.

Posted by peiper     on 11/13/2012 at 07:29 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • muslims • Stoopid-People • Terrorists •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 03, 2012

Police swoop on landlord for organising an ‘ugliest woman’ competition.

In my previous post I mentioned ISIMS. I forgot one til I saw this article on line tonight. Wasn’t even looking for it.
Just shows you the sick, confused PC world we have.  The ‘isim’ in this case is, sexism. What a dumb sounding word. Like all the other isims.
Now this really is just plain dumb. Why in the world would the police respond to call like this? 
Beyond that, the scary part are the words below. The police allowed.  Does that imply they could have just as easily stopped this bit of harmless nonsense?

Police swoop on landlord for organising an ‘ugliest woman’ competition

Unknown complainant reported Glasgow pub for sexism

When police arrived at the venue they allowed the competition to go ahead this Sunday

By Sara Malm

A pub holding a competition to find the ‘Ugliest Woman’ got a visit from the police after someone reported them for sexism.

An unknown complainant demanded the competition be cancelled and wanted the owners of Islay Inn prosecuted.

However, when police arrived at the Glasgow venue they gave manager George Hogg the go ahead after discovering it was, in fact, a competition for men dressed as women.

Mr Hogg told of his disbelief of the complaint and accused the protestor of being ‘over the top with political correctness.’

He said: ‘I have no idea who made the complaint and the police wouldn’t tell me - but if he or she had bothered to read the advert properly, they would have realised that it was not ugly women we were looking for - but ugly men dressed up as women.

‘The first we knew of a potential problem was when two female officers from Maryhill Police Station came into the bar on Thursday night.

‘They told me they had received a complaint about us holding a competition to find the ugliest woman in the bar and that it might constitute some kind of sexist offence.

‘But when I pointed out the facts, the policewomen were clearly amused and quickly told me the matter would go no further.’

Mr Hogg added: ‘It was a totally over the top reaction by whoever went to the bother of reporting us - political correctness gone mad!’

The event was advertised on the Facebook page of the pub, located in the city’s Kelvingrove area.

Earlier today the page was updated to clear up the ‘misunderstanding’ regarding the ‘Ugliest Woman’ competition, which is set to go ahead on Sunday.

The Islay Inn apologised for causing any offense adding: ‘Just so it’s clear to all, our ugly women will be men dressed as women, beard stubble and all.’

The pub offers a £50 cash prize for the ugliest ‘woman’ and in the spirit of equality, the ‘bonniest’ woman dressed as a man will receive a bottle of vodka.

The posting attracted several comments from customers, saying a competition for ugly men would not have been met with the same reaction.

Andrew Parr wrote: ‘Ridiculous getting the police involved. Some people are pathetic.

Mark McCarrick added: ‘As if our overstretched police service haven’t got enough to do without being bothered by some silly complaint.

‘I bet the silly fart wouldn’t have moaned had it been an ugly man competition.

‘Get yourself a life whoever you are, its a bit of fun in these dark and gloomy times!’

So among other things, what is wrong here?  There is ya know. What’s wrong is this.

“The Islay Inn apologised for causing any offense”

Why?  What’s the point? That’s as bad as the wanker who called to gripe. And just one complaint?
That’s another thing wrong with the world. Or at least the western part of same.  Too damn quick to say sorry even when it isn’t needed.
It sure isn’t needed here but they did anyway.

The very idea that their silly competition as the cops put it, “might constitute some kind of sexist offence,” is alone an outrage. Under what circumstance could holding a goofy competition like this constitute anything worthy of police interest?

SOURCE FOR MORE

Posted by peiper     on 11/03/2012 at 01:01 PM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Politically Correct B.S. • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - October 27, 2012

stupid just got got a lot more so and public is less safe so things are normal here

I suppose it doesn’t get too much crazier than this.
Another one of those things I couldn’t make up.

He is serving a life sentence for assaulting and robbing a 90-year-old woman and has been linked to sex offences.

Here’s the headline.

‘Lock your doors:’ Police warning after ‘dangerous and predatory’ sex offender goes on the run

· He is suspected to have committed a serious sex offence while on the run
· There are reports that two schoolgirls were approached for sex by a man who matched his description
· Cyrus remains at large despite a police hunt and several reported sightings
· Police warned the public to lock their doors and not to approach him

By Alex Ward
Daily Mail

Detective Chief Inspector Ian Dawson, of Preston Police, said: ‘Leach is an extremely dangerous and predatory individual who poses a serious threat to members of the public.

‘He has previous convictions for burglary, sex offenses against a young girl, assault and robberies in which he has targeted elderly people in their own homes.
‘We believe he could be sleeping rough and traveling extensively throughout the country. He has a number of links to Preston and prior to his sentence lived and offended in the Preston area.
‘We are liaising with a number of other forces in a bid to track him down and apprehend him but we need the public’s help.’

So then bmews readers, just what do you do with an animal like this?  Guy is violent, sex predator, deemed as violent and a threat to the public.  Hmm. Lets see.
What would you do?
OH!  I have it. I’m so darn brilliant I could kiss myself except I don’t kiss guys and another guy’s wives.
What to do?  Easy.  Why don’t we allow him day release?

Lee Cyrus has been a fugitive since October 9 when he failed to return from day release.

WHAT???  But he promised he’d return. He gave his word.  Damn it. Ya just can’t trust anyone anymore these days.

Oh btw.  It’s reported he has attacked a girl while on the run.

Is the system fucked up er what? 
Guy with that kind of background and they give him day release.
It just gets dumber and dumber and dumber. AND, there is no end in sight.

pix & more to read

Posted by peiper     on 10/27/2012 at 12:50 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 25, 2012

mr and mrs are not politically correct and must go. out,out damn spot, says brighton

I’m not sure but this could qualify under humor as well as anything else.
But it isn’t so funny to the txpayer I bet. 
What a dumb idea. And for what?  To make sure a teeny,tiny really small portion of the population doesn’t feel hurt or left out.
People definitely are not getting smarter.  Furthermore, I think there is so little actual work available to these jerks, that they make this stuff up to justify their employment.  Mad hatters.
Seems more and more the majority population must endure the silliness imposed by the politically correct just in case some minority might be offended. And once reminded of it, some minorities suddenly and with great surprise discover that, yes indeed. They are offended and it must stop.
Take a look at this bit of loony tune moonbattery. 

Brighton Council plans to remove Mr and Mrs titles from all documents to protect city’s transgender community from offence

Plans come after council investigated the lives of the city’s transgender community

One councillor brands move ‘ludicrous’ but plan will go ahead if public back support it

By Anna Edwards

Councillors in Brighton could scrap the titles Mr and Mrs from council forms so residents don’t have to choose between genders.

All titles could be scrapped from official paperwork under new plans following an investigation by the council into transgender community in the city.

The proposal is backed by Brighton and Hove City Council deputy leader Phelim MacCafferty, who has called the titles ‘useless’.

But the new proposal has been branded ‘political correctness gone too far’ by an opposition councillor who says the idea is ‘ludicrous’.

A scrutiny panel will put forward a number of recommendations, including the scrapping of Mr and Mrs, to the council for approval in December.

Green Party deputy leader Coun MacCafferty said: ‘Trans people aren’t necessarily male or female and sometimes they don’t want to be defined by their gender.

‘Putting Mr and Mrs on a form is completely useless.

‘This is an issue that concerns most institutions from banks to mobile phone companies.

‘Why is Mr on my debit card, for instance?

‘I don’t understand why it is there.

‘We should at least examine the issue and we will have the recommendations early next month.’

read more

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2012 at 10:23 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Politically Correct B.S. • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

an obama voter woo-hoo should this whatever it is even be voting?

Oh wow. take a look at this. And it votes too.

This is funny, you can also see the entire clip this comes from at the site.

Another one of those unplanned posts that just screamed, SHARE!!!

H/T http://www.mrctv.org/

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2012 at 09:05 AM   
Filed Under: • Humor • Politics • Stoopid-People • USA •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - October 21, 2012

tell me. is Sir Alex Ferguson an idiot or what?  he sure is politically correct

Well damn and double damn it.

Who’dda thunk this pc crazyness would manage to get this far? I may not have thought it but I am not at all surprised and I don’t think you are either.
But it’s bothersome.

I am not a sports fan here, don’t even know who the heck the teams being referred to are and don’t care to know. 
They aren’t the Dodgers or the Yankees.

What this is about is the “enforced” show of solidarity imposed by management on players of some team here, to wear some kind of special stupid anti racist T-Shirt before a game.  Like wearing a shirt is going to solve anything.  And now the idiot manager is threatening a player with the words,
“He will be dealt with, no doubt about that.” And all because the guy didn’t wear a politically correct feel good shirt.

It really never dawns on these MF******pc idiots, that this kind of display may be fine in a place like No. Korea and China, but not as a meaningless and worthless display here in the manner he dictates. What a fool.
These guys want to play football I am reasonably certain.  I’d bet most of them don’t give this pc subject much thought at all, unless it directly impacts them.

I guess this isn’t anything to get worked up over but it’s the idea and the bully boy attitude these pc leftist sobs force on the culture. It takes root and builds and leads them to other things to tell people to do and to wear in support of.

Rio Ferdinand let Manchester United down not wearing a Kick It Out T-shirt says ‘embarrassed’ Sir Alex Ferguson

Alex Ferguson has accused Rio Ferdinand of letting down Manchester United after the defender refused to take part in equality group Kick It Out’s anti-racism day.

By Telegraph Sport

Every player in the Premier League had been issued with a Kick It Out T-shirt to be worn during pre-match warm-ups to show support for the campaign to drive racism from the sport.

But Ferdinand infuriated Ferguson by failing to wear his ahead of Saturday’s 4-2 win over Stoke at Old Trafford.

Ferdinand is thought to have been protesting at what he believes to be the relatively weak punishment given to John Terry after the Chelsea defender was only handed a four-match ban despite being found guilty by the Football Association of racially abusing the United star’s brother Anton during a match against QPR last year.

The 33-year-old’s snub was especially annoying for Ferguson as the United manager, reacting to Reading striker Jason Roberts’ revelation that he wouldn’t support Kick It Out, had insisted on Friday that all his players would wear the T-shirts.

“I’m very disappointed, he has let us down,” Ferguson said after the Stoke game.

“I said yesterday that the players would be wearing it in support of the Professional Footballers Association and that every player should adhere to it. And he goes and lets us down.

“It is embarrassing for me. He will be dealt with, no doubt about that.”

Just had another thought.  Is it even in his contract that he’d have to wear clothing supporting whatever pet project the team manager was into at any given time? 

Posted by peiper     on 10/21/2012 at 05:00 AM   
Filed Under: • Sports • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - October 14, 2012

titles promoting guns should be put on the top shelf alongside pornography.

Darn if this isn’t one for the books. Where do I begin?
I don’t.
I’ll just share the story. Except to say, right on Smith. That’ll put a dent in crime and discourage the would be bad guys who want to own or learn about guns.
You’ll save the country with that move. (snicker)

They are sooooooooo delusional here.

WH Smith bans under 14s from buying shooting magazines despite no age restrictions on owning guns

By Emma Clark

WH Smith has banned children from buying magazines about shooting – even though it is legal for them to own a gun.

Britain’s biggest newsagent has introduced an over-14s limit on all copies of country sports magazines following a campaign by animal rights activists.

The retailer, whose founding family owned a highly prized shoot in Buckinghamshire, will enforce the restriction on hobby magazines including Shooting Times, because it understood children are not allowed to obtain a firearms certificate until they are 14.

However under the current law, there is no minimum age for applying for a shotgun certificate in the UK, although children under 18 are banned from owning or buying their own gun and under-14s must be supervised when using one.

The decision to grant a licence rests with a senior police officer.

Shooting enthusiasts have questioned why the high street chain does not restrict the sale of motoring magazines such as Top Gear to those old enough to drive.

Christopher Graffius, of the British Association for Shooting and Conservation, told WH Smith, said: ‘It is extraordinary that in WH Smith you can buy a car magazine at any age, despite the age limit of 17 for driving.

‘You can also buy war magazines which depict the killing of people, yet WH Smith is concerned about children buying shooting magazines, a legal and Olympic sport.

‘At the recent party conferences, frontbench spokesmen and government ministers sang the praises of shooting sports for the sense of responsibility and discipline that they encourage in the children who take them up.’

He added that it also causing offence to adult shooters who are stopped at auto-scan tills and asked to prove their age.

Across the country thousands of young people are involved in the sport at shooting clubs and with the cadet corps and Scouts.

At the London Olympic Games this summer Peter Wilson put the sport under the limelight after winning gold in the double trap, having started the sport when he was still a schoolboy.

It all seemed so dumb, well of course it is, but the following line tells us what we need to know. Doesn’t it?
The usual hand wringing, weepy eyed bed wetters on the left.

The move comes after Animal Aid, Britain’s largest animal rights organisation, published a report earlier this year labelling that country sports magazines as ‘pro-violence’ and having a ‘corrosive, long-lasting effect on impressionable young minds’.

It argued that titles promoting guns should be put on the top shelf alongside pornography and restricted to over-18s in the report, titled ‘Gunning for Children: How the gun lobby recruits young blood’.

A WH Smith spokesman told the Sunday Telegraph: ‘As part of our commitment to operate our business responsibly, we have a till prompt on shooting titles.

‘It asks our store teams to check that the customer is 14 years old or over, based on this being the legal age at which someone can possess a firearms certificate.’

this article was found at the Mail.

Posted by peiper     on 10/14/2012 at 02:41 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Guns and Gun Control • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 12, 2012

no law but lots of disorder as idiot judge ruins a good cop

Just the sort of thing to make us see red.

I can’t see what the cop did wrong. The little shit asked for the treatment he got.  I’m sorry the officer didn’t break his face. Little creep.
This is what law enforcement has to deal with. Daily I guess.  I could never do their job in a hundred years.  Wouldn’t want to either. Besides, I’d get banged up for shooting dead some bit of grime like the punk in this article.  This is why the bad guys are winning. Cos courts and bleeding heart, wimpy hand wringers and idiot judges turn on cops doing their job.  Just wish some of these judges and other critics could see the punks up close and personal. As victims.  Why the hell do people go into police work these days?  Take a look at this.
I’ve deleted all my expletives. Howz that for self control?

Moment a policeman lost his temper. . . and his career: CCTV catches officer using ‘pain restraint’ to calm 15-year-old who refused to do as he was told
· PC Stephen Hudson quit his job after 12 years of service
· Officer ‘likely to be declared bankrupt and is a broken man’
· Teenager suffered nose bleed and bruised chest
By James Tozer and Nazia Parveen

This is the moment a police officer lost both his unblemished career and his reputation by losing his temper with a disruptive teenage tearaway.
PC Stephen Hudson bent the 15-year-old boy’s arm behind his back and lifted him off the ground after he refused to empty his pockets.
CCTV captured the 6ft 1in officer – who in a 12-year career suffered injuries including a suspected fractured skull, cracked rib and broken finger while tackling criminals – slam the 4ft 8in boy on to the counter, causing him to scream in pain.

The 43-year-old then pushed his face against the teenager’s ear and shouted: ‘You are not the big man. You might think you are but you’re not.’
However the divorced father-of-three was himself arrested after the boy – described in court as a ‘local nuisance’ who had repeatedly tried officers’ patience – complained of bruising and a nosebleed.

Hudson claimed to have been using an authorised police restraint technique called ‘pain compliance’ and said he himself had been assaulted by the youth.
The boy, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had been arrested for a breach of bail.

He had been in the custody suite at Swinton police station in Greater Manchester ‘numerous times’ before and had previously kicked cell doors and refused to obey the rules, a court heard.

However a jury at Bolton Crown Court found the former officer, who worked at the suite, guilty of misconduct in a public office.
Hudson, who has quit his job, was given a nine-month jail term suspended for 18 months.

The court heard he had been left ‘a broken man’ facing bankruptcy, while his children had to be taken out of school as a result of bullying over the incident.
In addition, he faces being sued by the boy’s family.

But Judge Peter Davies accused Hudson, of Westhoughton, near Bolton, of ‘besmirching’ the reputation of a force which last month lost two female officers in a shooting by inflicting ‘deliberate degradation and humiliation’ on the teenager.

And he branded the laughter of three other watching officers, including a sergeant, ‘bullying of the worst form’ and said they ought to have been in the dock alongside Hudson.
The two PCs and a custody sergeant are now facing disciplinary action.
Judge Davies declared: ‘The overwhelming majority of police officers discharge the faith and trust invested in them by the public with diligence, courage and fortitude.
‘A tiny few, however, betray that trust, and I am afraid you have been found to be one of those few.’

Read and see more , Daily Mail source

Oh screw self control. Judge Davis, FUCK YOU. You are a major ass and so are all who buy your line of pap and bullshit.
Please drop dead soon and hopes for your nearest and dearest to do the same at the hands of a punk like this yob filth.

Little bastard is now 15. His family will sue no doubt, he’ll be a hero in his own tiny mind and grow into manhood a vile and violent creature of a limp wristed court and judge.  What a shit system and no better in the states either I’ll bet.

Posted by peiper     on 10/12/2012 at 05:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Justice - LACK OF • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - October 09, 2012

dumb and getting stupider I guess. what else explains this?

This might be my only post for another day or two.  Not doing very well.  No emerg. or anything like that. Maybe stress but I wouldn’t know.  Just not feeling well last few days. Actually, started almost a week ago but not too bothersome. Now it is. Been in bed all day.
Anyway … Since I had to write to Drew which is why I booted to begin with, I thought I shouldn’t waste this article which I saw in the Telegraph yesterday.
Talk about stupid people.  Just how in this modern world, here in England, does anyone get this dumb and still get a job?

H/T The Telegraph
but sorry. No link so you’ll just have to believe I could never make this up.

Shopper, 22, asked for ID at WH Smith… to buy two cans of diet coke

A thirsty shopper was stunned when she was barred from buying two cans of diet coke – until she could prove she was over 21.
Phillipa Davison, 22, was stunned to be asked for ID at the WH Smith check-out before being allowed to buy the 99p drink – because it contained caffeine.
Former care worker Phillipa was so shocked she refused to produce her driving licence – which showed she was born in 1990 – and left the shop.

Phillipa Davison outside the WH Smith store where she was refused two cans of diet coke
She said: “I went into the shop because I was thirsty and got a second one as part of a deal they had on.
“But I was shocked when the sales assistant refused to serve me unless I could prove I was over 21.
“I told her I was 22 but she obviously didn’t believe me. She just asked for my ID and refused to serve me because it had caffeine in it and was not suitable for children.

“I must admit I was rather annoyed – I wonder now whether she was new and didn’t understand that Coke was not alcoholic.
“It was ridiculous but there seemed to be nobody else around in the store – they must have all been in the back.
“I’m afraid in the end I got annoyed and put both the cans back and walked out. I won’t be going there again.”
Phillipa went into WH Smith in Warwick just after 2pm on Thursday, September 27, after going shopping in the town.
But when she walked up to the counter to pay the assistant told her she would need to produce an identity card as the drink was not available for children as it contained caffeine.
WH Smith have now apologised to Phillipa, from Warwick, and stated it was not a policy to ask for ID for caffeinated drinks.
A spokeswoman said: “I can confirm that we don’t have a policy that requires identification for selling this product and we are sorry for any confusion.”
Licensed shops are required to check proof of age of they sell alcohol to anyone under the age of 18 and in some cases 21.

Posted by peiper     on 10/09/2012 at 12:26 PM   
Filed Under: • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Wednesday - September 12, 2012

The fool on the hill in Ross-on-Wye

I have a very definite and compelling reason for this post.
In fact, I’m sticking it on top (for part of the day ) because I want all to see how mindlessly stupid and self delusional as well as self aggrandizing those idiot bed wetting jerks on the left are.  So help me these fools are a waste of oxygen I’d happily deny them.
And it all started with a letter to an editor.
See guys, when you age and haven’t much of anything really important to do, you just naturally find things that annoy.  In this case however, it was the wife who found it first and brought it to my attention. 

Okay look here.  This won’t mean much to Americans, it’s an English thing and there are many who come here from Europe to attend, and I would imagine there could be Americans in that number as well. None of which matters anyway for my purpose here with this subject.

First, I have no problem with The Proms. I am not a fan in any big way of the music but at least I know what it is and am quite aware of it.  And besides that, you can not be married to a Brit and not be aware.
I am posting this small bit of info and history of The Proms, so you will be able to see for yourself how incredibly stupid liberals of the ilk that wrote that letter that set me off.  I want to see if any of you will see any raaaaaaaaacism in connection with this event.

The Proms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is about the British concerts.

The Proms, more formally known as The BBC Proms, or The Henry Wood Promenade Concerts presented by the BBC, is an eight-week summer season of daily orchestral classical music concerts and other events held annually, predominantly in the Royal Albert Hall in London. Founded in 1895, each season currently consists of more than 70 concerts in the Albert Hall, a series of chamber concerts at Cadogan Hall, additional Proms in the Park events across the United Kingdom on the last night, and associated educational and children’s events. In 2009 the total number of concerts reached 100 for the first time. In the context of classical music festivals, Jiří Bělohlávek has described the Proms as “the world’s largest and most democratic musical festival”.[1]
Prom is short for promenade concert, a term which originally referred to outdoor concerts in London’s pleasure gardens, where the audience was free to stroll around while the orchestra was playing. In fact this tradition has been revived in parks and stately homes around the UK at promenade concerts such as the Battle Proms. In the context of the BBC Proms Promming now refers to the use of the standing areas inside the hall (the arena and gallery) for which ticket prices are much lower than for the reserved seating. Single-concert Promming tickets can be bought, with few exceptions, only on the day of the concert, which can give rise to long queues for well-known artists or works. Proms concert-goers, particularly those who stand, are sometimes described as “Promenaders”, but are most commonly referred to as “Prommers”. Prommers can buy full- or half-season tickets instead for guaranteed entry (until 20 minutes before the concert is due to start), although not the assurance of a particular standing position. A number of Prommers are particularly keen in their attendance. In 1997, one programme in the BBC documentary series Modern Times covered this dedicated following of enthusiasts.

Origins and Henry Wood

Promenade concerts had existed in London’s pleasure gardens since the mid 18th century, but on 10 August 1895 impresario Robert Newman arranged the first series of indoor promenade concerts, in the Queen’s Hall in Langham Place. Newman’s idea was to encourage an audience for concert hall music who, though not normally attending classical concerts, would be attracted by the low ticket prices and more informal atmosphere. In addition to promenading; eating, drinking and smoking were all allowed. He stated his goal as follows:
I am going to run nightly concerts and train the public by easy stages. Popular at first, gradually raising the standard until I have created a public for classical and modern music.

If interested, you just need to Google Proms for loads more info.
For my purpose even what I copied above might be too much. But anyway, you get the idea.  So here’s an idiot letter and it clearly shows what’s amiss in our world. Because this fellow isn’t the only damned fool on the hill.  He has lots of company, and they are the sorts that cause most of the problems.
It appeared under the heading of:

NO BLACK FACES
at the Proms

Like so many others I enjoyed
watching the last night of the Proms.
But my enjoyment was marred as I began to realize
that among all those thousands, I was unable to
detect one black face, either at the Albert Hall
or in any of the outdoor audiences.  I wonder what
message this sends us about the real state of
integration in British society?
Ray Smith
Ross-on-Wye

I think the paper should have passed on this asinine letter.  It reads as though somehow, someway Mr Smith’s favorite racial group had been excluded intentionally.  Made not welcome perhaps. Or refused tickets. Or perhaps just plain banned.  Oh that’s all likely.  Think so?  Neither do I.
Oh the poor man. His enjoyment was “marred.”
He was hurt on behalf of people who had shown no interest in the event.  But he gets to keep his liberal creds. 

Ross-on-Wye is a pretty village of some 10,000 people.  Be interesting to know how many black faces reside there.  I looked but couldn’t find any.  Doesn’t there aren’t any, just that I could not locate any.

Of the three towns Ross-on-Wye is twinned with, (what a stupid idea that is) one is Namutumba, Uganda.  No doubt Mr. Ross’s doing.

Bottom line ,,,, the guy’s a damn fool and a trouble seeking phoney.

Please die soon Ray.  Today would be good.

Posted by peiper     on 09/12/2012 at 05:42 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 11, 2012

add another one to the list of immigrant vermin to go free cos judge is sympathetic

I don’t recall ever having had a real epiphany before today.
I’m a slow learner.

Reading early morning papers and suddenly there it was.
An epiphany.

The problems we all bitch about and get angry over no matter it be high crimes or immigration or simply misdemeanors, the fault is less with the folks we normally don’t like anyway for very good reason. No. The fault is white people.

Yeah.  Who the hell else has trained up a cadre of morons who carry the word and actions over into courts and if you’re in the UK, the police too. I ask you. Who else?
White folks. And really STUPID ones at that.  Then too there are those who aren’t actually stupid at all.  They are the ones who call the shots and make the rules and dismantle civilizations, and are very cunning people indeed. But they still need useful fools and idiots who will buy their message and then go out and preach their poisoned gospel.  And there aren’t any exceptions as to what race they belong to.  The idiots are white who in turn find others of any color or race, who also buy into the liberal mindset and the doctrine that makes things so hard for most of the rest of us to come to grips with. 

For example, this bit of muzzie filth is an immigrant who came here and during last summers riots thought setting fire to a car and just general lawlessness would be a fun thing to do.  And after all, he was just following the instincts he was given at birth.
And just who enables all this stuff?
White libtards of ivory tower mentality.

H/T Casuals United Blog

So who will judges jail? After the burglar praised for ‘courage’, Afghan who hurled rocks at police is spared prison over violent childhood.

Judge Nigel Seed decided not to send a rioter to prison because he had a violent childhood.

A judge re-ignited the row over soft sentencing yesterday after allowing a rioter who hurled rocks at the police and helped to set a car ablaze to walk free.

Judge Nigel Seed said Nooragha Zadran had seen so much violence in his home country before moving to Britain that he should not be locked up.
The decision comes only days after another judge provoked an outcry by telling a burglar that it took ‘courage’ to break into somebody’s home.
Tory MPs said the latest ruling showed the huge challenge facing new Justice Secretary Chris Grayling to get a grip on the legal system and end the scandal of soft sentencing.
Zadran, 18, was found guilty of violent disorder and arson during the London riots last year.
But Judge Seed let him off with a fine after saying he had been used to witnessing violence every day and was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.
Zadran claims he was only five when both of his parents were killed in Afghanistan by a bomb which struck their home, a court heard yesterday. He was left to fend for his younger brother by begging on the streets, but, after leaving him in a playground, he found he had gone missing and was never found.
Zadran then managed to travel to the UK as a young boy, and has been in the care of social services. During the riots last August, he threw rocks at police and lit the rag that was used to set fire to a parked car in Lewisham, South-East London.
Judge Seed described his case as ‘exceptional’. He said: ‘No other defendant will have appeared in front of the courts in such circumstances, that is why you are not being sentenced to two to three years in prison,’ he said.

Don’t ya just love it when a judge tells the vermin what is wrong with them thus giving the scum more excuses to use in their plea for sympathy and of course a free pass.

The judge said: ‘I take into account the fact that at an early age you were living in war-torn Afghanistan. The family home was bombed and the explosion killed your mother and father, leaving you and your siblings orphans. You were left to beg because of your destitution.
‘You left your younger brother in a playground to try to beg, and he then disappeared, and all this happened before you were ten.
‘You suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, and a particularly complex form of post-traumatic stress disorder, which is very serious and makes you vulnerable to exploitation, and unable to think clearly.’
Zadran, of Rotherhithe, South-East London, was ordered to pay £2,000 to the owner of the car, and required to attend mental health treatment as part of his sentence. Other rioters have received immediate imprisonment.

Since Mr Grayling took over from Kenneth Clarke at the Justice Department last week, he has been left in no doubt of the challenges he faces getting a grip on the soft justice system.
Last week Judge Peter Bowers provoked an outcry when he told an offender who burgled three homes in five days: ‘It takes a huge amount of courage, as far as I can see, for somebody to burgle somebody’s house. I wouldn’t have the nerve.’

http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/

Posted by peiper     on 09/11/2012 at 10:12 AM   
Filed Under: • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • muslims • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner