Posted by Drew458     on 10/30/2010 at 12:42 PM   
Filed Under: • Humor • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - October 25, 2010

Freeze! It’s the Serious Crime Directorate 9 Human Exploitation … blah,blah,blah

See?  PC rules.  It really doesn’t end. Be interesting to see where this all ends if it ever does.

the word ‘vice’ was thought to have negative connotations.

Well duh. Ya think?
Or maybe not anymore. 

I had an uncle who (like 60 or more yrs ago) was on the vice squad. I can just imagine what his reaction would be reading this silly thing today, if he were still around.

Freeze! It’s the Serious Crime Directorate 9 Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command: Vice Squad goes politically correct
By Rebecca Camber

Scotland Yard’s famous Vice Squad has been renamed in a politically correct makeover.
The unit, which led some of the Metropolitan Police’s most celebrated cases in the capital’s seedy underworld, has a new title - the Serious Crime Directorate 9: Human Exploitation and Organised Crime Command, or SCD9 for short.

The Met says the unit has been renamed to reflect its work combating ‘all forms of human exploitation’, not just prostitution and criminal activities in nightclubs and casinos.

But sources say the switch was ordered as the word ‘vice’ was thought to have negative connotations.

The Vice Squad, established in 1932 as “8 Area Clubs and Vice Unit”, famously dealt with Ronnie and Reggie Kray when the gangster twins moved into running nightclubs in the 1960s.

source

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2010 at 04:47 AM   
Filed Under: • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

museum displays hidden so as not to offend pagans and other sensitives … our wacky world today

Well here we go again. It not only never ends, it gets worse. But that won’t surprise anyone.
I think it’s all because we have so much leisure time and so much time to dream up new dizzily stupid things that past generations might have laughed at. And then locked up the people who advanced stupidity.

A few weeks ago I was certain I’d found the Moonbat award for the year, even though the year isn’t finished yet.  I just didn’t think in the short time left, anyone would come up with a higher level of social insanity.  But hey .... leave it to the legions of the politically correct morons who sadly are in charge of things.

Mummy dearest .... why are you hiding?
So as not to offend those more sensitive souls.

Welcome to more of the world of IDIOTS!

Hide your mummies! Museum displays of human remains are covered up for fear of offending pagans

By Sarah Harris
Last updated at 7:39 AM on 25th October 2010

Museums are hiding away mummies and human remains for fear of offending pagans and other minority groups, it has been revealed.
They are putting up warning signs, closing previously opened coffins and displaying exhibits in darkened cases.
This is despite the fact that such displays are among the most popular attractions.

The move is designed to give the skeletons and mummies ‘privacy’ and to avoid upsetting faith groups and even some museum staff, according to academic findings.

Research shows how 17 museums have drafted policies on human remains, with most advocating that signs are put up to warn visitors of their presence.
Manchester University Museum’s policy requires consultation before displaying human remains, particularly with what it calls ‘marginalised communities and faith groups’.

At the insistence of a pagan group called Honouring the Ancient Dead, it removed the head of an Iron Age bog body – the skull of Worsley Man, which was found buried near Manchester 50 years ago – from display.

It also covered up the unwrapped mummy of Asru, the partially-wrapped mummy of Khary, and a child mummy with sheets. The three mummies were uncovered only after a public protest.

Meanwhile, the Egypt gallery at Bristol City Museum and Art Gallery has changed its display of Egyptian human remains.
Instead of the previous display of mummies in open coffins, it now exhibits them with half closed lids, which it considers more respectful.

click me for more.

Here’s a comment from the source at the Daily Mail.  Kinda says it all.

More PC insanity, ancient people went to extreme lengths to claim a little slice of immortality utilising mummification and other skills handed down over generations so now PC dimwits and members of other shallow hippy new age ‘religions’ make it so the small story from the past that these ancestors have to tell is ignominiously silenced as they are hidden away at the back of museum storerooms or re-buried.

It seems totally illogical that academics have to listen to people who go around claiming to be witches or druids anyway, these loons would be far too dimwitted to survive in pre-Christian times when the the old belief systems flourished and certainly should not be involved in destroying the archaeological heritage of this or any other country on the basis of half baked, rehashed quasi-religious dogma most likely pieced together from less than accurate Victorian history books and a mish-mash of local folk tales.
- leew, Lancashire

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2010 at 03:10 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Moonbat Award to: • Politically Correct B.S. • Stoopid-People •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 01, 2010

well talk about barking moonbats … as if things aren’t stupid enough … there aren’t enough bats

No kidding BMEWS readers.  If the powers that be in this country can find different ways to do themselves in, they will do so and happily wave as their ship sinks.

Keep in mind that not every Brit goes along with the lunacy.  I don’t believe most do.  Not the ones I speak to anyway.  So how does this stuff happen?  I’m at a total loss to explain it.  It’s way beyond pc gone amuck.

Imagine this guys ... you own a business and two ppl are sharing a gag or a comment.  Someone overhears what is being said AND ... they can charge harassment under a new law if they say it offends them.  And that’s the least of a law taking effect today, a law pushed thru by the previous govt. under that hag, Harriet Harperson. (Harman) I tell ya, they are getting flakier and flakier here.

However .... here is something even dumber.  Oh, you didn’t think things could get dumber? Well in Spain, men are to be allowed breast feeding time off.
You could not make this up.  Govts. are just plain stupid when it come to common sense and going overboard to ensure that all people and all things MUST be equal. 

Seems that since women are given an hour or so to tend baby, then husbands also must get equal time.  Just what they’re supposed to do during this time isn’t stated.  Maybe join wifey dear and watch? Oh yeah, they still get paid for the time off. I think it’s called Spanish Practice. Pay but no work.

Death of the office joke: Coalition enacts Harriet’s PC equality law which means ANYONE can sue for ANYTHING that offends them

By Daily Mail Reporter

New equality laws masterminded by Labour deputy leader Harriet Harman have come into force today, threatening to create a political correctness minefield for recession-hit businesses.

Under the Act, vegans, teetotallers and atheists are to be given the same protection against discrimination as religious groups while gipsies and travellers will get special favours because of the ‘many socio-economic disadvantages’ they face.

There is also a provision which extends protection from third party harassment, meaning employers have a responsibility to shield their staff, where possible, from abuse by customers.

This has led to fears that bosses could be sued for jokes or comments that staff overhear and find offensive - even if it is not directed at or about them.
The Act, which ministers claim will help stamp out pay discrimination, have been slammed by employer groups who claim it will cost £189million to implement.

firms will be banned from asking job applicants about their health, while new protections for disabled people will make it easier for staff who have taken a large number of sick days or who look after elderly relatives to win unfair dismissal cases.

The Act will also make is easier for staff to claim they were discriminated against because of disability because they no longer have to prove they were treated less favourably than a non-disabled colleague.

Tory and Lib Dem ministers are still arguing about whether to implement Miss Harman’s notorious plans to force local authorities to discriminate in favour of the poor in order to narrow income inequalities.

The plans were hailed as ‘socialism in a single clause’ when Miss Harman unveiled them last year.

READ ALL OF IT HERE

UPDATE ... I goofed in a way. What way?  Well ... it wasn’t the Spanish that enforced this law.  I read it wrong.

The mandate to enforce was done by ....The European Union Court of Justice in Luxembourg

can anyone spell “sovereignty?” Anyone care anymore?

Posted by peiper     on 10/01/2010 at 10:10 AM   
Filed Under: • Politically Correct B.S. • UK • work and the workplace •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - September 27, 2010

Bulletproof PC?

Sometimes the far left comes up with a good one. Well, by “good one” I mean an idea that is totally stupid but very difficult to criticize. This one makes me want to grind my teeth in rage because it’s so wrong, but it’s not going to be so easy to bust on it.


Latest Comic Book Superhero: A Muslim In A Wheelchair

Comic book fans will soon be getting their first glimpse at an unlikely new superhero—a Muslim boy in a wheelchair with superpowers.

The new superhero is the brainchild of a group of disabled young Americans and Syrians who were brought together last month in Damascus by the Open Hands Intiative, a non-profit organization founded by U.S. philanthropist and businessman Jay T. Snyder.

The superhero’s appearance hasn’t been finalized, but an early sketch shows a Muslim boy who lost his legs in a landmine accident and later becomes the Silver Scorpion after discovering he has the power to control metal with his mind.

Sharad Devarajan, co-founder and CEO of Liquid Comics whose company is now turning the young people’s ideas into pictures and a story line, said the goal is to release the first comic book—launching the disabled Muslim superhero—in early November in both Arabic and English.

Snyder says he was inspired by President Barack Obama’s effort to reach out to the Muslim world in his January 2009 inaugural address. Last month, Snyder flew 12 disabled Americans to Damascus to meet their Syrian peers, and one of their main goals was to come up with ideas and story lines for the new superhero.

Devarajan found the young people’s imagination to be quite amazing.

“Each of their ideas was so originally distinct, whether the Syrian kids or the U.S. kids,” he said, adding that perhaps because of their disabilities, the young people think as individuals without being influenced by outsiders. One girl, for example, wanted to have the power to combine the energy of the moon and the sun.

Devarajan said it was noteworthy that none of the young people wanted the hero’s power to be something that cured their disability.

“They were empowered by their own disabilities, and they should not be seen as a source of weakness,” he said.

The dozen Americans were selected after a national call for applications by The Victor Penada Foundation, a non-profit educational organization that promotes the rights of young people with disabilities. They included youths who were blind, deaf, using wheelchairs, or suffering from Down syndrome, autism, and cognitive disabilities.

The Syrians were invited by the Al-Amal school for the disabled whose chair, Asma Assad, the wife of Syrian president Bashar Assad, spent an afternoon meeting with the youngsters.

“It must be every child’s dream to create a superhero,” the Syrian first lady said in a video provided to the AP. “But I really do hope that we can bring our powers together—our human powers together—to be able to make a difference.”

Ok. I can accept RollerBoy and his super cool Wheelchair of Justice. Why not? That’s a positive message. And there is nothing wrong with a disabled superhero. Lots of people are disabled, kids included, so why not make a superhero that’s easy for them to identify with? And there is no reason that the superhero has to be a white guy. Heck, there have been plenty of superheros in the past who weren’t. Sure, make one who is middle eastern. Who cares? Granted, it’s a bit saccharin that he lost his legs in a landmine explosion, but that’s the real world. It happens, and it happens to children a lot in certain parts of the world. Awful, but real. The first issue is going to have to cover the boy’s accident, so it will be really illuminating who they show planted the mine in the first place. Want to bet the planters name is Ben-David?

But what is the point of specifically focusing on the fact that this one just happens to be a muslim? That I don’t see. I don’t think it ever played into the story lines that Captain America was Pentecostal. Is jizzlam going to play a central role in the story lines? Is his Transformer-like wheelchair named Al-Buraq or something? Does it fly like a magic carpet? Will the Silver Scorpion be out there righting wrongs by manipulating metal with his mental powers causing Jewish settlement housing to collapse? Maybe he’ll knock down skyscrapers filled with little Eichmanns just with the power of his mind. The odds that he’ll mind-ray the executioner’s sword into slag as it’s just about to behead or behand some captive being subject to jihad or sharia is pretty damn slim.

I think this is one of the more disgusting attempts of islamo-pandering I’ve ever seen. You can take the Cindy Sheehan “moral high ground” all you want, but don’t build an outhouse there and try to make us believe it’s a mansion.

Posted by Drew458     on 09/27/2010 at 09:35 AM   
Filed Under: • Politically Correct B.S. • RoPMA •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - September 11, 2010

the new and favored religions of multiculturism and diversity will eat the west if not confronted

H/T Gates of Vienna

Gates of Vienna

Multiculturalism is in some ways almost more totalitarian than Communism. We just didn’t realize this at first. In Norway, Khalid Salimi, a Pakistani “anti-racist,” complained about the fact that too many white natives peacefully enjoyed music at a festival together in their own country. This wasn’t “diverse” enough.
Soon whites will literally be banned from congregating in separate groups. I no longer consider this a joke.

BMEWS readers may recall the post from a few days ago, regarding a German banker who wrote a book.  He decried the islamification of his country, he also said that Jews shared the same genes in the same way people anywhere do.  Well you’ll recall the sky fell on him and Jewish “activists” were “offended” as were muslims and of course Turks. He was critical of immigration naturally.  Well, he is no longer on the board of the bank.  I heard about it on the radio early today. 

If you go to the link go Gate of Vienna and read the whole thing by Fjordman, there is one thing I take serious issue with and believe to be totally false although I am willing to say (I hope) it’s just a bad mistake or something in translation. In an otherwise excellent bit of reporting, he says this.

The “conservative” President Sarkozy has said publicly that native Frenchmen have to mix with immigrants. It is thus mandatory in France to import Africans and breed with them. 

Thilo Sarrazin vs. the Ruling Multicultural Oligarchs
Gates of Vienna 9 September 2010
By Fjordman
It is true, as some observers point out, that many people make stupid choices and more or less freely vote for parties that insult them and take away their freedom and dignity. This is a very real problem and exposes some of the flaws of mass democracy. I don’t question that. The issue is whether there is also something else at work in the modern West in addition to this, and my answer to that is “yes”.

As Bat Ye’or has demonstrated in her pioneer work Eurabia and I have confirmed in my own book Defeating Eurabia, the leaders of the European Union have been promoting Third World mass immigration, including Muslim immigration, as a long-term policy for decades. Similar policies are no doubt at work in North America.
The harassment of the popular immigration critic Thilo Sarrazin in Germany and the hostile international reactions to the referendum against Islamic minarets in Switzerland clearly demonstrate that we are also dealing with a self-appointed transnational elite in power throughout the Western world who are consciously and deliberately trying to dismantle Western nation states using international law combined with massive propaganda campaigns, “anti-racist” brainwashing of people of European origins and above all mass immigration.
In his essay The Tea Party vs. the Intellectuals, Lee Harris describes how the USA’s intellectual elite has become radically out of touch with the sensibility of a large chunk of their nation’s population. He notes the “mounting dissatisfaction at living in a society in which a small group has increasingly solidified its monopoly over the manufacture and distribution of opinion, deciding which ideas and policies should be looked upon favorably and which political candidates will be sympathetically reported.”

This has to be my final post for this evening ....  takes meds, retire.
Stay Tuned

Posted by peiper     on 09/11/2010 at 01:56 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Oppression • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - August 16, 2010

$2.25 Billion for Reparations?

via C&S, via Freep, via Pajamas Media

I am full-on confused here. WTFFFF?

Barack Obama and USDA’s Shirley Sherrod involved in reparations shake down?

Ok, there was this court case. Pigford v. Glickman. 1997. 400 black farmers felt they had been discriminated against by the USDA when applying for farm loans. They won. In 1999 each was given $50,000 for settlement. But by then the word had leaked out, and the original 400 plaintiffs had grown to a class action suit involving thousands. Sixteen thousand to be a little specific. It was the free money tree: all you had to be was black, and a farmer, and the government would cut you a check for 50 Large. Period. Done deal, no proof of anything discriminatory required. Yikes.

Well, that’s not entirely true. At the time the government was reviewing each claimant, and about 41% of them were denied.  But quite a few years later the case was re-opened. By a freshman Senator, Barack Obama. And by Chuck Grassley (R - IA). And the awarding started all over again, with those denied in the past now being accepted. And tens of thousands of new applicants accepted and approved. So many, in fact, that the number of applicants was 2 to 4 times greater than the actual number of black farmers, then, now, or ever. Go figure.

Somehow in this mess, Shirley Sherrod and her husband managed to get awarded a $13 million settlement, for a farm that they owned that had gone out of business. The largest settlement of all the Pigford claimants. How about that? And just after that, coincidentally, she got hired by the USDA. Amazing.

Now it looks like the total settlement amount could add at least $1.25 BILLION to the $1 BILLION already paid out.

What was originally a $20 million settlement has ballooned exponentially, twice. It does not appear that any real proof of discrimination, or even of actual farming, is necessary. It looks to me like somebody planted ACORNS and grew a money tree, and the fruit is ready for picking.

This really looks like a major scam. It looks like Sherrod and Obama are in it up to their necks. Please read the whole story, or at least as much as is known at this point, starting with

Rdoger’s post at C&S, a slightly longer synopsis at Hummers & Cigarettes then loads of details and data in Zombie’s post at Pajamas, and then by what might be the first post on this over at Free Republic. Googling up Pigford v. Glickman couldn’t hurt either.

From what I gather, $1 billion had already been paid out, back in 1999. Another $1.25 has been awarded, but the allocation of that money is in doubt. Looks like it was recently removed from a defense appropriations bill. How it was in there to begin with, God only knows, but that’s DC.

400 black farmers were discriminated against. Agreed. Pay them their settlement. 16,000 more tried to get some of that 11 years ago. Half failed. Now 89,000 black farmers are claiming they should be paid as well. Even though we have don’t have even half that many black farmers. How can this not be a scam? How the EFFITY EFF did Sherrod get $13 million and a job out of this? How can this not be some kind of stealth reparations in the most original form - because somewhere between $50,000 and $13 million really ought to enable you to buy 40 acres and a mule.

Spread the word. If this is not a con and corruption, then this is the biggest example of government ineptness ever. Ever. I want to see proof of discrimination for each and every loan application, all 89,000 of them, for the period in question. With further proof of farm ownership at that time. And 10 years in jail for any and every applicant who faked it. You can not join a class action suit after it is settled. That’s not allowed. It is not the fault of the government that the suit may not have been advertised sufficiently at the time, is it? You certainly can not be allowed to put your claim in 11 years after the fact. This smells to high heaven, and if it turns out to be rotten, then Chuck Grassley should get the axe too. Good intentions are no excuse if he didn’t investigate enough to smell a rat.

Posted by Drew458     on 08/16/2010 at 10:20 AM   
Filed Under: • Government • Corruption and Greed • Obama, The One • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - May 21, 2010

Racist and Anti-Islamic

The nuts are in the nuthouse, arguing over nonsense. I love it when the left eats their own.

Obama’s Middle Name Ignites Textbook Battle

Will history books refer to the 44th American president as Barack Obama, Barack H. Obama or Barack Hussein Obama?

Late into the night, the Texas Board of Education considered these and other questions for the state’s social studies curriculum. The debate has set off a culture war, pitting conservatives against democrats in a battle that attracted 40,000 e mails from parents, teachers and academics from around the nation.

Despite deep political differences, the debate remained polite until the topic focused on President Obama. Then it got personal. Lawrence Allen, a black former high school principal from Houston offered a motion to enter President Barack Obama’s name in a section of the curriculum that recognized significant dates in U.S. History.

David Bradley, a white businessman from Beaumont, motioned that the president’s legal name should be used, Barack Hussein Obama. “I think we give him the full honor and privilege of his full name.”

“I am getting pretty fed up with this,” said Democrat Mary Helen Berlanger. “You don’t have to be derogatory. We don’t always put in Jefferson in William Jefferson Clinton.”

“The intent behind what you are doing I think is pretty obvious,” said Republican Bob Craig.

“This is our first black president,” said board member Mavis Knight, who is black. “You are making it sound humiliating.”

Well, it’s humiliating having this wiener in charge, so why not use his real name? I mean, his current real name. Um, the anglicized version of Buraq Hussein Obama. What the heck, he’s named for Mohammed’s griffin-like dream horse El-Buraq, so why not spell it properly? Would that be calling too much attention to his islamic roots? Maybe we should use the name on his birth certificate. Good luck with that one.

And the whole thing in Texas is utterly stupid. Duh, you list the guy’s whole name once, then you use his last name and title for everything you write about him. But I still think it’s funny that, nearly 3 years since he appeared on the national scene, that lefties still assume that they’re the target of some kind of insult whenever anyone says “Hussein”. Gee, too bad.

Posted by Drew458     on 05/21/2010 at 10:29 AM   
Filed Under: • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (9) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - April 17, 2010

THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN …….  and …. STUPID LEFT WING HONKEY IDIOTS

See now?  Here we are with an aggravating story that I’ve avoided all week. Can’t ignore it any longer and feel compelled to share this idiocy.

It’s exactly this type of verminous scum that someone like me would use the dreaded ‘N’ word about.  But then I have to make myself think a bit more.  Yeah, she’s still a nigger and there’s no doubt about that.  But who encouraged her?  Who taught her? Who put ideas into an otherwise empty but thick skull? Who?  I’ll tell ya.
Stupid white libtard jerks.  This whole civil and human rights thing has gotten so far out of hand, that a bitch like this can actually make a court case against the defense dept and the army based in part on one of the holy ‘isms.’ You know the one. Begins with R.

Whenever one of these life forms doesn’t get their way or decides they’ve been insulted, idiot white folks cave in so fast, anyone nearby gets pneumonia from the breeze they cause.  Lets be clear about one thing. It isn’t all black folks who think this way or act this way. I suspect they are damn well embarrassed by others of their color who do.

The charge of racism against the army was brought because ... are ya sitting down?

The service refused to fly her sister from another country to baby sit for her.
And so that little thing has been in the courts for a few years now.  Her fault? Nope. She is just playing the system for what she can gouge because she has been allowed to. Who by?  Stupid white people. Who else?  She has been led to believe that whatever her little black heart wants she can have because to deny her is .....  R A C I S M!  She’s been led to believe that but come on. Do you think she really does?  Course not. But she has been schooled and probably from childhood, to understand how frightened dumb honkey white liberals are when it comes to being accused of anti anything. Especially anti black.  Even when it isn’t true. And if it is true sometimes as we know it has to be, my money is on what I see as a provocation to be that way.  That is, anti-black. In other words, ppl like her and the silly white bastards who support and allow her actions and others like her, bring on the very thing that the left leaning uber liberal bleeding hearts are trying to avoid. They have managed to make racists out of many people who weren’t that way inclined.

Which brings us now to the other dreaded “ism.” S E X I S M !  Oh yeah. And sister sexual harassment. 

Her commanding officer told her that the Army was a ‘ war-fighting machine’ and ‘unsuitable for a single mother who couldn’t sort out her childcare arrangements’.

The panel awarded Miss DeBique £15,000 plus interest of £2,016 for hurt feelings after it earlier ruled she suffered sex and race discrimination.

OK I’ll get outta here and let you read the whole thing unedited by me. See what the idiot panel deemed race discrimination and harassment.
We can be thankful they didn’t allow her the full sum she was suing for.  Btw ... take a look at the photo here. This is what the woman thinks is sexy.
You couldn’t make it up.

Single mother soldier who claimed £1.1m over childcare left her baby for two years

By Dan Newling and Kathryn Knight
Last updated at 11:44 PM on 16th April 2010

Her demand for more than £1.1million from the Army for sex discrimination would have enabled single mother Tilern DeBique to return home to her poverty-stricken Caribbean village in triumph as a rich woman.

Yesterday, however, the former corporal was having to revise her plans after a tribunal ruled she should receive only £17,016.

The 28-year-old from St Vincent, who calls herself SexyT on the internet, was told she made ‘an error of judgment’ in refusing a job in a family-friendly base where there were childcare facilities.

Tilern DeBique, who is known as SexyT on the internet, claimed £1.1m over childcare, but a tribunal ruled she should receive only £17,016

Miss DeBique, whose daughter Tahlia is now four, had argued that she was forced to choose between a military career and her child.

Yet the Daily Mail has discovered that while portraying herself as a devoted single mother, she has in fact spent nearly two years apart from her daughter after dispatching her to the Caribbean to live with her sister.

Tahlia was just three months old when she was handed over to her aunt Sonia. It was almost a year before Sonia took the child back to the UK to

be with her mother. And less than a year after that, Tahlia was back in St Vincent.

So what is the true story of the woman who poses on MySpace in a see-through top suggesting: ‘Give me a shout sometime’, and became embroiled in a three-year legal battle with the Army which cost the taxpayer an estimated £100,000?

This is not a short read but I would urge all to please read the entire thing. Beside being informative and interesting, it’s also a sterling example of how far into the stupid well too many white folks have fallen into.

Here’s the link.
THE WHITE MAN’S BURDEN. IN PERPETUITY

When you’re done with that, see this one.  The writer doesn’t have it all correct as she says the panel in the end showed “common sense” or like words. You tell me. Where did common sense come into this?

After all, how could the Ministry of Defence have the temerity to expect a single mother to appear on parade when she couldn’t find appropriate childcare?

And how could the Army refuse her modest request for her sister to fly halfway around the world to look after her daughter?

this ludicrous loophole (imposed by Europe)

Given the recent history of similar tribunal claims - for example the £484,000 paid to an RAF typist who injured her thumb - Ms DeBique had every reason to believe she’d hit the jackpot.

WHITE MAN’S BURDEN CONTINUED

Posted by peiper     on 04/17/2010 at 12:34 PM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Politically Correct B.S. •  
• Comments (7) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner