Thursday - July 15, 2010
Another Lost Post
Beats me what happened. I thought I put this up yesterday. So I’ll try again before I blame the government watchbirds.
Too true. I would have drawn the guy in the back to look a lot more like Eric Holder though.
The first time I did this post I put in a link to IBD’s From The Left column, written by D.J. Dionne, so you could all have a laugh at his expense. He wrote an essay supporting the NAACP’s accusation of racism in the Tea Party movement and calling for a purge from within that group. Pure projectionism and moonbattery. Perhaps suffering from his own form of White Guilt, Dionne agrees with everything that Jealous said the other day, takes Sarah Palin to task because she commiserated with the Tea Party folks because she herself has been the target of baseless accusations, and lashes out at Tom Tancredo because it was soooo racist of him to opine that BHO got elected because most Americans haven’t the slightest inkling of what Socialism, Communism, and Tyranny are all about. But let’s crucify Tancredo because he expressed that thought by brandishing the racial tar baby and calling such a lack a “civics literary test”. The irony was completely lost on Dionne. And the NAACP/NBPP I’m sure.
Ok, links restored. Let’s see if this iteration survives.
Posted by Drew458
on 07/15/2010 at 09:49 AM
Filed Under: • Politics • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (3)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Sunday - April 04, 2010
the new racism
From Rich K. I’m sure y’all have a reaction, so fire away!
Since we can’t seem to escape the term “racist,” I suggest that we embrace the term, and let other Americans understand what a conservative racist is:
I’m a racist because I believe that blacks are fully capable human beings who are perpetually demeaned by the liberal theory holding that blacks cannot function without handouts from condescending, rich white people.
I’m a racist because believe that blacks are just as academically capable as any other people in America, but that they are having their abilities systematically squished when condescending, rich white people assure them that they can’t make it without assistance—a heinous approach predicated on the liberal’s implicit assumption that blacks are inherently stupid, ill-informed and ill-suited for intellectual effort.
I’m a racist because I believe that vigorous (but still constitutional) law enforcement benefits blacks, who are disproportionately the victims of crimes by other blacks.
I’m a racist because I believe that excusing harmful behaviors in the black community (whether academic failures, teen pregnancies, drug use or crime), on the ground that blacks cannot help themselves because whites have essentially ruined them, is the ultimate insult to blacks, reducing them to the level of animals without intelligence, self-discipline, moral fiber, ambition or ordinary human decency.
I’m a racist because I think liberals have sold blacks a bill of goods by convincing them that, because slavery was work, all work is slavery.
I’m a racist because I believe that a rising tide lifts all boats—which means that I believe that social programs that destroy the economy will not raise up minorities, but will ensure that everyone wallows in poverty.
I’m a racist because, in San Francisco in the 1960s and 1970s, I saw non-English speaking Asians fresh from the Killing Fields of Cambodia, the prisons of Vietnam, and the horror of the Great Leap forward all arrive in America and immediately begin working and studying, so that their children could enjoy the American dream—and I believe that only liberal condescension and paralyzing social programs stand in the way of both blacks and Hispanics making the same strides.
Posted by Drew458
on 04/04/2010 at 02:30 PM
Filed Under: • Racism and race relations • The New Conservatives •
• Comments (9)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - March 19, 2010
Muzzies holler RACE! Judges says up yours and awards 400,000 to the victim. That a first?
Looks like this one time the one representing civilization worth saving wins one. Hope she gets every dime and has fun with the money and flaunts it at the spineless council.
Headmistress wrongly accused of racism by Muslim governors wins £400,000 payoutBy Daily Mail Reporter
A headmistress hounded out of her job after being falsely accused of racism by two Muslim governors is entitled to £400,000 damages, the Court of Appeal ruled today.
Erica Connor, 57, had run a ‘happy and successful’ primary school but was driven to a breakdown by the allegations.
She left the New Monument primary school in Woking, Surrey, after Paul Martin - a Muslim convert - and Mumtaz Saleem began monopolising meetings with the aim of turning New Monument in Woking into an Islamic faith school.
The Surrey town is home to the first purpose-built mosque in the country - the Shah Jahan Mosque - which dates from 1889.
A deputy High Court judge ruled in March last year that Surrey County Council had failed in its duty to protect her and to intervene when the actions of the governors created problems. He awarded her £407,700 damages.
Martin started making allegations about anti-Muslim comments by members of staff which led to an investigation by Mrs Connor.
She found that all the staff denied the allegations which she said had demoralised them.
An official review also found no evidence of deliberate racism or religious bias but said the governing body had become dysfunctional.
The High Court had been told Martin tried to stir up disaffection in the community against the school and Mr Saleem was verbally abusive in school meetings.
Although during the first five years that Mrs Connor was in charge of the school there had been good relations with the local Muslim community and improved results, the situation changed when the two men were elected as governors.
Judge John Leighton Williams ruled in the High Court that the men had an agenda to increase the role of the Muslim religion in the school and that this, combined with the authority’s failure to protect Mrs Connor, had led her to suffer serious depression.
Paul Martin: Primary school GovenorPaul Martin: Primary school Govenor
When Martin was removed from the board of governors in June 2005, he wrote a letter of complaint saying it was because he had been raising complaints of institutional racism within the school.
A few days later a petition was circulated calling for Mrs Connor’s removal from the school and containing “defamatory and offensive remarks”, the appeal judges were told.
Lord Justice Laws said the High Court judge was right to find there had been negligence on the part of the council.
He said it was an unusual case - “partly because of the council’s lamentable capitulation to aggression”.
the council’s lamentable capitulation to aggression
Kinda says it all, doesn’t it? That’s how they operate and that’s how they get away with things. Like the travelers. About the same thing.
Posted by peiper
on 03/19/2010 at 01:11 PM
Filed Under: • Racism and race relations • RoPMA • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 11, 2010
Oh just shut up already
Outrage? WTF, are these folks taking lessons from the muzzies now?
Atlanta’s transit system will rename a train route into the heart of the city’s Asian community in response to complaints that calling it the “yellow line” showed a lack of racial sensitivity.
The Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority issued a statement Thursday afternoon announcing it would change the name of the line to the “gold line.”
“The expressed concerns regarding the use of the phrase ‘yellow line’ will be addressed in the most expeditious and cost-effective manner possible,” MARTA officials said in the statement.
The move to change the name to “gold” coincides with the demands of some advocates in the Asian community.
“Our thought is, why don’t you change it to gold? It’s really more of a ‘why not?’ question. Why not change it?” said Helen Kim, director of advocacy and education at the nonprofit Pan Asian Center for Community Services.
Naming it the “yellow line” was part of MARTA’s color-coding the entire transit systems by using primary colors.
“There was absolutely no intent to confer any negative connotation through the use of any of the colors chosen,” the statement released Thursday said.
MARTA also has a red line, a green line and a blue line. Several other cities — including San Francisco, Tokyo and Washington — utilize yellow within their color-coded systems.
...
“It’s not a term, it’s a color,” said Darcy Olsen, president and CEO of the Goldwater Institute, a conservative think tank based in Phoenix, “Should we outlaw yellow jackets, yellow traffic lights? How about the white nights of summer solstice? This is manufactured offense when clearly no offense is intended.”
Hey I know, let’s just deport all the Asians in Atlanta, and then there won’t be any left to get all offended. I wonder if any of them are actually legal immigrants to begin with. [/snark] Geez Luise, some people are some uppity little bitches aren’t they? Next thing we’ll have Jesse and Al picketing because there isn’t a brown line. And if MARTA puts one in, they’ll be sued for racism if that route goes past a single black neighborhood. Get a fuckin life already you losers.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/11/2010 at 10:11 PM
Filed Under: • Politically-Incorrect • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - February 06, 2010
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?
We’ve covered this outspoken critic of islam before but at the moment, things not going that well for our side. Seems the very PC Dutch ar quite happy to gag one of their own ELECTED politicians and give their country away to the islamists. If that’s really the case, what the heck did they fight the Germans for?
Nothing I have read on the subject and I confess I haven’t read everything, indicates that the Dutch are very happy with events there. Unfortunately for them, their country is in the hands of the left. They are concerned about immigration and they are worried about militant islam. In fact, many are just plain bothered about islam period, militant or not. Some have “quietly” said it has no place in their culture. I think the Dutch who said that have already moved out.
So anyway ... Geert Wilders is on trial. More like the Inquisition minus the burning then a trial. But you guys MUST read this to get a feel for how scary this actually is. Especially from muslim authorities.
H/T TUNDRA TABLOID
The Amsterdam District Court apparently doesn’t want to hear the truth about Islam. Nor is it interested to hear the opinion of top class legal experts in the field of freedom of expression. In one swift move, the Court brushed aside fifteen of the eighteen expert-witnesses the defence had requested to be summoned.Only Hans Jansen, Simon Admiraal and Wafa Sultan were allowed to be heard as expert-witnesses. Their testimony will be heard in a session behind closed doors. Apparently the truth about Islam must remain a secret.
Geert Wilders: “This Court is not interested in the truth. This Court doesn’t want me to have a fair trial. I can’t have any respect for this. This Court would not be out of place in a dictatorship”.
The Court also brushed aside the preliminary objections concerning its jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Public Prosecutor.Nevertheless, Geert Wilders remains extremely motivated to seek justice: “I’m still counting on an acquittal”.
THERE IS THIS FROM THE GATES OF VIENNA BLOG AND I ENCOURAGE ALL WHO HAVEN’T READ IT TO GO OVER THERE AND DO SO.
It isn’t a short read.
It’s obvious that the Dutch government wants Geert Wilders out of the way, and doesn’t much care how it happens.
In bygone days the Queen might have murmured to herself, “Who will rid me of this troublesome blond?” And then, to please his monarch, some eager courtier would have dispatched Mr. Wilders to meet his maker.
But today’s tactics have to be different. First the government demonizes the head of the PVV, eroding his official legitimacy and making it seem as if he almost deserves a violent end. Then it puts him on trial on trumped-up charges, and declines to provide the same courtroom security for a member of parliament that it gives to Islamic terrorists.
Photo from Gates of Vienna
I HAVE CRAMMED QUITE A BIT IN HERE BUT HAVE EDITED A LOT SO PLEASE GO TO THE LINK FOR MORE.
H/T Europe News for the following and see her site. This really does get bad and scary.
How Do You Say “Kangaroo Court” in Dutch?International Free Press Society 4 February 2010
By Diana WestEven if you have never been involved in a criminal prosecution wherein your very freedom is at risk, I want you to now imagine that you and your attorney have prepared a defense that includes a list of witnesses that will provide a mountain of exculpatory evidence. Then, imagine that the Court summarily and arbitrarily decides that it will not listen to nearly ninety percent of your case.
“This court is apparently not interested in the truth.” Wilders told De Telegraaph (translations from Gates of Vienna). “I cannot conclude anything but that the court does not award me a fair trial.”
“I have no respect for this,” Wilders added. He pointed out that in a typical criminal case there are often dozens of witnesses heard.
But this is not a typical trial. This is a rigged game, a fixed fight, a show trial that is premised not on Dutch law but on Islamic law. Indeed, the trial of Geert Wilders is a test case for sharia in the Netherlands, the grafting onto a free Western country the repressive cage of Islamic rule.
Discussing Muslim progress against “Islamophobia” at the 35th meeting of foreign ministers of the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) in Kampala, Uganda in 2008, Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu made the following statement:
In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film “Fitna”, we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed. As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
One reading doesn’t convey the chilling import of these words.
As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues.
Yes, and to the craven point where “the official West and its public opinion” are paralyzed and silenced by these same “sensitivities.”
They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.
When the OIC speaks about “freedom of expression,” it means freedom of expression as governed by the laws of Islam — sharia. When the OIC says we in the West have “started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility,” it means we in the West have started to regard expression from the perspective of sharia — from the perspective of the totalitarian Islamic system.
So here’s some unwashed creep with a name nobody outside his own country can pronounce ( Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu), and he’s telling the west how things are gonna be. And so far, a lot in the west seems to be caving in.
Posted by peiper
on 02/06/2010 at 12:52 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • FREEDOM • Government • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • Jack Booted Thugs • Oppression • Outrageous • Politically-Incorrect • Racism and race relations • Religion • RoPMA • Stoopid-People • Terrorists •
• Comments (0)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Thursday - February 04, 2010
Good Data, Bad Conclusion
The Violence Policy Center, a leftist anti-gun “think tank”, is aware that nearly half the violent crime in America is committed by black people against other black people. Their solution? Disarm the black folk. They aren’t “advanced” enough to responsibly own firearms.
Calls to limit the access of African-Americans to firearms specifically echo the “black codes” adopted immediately at the end of the Civil War. These laws were passed in southern states in response to the Thirteenth Amendment’s outlawing of slavery, and were specifically engineered to circumscribe the civil rights and liberties of newly freed slaves and freemen. The codes assured the second-class status of African-Americans, and were a forerunner to decades of “separate but equal” segregation under Jim Crow laws — which were only overcome during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Among the codes commonly passed were laws that forbid or restricted the ownership of firearms by African-Americans. The codes were “justified” with the explanation that African-Americans did not have the same rights as white citizens.
Calls to limit the access of African-Americans to firearms specifically echo the “black codes” adopted immediately at the end of the Civil War. These laws were passed in southern states in response to the Thirteenth Amendment’s outlawing of slavery, and were specifically engineered to circumscribe the civil rights and liberties of newly freed slaves and freemen. The codes assured the second-class status of African-Americans, and were a forerunner to decades of “separate but equal” segregation under Jim Crow laws — which were only overcome during the civil rights movement of the 1960s. Among the codes commonly passed were laws that forbid or restricted the ownership of firearms by African-Americans. The codes were “justified” with the explanation that African-Americans did not have the same rights as white citizens.
From VPC’s report:
Introduction
America is facing an epidemic of homicide among young black males.
According to a recent study conducted by Professor James Alan Fox of Northeastern University, one of the nation’s leading criminal justice researchers, from 2002 to 2007 the number of black male juvenile homicide victims rose by 31 percent. The number of young black homicide victims killed by guns rose at an even sharper rate: 54 percent.
This study examines the growing problem of black homicide victimization at the state level.
The devastation homicide inflicts on black teens and adults is a national crisis, yet it is all too often ignored outside of affected communities. This study analyzes unpublished Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR)2 data for black homicide submitted to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The information used for this report is for the year 2007 and is the most recent data available. This is the first analysis of the 2007 data on black homicide victims to offer breakdowns of cases in the five states with the highest black homicide victimization rates and the first to rank the states by the rate of black homicides.
Gender
Of the 7,387 black homicide victims, 6,345 (86 percent) were male, and 1,042 (14 percent) were female. The homicide rate for black male victims was 37.59 per 100,000. In comparison, the overall rate for male homicide victims was 8.56 per 100,000. For white male homicide victims it was 4.63 per 100,000. The homicide rate for female black victims was 5.62 per 100,000. In comparison, the overall rate for female homicide victims was 2.11 per 100,000. For white female homicide victims it was 1.61 per 100,000.Age
Six hundred seventy-four black homicide victims (9 percent) were less than 18 years old and 150 black homicide victims (2 percent) were 65 years of age or older. The average age was 30 years old.Most Common Weapons
For homicides in which the weapon used could be identified, 82 percent of black victims (5,743 out of 7,011) were shot and killed with guns. Of these, 73 percent (4,204 victims) were killed with handguns. There were 701 victims killed with knives or other cutting instruments, 247 victims killed by bodily force, and 200 victims killed by a blunt object.Victim/Offender Relationship
For homicides in which the victim to offender relationship could be identified, 72 percent of black victims (2,474 out of 3,431) were murdered by someone they knew. Nine hundred fifty-seven victims were killed by strangers.
Conclusion
Blacks in the United States are disproportionately affected by homicide. For the year 2007, blacks represented 13 percent of the nation’s population, yet accounted for 49 percent of all homicide victims.
As noted at the beginning of this study, the devastation homicide inflicts on black teens and adults is a national crisis, yet it is all too often ignored outside of affected communities. For blacks, like all victims of homicide, guns—usually handguns—are far and away the number one murder tool. Successful efforts to reduce America’s black homicide toll must put a focus on reducing access to firearms.
Not one word about figuring out a way to teach these young men respect for human life, or anger management, or anything positive like that. Nope. Best to just disarm them all, since they’ve proven they can’t be trusted with a gun.
Like eugenics, the other left wing “solution” to a problem, this one draws the wrongest possible conclusion from otherwise accurate data. And this from the camp that is made up of our superiors, the folks who know better and believe they should be empowered to tell us what to do. For our own good, right Hillary?
[ to be completely fair to the VPC, they are for disarming everyone. But this paper of theirs speaks specifically about the violence endemic among black people. So their call to reduce access to firearms must be taken in context: they are talking about disarming black people. Later on they’ll get around to disarming everyone else. ]
One commenter at Pajamas Media put the proper solution in a golden nutshell: ”Laws don’t prevent crime, civilized culture prevents crime.” Darn shame we live in such a PC-delimited world. Once upon a time, in a more forthright age, the task of permeating civilized culture to the black races was called ”the white man’s burden”. But even then the perils were known:
Take up the White Man’s burden--
The savage wars of peace--
Fill full the mouth of Famine
And bid the sickness cease;
And when your goal is nearest
The end for others sought,
Watch sloth and heathen Folly
Bring all your hopes to nought.
So who will tame the savage breast? The “savages” themselves. It’s a bootstrap lifting thing that has to come from within. Damn shame that 60+ years worth of “free footwear” has only given the “abos” more desire to go barefoot.
Posted by Drew458
on 02/04/2010 at 12:38 PM
Filed Under: • Guns and Gun Control • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - February 02, 2010
Taxi drivers accused of racism over St George stickers. Can’t do anything without offending some.
It isn’t a long article but it naturally caught my eye. So now under some circumstances, the English flag can be seen as offensive and oh my. Even, dare I say it here? racist. (whispered) Jerks.
Taxi drivers who put up St George stickers in their cabs saying they speak English have been accused of racism and warned they face suspension.
A group of drivers of licensed cabs in Southampton put up the signs because they claimed passengers complained to them that some drivers cannot speak English.
The matter came to a head in a meeting with drivers and the city council last week when some drivers told the council of the alleged problem.
Now the city council has said any cab that has the sign or a St George flag put up will have their licence suspended if they do not take them down within seven days.
Posted by peiper
on 02/02/2010 at 01:06 PM
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Government • Nanny State • Racism and race relations • Stoopid-People • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - January 29, 2010
eBay Update … eBay Backtracks, says sorry and allows sale of a board game.
eBay Update
eBay says sorry for banning dad’s army game
Yorkshire Evening PostAuction giant eBay apologised to one of its users today after blocking the sale of a Dad’s Army board game because it could promote racial hatred.
Officials at eBay conceded that the game, based on the much-loved television series and being offered for sale by retired bank official David Davidson, had been wrongly classed as “offensive material” by its checking systems.A spokeswoman for eBay stressed that more than 100 million items were for sale on the site and that it did everything it could to bar items which promoted racial hatred.
The spokeswoman said: “While we are committed to keeping items that promote racial hatred off eBay, a Dad’s Army board game is clearly not one of these.
“We hope that Captain Mainwaring would have been impressed with our efficiency!”
I think the capt. would have given you guys the flat side of his sword.
BTW ... banning items that promote hatred won’t work or make fewer ppl racist. That is not what makes people that way. Not anymore. Those folks have already made up their minds. But there are collectors who don’t hate anyone who just are fascinated by a particular time in history and collect memorabilia. They probably also collect items to do with Ike and Churchill and Monty. I think the closer truth however is, ppl are also drawn to evil even when they personally are not themselves evil. The whole cult like popularity of AH and the Nazi movement apparently sell more then all the others mentioned. It’s almost like going to see a horror movie you know will scare you. I can’t explain it better then that. According to what I hear and read, books and items to do with the Nazis have not diminished over the years. In fact, interest has grown outside the holocaust issue. But there isn’t any evidence that it has produced more Nazis or turned those who are not so inclined into neo-Nazis.
The liberal left social engineers who get their panties in a wad at the sight of anything associated with that period, need to get their own lives and leave the rest of us alone. Fat chance of that when companies hire them and promote em all the time.
Posted by peiper
on 01/29/2010 at 06:17 AM
Filed Under: • Personal • Racism and race relations • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Saturday - October 31, 2009
THE STATE OF THE LAW AND THE WORLD ….. NOT SO GOOD!
Drew’s very disturbing post yesterday with regard to the gang rape and ppl taking pictures, shows just how far the left has carried us as a culture.
With hand wringing libs, the aclu and every other ‘rights’ group that scream “RACE” whenever a favored minority is injured or arrested, nothing surprises us anymore. We’re all disgusted, of that there is no doubt. But surprised? Not likely.
This past week two 10 year old boys were arrested for the rape of an eight year old girl. Outraged? Sure. Surprised? Nope. And worst of it is those boys will learn nothing and receive NO retribution. You can bet they’ll do it again at some point in the future.
Yet another man with a record of crime and who was supposed to have been watched, somehow managed to entice a young and very foolish girl of 17 to meet him. They met of course on the net. He killed her. He should have been in jail long ago and never released. His victim would still be foolish but perhaps alive. And how often have you heard that line? But they say the prisons here are crowded to overfilling, many have been let loose but the authorities say they don’t represent a danger to the public. HA! How often have we heard that in the past?
This past week the story about a man killing his cheating wife came to light. And this is one of two cases like it.
Married 21 years, he had problems (don’t they all?) and after putting up with him for a long time, his wife said she wanted a divorce and that she no longer loved him. Meanwhile, he somehow found a note or email that she sent to another man who she claimed she was in love with.
So, using more then one knife he repeatedly stabbed her, something like thirty times, in front of the kids.
The courts here accept the “driven to it by adultery excuse) and so there is no murder charge. It’s manslaughter and he’ll be out in three years.
He also claimed (as has the other guy in another case) diminished responsibility. Bullshit! The bastard knew exactly what he was doing 30 times.
Adultery is not a reason to take away another person’s future. Any court that accepts that is mad. But the age we live in makes all sorts of excuses for bad behavior. And not just capital crimes. And here’s another example and while not a capital crime, the reaction of the criminal’s friends and apologists is yet another sign of these sorry assed times. There is hardly any reason at all for the gremlins to be fearful unless it’s fear of an armed citizenry. And that would not have been an option in the gang rape case of a 15 year old girl in California.
Premier League star jailed for punching girl in face ‘will find another club when he is released’
By Sam Greenhill
Disgraced millionaire footballer Marlon King will be signed by another club when his jail sentence is finished, his agent insisted today.
The player was sacked by Wigan yesterday after being jailed for 18 months for groping a woman and then smashing her in the face after she rejected him.
But today his agent Tony Finnigan said that prison would change King for the better and that he would have good career prospects on release.
Oh right. This fugitive from a jungle where he belongs, is gonna change and be Mr. Nice Guy. He claims a case of mistaken identity in spite of the fact that dozens of folks on the scene saw and identified him including, A MEMBER OF HIS OWN FREEKIN TEAM!
Let’s take a quick peek at Mr. Nice Guy’s past to see where he’s come from.
If you have any trouble reading this here, see the link below the story.
In a criminal career that ran parallel to his sporting one, the 29-year-old was given a succession of fines and community service orders - but only once was he actually jailed.
Yesterday he lost both his liberty and his job as a soccer player after a Southwark Crown Court jury found him guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and sexual assault by touching.
Within minutes of the verdict, he was sacked by his club Wigan Athletic.
Chairman Dave Whelan, who said he learned details of the trial only days ago, said: ‘He is absolutely sacked.
‘We will not tolerate football players who get sent to jail for 18 months.’
But the £40,000-a-week star will still earn earn another £228,000 from behind bars during a 40-day notice period.
King is now a convicted sex attacker who must sign the Sex Offenders Register.
That means that if the Jamaican international ever returned to football in Britain he would have to notify police of any intention to travel abroad for matches.
King had been on a boozy night out with friends in December last year to celebrate news that his wife was expecting their third child and to mark scoring a winning goal for Hull City, where he was on loan.
Just two days earlier he had been banned from driving for eight weeks after speeding at 106mph on a 60mph road.
Onlookers said he appeared to be drunk or on drugs as he tried to force his attentions on girls in the Soho Revue Bar in London’s West End.
When a 20-year- old student objected to him touching her bottom, King sneered: ‘Don’t you know who I am? I’m a millionaire.
‘You’re not even in my league.’
Minutes later, after the slightly-built woman tried to stop him touching her hair, he swung his fist and knocked her to the ground, breaking her nose.
The blow was so hard that two of her friends were knocked to the floor with her.
Yesterday, after the jury brought in 10-2 guilty verdicts, Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith told King to pay his victim £3,125 compensation and £1,600 prosecution costs.
The player showed no reaction as he was convicted but sat open-mouthed as the judge told him: ‘You have shown not a hint of shame for your disgraceful and arrogant behaviour’.
As King’s victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, sat holding the hand of an aunt, the judge continued: ‘You broke her nose, and that can still be seen, and you cut her lip.‘You are 29, you are just over six feet and you are a professional footballer.
‘She is a comparatively slight woman, just over five feet tall.’
As the sentence was delivered , several of King’s supporters stormed from court, swearing at the judge.
One screamed: ‘This is a clear case of institutional racism.
‘You should not be up there… Up the National Front. Heil Hitler.’
And of course it isn’t the 6ft. bully boy buck who is guilty of anything. It’s all those white folks and a racist judge. No mention of the jury here altho how two of them didn’t see what ten others did may speak volumes as well.
Posted by peiper
on 10/31/2009 at 07:36 AM
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Racism and race relations • Typical White People: Stupid, Evil, Willfully Blind • UK •
• Comments (1)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - August 12, 2009
A VERY HIGH WOW FACTOR FROM PAT CONDELL ….. CAUTION, UNKIND WORDS FOR LIB-LEFT
Nothing for me to say except watch this ... I believe you’ll be most impressed. He has it right and he says it well.
My postings may be light today so happy I found this.
Cheers.
[ Drew watches the video and responds: ]
Posted by peiper
on 08/12/2009 at 09:27 AM
Filed Under: • Blog Stuff • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Racism and race relations • RoPMA •
• Comments (4)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Wednesday - July 08, 2009
Williams on Reparations
Outstanding. Not only is the essay a concise bit of wonderful, the first few dozen comments are pure genius. Read, read, read! If “they” haven’t yet revoked Williams Race Card, taken away his government cheese, and reclassified him as a white guy, then this essay will do it.
by Walter E. Williams
It goes without saying that slavery was a gross violation of human rights. Justice would demand that all the perpetrators—that includes slave owners, and African and Arab slave sellers—make compensatory reparation payments to victims. Since slaves, slave owners and slave sellers are no longer with us, such compensation is beyond our reach and a matter to be settled in the world beyond.
Absent from the reparations debate is: Who pays? Don’t say the government because the government doesn’t have any money that it doesn’t first take from some American. So which Americans owe black people what? Reparations advocates don’t want that question asked but let’s you and I.
On black people’s side of the ledger, thorny issues also arise. Some blacks purchased other blacks as a means to free family members. But other blacks owned slaves for the same reason whites owned slaves—to work farms or plantations. Are descendants of these blacks eligible and deserving of reparations? There is no way that Europeans could have captured millions of Africans. They had African and Arab help. Should Congress haul representatives of Ghana, Ivory Coast, Nigeria and Muslim states before them and demand they compensate American blacks because of their ancestors’ involvement in capturing and selling slaves?
Reparations advocates make the foolish unchallenged pronouncement that United States became rich on the backs of free black labor. That’s utter nonsense. Slavery has never had a very good record of producing wealth. Think about it. Slavery was all over the South. Buying into the reparations nonsense, you’d have to conclude that the antebellum South was rich and the slave-starved North was poor. The truth of the matter is just the opposite.
The comments are ... superb!
Posted by Drew458
on 07/08/2009 at 11:41 AM
Filed Under: • Politically-Incorrect • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (8)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - June 19, 2009
Juneteenth, Again
Today, Americans celebrate Juneteenth—when in 1865 slavery finally ended throughout the entire United States. Sadly, few people know that Juneteenth was a high water mark for African- Americans. Soon after that great day, the Democratic Party defeated the post-Civil War policies of the Republican Party, delaying the civil rights movement until the 1950s.
On this day in 1865, Union Army General Gordon Granger landed in Galveston, Texas and spread the word. See Zak’s Grand Old Partisan Blog for more details. [this is his annual link from BMEWS.]
Yesterday the Senate issued a non-binding resolution apologizing for slavery. Isn’t that wonderful?
The Senate unanimously passed a resolution yesterday apologizing for slavery, making way for a joint congressional resolution and the latest attempt by the federal government to take responsibility for 2 1/2 centuries of slavery.
“You wonder why we didn’t do it 100 years ago,” Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), lead sponsor of the resolution, said after the unanimous-consent vote. “It is important to have a collective response to a collective injustice.”
The Senate’s apology follows a similar apology passed last year by the House. One key difference is that the Senate version explicitly deals with the long-simmering issue of whether slavery descendants are entitled to reparations, saying that the resolution cannot be used in support of claims for restitution. The House is expected to revisit the issue next week to conform its resolution to the Senate version.
Even among proponents of a congressional apology, reaction to yesterday’s vote was mixed. Carol M. Swain, a professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt University who had pushed for the Bush administration to issue an apology, called the Democratic-controlled Senate’s resolution “meaningless” since the party and federal government are led by a black president and black voters are closely aligned with the Democratic party.
“The Republican Party needed to do it,” Swain said. “It would have shed that racist scab on the party.”
Racist scab? You mean the one that isn’t there, that only the far left and professional victims and race baiters can see? No, we ended slavery. We gave you your freedom. The Democrats didn’t, and you didn’t earn it, or win it yourselves. It was a gift. From the “racist” Republicans. With a lot of help from the Union Army.
So of course the TV news had the head of the NAACP on this morning going on about how this gesture wasn’t enough, because it didn’t address reparations.
Hey, remember that big national discussion on race we were all accused of being too afraid to have 10 months or so ago? [Afraid. Yeah right. More like sick to death and bored to tears.]
Fine. Here’s my take on reparations: no one bloody cent. Every day you are alive is a reparation. Go get a passport. It says you’re a citizen of the United States of America. That’s your reparation. Every dollar spent on social services, Affirmative Action, government cheese, special standards, Abbot schools, and so on down a nearly infinite list - that’s your reparation. Save your money and go take a long vacation in Africa, so that you see the utter shithole that entire continent is. Disease infested, starving, uncaring, crime ridden, violent, tribal, uneducated, barbaric turd world “nations” run by tyrants and dictators. All of whom are black! Just like 95% of the people! Then know that your passport allows you to leave and come back here. That’s all the reparation you could ever want. What, you want money too? Go get a job and earn some.
Posted by Drew458
on 06/19/2009 at 02:01 PM
Filed Under: • Racism and race relations •
• Comments (7)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Friday - June 12, 2009
Judge in racial slur storm . Naughty, naughty judge hasn’t yet learned PC Speak.
I did a post yesterday and in the comments were the following from GrumpyOldFart and Drew.
Grumpy said:
Hmmm… I can’t say “The ‘N’ Word"(tm) and other racial slurs cos that’s basically projecting my own ignorance onto you, using my own wilful ignorance as an excuse and justification for my insults. Okay, I get that part. Now you can’t insult a German the way another German would cos that’s somehow racially insensitive as well.
Does anyone sell scorecards for this kinda stuff? How do you keep track without one?
And Drew said:
This is only the beginning. The wurst is yet to come.
Well Sir Drew, it came sooner then we thought. Grumpy will keep score.
Get an eyeful of this.
Judge in racial slur storm for telling fraudster he ‘gypped’ eBay customers in online scam
By DAILY MAIL REPORTERA judge has been accused of using a ‘racial slur’ against gipsies when sentencing a conman.
Judge Christopher Elwen told the fraudster he had ‘gypped’ a student out of money on the eBay website.
The slang verb ‘to gyp’ means to defraud or steal. Experts suggested there is ‘scholarly consensus’ that it is derived from the word gipsy.
Romany gipsies also claimed the word began life as ‘gypsied’ and is an insult.
But the judge insisted there is ‘no evidence to connect it to any racial group’.
Judge Elwen used the word at Truro Crown Court while sentencing bogus eBay electrical goods trader Lee Scott-Major to three years’ jail.
He said that the harm the conman had done was not reflected in the sums involved, whether in the case of those ripped off for thousands of pounds or ‘the young student who was gypped out of £169’.
Travellers Times editor Jake Bowers said: ‘Gypped is an offensive word.
‘It is derived from gipsy and it is being used in the same context as a person might once have said they “jewed” somebody if they did an underhand business transaction.
‘Basically what Judge Elwen has done is ascribed thievery to an entire ethnic group.
‘Of course there are criminals in the gipsy community, but there’s no evidence there is a higher level of criminality than in any other community.
‘I’d say his comment reflects the amount of ignorance that there is, from the bottom of society to its top in the judiciary, about gipsies, and the idea that it’s okay to have a go at the gipsy or traveller community without thinking about it.
Romany activist Maggie Bendell-Smith said: ‘I would have been right up on my feet if I’d heard that in court, asking the judge to justify his choice of words.
‘It is derogatory and I think an apology is called for.’
A spokesman for the Judicial Communications Office defended the judge’s choice of words, saying: ‘Gyp is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as an act of cheating, nothing more.
‘There is no evidence to connect this term to any ethnic group and this is certainly not how it was used in court.’
The OED defines gyp as a late-19th century verb of unknown origin that means to cheat or swindle someone.
Its principal etymologist Dr Philip Durkin said: ‘The consensus of most people who have looked at this word recently is that it does indeed derive from “gyp: thief”, which itself derives (as a racial slur) from gypsy.’
But he added: ‘The main problem with the “gyp: thief” explanation is that there seems to be very little evidence for this use of gyp as a noun, either in the 19th century or later.’
It is not the first time Judge Elwen, recently appointed presiding judge in Truro, Cornwall, has come to attention for outspoken comments related to nationality.
Last year the judge said Britain had ‘lost control of its borders for the first time in 1066.’
He made the remark while sentencing asylum seekers who rioted at Harmsworth Detention Centre.
His latest gaffe came as he was sentencing cocaine-addicted conman Scott-Major for a six figure EBay swindle in which unlucky punters were duped into buying non-existent phones, hoovers and other items from ‘Cornwall Electrics’.
The 29-year-old’s two-year con was run from his two-bedroom flat in Penzance while he was still serving probation.
Judge Elwen told Scott-Major: ‘Whether the sum was £100,000 or £200,000 does not reflect the harm done to your victims, whether that be Mr and Mrs Andrewartha, Mr Kingshott, or the young student who was gypped out of £169.
He then sentenced him to a three year jail term.
The row over the judge’s latest comments may only finally be resolved with the next edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.
Etymologist Dr Durkin said: ‘One other suggestion - given by the Dictionary in an entry published in 1972 - is that it derives from “gyp” “pain” (as in to “give someone gyp").
Posted by peiper
on 06/12/2009 at 12:08 PM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Racism and race relations • UK •
• Comments (6)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Tuesday - June 02, 2009
Worker who suffered racial discrimination at refugee charity wins £65,000. Another wronged negr
They’re everywhere.
So ok. Maybe he’s telling the truth. Although I don’t believe him. Which counts for less then nothing I know.
See what gets me is all this BS talk about flashbacks to where he’d lived before.
Born here but parents took him back to the dark continent when a baby and so he grew up there. But times got bad for mammy and old black joe and so back to the UK they came as fast as their donkey could carry them. Article says they came back due to the war and killing where they were. Right. More likely they wanted Brit largess which more then likely put this guy thru law school. Oh wonderful. Another black lawyer.
How’d he handle the stress there must have been studying and taking tests. Of course, we don’t actually know if the tests he took were the very same ones, others took. I mean, maybe his civil and human rights required he have an easier test. ??? Well hell. I don’t know. I just see that old RCOB when ppl start suing for “hurt feelings.”
He suffered psychiatric trauma
he suffered flashbacks to the Nigerian Civil War
He suffered disabling depression
His mind always wandering
He became very resentful of white women, who he feels have been given work in preference to him.
He felt demotivated
And all because he thought he was being discriminated against. Well, perhaps he was. But how is it determined that race was the reason? Oh right. I forget.
Any time a person of color raises that issue, the door is closed to anything else.
There has been a total failure by the respondent to offer any form of apology to him at any time.’
Well duh ... would that make a difference? Sure it would. It would be an admission of guilt and besides. What if they don’t think there is anything to say sorry for? What if race really had nothing to do with it? But of course, it had to. De black dude says so and ya can’t deny it by sayin’ , it ain’t necessarily so.
Black immigration worker who suffered racial discrimination at refugee charity wins £65,000By Andrew Levy
Last updated at 3:43 PM on 02nd June 2009A black man who was made redundant by the British Refugee Council, leaving only white people at the immigration centre where he worked, has been awarded more than £65,000 compensation.
Emmanuel Obikwu, 45, was unfairly singled out when his unit was earmarked for closure, an employment tribunal ruled.
While he and a Tanzania-born colleague lost their jobs, white colleagues were moved on to new posts.
Mr Obikwu, who has two British Masters degrees in law, suffered stress, anxiety, sleeping disorders, depression, and flashbacks to his own time as a refugee as a result of his treatment.
He has now been awarded £65,475 for unfair dismissal, racial discrimination, injury to feelings, psychiatric injury, and loss of earnings.
The payout follows £30,000 awarded in January to a former colleague, Tanzania-born Zaina Ukwaju, who also lost her job.
Speaking yesterday after the tribunal’s judgement was published, Mr Obikwu accused his former employers of racism.
‘This was a charity that I believed was dedicated to equal treatment of its employees and committed to human rights and the welfare of refugees,’ he said.
‘All I had ever wanted from the British Refugee Council was to be treated equally and fairly.
‘The racism and unfairness meted out to me by this organisation affected my health and damaged my well-being psychologically and psychiatrically.’
Mr Obikwu was born in London but his Nigerian parents returned with him to their homeland when he was a baby.
They came back to the UK a few years later after fleeing the country’s brutal civil war.
Mr Obikwu was educated in Britain and went on to work as an asylum support advice worker at the Oakington Immigration Centre, near Cambridge.
He lost his job in May 2006 after plans to close the unit at the Home Office-run centre were announced.
But he was horrified to learn later on that his white colleagues had been allowed to take jobs elsewhere.
During the eight-day hearing last year, the tribunal was told the council had failed to follow its redundancy rules in ‘the most extreme way’.
It was alleged by Mr Obikwu and Miss Ukwaja that the operations manager Anne-Marie Leech was ‘consciously biased’ when selecting members of staff to be made redundant.
They highlighted the fact that no one who attended a party at her home had lost their job.
The tribunal rejected this claim but said it was likely Ms Leech ‘subconsciously’ favoured colleagues she was friendly with - particularly those at the party.
Bury St Edmunds Employment Tribunal in Suffolk ruled Mr Obikwu deserved compensation for his psychiatric trauma and refused to accept the council’s claim that he would have lost his job regardless of his skin colour.
In their judgement, the three-man panel commented: ‘We are quite satisfied that the ill health which the claimant suffered was caused by race discrimination for which the respondent is responsible.
‘There has been a total failure by the respondent to offer any form of apology to him at any time.’
After losing his job, the tribunal heard, Mr Obikwu took a post as a night project worker with the Salvation Army. But he left in May last year as his psychological problems mounted.
A psychiatric report published with the judgement said he suffered flashbacks to the Nigerian Civil War.
It said: ‘These are pictures coming into his mind, certainly two or three times a week, of them moving from place to place.
‘He was also doing some studying but found his mind always wandering back to what happened at Oakington. He felt demotivated and it was pointless to study.’
A GP’s report added Mr Obikwu’s attitude to employment had also suffered.
‘He has had a major change in his attitude towards colleagues, particularly becoming very resentful of white women, who he feels have been given work in preference to him,’ it said.
‘This depression has been a disabling condition, particularly affecting his motivation and concentration, but also his attitude to work and relationships within the family.’
The British Refugee Council yesterday insisted its managers had acted ‘in good faith’.
A spokesman added: ‘We have reviewed our procedures to ensure that all staff are treated equally and fairly. We regret the distress the process has caused Mr Obikwu.’
Posted by peiper
on 06/02/2009 at 12:04 PM
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Racism and race relations • UK •
• Comments (5)
•
Trackbacks(0)
Permalink • Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Once Again, The One And Only Post
(4 total trackbacks)
Tracked at iHaan.org
Thｅ advantage to having a guide with you is thɑt an expert will haѵe very first hand experience dealing and navigating the river with гegional wildlife. Tһomas, there are great…
On: 07/28/23 10:37
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We've Been Waiting For
(3 total trackbacks)
Tracked at head to the Momarms site
The Brownshirts: Partie Deux; These aare the Muscle We’ve Been Waiting For
On: 03/14/23 11:20
Vietnam Homecoming
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at 广告专题配音 专业从事中文配音跟外文配音制造，北京名传天下配音公司
专业从事中文配音和外文配音制作，北京名传天下配音公司 北京名传天下专业配音公司成破于2006年12月，是专业从事中 中文配音 文配音跟外文配音的音频制造公司，幻想飞腾配音网领 配音制作 有海内外优良专业配音职员已达500多位，可供给一流的外语配音，长年服务于国内中心级各大媒体、各省市电台电视台，能满意不同客户的各种需要。电话：010-83265555 北京名传天下专业配音公司…
On: 03/20/21 07:00
meaningless marching orders for a thousand travellers ... strife ahead ..
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Casual Blog
[...] RTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPL [...]
On: 07/17/17 04:28
a small explanation
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at yerba mate gourd
Find here top quality how to prepare yerba mate without a gourd that's available in addition at the best price. Get it now!
On: 07/09/17 03:07
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.
Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner
Oh, and here's some kind of visitor flag counter thingy. Hey, all the cool blogs have one, so I should too. The Visitors Online thingy up at the top doesn't count anything, but it looks neat. It had better, since I paid actual money for it.
RSS 2.0 
Atom 
