Tuesday - February 16, 2010
Wife of trans-Atlantic airlines bomb plotter ‘wanted him to become a martyr’
Hard to tell with face covering but chances are no normal Brit male would have wanted her anyway.
Chances are she probably doesn’t bathe which I understand is how these vermin like their women. They find them in crowds by the scent. lol.
They are vermin but you would never know it judging by the way the hand wringers on the left defend them. And the bru-ha-ha going on at this very moment with regard to the evil MI5 and American torturers at GITMO is so overwhelming that it obscures everything else going on with these verminous bastards. They’ve managed to turn the ones being attacked by them into the bad guys.
Says here she lost a baby. GOOD. One less future bomber/breeder.
Too bad there isn’t a way to sterilize them all. Or better yet, just rid the earth of their shadows. Think of them as rats that need exterminating instead of anything human. They aren’t human and shouldn’t be treated or dealt with as such. Their goal is easy to understand because they’ve made no secret of it.
It won’t happen of course, but the west should long ago have stopped trying to use civil rights or human rights in relation to these scum. They only use the system here to further their own ends, which also means the end of the systems in place here in the west. You would necessarily have to track down and put an end to the fifth column in the the UK and USA. That isn’t going to happen either and the enemy knows it. Which is why they may eventually win this limp wristed so called “war on terror.” This may all seem very uncivilized but then, the enemy we face is exactly that, and they will not be beaten with us fighting by
The Marquess of Queensberry rules. Look at these faces. Do they really appear human? Close maybe but no cigar.
Abdulla Ahmed Ali (left), Assad Sarwar and Tanvir Hussain (c) photo PA
The wife of the leader of a plot to blow up trans-Atlantic airliners kept a diary in which she pledged support for his cause and hoped that he became a martyr, a court has heard.
By Duncan Gardham, Security Correspondent16 Feb 2010
Cossor Ali wrote about making herself slimmer for his return from Pakistan and added that she was becoming “more and more attached to the cause for which you are striving.”
She added: “I hope and pray Allah grants your wish and gives you the highest level of shahada” – a word which is said to refer to martyrdom.In another entry she said: “I hope that when you attain shahada, I will have at least one small child and will be pregnant with another or at least be pregnant with a healthy baby at the least inshallah [god willing.]”
Mrs Ali, who married her husband in July 2003, gave birth to their first child prematurely nine months later but the baby had died shortly afterwards.
By the time her husband, Abdulla Ahmed Ali, was arrested in August 2006, they had an eight month old baby boy.
Richard Whittam QC, prosecuting, told Inner London Crown Court: “It is the prosecution case that she knew her husband intended to commit an act of terrorism that involved his own death.”
She is accused of failing to disclose information that she knew or believed might have been of material assistance in preventing the commission of an act of terrorism between March 2004 and August 2006.
Ali and two other men were convicted in September last year of conspiracy to murder by detonating improvised explosive devices on board passenger aircraft.
The devices were to be disguised in soft drinks bottles and Mrs Ali admitted in a statement to police that her husband had brought bags of a soft drink powder back from Pakistan with him but she thought that he was developing a drink to sell with his friends.
The court heard that Mrs Ali, 28, was born in Britain.
Here’s a photo of the great beauty by their standards. In reality, she a verminous slag.
Posted by peiper
on 02/16/2010 at 10:29 AM
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • Homeland-Security • Illegal-Aliens • RoPMA • Terrorists • War On Terror •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 15, 2010
BRIT TAXPAYERS TAKE ANOTHER BODY BLOW TO THE PURSE. (Caution Lyndon/Chris. DO NOT LOOK)
Single mother-of-six finds £2m mansion on the net… and then gets YOU to pay £7,000 a month rentBy Emily Andrews and Stephen Wright
Feb. 15A single mother-of-six is getting more than £80,000 a year from the taxpayer to live in a £2million mansion in an exclusive London suburb.
Essma Marjam, 34, is given almost £7,000 a month in housing benefits to pay the rent on the five-bedroom villa just yards from Sir Paul McCartney’s house and Lord’s cricket ground.
She also receives an estimated £15,000 a year in other payouts, such as child benefit, to help look after her children, aged from five months to 14.
The four-storey house in Maida Vale has five bedrooms, two bathrooms, a double living room, large fitted kitchen-diner with French doors on to the landscaped garden and a state-of-the art buzzer entry system.
Astonishingly, it is understood Miss Marjam found the house on the internet through a private letting agency, rather than waiting for Westminster council to give her a vacant property on their books.
She then applied to the council for the £1,600-a-week benefit - the maximum amount the council allows.
Miss Marjam said: ‘I moved here at the beginning of the month as I’m entitled to a five-bedroom house.
‘I was in a three-bedroom council house but I needed a bigger place once my new baby came along. So the council agreed to pay the £1,600 a week to a private landlord as they didn’t have any houses big enough.
‘I’m separated from my husband. He’s a solicitor in Derby, but I don’t know if he’s working at the moment. He doesn’t pay anything towards the kids. Things are quite difficult between us.
‘The house is lovely and very big, but I don’t have enough furniture to fill it.’
OH DEAR,OH DEAR. NOT ENOUGH FURNITURE? HUH? DON’T YOU FOLKS SIT ON FLOORS? WHATEVER. NO WORRY DEAR. THE ENGLISH TAXPAYER WILL FILL YOUR NEW HOME WITH ALL THE FURNITURE YOU NEED. JUST ASK. DEMAND. AND BE SURE TO SAY IT’S YOUR HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHT. (oh yeah. hint. if anyone questions your request demand, simply tell em they are being racists. that’ll shut em up)
Taxpayers are also picking up the £6,400-a-month bill to house Nasra Warsame, her seven children and her elderly mother in central London, with Westminster council also providing Mrs Warsame’s husband and their eighth child with a two-bedroom flat nearby.
In total, 16 families are living in million-pound-plus London properties funded by the Local Housing Allowance.
Posted by peiper
on 02/15/2010 at 11:29 AM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Illegal-Aliens • Insanity • Outrageous • RoPMA • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 09, 2010
Citizenship Blues
While Peiper fights the system trying to get his papers in order so he and his wife can come back to the US, this woman has it far worse. Her grandfather was an American, her father is an American, and she has lived her live believing she also holds citizenship. She even had a US passport. Now the State Department says “oops, sorry, we made a mistake”.
Bulgarian-born Niles woman, bestowed U.S. citizenship in 1981, struggles against sea of bureaucratic red tape while worrying she could be deported
Angela Boneva always thought she was an American, never imagining that valued piece of her identity could be stripped away.
Because her father was born in Indiana, an American consulate in Bulgaria bestowed U.S. citizenship on Boneva when she was growing up there in 1981. It granted Boneva privileges unavailable to her Bulgarian friends, allowing her to visit relatives in Chicago and then to move to the area in 1997.
Boneva, now 34 and a married mother, settled into a quiet American lifestyle in Niles — until the day a letter arrived from the U.S. State Department, upending her world. In six indifferently worded paragraphs it said, in effect: There was a mistake. You’re not an American.
Boneva’s situation also illustrates the sometimes dizzying, kaleidoscopic nature of the U.S. immigration system. While the U.S. has welcomed new arrivals for generations, critics of the current system say that overlapping bureaucracies and conflicting rules can lead to unimagined outcomes and complications, especially in an era of heightened national security concerns.
After she sought to renew her U.S. passport in 2003, the State Department informed her that a consular employee’s decision to give her citizenship in 1981 broke a rule dictating that her father had to have lived in the U.S. for 10 years before she was born. His time in the U.S. before moving to Bulgaria totaled only six years.
But the letter pointed out, that same residency requirement was reduced in 1986 to five years, so someone in her position would be eligible for citizenship today — though not her.
Boneva received a form letter in 2003 saying “it does not appear” that she qualifies as a citizen anymore. She has made repeated but vain attempts to get a definitive answer from U.S. authorities.
Though frustrating, the experience at least has helped Boneva discover some lost family history — in the Midwest and in Bulgaria.
Digging through old records to show U.S. officials, she learned of her family’s late 19th century roots in Akron, Ohio. Boneva’s grandfather Pete Boneff was born there in 1895
Gosh, you mean that the State Department actually analyzes claims of bestowed citizenship under the laws applicable at the time? And in 1981 one of her parents had to be a citizen for 10 years before the golden aegis could be passed along? Will wonders never cease.
What about the laws that were in place in 1961? Wasn’t the rule 19 years back then?
Posted by Drew458
on 02/09/2010 at 12:54 PM
Filed Under: • Government • Illegal-Aliens •
• Comments (2)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - February 08, 2010
EDUCATION, IMMIGRATION, STUDENT VISA SCAMS. WHAT NEXT? HOW ABOUT A FIRE SALE?
It wasn’t long after I arrived on these shores that I discovered and was vocal about, what I perceived to be the giving away of this country. It wasn’t rocket science or a great mental leap of any kind. It was just obvious. I suggested to some friends here that if Brits were in so big a hurry to give away their country, and it seemed to be that way, then why drag things out? Why not just put the country up for sale on eBay and be done with it quickly.
The town where pupils speak 150 different languagesBy Daily Mail Reporter
Schools in just one town are having to cope with pupils who speak 150 different languages, a survey has found.They range from the Ghanaian dialect of Akan, through the African language of Chichewa and the ancient Aztec tongue of Nahuatl to the Indian language of Telugu.
This is as well as the more common foreign languages of Urdu, Punjabi and Polish.
The survey in Reading, Berkshire, shows how schools are being put under mounting pressure by the rising levels of pupils who do not speak English as their first language.
White Cliffs of Dover to be sold to the French to help reduce Government’s debt
By Vanessa Allen
For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britain’s freedom and independence.
The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nation’s frontier with the Continent.
But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy – France.
The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.
It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt.
The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.
Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ‘It’s clear Gordon Brown has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town.
‘How dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him – hands off our port, hands off the English border.’
Oh heck. Just can’t resist one more example, not related to first story at top, which I suppose makes it even worse. And ppl have to be soooo careful when using words as you can all imagine. Use the wrong pc word or phrase and naturally it goes from being a scam to a bad racial attitude.
New promise to end student visa scams: But the Tories jeer ‘haven’t we heard it all before?’
By JAMES SLACK
Alan Johnson yesterday promised yet another crack down on the rampant abuse of the foreign student visa regime.
The Home Secretary said tougher rules would be introduced requiring applicants to speak English to near-GCSE level and ban those on short UK courses from bringing dependents.
Officials claim the new regulations will lead to a sharp reduction in the 240,000 student visas currently issued by the UK each year - the equivalent of one every two minutes. But the Conservatives accused the Government of ‘floundering around’ as it sought to correct its own mistakes.
Bringing “dependents?” Students have a crying need to bring dependents? Jeesh.
The rest of the article is HERE
Posted by peiper
on 02/08/2010 at 05:58 AM
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • Education • Illegal-Aliens • UK •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 06, 2010
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?
We’ve covered this outspoken critic of islam before but at the moment, things not going that well for our side. Seems the very PC Dutch ar quite happy to gag one of their own ELECTED politicians and give their country away to the islamists. If that’s really the case, what the heck did they fight the Germans for?
Nothing I have read on the subject and I confess I haven’t read everything, indicates that the Dutch are very happy with events there. Unfortunately for them, their country is in the hands of the left. They are concerned about immigration and they are worried about militant islam. In fact, many are just plain bothered about islam period, militant or not. Some have “quietly” said it has no place in their culture. I think the Dutch who said that have already moved out.
So anyway ... Geert Wilders is on trial. More like the Inquisition minus the burning then a trial. But you guys MUST read this to get a feel for how scary this actually is. Especially from muslim authorities.
H/T TUNDRA TABLOID
The Amsterdam District Court apparently doesn’t want to hear the truth about Islam. Nor is it interested to hear the opinion of top class legal experts in the field of freedom of expression. In one swift move, the Court brushed aside fifteen of the eighteen expert-witnesses the defence had requested to be summoned.Only Hans Jansen, Simon Admiraal and Wafa Sultan were allowed to be heard as expert-witnesses. Their testimony will be heard in a session behind closed doors. Apparently the truth about Islam must remain a secret.
Geert Wilders: “This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court doesn’t want me to have a fair trial. I can’t have any respect for this. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship”.
The Court also brushed aside the preliminary objections concerning its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Public Prosecutor.Nevertheless, Geert Wilders remains extremely motivated to seek justice: “I’m still counting on an acquittal”.
THERE IS THIS FROM THE GATES OF VIENNA BLOG AND I ENCOURAGE ALL WHO HAVEN’T READ IT TO GO OVER THERE AND DO SO.
It isn’t a short read.
It’s obvious that the Dutch government wants Geert Wilders out of the way, and doesn’t much care how it happens.
In bygone days the Queen might have murmured to herself, “Who will rid me of this troublesome blond?” And then, to please his monarch, some eager courtier would have dispatched Mr. Wilders to meet his maker.
But today’s tactics have to be different. First the government demonizes the head of the PVV, eroding his official legitimacy and making it seem as if he almost deserves a violent end. Then it puts him on trial on trumped-up charges, and declines to provide the same courtroom security for a member of parliament that it gives to Islamic terrorists.
Photo from Gates of Vienna
I HAVE CRAMMED QUITE A BIT IN HERE BUT HAVE EDITED A LOT SO PLEASE GO TO THE LINK FOR MORE.
H/T Europe News for the following and see her site. This really does get bad and scary.
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?International Free Press Society 4 February 2010
By Diana WestEven if you have never been involved in a criminal prosecution wherein your very freedom is at risk, I want you to now imagine that you and your attorney have prepared a defense that includes a list of witnesses that will provide a mountain of exculpatory evidence. Then, imagine that the Court summarily and arbitrarily decides that it will not listen to nearly ninety percent of your case.
“This court is apparently not interested in the truth.” Wilders told De Telegraaph (translations from Gates of Vienna). “I cannot conclude anything but that the court does not award me a fair trial.”
“I have no respect for this,” Wilders added. He pointed out that in a typical criminal case there are often dozens of witnesses heard.
But this is not a typical trial. This is a rigged game, a fixed fight, a show trial that is premised not on Dutch law but on Islamic law. Indeed, the trial of Geert Wilders is a test case for sharia in the Netherlands, the grafting onto a free Western country the repressive cage of Islamic rule.
Discussing Muslim progress against “Islamophobia” at the 35th meeting of foreign ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Kampala, Uganda in 2008, Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu made the following statement:
In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film “Fitna”, we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed. As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
One reading doesn’t convey the chilling import of these words.
As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues.
Yes, and to the craven point where “the official West and its public opinion” are paralyzed and silenced by these same “sensitivities.”
They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
When the OIC speaks about “freedom of expression,” it means freedom of expression as governed by the laws of Islam — sharia. When the OIC says we in the West have “started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility,” it means we in the West have started to regard expression from the perspective of sharia — from the perspective of the totalitarian Islamic system.
So here’s some unwashed creep with a name nobody outside his own country can pronounce ( Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu), and he’s telling the west how things are gonna be. And so far, a lot in the west seems to be caving in.
Posted by peiper
on 02/06/2010 at 12:52 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • FREEDOM • Government • Illegal-Aliens • Jack Booted Thugs • Oppression • Outrageous • Politically-Incorrect • Racism and race relations • Religion • RoPMA • Stoopid-People • Terrorists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - January 25, 2010
can’t deport killer to homeland as he would be a threat to folks there. well how about here?
I have to be gone in about a half hour but can’t leave without sharing this lunatic decision. Seems some idiot Brits in positions of some authority are bound and determined to screw this country up even more then it is. You’d think they couldn’t do more damage, but apparently not as there’s always room for more mayhem and more ways to, “sock it to fellow Brits.” And hey, when it’s done in the name of Allah ... well ....
Iraqi who killed two doctors must stay in Britain to safeguard HIS human rightsBy Chris Brooke
A crazed immigrant who stabbed to death two doctors has won the right to stay in Britain - because he would be a threat to the public if deported to his homeland.
A judge has ruled that sending Laith Alani back to Iraq would also be a breach of his human rights.
Alani, 41, is likely to be released in the near future.
Oh good. After all, we wouldn’t want to breach his rights or the rights of anyone in his homeland. Naturally not. Now then. About the rights of the citizens of this country.
Been a hard day , yesterday too. Can’t find passport. Not lost. It’s here. In fact, in a very small room. But I moved it some months ago and now can’t find the damn thing. Why didn’t I simply return it to where it had been stored for five years where I always knew where I could lay hands on it?
Answer. Because apparently I haven’t the brains god gave a tennis ball. Aaaaggghhhhhh!
Posted by peiper
on 01/25/2010 at 01:02 PM
Filed Under: • Border Security • Illegal-Aliens • Justice - LACK OF • Nanny State • RoPMA • Stoopid-People • UK •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - January 21, 2010
Muslim police in ‘hatred’ warning: Anti-terror tactics ‘promote Islamophobia’, say officers.
Couldn’t let this one pass and just have to comment on it as well. Can’t wait to hear what the White Christian Police Officers Association has to say on the subject. Oh wait a minute. Never mind. Those folks don’t have one of those as it might appear to be, well you know. Anti something and racist.
Muslim Police Say Anti-Terror Strategy Has It WrongBy Claire Ellicott
Daily MailMuslim police officers have warned that the Government’s anti-terrorism strategy is an ‘affront to British values’ and encourages Islamophobia.
No Sirs. What causes that big word is the attitude and the actions of the many followers of that highly political faith.
The National Association of Muslim Police (NAMP) told MPs that far-Right organisations were a greater threat to national security than Islam.
Well, since there’s only one nationally well known “far right” party here I must assume they are talking about the BNP. The British National Party. So far though, I haven’t noticed anyone from the BNP flying planes into buildings in the name of Jesus. And I haven’t noticed any Christians calling for a return to the inquisition for non believers. That seems to be the forte of a goodly number of your own co-religionists.
Sure, I could be mistaken but it does seem to me that almost every time someone coverts to islam, they seem all fired up to blow something up. And all in the name of ? I’d say the word but don’t want to be taken for someone who is islamphobic.
The hatred towards Muslims has grown to a level that defies all logic and is an affront to British values. ‘The climate is such that Muslims are subject to daily abuse in a manner that would be ridiculed by Britain, were this to occur anywhere else.
Oh come on. As practised by muslim hate preachers I’d say the public at large was being very logical and maybe too tolerant. Try and sell that to the victims of the tube bombings a few yrs ago.But Muslim officers believe the Government is wrong to blame Islam as the main ‘driver’ of terrorist activity. Muslim officers may be reluctant to take part in ‘hearts and minds’ anti-terrorist campaigns in the future.
Ah. Got it at last. The main driver of TERRORISM just has to be .... drum roll .... The Damn Jews. Who else? It’s a Jewish/Western plot to discredit, you know. I can’t say it though.
I don’t see the non-Christain public, muslims excepted, planting bombs in the subways or on buses or trying to blow planes out of the sky. Once again, your people have the market cornered on that commodity.
Most of Europe and the UK were doing well enough before the great influx of radical muslims were forced on them. Things do not look as though things will improve much.
Posted by peiper
on 01/21/2010 at 11:23 AM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Illegal-Aliens • RoPMA • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 19, 2010
Save this for when you get really po’d re. American immigration/border policies, and then
BE DAMN THANKFUL YOU DON’T HAVE THIS. Or do we?
Another gem from Richard Littlejohn. There’s two actually and I’ll post the other one separately. For now however, put you eyes on this. It’s been going on a long time now, and I can not understand how or why people who hold offices and who are generally well educated, can at the very same time be so damn stupid. They really are killing this country with kindness. Or maybe it isn’t intended kindness at all.
Bottom line. As he is so often, Littlejohn is correct.
The lunatics now have full control of the asylum. Not funny.
When it comes to asylum, the lunatics really have taken over
By Richard Littlejohn
This morning’s edition of You Couldn’t Make It Up stars 31-year-old Moroccan Rashid Ali, who came to this country six years ago in search of a better life.
He tore up his passport and pretended to be Algerian, in the belief that he stood more chance of being granted asylum.
A short while after arriving, he decided that Britain wasn’t all it was cracked up to be. So, naturally, he decided to leave.
With the myriad problems we have deporting failed asylum seekers and terrorists, you might have thought the authorities would be happy to see the back of him.
After all, the Government has resorted to bribing illegal immigrants to go home, even chartering special flights to repatriate them.
So they should have been offering to drive Rashid to the airport and bidding him a fond farewell. Missing you already.
But the Moroccans are in no rush to get him back and have failed to issue him with a new passport. And because he has no papers, British officials refused to let him leave. When he tried to escape, he was arrested and put in detention.
So far, he has stowed away on six cargo ships, but each time he has been brought back. He has even been offered his own flat to persuade him to stay put, but refused.
Rashid is currently being held in a ‘removals’ centre near Heathrow, even though he won’t be going anywhere fast.
This Kafkaesque farce has been running since 2004, during which time Rashid has been jailed for nine months for stealing a coat and made the subject of a deportation order.
More than a year ago a judge promised to ‘kick some backsides’ at the Home Office, saying the refusal to repatriate him beggared belief.
It costs £43,000 a year to keep him in detention. The bill to the British taxpayer, including legal fees, adds up to more than £300,000.
We have known for a decade that Britain’s asylum and immigration system is absurd. But this case is beyond bonkers.
If Rashid Ali wants to leave, let him. If Morocco doesn’t want him, he can try his luck somewhere else.
Where he goes next is not our problem. He is not a British citizen and we have no obligation towards him.
Rashid is being held in a secure unit because of fears he may abscond. But he wants to abscond, for heaven’s sake.
Officials also say they are concerned that he may hurt himself if he tries to stow away on another ship. I suppose it was inevitable that elf’n’safety would have a walk-on part in this fiasco.
Ever since the pernicious ‘yuman rites’ act was passed into law, the British authorities seem to believe they have a moral and legal obligation to feed and water the world’s waifs and strays, however undesirable.
And they will go to any lengths to carry out their ‘duty’.
It has also been revealed that the Foreign Office is supporting an attempt to remove seven foreign terror suspects, currently living in Britain, from a UN watch list.
All of them are said to have links with al-Qaeda and the Taliban. They include people who have been convicted of involvement in bombings in Casablanca, accused of blowing up two U.S. embassies and found guilty by a military tribunal of plotting terrorist attacks.
Currently, the men are forbidden to leave the country. Why the hell were they ever allowed to enter Britain in the first place? They should have been kicked out years ago.
Even when we try to deport terror suspects, our hands are tied by ‘yuman rites’. In another ludicrous development yesterday, the High Court ruled that two suspected terrorists, one Libyan and one Iraqi, who have been subject to control orders in Britain since 2006 - because it is illegal to detain them in prison - are entitled to sue for compensation.
They were given control orders only because sending them back to Libya or Iraq would break their fundamental rights.
That’s not all. Europe’s top law officer has announced that the wives and families of men linked to al- Qaeda should receive tens of thousands of pounds in benefits from the British taxpayer.
Refusing to pay them is - you guessed - a breach of their ‘yuman rites’. No wonder Britain harbours more terrorists than any other Western country.
The insanity of our system for dealing with foreign terrorists and illegal immigrants is beyond parody.
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave, even if you want to.
WHEN IT SOMES TO ASYLUM, THE LUNATICS HAVE REALLY TAKEN OVER.
Posted by peiper
on 01/19/2010 at 10:04 AM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Illegal-Aliens • Stoopid-People • UK •
• Comments (10)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Monday - January 18, 2010
The U.S. must not ‘occupy’ Haiti, declares French minister. wtf? Huh?
Gosh oh gee. Wonder where these folks will eventually be headed.
Get ready America. Coming soon to a neighborhood near you. Coming soon, whoops. They’re almost there now.
btw ... Any word over there (USA) of possible takeover of Haiti by the US? You haven’t heard from the French yet have ya?
The U.S. must not ‘occupy’ Haiti, declares French minister as aid FINALLY trickles through
By Mail Foreign Service
Last updated at 4:21 PM on 18th January 2010The UN must step in to ensure the U.S. is not occupying Haiti in the wake of a devastating earthquake that may have killed 200,000 people, a French minister has said.
French Cooperation Minister Alain Joyandet spoke as the country descended into anarchy. Aid is only just trickling through the ‘bottleneck’ at Haiti’s airport, while angry Haitians desperate for help are striking out at international agencies - and each other.
Some 10,000 U.S. troops are on the way to try to restore order - but their role is being questioned.
‘This is about helping Haiti, not about occupying Haiti,’ Joyandet, in Brussels for an EU meeting on Haiti, said on French radio.
Joyandet has already complained about America’s role in Haiti. Last week U.S. forces turned back a French aid plane carrying a field hospital from the damaged, congested airport in the Haitian capital of Port-au-Prince, prompting criticism from the French minister.
The plane landed safely the following day.
In another weekend incident, some 250 Americans were flown to New Jersey’s McGuire Air Force Base on three military planes from Haiti.
U.S. forces initially blocked French and Canadians nationals from boarding the planes, but the cordon was lifted after protests from French and Canadian officials.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Saturday the U.S. government had no intention of taking power from Haitian officials.
Posted by peiper
on 01/18/2010 at 11:40 AM
Filed Under: • Border Security • Illegal-Aliens • International •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 16, 2010
Senior member of extreme Islamist group is teaching at a London school
I really do wonder when and where this kind of thing will end. The only thing I am certain of is, it will not be in my lifetime.
So then, I wish the future generations much Good Luck. You are going to need all of that you can get.
And what a GAK producing couple (photo) barf.
Take a look BMEWS.
by, Sean O’Neill,
Crime and Security EditorThe Times
A senior figure in Hizb ut-Tahrir, a hardline Islamist group that the Government keeps “under continuous review” and the Conservatives want to ban, is teaching and preaching at a top university.
The Times has learnt that Reza Pankhurst, who was imprisoned in Egypt for membership of the group, is a teacher at the London School of Economics and regularly preaches to students at Friday prayers.
The group is supposedly barred from organising and speaking on campuses under the National Union of Students’ policy of “no platform” for racist or fascist views. The presence of one of its prominent members as a university teacher raises new concerns about Islamist radicalisation on campus.
A new review of campus extremism began last month after it was discovered that the alleged Detroit airline bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, was a former president of the Islamic Society at University College London.
The Times understands that at least two London university lecturers are either supporters or members of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
Mr Pankhurst is a postgraduate student in the LSE’s government department and teaches classes for the course “States, Nations and Empires”.
On Fridays he is one of the regular speakers at prayers organised by the students’ union Islamic Society in the college gym.
A society member told The Times: “He preaches every other week and is constantly bringing the subject around to politics, talking about Afghanistan and the need to establish the Caliphate [Islamic state].
“Only last week he was talking about the Detroit bomber and saying the guy was not radicalised in London and it was all to do with foreign policy.
“Last year he recommended we should attend a conference which I later discovered was organised by Hizb ut-Tahrir, but he never mentions the party by name.”
In 2002 Mr Pankhurst was one of three British Hizb ut-Tahrir members arrested in Egypt for attempting to promote the movement. They were held for four years and tortured before being released in 2006.
He remained active in the movement after his return and, according to well-informed sources, is still a senior figure. Last month a meeting at Queen Mary College, London, at which Mr Pankhurst and Jamal Harwood, another member of Hizb ut-Tahrir, were due to speak, was cancelled after student protests about the speakers’ views.
The Times made repeated attempts to contact the group and Mr Pankhurst yesterday but without success.
The group states on its website that its “political aim is the re-establishment of the Islamic Caliphate as an independent state”. It says that it rejects forcing change “by means of violence and terror”.
Hizb ut-Tahrir is banned in Germany for anti-semitic activity but, despite Tony Blair announcing plans to proscribe it in 2005, it remains legal in Britain.
In a speech last month Chris Grayling, the Shadow Home Secretary, said that the Conservative Party would ban the group if elected to Government. Mr Grayling said: “Within the UK it takes extreme care about how it words its propaganda ... But anyone who doubts its true character should take a look at the website for its sister organisation in Bangladesh, which talks about evil American plans to subjugate Muslims and about mobilising armed forces to eliminate the Jewish entity. We cannot allow such views free rein in our society.”
The LSE confirmed that Mr Pankhurst was a research student and a graduate teaching assistant.
A spokesman said: “No concerns about his conduct have been raised with the school and we are not aware that he is a member of any proscribed organisation or has broken any laws or LSE regulations.”
The students’ union said that Mr Pankhurst was a member of its Islamic Society. Aled Dilwyn Fisher, general secretary of the union, said: “As far as we are aware, Mr Pankhurst is not currently a member of an illegal extremist group.”
A spokesman for the anti-extremism think-tank, the Quilliam Foundation, said: “Hizb ut-Tahrir, an organisation which has a long track record of promoting intolerance, has not abandoned its efforts to infiltrate British universities in order to spread its destructive, confrontational message.
“Its infiltration of internationally renowned universities such as the LSE make a mockery of universities’ claims to be tackling extremism on campus.”
A Home Office spokesman said “Hizb ut-Tahrir is kept under continuous review. As and when new material comes to light it is considered and the organisation reassessed as part of that process.”
Can it be said that things like this are any better back home? (USA)
Posted by peiper
on 01/16/2010 at 06:34 AM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Illegal-Aliens • Insanity • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 12, 2010
MUSLIM EXTREMISTS FINED, BUT THE PUBLIC PAYS COZ THEY’RE ALL ON BENEFITS.
Outside the court, they defiantly declared: ‘The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits’.
And ya know what? They aren’t wrong. This pile of dung masquerading as real life humans are ALL on benefits with compliments of the Brit taxpayer.
One of the many things I find hard to understand is their claim that they are exercising a right of free speech, while carrying banners and poster that
read the hell with freedom. I know they’re incredibly stupid life forms but it amazes me they can’t see just how dumb that appears to the world. Of course I realize I demand too much of them. My fault, not theirs. I expect them to exhibit something human when they so obviously are anything but.
Like this ..... pathetic looking idiot. In case you can’t see it on your monitor, it read, “freedom can go to hell.”
This fool doesn’t seem to understand that without freedom, he couldn’t carry a sign in public that makes him look any dumber then he already is.
These jerks aren’t really all that concerned about what’s happening in muslim countries. If they were, they’d go there and most of us wish the hell they would. But hey ... no benefits to speak of where this species come from ( under most any rock ). And try carrying a sign that would question religion or war or state policy. Orf with ees ed. And still, the west puts up with this sub-human species and placates and pleases and pays benefits to. The list is almost endless.
And talk about appease and placate and bend over backwards. The group refused to stand when the judge entered court and she did NOTHING!
Read this article and see what reason was given for allowing them to get away with that. Of course, if the defendants were real humans well, you can just imagine.
Guilty? It’s a badge of honour say Muslim hate mob (and because we’re on benefits, the state will pay our costs)
By Lucy Ballinger and Dan Newling
Jan 12,2010
A group of Muslim extremists who screamed ‘rapists’ and ‘murderers’ at British soldiers went unpunished yesterday - and called their conviction ‘a badge of honour’.
The five were given conditional discharges for shouting ‘baby killers’ and ‘terrorists’ and waving placards at hundreds of soldiers returning from Iraq.
Outside court they were surrounded by a mob of supporters and boasted they would do the same again, saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.
The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: ‘The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits’.
Surrounded by other followers of Islam4UK - the group led by so-called preacher of hate Anjem Choudary - they said they would protest again.
Their backers waved a banner saying: ‘Islam will dominate the world. Freedom can go to hell’.
Some of the group members were linked to an egg attack on Tory peer Baroness Warsi when she visited Luton two months ago.
The peer - who was hit by at least one of the eggs - faced a group of shouting protesters telling her that she was not a proper Muslim. No one was charged.
During their six-day trial, the men argued they were exercising their right to freedom of speech and had been telling the truth about the conduct of British forces in Iraq.
They were part of a demonstration against the 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment, who were marching through Luton after returning from Iraq.
The protest sparked a hostile stand-off with angry members of the public who had been cheering the soldiers.
Yesterday at Luton Magistrates’ Court, five of the group were found guilty of using threatening, abusive, insulting words and behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others.
They were Sajjadar Choudhury, 31, Munin Abdul, 28, Jalal Ahmed, 21, Yousaf Bashir, 29, and Ziaur Rahman, 32, all from Luton. Two others were acquitted.
Although the offence carries a maximum fine of £1,000, the five were merely given a conditional discharge for two years by District Judge Carolyn Mellanby, which means if they are found guilty of anything else this conviction will be taken into account.
The protesters had refused to stand for the judge as she entered and left court. But she yesterday said she did not wish to ‘set a precedent’ by charging them with contempt of court because of this.
After the trial Munin Abdul, who was found to have called the soldiers ‘terrorists and murderers’ and said they would ‘burn in hell’, said: ‘We won’t stop speaking the truth, even if they think they have made an example of us.
‘This case was political, and we have been made scapegoats to pacify the public. We knew we were being offered as sacrificial lambs. But I see our convictions as a reason for us to carry on in our calling.
Posted by peiper
on 01/12/2010 at 01:37 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • FREEDOM • Illegal-Aliens • RoPMA • Terrorists • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - January 09, 2010
IMMIGRANTS RIOT IN ITALY ….. apologies from authorities expected.
Here we go again. De blacks doin what day always do when day got nottin to do. Riot. Cause vandalism. Burn cars.
Doesn’t matter what country they’re in it seems. Any one will do. Jus ax dem. This time it’s Italy.
Now then, I don’t hold with whoever took some pot shots at black immigrant workers. You can’t tell in random shooting if the target is some hard working law abiding guy or a left wing trouble maker. It wasn’t right. Period. As for beatings, the article doesn’t go into real detail there. Justified by self defense or otherwise? A gang thing? An argument that ended in a fight?
Just what kind of point are they making or justice seeking when they attack (as they ALWAYS do) generally defenseless people who have had absolutely nothing to do with whatever happened. Reminds me in part of the nights I worked in LA with an auto re-possessor. One of the many places we went to was the Watts area of LA. If we were seen taking away a car that hadn’t seen a payment in over 6 months, and it sometimes took that long to track down and find some people so figure payments were in arrears for longer, it ALWAYS turned out that we were anti-black racists. It’s really how they think. Or at least the ones we had to deal with did.
However, these animals are using what happened as an excuse like they always do in any country they’re in. It’s just something in their genes, and the Italian govt. should be spanked for allowing so many in and allowing so many to stay.
Their presence in any number and especially in a small country, undermines good order and harmony. But, well, I guess it’s the white man’s burden.
And things will NEVER change cos silly, guilty beat me I’m sorry for slavery whites will go on appeasing and making excuses and allowances, from now to eternity.
It’s in their genes too. Jeesh. What a team they are.
Immigrant riot in Italy leaves 37 injured after series of beatings by white youths
By Mail Foreign Service
Last updated at 4:30 PM on 09th January 2010Violence broke out in southern Italy yesterday as hundreds of migrant workers, most of them Africans, went on a rampage in retaliation to two of their number being shot and three more beaten with iron bars by white youths.
Authorities reporting at least 37 were wounded in the ensuing clashes, including 18 police officers and five migrants, as the violence reached its second day in the coastal town of Rosarno in Calabria.
The riots in the region were sparked off when when two migrants were wounded by pellet fire two days ago, starting the cycle of violence, said a top police official, Renato Cortese, in the regional capital.
The simmering racial tension was then exacerbated when two more migrants were shot in the same location, an unoccupied factory which serves as sleeping quarters for African workers in the hamlet of Laureana di Borrello 6 miles from Rosarno.
In retaliation, the immigrant farm labourers went on a rampage and fought pitched battles with the police.
Police reinforcements were being sent in the next hours, likely during the night, with the exact number still being decided, the Interior Ministry said.Friday, angry migrants, mostly from African nations, some armed with metal bars or wooden sticks, scuffled with police and residents in the streets of Rosarno.
Other residents were holed up in their homes, state radio reported, and schools and shops were shuttered.Cortese said of the situation in Rosarno: ‘I’d say you could step out and buy some bread only because you have to eat, but if I had to choose I wouldn’t go out for an evening stroll.’
Police said late Friday evening that at least 37 people had been injured, including the five migrants, 14 residents and 18 police officers.
A young mother with a bruise under an eye and a bandage on the side of her head, told state TV a group of migrants started smashing her car.The woman said that, fearful for the safety of her small children, she managed to drive about two meters before her attackers pushed her car into a wall.
The combination of ethnic strife and organized crime has sparked violence before among migrant communities in southern Italy. In 2008, migrants rioted in the Naples area after six Ghanians were murdered in a gangland-style shooting blamed on the local Camorra crime syndicate.
SOURCE AND THE REST PLUS PHOTOS HERE
Now here in dis photo we see de aggressive, bullyin, white honky bitch her be pickin on dis lawbidn thick lipped buck but he be givin her a piece ob what he hab for a mind. He be tellin her bout him cibil rights ya bet coz he know all about dat dere stuff.
Posted by peiper
on 01/09/2010 at 01:11 PM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Illegal-Aliens • Terrorists •
• Comments (24)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - January 08, 2010
Christianity’s survival may depend on something as prosaic as immigration control
This is how the entire line is supposed to read. But you get the idea. And the article it comes from is quite interesting. You don’t have to be religious to appreciate this. Take a look.
Christianity’s survival as a mass movement may depend on something as prosaic as immigration control
The church fights back against Islamification
Lord Carey’s brave call to limit immigration is a timely defence of Christian values.
By Damian Thompson
08 Jan 2010We have had to wait decades for this moment, but it has finally happened. A leading British clergyman has said something sensible about immigration.
Lord Carey of Clifton, the former Archbishop of Canterbury, this week signed a declaration by the Cross Party Group on Balanced Migration calling for an urgent tightening of borders to stop the British population reaching 70 million by 2029. He also gave an interview yesterday in which he called for a tougher Church. “We Christians are very often so soft that we allow other people to walk over us, and we are not as tough in what we want, in expressing our beliefs, because we do not want to upset other people,” he said.
Tougher church … people walking all over us … controls on immigration: it really is not all that difficult to join the dots. Later in the interview, Lord Carey almost joined them for us, suggesting that there might be a “points system” based on respect for Britain’s Christian heritage.
Some of Lord Carey’s critics will accuse him of blowing a dog whistle to racists. That is nonsense. Lord Carey is a veteran anti-racist: he enjoys the sort of following among African evangelicals that Bill Clinton did among black Americans. But if Lord Carey were accused of whistling to Christians worried by the prospect of millions of dogmatic Muslims in Britain, then he would find it difficult to rebut the charge. Politicised Islam is at the forefront of his mind: he knows that Britain’s evangelical Christians are fed up with being told to develop ever closer ties with their Muslim neighbours.
These evangelicals see Muslim communities that are increasingly hard to distinguish from ghettos; whose young men are sympathetic towards Islamist insurgents; and whose elders enforce a Sharia law that bullies young British Muslim women at home and persecutes Christians abroad. (Nothing, not even the issue of homosexuality, has done more to damage the authority of Dr Rowan Williams in the conservative provinces of the Anglican Communion than his idiotic equivocation on British Sharia.)
Britain’s black and Asian Christian leaders will support Lord Carey in this controversy; many of them have seen Islamism at work in their home countries. Only one Church of England bishop has resigned his see in protest at Church leaders’ feebleness in the face of Islamism, and he is an immigrant: Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Bishop of Rochester. In contrast, the rest of the hierarchy, together with all the Roman Catholic bishops of England and Wales, still adhere to the old orthodoxy that immigration is by definition a glorious blessing because it “enriches” our culture.
In Europe, however, many Catholic bishops never really subscribed to that orthodoxy in the first place, and now they are talking openly about the coming “Islamification” of Europe. Yesterday, just as Lord Carey was issuing his own warning, Cardinal Miloslav Vlk, the Archbishop of Prague, marked his retirement with a melodramatic prophecy. “Unless the Christians wake up, life may be Islamised and Christianity will not have the strength to imprint its character on the life of people, not to say society,” he said.
The Cardinal is right, but only up to a point. The Islamification of parts of Europe is indeed under way. As Christopher Caldwell says in his book Reflections on the Revolution in Europe, Muslims “vie for dominance” in Rotterdam, Strasbourg, Marseilles, suburbs of Paris and Berlin, Bradford, Leicester, the periphery of Manchester and east London.
Where Cardinal Vlk displays naivety is in his proposed remedy: he is optimistic that the Church can persuade the West to reject the empty secularism that has created a Europe-wide vacuum filled by people of another faith.
The message that “secularism” is the real enemy of Christianity is parroted by liberal bishops everywhere. Although they may be horrified by Cardinal Vlk’s talk of Islamification, they share his belief that the essential division in the world is between “people of faith” and rootless materialists. Pope John Paul II also subscribed to that world-view. But Pope Benedict XVI, significantly, does not. Benedict wants to convince secular-minded people that, in an odd way, they are already part of the Christian flock, because many of their ideals are rooted in the ethics of Christianity.
In other words, the Church’s respect for the dignity of the human person is broadly shared by those secular intellectuals committed to a free society. The Pope recognises this, which is why he has spent so much time talking to them; so does Bishop Nazir-Ali, whose friends include atheist thinkers whose respect for the West’s Christian heritage is far greater than that of Muslim community leaders or their multiculturalist allies.
In the long term, the future of Western civilisation can be secured only by an alliance between Christians and secularists against the totalitarian ideology of Islamism. That is a strange prospect; and even more uncomfortable is the realisation that Christianity’s survival as a mass movement may depend on something as prosaic as immigration control. But that is surely what Lord Carey is hinting at, and it is brave of him to do so.
Now the big question is , will anyone listen? This island’s immigration is a mess and worse, as LyndonB has commented on more then once. And he is someone in a very good position to know the truth of it.
The bleeding heart hand wringers on the left even find reasons not to deport those who are illegal if their home country is, they will claim, a danger to them. They didn’t even deport airplane hijackers a couple of years ago.
As a bystander here looking on, it does seem that like the USA, it’s the Christian community who bend over backwards and the Christian community who make allowances for others and the Christian community who MUST do all the understanding and finally, the Christian community must never be seen to offend anyone. EVER!
It has to be a frustrating experience being a devout Christian these days.
Posted by peiper
on 01/08/2010 at 09:01 AM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Illegal-Aliens • Religion • UK •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - January 05, 2010
LIKE RATS DURING THE PLAGUE AND JUST AS FILTHY, AND THEY’RE LIVING AMONG US. AND MORE COMING.
Actually started putting this together about five hours ago. One interruption after another, helped friend gather logs for his fireplace, then browser trouble again.
Took a short time to get used to FireFox but once I did, I kissed IE goodbye. Then FF had an upgrade of some kind and things have been wonky since.
So now using Chrome which I find generally is faster. Hey, whatever works and right now Chrome does. But I wish FF did.
Started snowing just after I posted last and it still is. But lightly.
OK, this is a follow up to yesterday wherein I posted about some rat droppings (muzzies) who are planning another protest re. the awful crusade that the west has launched against islam. Oh, only if. The guy organizing same is a former lawyer, and he plans to carry empty coffins thru the town where so many fallen Brits are carried. He is scum and so are those around him. They pull this sort of crap here and sure as hell if they tried similar in their own damn countries, they’d lose their heads. They come to the west where they have more freedom without any responsibility, and carry signs damning their host countries. I will not call em stupid cos rats are smart as we know. Devious, cunning, sneaky and deadly and not to be trusted. However ...
THEY HAVE RIGHTS HERE THEY’D NEVER HAVE AT HOME. Including the right to march anywhere they want to and provoke outrage.
This is all quite interesting to me because I know that folks who’ve had their feelings hurt have sued successfully and the person doing the hurt has actually been prosecuted. So then ... with so many families who have lost kin, surely their feelings must be raw watching and hearing walking, talking rats denigrate thier military and those who’ve fallen. But that law I think only applies to certain ppl. Namely, easy targets and not usually members of favored groups.
So then this is where Brits are today and this is what they are facing.
Court hears Muslims calling British soldiers ‘rapists’, ‘cowards’ and ‘scum’By LUCY BALLINGER and MARK DUELL
Shocking films of a group of Muslim protestors shouting ‘rapists’, ‘scum’ and ‘burn in hell’ at soldiers on a homecoming parade were played to a court today.
The mob of Muslim anti-war protesters screamed hostile chants including ‘baby killers and murderers all of you’ and ‘British army murderers’ at 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment - which had lost 12 soldiers in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts.
Holding signs made from cardboard boxes denouncing soldiers as ‘Butchers of Basra’ and ‘war criminals’, the group of men jeered ‘murderers’ as they marched past.
What should have been a joyful homecoming spilled over into violence as angry members of the public there to give the soldiers a heroes’ welcome shouted insults back at the protestors, Luton Magistrates Court heard.
The court saw video footage of the protestors being circled and protected by police. They were later joined by a group of 20 women dressed in full hijab coverings, as well as children and babies in buggies.
A Muslim woman, clad from head to toe in black, carried a placard that read ‘Muslims rise against British oppression’.
MEANWHILE .... This is a continuation of yesterday and has caused much angst. Which is fine as long as nobody insults or causes hurt to these life forms.
Top officer says Muslim hate preacher ‘DOES have right to march’ as 400,000 join Facebook group against Wootton Bassett protest
By IAN DRURY
Last updated at 6:04 PM on 05th January 2010A senior police officer has called for a provocative march by Islamic extremists through Wootton Bassett, the town renowned for honouring Britain’s war dead, not to be banned amid fears it could further inflame tensions.
The Home Secretary Alan Johnson yesterday reacted to mounting public anger at hate preacher Anjem Choudary’s plan to stage the stunt, by saying he would support any request to ban the march.
Gordon Brown had earlier declared that he was ‘completely disgusted’ at the ‘abhorrent’ protest proposed by the firebrand cleric.
But Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), said he would be ‘surprised’ if senior officers in Wiltshire block the protest.
IN HIS COLUMN TODAY, Richard Littlejohn had this to say.
THE NAME’S CHOUDHARY ... RAM JAM CHOUDHARY
I fell about laughing when I saw Ram Jam Choudhary on Sky News justifying his plans for a Muslim march through Wootton Bassett in the name of British ‘freedom and democracy’.
This is a man who heads an organisation dedicated to destroying freedom and democracy, not just in Britain but around the world.Remember those ‘Free Speech Go To Hell’ and ‘Behead All Those Who Insult Islam’ banners carried by Ram Jam and his disciples on the anti-war march in Trafalgar Square?
What astonishes me is that we are expected to pay him to troll round Britain preaching holy war.
On what grounds does he receive unemployment and welfare benefits, which allow him to live in a £350,000 house in North London?
He is 42 years old, apparently fit and healthy, and a trained lawyer. Even in these difficult times, he ought to be able to find a job. There may not be a lot of call for a full-time jihadist, even in Haringey, but surely a little light conveyancing shouldn’t be beyond him. Maybe the Wicked Witch could sub-contract him a bit of yuman rites work. If all else fails, he could always get a job as a security guard at the Home Office. They don’t seem fussy, judging by the number of illegal immigrants they employ.
Some people ask why he’s still at large, given that he spends most of his time stirring up hatred. His legal training tends to keep him just the right side of the incitement laws.
To be honest, I’ve always assumed that Ram Jam is an MI5 double agent, recruited by the Funnies while he was still at university, where he was known as ‘Andy’ and was partial to birds, booze and the odd spliff.
If you were looking for someone to discredit the cause of militant Islam, you couldn’t make him up.
Posted by peiper
on 01/05/2010 at 01:16 PM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Illegal-Aliens • RoPMA • Terrorists • UK • War On Terror •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
LAAR She Blows! Part One
(2 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Planes Ideas Blog
[...] CABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEB [...]
On: 07/12/11 01:57
The Tactical Cowboy
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Sights Service Blog
[...] E LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE [...]
On: 07/10/11 08:30
Nasty Dirty Money
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Money Reviews Blog
[...] ONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLES [...]
On: 06/17/11 08:31
Amazing aerial images taken by daring Allied pilots on secret missions during WW 2
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Hookers and Booze
peiper over at Barking Moonbat EWS found some absolutely kickass aerial photos from WWII. I grabbed this one because I’m a big fan of the movie A Bridge Too Far.…
On: 11/23/09 04:14
Clear Thinking and Straight Talk
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at baldilocks
Let Them Fight or Bring Them Home Read all of it--and tell every American you know to do so. (Thanks to BMEWS) UPDATE: The author of the above blog is…
On: 10/02/09 09:29
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
