Sunday - December 09, 2012

a futuristic face?

I have been writing a bit under the comments section on how I see the future.  Bleak house says it. Or to use SDKAR’s word, catastrophic. I think he used it ot close.  I read the news and hear it on radio and listen to people around me and okay I admit it, sometimes I get a chance to eavesdrop like the last time I was at the bus station in town, many months ago, and simply listened more to some folks talking about the state of their country and the world in general.
So I guess I’m not the only one who thinks things have already gone to the dogs.  And not just any dogs. Stupid and stupid looking dogs. Like my hated neighbor’s flea farm.

More and more and more people are coming to these shores who simply do not fit and will never do so. They are NOT the kind of immigrants that once graced this place and made improvements and brought innovation. 
The country has changed in other ways as well.  The easy acceptance of a more decadent culture. A society that isn’t really shocked by violent movies and video games where blood runs free but god forbid some actress or model shows a bit more tit than good taste demands. Even that isn’t the end of civilization.
But the death of the west and especially this country is in the cards unless they restrict the kind of immigrant flooding their shores.
They arrive in droves and the pansy-assed politicians do nothing but debate and talk and make noises. And they still come and they breed. Oh boy do they breed.
The racial make up of this country will be altered to a point where if you came back in a thousand years, you might never know it had once been a white and Christian country.  Chances are it might be a muslim one by then.
Anyway, here’s my take on what most immigrants will look like and many might well be like.

Take a look. And be afraid.

Taxi driver who knocked down eight men by driving cab ‘like a bowling ball’ after row is jailed for 15 years

Majid Rehman ploughed into six railmen and two innocent passers-by after a petty dispute

The 29-year-old sent ‘bodies flying in all directions’ during the attack in Wales

By Amanda Williams

A taxi driver has today been jailed for 15 years yesterday for mowing down eight men ‘like a bowling ball’ with his black cab.

Majid Rehman, 29, deliberately used his car to run over the men walking on a pavement after a row at a railway station taxi rank.

A court heard how furious Rehman deliberately ran a red light and drove ‘at speed’ towards six railworkers as they walked home from the station, just yards from the Millennium Stadium in Cardiff.

Shocked commuters watched as his cab ploughed into the six railmen and two innocent passers-by in rush hour carnage.

Judge Phillip Richards told him: ‘You sent bodies flying in all directions, one being trapped under your car.

‘Your intent was to cause them all serious harm. It was intolerable behaviour in a civilised society.’

The court heard Rehman was on the taxi rank outside Cardiff Central train station when a row flared with the railway workers.

Prosecutor Claire Wilks said: ‘Six of the men were leaving the train station wearing high visibility orange suits as they walked away from the train station. Along the way some of the group began to argue with Rehman.

Two innocent men Mark Underwood and Richard Partridge were walking in front of the group on the pavement - and had nothing to do with the railmen.

Miss Wilks said: ‘As they walked away from the railway station, Rehman drove his taxi, and in a rage, mounted the pavement and collided with the group of eight men.

‘It was a deliberate manouvre at some speed, knocking them down like a bowling ball knocking over pins in an alley.

‘Some of the men were more fortunate than others.

‘Mark Underwood was trapped under the taxi and suffered significant burns to his back, legs and arms as he was wedged under the hot engine.

‘It was a chaotic scene, emotions were running high, and Rehman was pulled out of his taxi and assaulted.’

The jury was shown CCTV footage of the taxi mounting the curb at 14mph outside Cardiff central train station on March 27.

Mr Underwood needed extensive skin grafts to his back and is still receiving treatment.

Rehman told officers at the scene he drove towards the group of men after being attacked by the railworkers on the taxi rank outside a main railway station.

He told police officers at the scene: ‘No one drives at people for nothing. They assaulted me and it was in self defence.’

READ AND SEE MORE

Posted by peiper     on 12/09/2012 at 05:33 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 24, 2012

update, black sob attack on teen

Regulars here at bmews will recall the other day when I posted the story of a young white teen attacked by a miserable black bastard.  It’s what that minority does when they aren’t burning cities.

This is an update and for those who don’t recall or don’t know, here’s a look.

Well, here’s an update on the filthy nig whoops, negro.

A DARKIE UPDATE:

Thug, 34, admits punching 16-year-old girl unconscious in shocking random street attack which was caught on CCTV

· Michael Ayoade, 34, ran up behind Tasneem Kabir as she walked to college and smacked her around the head
· Ayoade jogged away as the 16-year-old lay unconscious on the ground in Plaistow, East London
· When arrested Ayoade told police he was intimidated by the petite teen and that ‘she started it’, Thames Magistrates’ Court was told

Michael Ayoade told police that the petite 16-year-old ‘didn’t have a friendly face’, that he was ‘intimidated by her’ and that she ‘made me feel like a pauper with her facial gestures’.

He said he couldn’t cope with ‘taking an insult from a little person like that’.

‘He said he was going about his business and was intimidated by her look, she looked like she wanted a fight. She looked about 19 or 20. He did not approve of the way she looked so he went back and punched her....He said “Nah, that hurt, I can’t go further in my day taking an insult from a little person like that”.’

‘He thought to himself “No, no I am not taking this”,’ the lawyer said. ‘He never spoke to her, just punched her.’

Marianna Christou, defending, said that Ayoade had come to the UK from Nigeria when he was just three years old, and had to fend from himself from young age. He was said to have no contact with his family.

Ms Christou said: ‘He has drunk since he was 16 and smokes up to 10 joints a day which in my submission is excessive and perhaps this causes some degree of paranoia and low self esteem.’

Ayoade was remanded in custody and is due to appear at Inner London Crown Court on a date to be fixed.

READ MORE AT SOURCE

So the black sob comes here with a last name nobody can pronounce and his lawyer defends and comes up with, ??  Maybe next time, and we know there will be, it’ll be his lawyer he doesn’t like the look of.  Or maybe he’ll attack someone who will be alert enough to bring him down and maybe kill the shit. What a waste of space.

Posted by peiper     on 11/24/2012 at 02:07 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

foster care cpl not allowed due to membership in UKIP. UK Independent Party

I’m usually somewhat busy early mornings, although I hate using the word “busy” in view of what Drew is involved in these days. Now moving is really busy.
Anyway, I wouldn’t normally boot this early on weekends but, I saw this madly insanely bizarre headline when I took the papers off the front porch today.  There it was on the front page in huge bold print and above the fold. No way to miss it.

This is an excellent example and one I wish didn’t exist, of just how far to the left and how far gone parts of this country have drifted in compliance with the dictatorship of political correctness.  How did things become “CORRECT?” Why has a major part of of this country (and I would include the USA) not thrown off the shackles of this miserable and punitive new age form of thought and speech control?  Why has one group who is not even a majority, been allowed to decide for the many just what correct is?  And why can they not understand that it’s ppl like them that in the end, give birth to the people like that fellow in Norway who shot dead so many?  It’s the people on the left with their bizarre ideas of equality and their take on how things should be, that give rise to folks like me whose attitude to the killings in Norway was, Oh well.  At least they were only liberals. 

FOSTER COUPLE LOSE CHILDREN FOR BEING MEMBERS OF UKIP

Just what the heck is UKIP?

Well, it is the U.K. Independent Party, and here is a link to their site.  Lets see just how dangerous these mad folks are. Ya never know. They could as far right as I am and that would be a danger. 

UKIP

UKIP immigration policy

· An immediate five-year freeze on immigration for permanent settlement.
· After the five year freeze, a strictly controlled, points-based system similar to Australia to be introduced.
· An aspiration to ensure that future immigration does not exceed 50,000 people a year.
· Regain control of UK borders by leaving the EU.
· Repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights.
· Ensure British benefits are only available to UK citizens or those who have lived here for at least five years.
. End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government

Hmmmm. Overall I’d guess, just a wild one mind you, I’d guess they insist on England first. Control their own borders without having to consult with foreigners.
OK, that last one seems unreasonable. Imagine that will ya.  They want to protect their country’s borders. Jeesh. What’s with that?  I mean, how the hell else will illegals be able to gain entry to an already overcrowded island?

Withdraw from the the European court. Seems like more than half the country wants that and so do many in the govt. Still tho, that’s unreasonable too.
The Brits fought a war to be allowed to have other folks from other countries come here and dictate how they should think and speak and act.

Don’t give benefits so freely and especially to those who have not been here awhile.  Whoa. Hold the phone there fella. Does that mean the Brit working taxpayer shouldn’t have the god given right to support everyone from Afrika and from Eastern Europe and the middle east? And how about those Asian families with 12 and more kids and no daddy living large in nice houses?  Does UKIP oppose supporting those poor unfortunates? Oh my. 
Now that really is unreasonable.

OK, so here is the story and this is from the BBC. There is a video at the site which you may or may not be able to view. No matter cos you won’t need to see a video anyway, to see how very wrong and how very mind numbingly dumb this decision was.
For the record least anyone think I drift to the left on the issue.  I don’t. No way.  I don’t personally think too highly of multi cultural fostering and adoptions.
But that isn’t for me to decide and if ppl think they just can’t live unless they do that, oh well. That’s up to them.
So I do find myself in sympathy with the couple here, who have done nothing more then belong to a legal political party whose leader is not a pariah and in fact is regularly interviewed on TV and radio and has no criminal record of any sort. He is in fact an outspoken critic of the EU.  He speaks out loud, very loud, what many here say quietly or among friends. And he says it from of all places, right inside the European Parliament.

UKIP couple have foster children removed from care

A couple have had three foster children removed from their care because they belong to the UK Independence Party.
Rotherham Borough Council said the children were “not indigenous white British” and that it had concerns about UKIP’s stance on immigration.
It said it had to consider the “needs of the children longer term”.
The unnamed couple told the Daily Telegraph social workers had accused them of belonging to a “racist party”. UKIP said it was an appalling decision.
Rotherham Borough Council’s Strategic Director of Children and Young People’s Services, Joyce Thacker, told the BBC that her decision was influenced by UKIP’s immigration policy, which she said calls for the end of the “active promotion of multiculturalism”.
UKIP’s immigration policy states the party wants an “end [to] the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government”, and urges Britain to leave the European Union (EU).
The Labour Party has called for an investigation into the Labour-run council’s decision, after claims from UKIP it could have been politically motivated.
‘Dumbfounded’
The couple, who have been approved foster parents for seven years, were eight weeks into the placement when they were approached by social workers about their membership of the party.
The wife told the Daily Telegraph: “I was dumbfounded. Then my question to both of them was, ‘What has UKIP got to do with having the children removed?’
“Then one of them said, ‘Well, UKIP have got racist policies.’ The implication was that we were racist. [The social worker] said UKIP does not like European people and wants them all out of the country to be returned to their own countries.”
The paper says the woman denied she was racist but the children were taken away by the end of the week.
She said the social worker told her: “We would not have placed these children with you had we known you were members of UKIP because it wouldn’t have been the right cultural match.”
The couple said they had been “stigmatised and slandered”.
Ms Thacker said she did not regret the decision, which was reached after “a lot of soul searching”.
“These children are not UK children and we were not aware of the foster parents having strong political views. There are some strong views in the UKIP party and we have to think of the future of the children.”
She added during an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today: “I have to look at the children’s cultural and ethnic needs.
“I have legal advice I have to follow for the placement of children and I was criticised before for not making sure their cultural and ethnic needs were met.
“If the party mantra is, for example, ending the active promotion of multiculturalism I have to think about that… I have to think of their longer-term needs.

SOURCE: BBC TV NEWS

Posted by peiper     on 11/24/2012 at 06:39 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 20, 2012

protecting muslim sensitivities in europe

The liberal west invited this mess and the rest of us are it seems, gonna have to live with it. For people my age that might not be too long. Who knows?
For you youngsters 60 and below, keep your powder dry. 

Nothing new here really.  It’s another page in the book of muslims taking offense whether made up or real.
Lets hear it for diversity and multi culture and liberalism.

These are the headlines and opening paragraphs. The links to all are at Islam vs Europe

H/T Islam versus Europe

Where Islam spreads, freedom dies

Europeans Continue to be Persecuted for Speaking Out Against Islamisation

Posted by Cheradenine Zakalwe

FRANCE

Thanks to the clever mosque occupation stunt a few weeks ago, Génération Identitaire has been given extensive coverage in the French media recently. Prominent in the coverage has been the intelligent and articulate Damien Rieu, one of the group’s spokesmen.

Until a few days ago, he was working as a trainee at a publishing house in Lyon, responsible for communications. He has now been dismissed from this position as a result of his political activism.

BELGIUM

a documentary about Sharia4Belgium aired on Belgian television. In it the movement’s spokesman Fouad Belkacem declared that they didn’t feel an “ounce of respect” for non-Muslim Belgians. “We have our religion: superior to yours. We have our system: superior to your system. We have our values: superior to yours.”

In response to this, Stéphanie Gilson, a student at the IPES college in Verviers, wrote on her Facebook page: “Superior to us? Excuse me? LOL and a big LOL”. She also wrote that in her class at college there were two girls who said the same type of things and it scared her.

The following day the two girls mentioned, who had obviously read her Facebook page, attacked her in the college, throwing a bench and chairs at her face. All three girls were suspended from the college for one day, the management telling her that she had no right to express opinions about Muslims on her Facebook page. Refusing to accept this, Stéphanie quit the college and filed a complaint with the police. “I am the victim, and all I did was give my opinion.”

GERMANY

Jörg Uckermann, deputy leader of the anti-Islam party Pro-Köln, was arrested in Cologne. He is suspected of claiming payment for political party meetings that did not, in fact, take place. This follows the raids on the party premises that took place two weeks ago.

His family has issued a statement complaining about massively biased reporting in the locally-dominant Dumont press. They claim that the Dumont press is working with the police and political establishment to smear Uckermann, while they themselves have been denied information about what is happening to him. They have not been allowed to visit him and he is not being allowed access to the medications on which he is dependent. The family has set up a Facebook page to campaign for his release.

Uckermann was responsible for organising the anti-Islam cartoon contest earlier in the year, which so panicked the German government and resulted in a horde of Muslims attacking the German embassy in Sudan.

ITALY

Moroccan Muslim Slits the Throats of His Two Children to Punish His Wife

A stormy relationship come to an end now. He apparently could not stand the habits of his wife, including the fact that she had decided not to wear her veil in the tradition of women in their country. This is the scenario in which you acquired the tragedy in the province of Perugia.

The Victims were the couple’s two children, Ahmed, 8, and his sister Jiahane of 12 years. The father Mustafa Hajjaji, a Moroccan of 44 years of age, murdered them by slitting their throats with a knife.

DENMARK

An MP has criticised a housing association’s Muslim-majority board for paying 60,000 kroner for an Eid party, but not 7,000 kroner for a Christmas tree

“I think it’s deeply troubling that our integration efforts have failed so badly that Danish traditions are removed and replaced by Muslim traditions the moment there is a Muslim majority”

He added that he fears there are people that want to transform Denmark into a Muslim country

Hard feelings remain in the town of Kokkedal after a residents’ association voted not to pay for Christmas festivities

A number of national lawmakers immediately jumped into the fray, accusing those voting against the tree of “trying to kill Christmas”

“Every year we hear more and more about schools and institutions that downplay Christmas to protect the rights of a Muslim minority.”

Posted by peiper     on 11/20/2012 at 06:46 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Saturday - November 17, 2012

THERE ARE CONSEQUENCES FOR FREE SPEECH, BUT ONLY IF UR CHRISTIAN

Just to show you, as if you need proof, what a weird world we live in.
Four or five words on a personal blog and the man is demoted and gets a reduction in salary.
Hey, you wanna voice Christian thoughts in public?  Then be prepared for the consequences.  Free thought and speech?  Sure thing.  But not if you just happen to belong to a politically incorrect religion.  Or one that doesn’t have race and minority privilege. 

Take a look at this.

Vindicated - but ruined: In a historic victory, a Christian demoted at work after writing on Facebook that he opposed gay marriage in church tells how his battle has come at a terrible price

By Andrew Pierce.

Adrian Smith was disturbed to read a report that gay marriages may be permitted in church.
So he went onto his Facebook page and posted four words summarising his own position.

‘An equality too far,’ he wrote.

But those four words, even though they were seen by only a few dozen friends and work colleagues, triggered a major battle over freedom of speech which finally ended yesterday.
Mr Smith, a tireless charity supporter who works for Trafford Housing Trust, had become a victim of the increasingly aggressive war against so-called hate crimes.

After a work colleague complained that his comment was offensive (despite having not seen the post), Mr Smith, a family man and lifelong Labour voter, was disciplined, had his job downgraded and his salary cut by £14,000. But yesterday, after a bitter and protracted court fight to overturn the decision, the married father-of-two won a landmark victory.

His triumph comes in the wake of a series of recent claims by Christians that they have been discriminated against for expressing their beliefs.
In Mr Smith’s case, his employers claimed he broke their code of conduct by expressing religious or political views which might upset co-workers.

But Mr Justice Briggs, in London’s High Court, yesterday ruled that the housing trust did not have a right to demote Mr Smith as his Facebook postings did not amount to misconduct.

He said the comment about gays marrying in church was not — viewed objectively — judgmental, disrespectful or liable to cause upset or offence, and was expressed in moderate language.
As for the content, it was a widely held view frequently heard on radio and television, or read in the newspapers.

source

The thing that actually surprises me most is that our victim here has been, the article states, a life long supporter of the Labour Party. Which as most of you might know, is left. Some are very left.  I have not seen any conservative call for the public hanging, in a manner of speaking, for people who reject religion.  But it seems to be the case that the left willingly plays the race and offence card whenever possible.  One whack job took offence at a few words and look at the cost to this man.  The nutter who complained would surely NOT have been a conservative.
Maybe Mr. Smith should start looking at another political party to support tho lord knows, most of them are bananas in one way or another.

>

Posted by peiper     on 11/17/2012 at 08:11 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Stoopid-People • UK • work and the workplace •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - November 13, 2012

law, order and justice too? Yeah right. In yer dreams.

okay I’ll be honest. I haven’t any idea which govt. this newest soft approach to doing time is responsible.  Is it the leftover from the Labour govt., “Tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime.” Needless to say neither has come to pass. 
Anyway, I thought I’d acquaint the readership with just how mean and tough the folks here can be when they set their minds to it.

Prisoners have landlines installed in their cells despite Government pledge to crackdown on perks behind bars

· The cost of the pilot scheme is being paid for by BT
· If successful, it could be copied in prisons throughout England and Wales
· Offenders buy phone credit but there is no limit to how many calls they make
By Martin Beckford
If the pilot scheme is deemed a success it could be copied in public sector prisons across England and Wales, having been used for several years in privately run institutions.
But it is taking place at the same time as the new Justice Secretary, Chris Grayling, has vowed to stop prisoners spending all day in their cells watching television or playing video games.
Inmates can also have televisions in their cells for £1 a week while those given “enhanced” status for good behaviour are allowed PlayStation consoles from home and can sleep on their own bedding.
Last month the prisons watchdog, Nick Hardwick, said too many prisoners were “lying on their backs in their cells watching daytime telly” because of a lack of money and staff to give them useful activities.
But some of the in-cell perks could be scrapped as ministers try to stop prisons being seen as “holiday camps”.
A law is being passed that will allow jamming devices to block mobile phone signals in jails, while access to satellite TV channels could be removed.

more at source

Hmm. Wonder who will pay in the end for those BT land lines that says BT will pay for. Like hey man, since when does a telecom giant like British Telecom offer to get involved with social matters on this scale?  Yeah they’ll pay alright. Then collect from the public in higher rates. Again.

Half of all burglars are not sent to prison, even though most have 12 convictions

By Martin Beckford
Burglars with a string of previous convictions are being spared jail, prompting calls for Ministers to toughen up on sentencing.
New figures show the average burglar now has 12 break-ins to their name, the highest number ever recorded.
More than 3,000 convicted last year had been found guilty at least 20 times before.
Despite this, half the burglars were given fines or community sentences rather than being sent to prison.

read more

Community sentences instead of prison. Yes by golly. That will damn well put the frighteners on the bastards. 

Although I could easily come up with more, I’ll simply say finally, there’s this bit of pc rocket science.

Met’s black officers to get priority for top jobs

By Martin Beckford
Britain’s biggest police force is to become the first public body to adopt a policy that gives priority for top jobs to black people and women.
The Metropolitan Police will recruit senior officers and promote civilian staff from minority groups in ‘tie-break’ situations where they are just as qualified as white or male candidates.
Scotland Yard’s diversity board has warned that the ‘positive action’ policy, made legal by equality laws last year, will be controversial.

The move could trigger lawsuits by job applicants who lose out and is likely to raise concerns that successful candidates were chosen to fill quotas rather than on merit. But a meeting chaired by Met Commissioner Bernard Hogan-Howe took the decision to use positive action after it was given Government advice.
Minutes of the policy forum meeting on July 11 state: ‘The Forum were supportive of using a legal provision that could potentially deliver a more diverse workforce.

read more

Ah diversity. Where would we all be without thee?

Posted by peiper     on 11/13/2012 at 11:53 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - October 26, 2012

something rotten at the core?

Not much for me to write about. It’s been said at least, ???? lost track of the number of times.

The Brits have a problem okay and much is of their own doing.  Not people like Chris Edwards or LyndonB. Not the average Brit who struggles to make ends meet.
But there is surely something very rotten at the core when year after year, almost month after month, similar stories surface.  Not all the cheats and thieves are foreigners of course.  But this country, meaning Uganda and Nigeria as well, seem to produce some outstanding (and they do stand out) con artists.
Sort of like Romania and gypsys.  Thing about some of the more outrageous con jobs is, they go through so much planning and trouble and artful dodging, wouldn’t you think that they might make even more if they turned all that brain power into something legal?

I guess not. 

A family of African fraudsters stole at least £4million from taxpayers in a 20-year scam.

By Christian Gysin

One created fake identities for up to 100 children to milk the benefit system.

She also claimed to suffer from HIV and require costly drugs – but in reality sent them back to Uganda to be sold for huge profits.

A court heard that supplying the drugs for so many years cost the taxpayer more than £2million.

A further £154,000 went on education for the ‘family’, with £37,500 for a single higher education course.

Fraud relating to accommodation costs and sub-letting of flats cost £650,000, and the family’s myriad benefits totalled £900,000.

During their six-week trial, a jury heard how the group ‘conspired together to create, use and exploit’ false identities in order to carry out the staggering fraud.

An investigator told the Daily Mail: ‘The trouble is, they had so many identities that it may never be known exactly how much they took out of the benefits system and this country over such a long period of time.’

Prosecutor Paul Raudnitz said: ‘The tentacles of this fraud went far and wide for many, many years. Each defendant at different times joined the conspiracy.’

He said ‘key player’ Ruth Nabuguzi, 49, ‘employed multiple identities ... so many that the true number of identities may never ever be known’.

Nabuguzi, originally from Uganda, made claims for HIV/AIDS drugs costing £2,280,000. She also received £500,000 in housing benefit from Newham Council in east London, Croydon Crown Court heard.

CRIVENS!  Take a look at these names. Can anyone pronounce any of them?
FIRST thing should be done is to force name changes on foreigners who intend to live among the native population, so that English speakers don’t have to learn 100 different languages to communicate. Don’t care for that? Fine. Then go elsewhere and live and take your jumble of impossible letters with you.

Nabuguzi came to the UK in 1991 and claimed asylum for herself and four children she had left behind in Uganda.

Three years later, she used the name Jane Namusisi to apply for asylum again – along with two more children. In 1999 – using the name Pauline Zalwango – she applied once more, this time with three children.

Dennis Kyeyune, 29, is thought to be Nabuguzi’s son or nephew. Police found a black holdall at his east London home hidden on a shed roof with a vast array of fake documents, described as a ‘kitbag for the commission of identity fraud’.

Other members of the gang include Jordan Sebutemba, 26, thought to be Nabuguzi’s daughter or niece;

Albert Kaidi, a former partner of Sebutemba who is believed to be from Rwanda; and Lamulah Sekiziyuvu, 36, a former partner of both Keyuyne and Kaidi.

Kyeyune, Sebutemba, Kaidi and Sekiziyuvu were found guilty of various fraud offences yesterday.

They will be sentenced along with Nabuguzi and Betty Tibakawa, 21, Lina Katongola, 29, Mathy Matumba, 50, and Eddie Carlos Semcenda, 30, next week.

‘There must also now be questions about their immigration status and right to be in the country.’

Mark Simpson, an investigator for the Department for Work and Pensions, said: ‘This case shows how criminals determined to cheat the benefits system have nowhere to hide when the different branches of the Government come together.

‘We can pool our expertise to target and stop this fraud.’

Hockey pucks. You wanna stop this kind of thing then you use the DP.  You have to make the penalty if caught, not worth the risk of the activity. That’s what works.
Oh yeah.  And “Kill the lawyers.”

Posted by peiper     on 10/26/2012 at 06:01 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - October 25, 2012

mr and mrs are not politically correct and must go. out,out damn spot, says brighton

I’m not sure but this could qualify under humor as well as anything else.
But it isn’t so funny to the txpayer I bet. 
What a dumb idea. And for what?  To make sure a teeny,tiny really small portion of the population doesn’t feel hurt or left out.
People definitely are not getting smarter.  Furthermore, I think there is so little actual work available to these jerks, that they make this stuff up to justify their employment.  Mad hatters.
Seems more and more the majority population must endure the silliness imposed by the politically correct just in case some minority might be offended. And once reminded of it, some minorities suddenly and with great surprise discover that, yes indeed. They are offended and it must stop.
Take a look at this bit of loony tune moonbattery. 

Brighton Council plans to remove Mr and Mrs titles from all documents to protect city’s transgender community from offence

Plans come after council investigated the lives of the city’s transgender community

One councillor brands move ‘ludicrous’ but plan will go ahead if public back support it

By Anna Edwards

Councillors in Brighton could scrap the titles Mr and Mrs from council forms so residents don’t have to choose between genders.

All titles could be scrapped from official paperwork under new plans following an investigation by the council into transgender community in the city.

The proposal is backed by Brighton and Hove City Council deputy leader Phelim MacCafferty, who has called the titles ‘useless’.

But the new proposal has been branded ‘political correctness gone too far’ by an opposition councillor who says the idea is ‘ludicrous’.

A scrutiny panel will put forward a number of recommendations, including the scrapping of Mr and Mrs, to the council for approval in December.

Green Party deputy leader Coun MacCafferty said: ‘Trans people aren’t necessarily male or female and sometimes they don’t want to be defined by their gender.

‘Putting Mr and Mrs on a form is completely useless.

‘This is an issue that concerns most institutions from banks to mobile phone companies.

‘Why is Mr on my debit card, for instance?

‘I don’t understand why it is there.

‘We should at least examine the issue and we will have the recommendations early next month.’

read more

Posted by peiper     on 10/25/2012 at 10:23 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Politically Correct B.S. • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - October 22, 2012

plot to massacre crowds using a car fitted with knives and bombs

What do ya make of this?  I’m always saying I have no words and manage to come up with a few. But here, all I’d be able to do is say the same things I’ve already said about this verminous scum. What can I add to everything that’s been said by Drew and our readers?

Take a look at this.  Why oh why can’t the police simply kill these grizzly bearded sub humans? Why a trial? For what purpose?  OK, I won’t get started.

‘Terror suspect trio plotted to massacre crowds using a car fitted with knives and detonating eight suicide bombs in attack bigger than July 7’

* One suspect allegedly boasted the attack would be another 9/11

* Trio ‘received training in Pakistan on how to use weapons, how to make bombs and poisons, and made suicide videos while they were there’

* Defendants Irfan Naseer and Irfan Khalid ‘bragged about making martydom videos’

* ‘Suspects posed as bogus charity collectors to raise money for training in terror’

* They thought they would be rewarded with 72 virgins if they died martyrs

* ‘Jihadists’ spoke about blowing their rucksacks up, shooting people and even blasting them with a rocket launcher, jurors were told today

* Plotters ‘took their inspiration from Osama Bin Laden’ and were influenced by the lectures of Anwar al-Awlaki, a US born extremist

By Larisa Brown

Irfan Naseer, 31, Irfan Khalid and Ashik Ali, both 27, are accused of masterminding a plot to detonate eight suicide bombs after one of the extremists claimed 7/7 attackers should have used nail bombs to inflict more damage.

The trio, said to be ‘central figures’ in a home-grown terror cell, posed as bogus charity collectors to raise money for training in terrorism in Pakistan, where they learned how to use weapons and make improvised explosive devices, it is alleged.

Speaking at Woolwich Crown Court, prosecutor Brian Altman QC said: ‘The police successfully disrupted a plan to commit an act or acts of terrorism on a scale potentially greater than the London bombings in July 2005 had it been allowed to run its course.

‘The defendants were proposing to detonate up to eight rucksack bombs in a suicide attack and/or to detonate bombs on timers in crowded areas in order to cause mass deaths and casualties.

‘One of them was even to boast the plan would be another 9/11.’

The court heard that Naseer was recorded saying the July 7 attackers did not do a good enough job because they did not use nail bombs.

‘Naseer was recorded agreeing with Mohammed Rizwan that July 7 had gone a bit wrong, really that the London bombers had not done more damage because they had failed to put nails on or in their bombs.

‘They hadn’t done it well enough by not attaching shrapnel to the bombs that they exploded in London on that fatal day in 2005.’

The men also spoke about blowing their rucksacks up, shooting people and even blasting them with a rocket launcher, jurors were told.

The trio had not decided on any targets or how many lives were to be claimed in an attack which they hoped would be ‘bigger than 7/7.’

Mr Altman said: ‘In a police interview Ali confessed the plot involved him wearing a suicide vest and carrying a gun.

‘The defendants also spoke about acquiring a rocket launcher from Pakistan and different ways of killing people including bombs, guns and even the possibility of fixing blades to a vehicle and driving through a crowd of people.’

The court heard the defendants, who are all unemployed and from Birmingham, had got the idea from banned Al-Qaeda magazine Inspire.

Mr Altman said the ‘jihadists,’ who thought they would be rewarded with 72 virgins if they died martyrs, had not organised when the attacks would be carried out before they were arrested in September last year.

MORE TO READ

Now then, it doesn’t end here. It begins. Here are the victims. PLEASE go to the BBC News link below. You will see these ppl and by clicking on their photos, you will get a brief bio on each.  And these are the dead. There were many who were maimed for life, lost limbs etc. And these filthy muslim bastards saw these innocents as a target.

THE VICTIMS, BBC NEWS

Posted by peiper     on 10/22/2012 at 11:48 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims • Terrorists • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - September 25, 2012

immigration blues

I can’t imagine many mainstream writers being able to tell this sort of truth in print back home. Not in any major paper I’ve seen in the past anyway.  But Littlejohn pulls no punches and he’s much maligned by the left for his views. 

Well, what brought this to being posted was, in the hard copy edition of the Daily Mail on Saturday, there was a very much enlarged photo of the crowd waiting for the Apple store to open.  The very first thing I noticed about the pix, which you’d be blind to miss the photo was so large, was that the majority of the people in the London photo were foreign looking.

Anyway, the photo they published on line and which I present here, was cropped a lot by the Mail and so I don’t see the blonde Littlejohn refers to in this small blurb. His take on immigration is spot on.  She stands out a lot in the hard copy, simply because she seems to be the only white face among them all.  Just one more reason ppl refer to the city as Londonistan.  And that is not funny.  But it is accurate.

Littlejohn also refers to Sangatte, which most Americans won’t be aware of. So here’s the explanation, much edited but all you need to understand the problem.  Keeping it up and running for the benefit of all the vermin who manage to get to France cost millions. Most of those folks were there and waiting for the opportunity to get here to the UK by any means. That usually means sneaking in as illegals.  The camp closed in 2002, which didn’t mean the scum weren’t still getting here.
Sangatte was just half a mile from the entrance to the Channel Tunnel and many of the refugees were prepared to pay traffickers to show them how to breach security measures.

The British government and railway executives accused France of inadequate policing of their side of the tunnel, while France pleaded it was unable to cope with the vast numbers of refugees crossing its borders.  It never occurred to the authorities that shooting them all dead would have solved the problem for all time.  Saved lots of money too. 

Now then, that bring us to here.

Fears of new ‘Sangatte’ as French propose law change on arresting illegal immigrants.

The new legislation will mean that police can no longer detain illegal immigrants indefinitely and means they must be released after six hours.
That means they are free to make repeated attempts to enter Britain – and less likely to be deported.

The new French government is to change the law making it harder for police to arrest UK-bound illegal immigrants in Calais.

Just what the Brits need right now. As if they don’t have enough headaches with home grown problems. Now this. And to think.  The Brits helped liberate France from it’s rightful owner in ’44-45.  Ha. I make joke. Maybe. Not too sure sometimes.
So that’s the background to his Sangatte remark. Things are bleak.

Has Apple opened a Sangatte?

By Richard Littlejohn
Daily Mail

If you want a graphic illustration of how unfettered immigration has changed the demographic make-up of Britain, look no further than the picture in Saturday’s Mail of the crowd waiting for the Apple store in London to open.

It looks like the queue for the lorries at Sangatte. There’s even a bloke wrapped in a blanket. I shan’t speculate as to how they can all afford £599 for a new iPhone, although apparently some of them were paid by others to queue up.

Plenty of readers did a double-take, even those who live in our multi-culti capital city.

No doubt the usual suspects will howl ‘racism’, but it is remarkable that the only white face belongs to a blonde bird in a hi-viz jacket.
And she’s probably Polish.

Posted by peiper     on 09/25/2012 at 03:51 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • DIVERSITY BS • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - September 10, 2012

skool daze, skool daze. best days of their lives?

There’s a damn good reason for referring to the PM as conservative lite.
Thing is, in order to gain votes, the cons now have to go out and agree to things really not too conservative, in order to prove that cons can be all inclusive and loving, touchy feely ppl too. 

Really doesn’t affect me truthfully.  At my age, I won’t get to see how it all plays out in the end although from what we see happening today, my guess is the world will continue operating upside down for a good while to come.

And it does all start in schools you know.  Get em while they’re very young and fill those empty heads with left wing crap and what ya get is diversity, multicultural, claptrap and steve and adam tying the knot. Legally.  What the hell. 
I don’t even know if there’s a reason to care anymore. 

BUT!

Now this is something else entirely unless I missed something.
This reads like what it appears to be.  A teacher could be FORCED into endorsing
something alien to his or her core beliefs. 
I suppose another argument could go, well what if a core belief of some teacher honestly held, was Communism or National Socialism or an approval of slavery.

We live in a world where it all depends on what you mean by ‘is.’

Teachers ‘face sack’ for refusing to endorse gay marriage

Teachers who refuse to endorse gay marriage in the classroom could face the sack under controversial Government reforms, a legal expert has warned.
By Graeme Paton, Education Editor

Schools will be within their statutory rights to dismiss staff that wilfully fail to use stories or textbooks promoting same-sex weddings, it is claimed.
Aidan O’Neill, a senior QC and expert on religious freedom and human rights, also warned that parents who object to gay marriage being taught to their children will have no right to withdraw their child from lessons.
In a report, he said that any decision to redefine marriage would have far-reaching consequences for schools, hospitals, foster carers and public buildings.
The most serious impact is likely to be felt in the church where vicars and priests conducting religious marriage ceremonies could be taken to court for refusing to carry out a gay wedding, he said.
The conclusions – in legal advice commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage – comes amid continuing fall-out over Government plans to tear up the centuries-old law on marriage.

Please note that the article, which continues at this link, doesn’t absolutely claim this WILL happen, but only that it could lead to this result.
Somehow, I don’t see authorities being in a position to disallow parents from pulling their kids out of a school and sending them to another.
Which of course would be far easier for those who can afford it.  The article is interesting mostly because it looks like this is the way the world is moving. Not just here in Britain.

Posted by peiper     on 09/10/2012 at 08:59 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Gay Gay Gay! •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - September 02, 2012

To hell with free speech.  Part 2 ????

To Hell With Free Speech Pt. 2?

Never ends does it?

I sometimes wonder how I could have gotten this old and learned so little.

But then I say to myself, self, don’t worry so much about that.
Look at what these idiots do.

And then I read things like the following and don’t feel so bad.

Take a look. I could not make this up. No way.

House of Lords staff banned from bantering with colleagues in case it is deemed offensive

· New rules have been branded ‘Orwellian’

· Staff told banter can ‘alienate’ and upset other staff

By Chris Hastings and Peter Henn

It prides itself on being the home of independent thought and robust free speech.

But now the House of Lords has been branded ‘Orwellian’ after it advised its staff to avoid office banter on the grounds that it can be offensive.
Employees of the second chamber have been advised that even seemingly harmless chat can lead to other colleagues feeling left out and alienated.
The advice has been issued to hundreds of staff as part of a series of taxpayer-funded equality and diversity sessions on ‘cultural awareness’.
During the two-hour sessions, staff are told that the ‘golden rule’ of treat others as you would like to be treated has been replaced by the ‘platinum rule’ of treat others as they would like to be treated.
A section on ‘effective communication’ advises participants to ‘avoid banter’, ‘to allow people to self-identify’ and ‘to make minority groups visible using inclusive terms’.

During the past 12 months, almost 300 House of Lords employees have been on equality and diversity courses at a cost to taxpayers of just over £18,000.
The House’s clampdown on banter has infuriated campaigners and writers, who insist it is part and parcel of office life. Chrissie Maher, founder of the Plain English Campaign, said: ‘I thought the House of Lords is supposed to be a place where people can speak their minds.

source

Posted by peiper     on 09/02/2012 at 09:34 AM   
Filed Under: • Big Brother • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • DIVERSITY BS • Politically Correct B.S. • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - August 31, 2012

not guilty by reason of being muslim. again. anyone keeping score?

It has been one hell of a trying 24 hours, no complaints, just to explain that I had every intention of shutting this damn thing down after my last post. I really thought I was going to get away for the night.

THEN I RAN SMACK INTO THIS.

Yeah right.  He did no wrong. We all believe that. Don’t we?  In a pig’s eye.  Or is that ass?

Another muzzie gets the light touch because a panel decides he knew no better because .... ??

Right the first time.
His muslim background.

This fellow says it all better.

Now let’s see....errr....naivety comes to mind. A pharmacist who supposedly has a reasonable level of intelligence: ‘unaware of the offence his conduct had caused’ and a panel so wary of the ramifications of the PC Brigade - they appear to have quivered into submission. This, to me, underscores the rotten society we live - the question now is: when liberals tuck into bed at night what plan they are hatching for the rest of us to dance on hot embers or tread on broken glass. They probably rationalise by thinking that what they have to offer is kinder than that of Germany in the 30s/40s and the Central Committee of the USSR under Joseph Stalin. Well...yes, I suppose they are kinder....but do we like it?

- Observer, East Midlands, 31/8/2012 16:19

So here’s what that’s all about.

Pharmacist who asked colleague what her favorite sex position is LET OFF at tribunal because he had a ‘restrictive Muslim background’

Professional panel accepted Khalil Jamil’s conduct was not sexually-motivated

He claimed his strict Muslim background meant he lacked basic understanding of appropriate workplace behavior

Jamil was cleared of professional misconduct and was instead given an official warning

By Kerry Mcqueeney

A pharmacist who made crude remarks to three of his female colleagues has escaped with a warning after a panel heard he came from a ‘restrictive Muslim background’ and was unaware of the offence his conduct had caused.

Khalil Jamil asked one of the women about her favourite love-making position and quizzed another about the mating habits of her horses - but a professional panel ruled his behaviour was not sexually motivated.

The General Pharmaceutical Council panel found Jamil acted inappropriately by making the comments and standing too close to his assistants.

However, they accepted that his background in a strict Muslim community meant he was unfamiliar to working in such an open environment with women and his basic social skills meant he lacked understanding of appropriate conduct.

As the remarks were not sexually motivated the panel cleared Jamil of misconduct and gave him an official warning.

It also took into consideration the fact that Jamil had remedied his actions by attending a ‘dignity at work’ course.

Panel chairman Patrick Malmo QC said: ‘He felt the source of this behaviour in 2009, was that he comes from a very restrictive background, with little social life, and none at all outside of his own community.

‘He lacked social skills, and had little knowledge of how one should be when working with colleagues.

‘He was unable to distinguish between friendliness and over familiarity.’

Mr Malmo added: ‘We do not think there is a serious risk of this kind of conduct being repeated.

‘Although we do not find the registrant impaired, we have the ability to issue a warning, and given the circumstances of this case, we believe it is necessary to do so.’

In a statement read to the hearing one of Jamil’s colleagues, referred to as CH, said she was working with Jamil at the Cooperative Pharmacy in Fauldhouse, West Lothian, in July 2009, when he asked: ‘Do you have a boyfriend? Do you want a boyfriend?’

She said: ‘Whenever it went quiet he came back to me and stood close again. He asked me if I was into sports, I said “No”.

‘He said he was into boxing and said feel my stomach. He grabbed my wrist and tried to get me to touch his stomach.’

The pharmacist approached her while she was at the computer at and asked her if she had a boyfriend and how she liked to have sex with him.

A similar incident occurred the following week in which he put his arms around her waist.

A third woman, known as SR, was working at the same pharmacy when Jamil stood close to her that as she bent down to pick up some prescriptions, she could not help but back into him.

She added that he had asked if getting her horses’ castrated had affected the animals’ sex drives and whether it would have the same effect on a man.

read more, source

What a load of rubbish, if he came from a so called strict Muslim background, he in theory should not even be having these conversations with a woman who was not his wife

- OpenEyes., London, 31/8/2012

Posted by peiper     on 08/31/2012 at 02:35 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (3) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - August 21, 2012

Cinema warns against noisy Muslims, warning taken as, raaaaaaacism

H/T Europe News

Meant to close last night but found this.
Not surprising, and I think I’m thankful we no longer attend movie houses as I expect the same here before too long.
I think part of Europe woke up too late though.
It’s all over but the shouting and that shouting may well be something that sounds like akbar snackbar.
Thank heaven America at least is armed.  Of course, that means they’ll have access to the same thing.
Future looks like a bloody one.

The English translation here makes for a slightly clumsy ride but overall it’s understandable.

Denmark: Cinema warns against noisy Muslims

By Nicolai Sennels

The cinema Palads is probably the biggest in Denmark. I and most of my friends always avoids it because of the many noisy and misbehaving immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa. The warning against noisy Muslims in certain cinemas thus applies unofficially all year round.

This sign was put up at the cinema Palads in connection with Ramadan 2012 before being taken down again a few hours later because of accusations of racism:

Translation of Palads’ warning:
“Ramadan and Eid
Saturday, Sunday and Monday (August 18.-19.-20) the Muslim month of fasting, Ramadan, ends and all Muslims will be celebrating.
It happens with food and drink, and some also go to the cinema. Therefore cinema guests all over the country must expect more guests and more noise than usual.
We expect that it will happen in connection with movies such as Batman 3, Bourne Legacy, Total Recall, Abraham Lincoln and Prometheus, but we of course can not know beforehand.
Guards from the security company GS4 will be patrolling the cinema all day long, and if you experience disturbances please contact them or our staff.
We apologise for any inconvenience.
Yours,
Palads”

MP Martin Henriksen (Danish Peoples Party) comments the case in Jyllands-Posten (August 19 2012 “OK to warn against Muslims"), Denmark’s biggest newspaper:
“It is well known that some Muslims behave differently when they are together with many other Muslims. For some it feel uncomfortable ... If you that ask Muslims to quiet down, they tend to show threatening behaviour. Therefore it is good that people are warned. ... I see Palads’ warning as pointing to reality. When it is Ramadan, some Muslims change their behavior. It is not all Muslims who misbehave but there are quite some who do. ... When many Muslims are gathered at one place there is a tendency for the formation of unpleasant situations. There is a tendency that this kind of problems appear in connection with Ramadan and they must be dealt with. There is a reason why Palads put up the warning.”
Two anonymous cinema workers comment the case - via the award winning and most read blog in Denmark, Uriasposten.net:
“My brother was manager in Palads for six years. He has asked me to post the following of his experience from five years of Eid:
- One stabbing incident.
- An episode of young immigrants running around with a knife and threatened Danish guests ‘for fun’
- A mass brawl between 40-50 Somalis, preferably girls (WTF!!)
- An episode where two rows of chairs had their seats and backrests slashed with a knife, all in all about 40 chairs.
- A manager got a gun to his forehead when he asked an immigrant to extinguish his cigarette inside the hall during the film.
- Several episodes of immigrants taking pictures of the staff when they were asked not to ruin the show for others by smoking, shouting, phoning, etc.
- Several episodes of young female workers being harassed sexually by immigrants.
Out of the approx. 200 guests that I have asked to leave the cinema because they could not behave properly only 20 of themhave been Danes, the rest were immigrants. Although there are less trouble over the years, I finally had enough and quit my job at Palads, because I found myself losing faith in my fellow citizens. It is depressing in the long run.”
And:
“I have worked in a cinema during Eid and believe me when I say it is Hell. People behave completely wild and I was not the only one receiving threats. We were told by our managers to take off our name tags after work because several from our staff got beaten up after work.”

Posted August 20th, 2012 by pk

Posted by peiper     on 08/21/2012 at 05:00 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS • muslims •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner