Tuesday - January 12, 2010

MUSLIM EXTREMISTS FINED, BUT THE PUBLIC PAYS COZ THEY’RE ALL ON BENEFITS.

Outside the court, they defiantly declared: ‘The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits’.

And ya know what?  They aren’t wrong.  This pile of dung masquerading as real life humans are ALL on benefits with compliments of the Brit taxpayer.

One of the many things I find hard to understand is their claim that they are exercising a right of free speech, while carrying banners and poster that

read the hell with freedom.  I know they’re incredibly stupid life forms but it amazes me they can’t see just how dumb that appears to the world. Of course I realize I demand too much of them.  My fault, not theirs.  I expect them to exhibit something human when they so obviously are anything but.
Like this ..... pathetic looking idiot.  In case you can’t see it on your monitor, it read, “freedom can go to hell.”

This fool doesn’t seem to understand that without freedom, he couldn’t carry a sign in public that makes him look any dumber then he already is.
These jerks aren’t really all that concerned about what’s happening in muslim countries. If they were, they’d go there and most of us wish the hell they would. But hey ... no benefits to speak of where this species come from ( under most any rock ).  And try carrying a sign that would question religion or war or state policy.  Orf with ees ed.  And still, the west puts up with this sub-human species and placates and pleases and pays benefits to. The list is almost endless. 

And talk about appease and placate and bend over backwards.  The group refused to stand when the judge entered court and she did NOTHING!
Read this article and see what reason was given for allowing them to get away with that.  Of course, if the defendants were real humans well, you can just imagine.

Guilty? It’s a badge of honour say Muslim hate mob (and because we’re on benefits, the state will pay our costs)

By Lucy Ballinger and Dan Newling
Mail
Jan 12,2010

A group of Muslim extremists who screamed ‘rapists’ and ‘murderers’ at British soldiers went unpunished yesterday - and called their conviction ‘a badge of honour’.

The five were given conditional discharges for shouting ‘baby killers’ and ‘terrorists’ and waving placards at hundreds of soldiers returning from Iraq.

Outside court they were surrounded by a mob of supporters and boasted they would do the same again, saying they wanted to see sharia law in Britain.

The men, all of whom are on benefits, were each ordered to pay £500 in costs towards the prosecution. Outside the court, they defiantly declared: ‘The taxpayer paid for this court case. The taxpayer will pay for the fines too out of benefits’.

Surrounded by other followers of Islam4UK - the group led by so-called preacher of hate Anjem Choudary - they said they would protest again.

Their backers waved a banner saying: ‘Islam will dominate the world. Freedom can go to hell’.

Some of the group members were linked to an egg attack on Tory peer Baroness Warsi when she visited Luton two months ago.

The peer - who was hit by at least one of the eggs - faced a group of shouting protesters telling her that she was not a proper Muslim. No one was charged.

During their six-day trial, the men argued they were exercising their right to freedom of speech and had been telling the truth about the conduct of British forces in Iraq.

They were part of a demonstration against the 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment, who were marching through Luton after returning from Iraq.

The protest sparked a hostile stand-off with angry members of the public who had been cheering the soldiers.

Yesterday at Luton Magistrates’ Court, five of the group were found guilty of using threatening, abusive, insulting words and behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress to others.

They were Sajjadar Choudhury, 31, Munin Abdul, 28, Jalal Ahmed, 21, Yousaf Bashir, 29, and Ziaur Rahman, 32, all from Luton. Two others were acquitted.

Although the offence carries a maximum fine of £1,000, the five were merely given a conditional discharge for two years by District Judge Carolyn Mellanby, which means if they are found guilty of anything else this conviction will be taken into account.

The protesters had refused to stand for the judge as she entered and left court. But she yesterday said she did not wish to ‘set a precedent’ by charging them with contempt of court because of this.

After the trial Munin Abdul, who was found to have called the soldiers ‘terrorists and murderers’ and said they would ‘burn in hell’, said: ‘We won’t stop speaking the truth, even if they think they have made an example of us.

‘This case was political, and we have been made scapegoats to pacify the public. We knew we were being offered as sacrificial lambs. But I see our convictions as a reason for us to carry on in our calling.

HERE FOR MORE AND PHOTOS

Posted by peiper     on 01/12/2010 at 01:37 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • FREEDOM • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration • RoPMA • Terrorists • UK •  
• Comments (5) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - January 10, 2010

Unexpected Part Two of, It’s a cool idea to have Loony Tunes themes handy while reading. BIZARRE!

Some few weeks ago I posted another one of those really dumb things that the Brits, in their left wing rush to destroy what’s left of this place, have done.
At the time, I said that things keep getting more bizarre and more stupid and I found that my use of the term, “Things just can’t get any stupider then this” no longer had any meaning.  That’s because things do indeed keep getting more bizarre, more politically correct, dumber and stupid without cause or reason.  If Gorbal Warming is their new guiding light, then political correctness is their bible with all it’s (pc) ramifications and rules about insults accidental or intended.

So I will not ask, can things get dumber or more bizarre with regard to this article because they most assuredly can and no doubt they will.  Until then, I offer you this which isn’t the friendliest thing I can think of doing.  It certainly does raise the old RCOB though. Doesn’t it?

Businessman is arrested in front of wife and son ... for ‘anti-gypsy email that he didn’t even write.

By James Millbank
Last updated at 10:04 AM on 10th January 2010

Paul Osmond who made a comment about a gipsy planning application

A wealthy businessman was arrested at home in front of his wife and young son over an email which council officials deemed ‘offensive’ to gipsies – but which he had not even written.

The email, concerning a planning appeal by a gipsy, included the phrase: ‘It’s the ‘do as you likey’ attitude that I am against.’

Council staff believed the email was offensive because ‘likey’ rhymes with the derogatory term ‘pikey’.

The 45-year-old IT boss was held in a police cell for four hours until it was established he had nothing to do with the email, which had been sent by one of his then workers, Paul Osmond.

But police had taken his DNA and later confirmed they would be holding it indefinitely.

The businessman, who has asked not to be named, was also fingerprinted in the police investigation estimated to have cost taxpayers up to £12,000.

He said two uniformed officers came to his house on a Sunday afternoon and said he would be handcuffed if he did not accompany them to the police station.

His computer and other internet equipment were also seized.

The email, from a computer at his company, was sent last August to a website at Rother District Council, in East Sussex, on which the public can comment on planning applications.

It referred to an appeal by gipsy Linda Smith, who wants to keep a mobile home in an area of outstanding beauty overlooking the Battle of Hastings site.

The email also read: ‘Get a job, get planning permission but more to the point get out of the neighbourhood.’

The businessman, a father of two, said last night: ‘I had a sense of total disbelief. My wife and I decided to tell my 11-year-old son I had to go with the police because I had witnessed a road accident.

‘Even though the officers were fairly pleasant to me, I was informed I would be handcuffed if I didn’t go voluntarily. They then confiscated my computer and my wife’s computer and took them to the police station.

‘I was extremely angry. I was relaxing in the comfort of my home on a Sunday afternoon and then I was in a police car under arrest – all for an innocent comment by a colleague.’

He was driven five miles to Hastings police station.

He said: ‘I have never had any criminal record and try my best to teach my children right from wrong. This was a ridiculously heavy-handed police reaction to what they perceived as a racist comment. I am not the least bit racist and neither is Paul Osmond. The gipsy family concerned did not complain.

‘I did nothing wrong yet ended up in a police cell for four hours with my DNA stored on a criminal database.’

The arrest happened on November 15 and followed a three-year battle by a gipsy family to win planning permission for the mobile home on land outside the town of Battle.

The family bought a field from a farmer, put down a concrete base, and installed the mobile home at the end of a short driveway. Rother Council issued an enforcement notice against the building.

The businessman said he also objected to the council over the location of the mobile home, which is near his property.

He said: ‘It seems I have to get planning permission for everything I do right down to dead-heading the daffodils.

‘It seems they can erect this home with impunity. But I made my objections entirely through the proper channels and I have absolutely nothing against anyone in the gipsy community.’

The case finally ended last week when Mr Osmond, who had been arrested and bailed, was told there would be no further police action. The planning case is continuing.

Mr Osmond, 39, of Icklesham, said: ‘I made it clear to them I am absolutely not racist. I said I was simply registering my objection to this application because it is 200ft from the most important and historical battlefield in the country.

‘I now feel I am not even able to express an opinion for fear of being arrested by the police.

‘One of my closest friends is an Irish traveller and he uses the term ‘pikey’ all the time. This is the ultimate in political correctness going off the scale.’

Sussex Police said they had arrested the businessman over ‘suspicion of committing a racial or religious-aggravated offence’.

After consultation with the Crown Prosecution Service, it was decided to take no further action against Mr Osmond.

Chief Inspector Heather Keating said: ‘Sussex Police have a legal duty to promote community cohesion and tackle unlawful discrimination.

‘We are satisfied we acted appropriately in identifying the owner of the computer used and through this, the identity of the writer of the offending line.’

Police said they would hold the innocent men’s DNA indefinitely, which they said was in line with national policy.

A council spokesman said: ‘As far as we were concerned it was an offensive comment, so we got in touch with the police.’

SOURCE AND PHOTOS

I have been here over five years now and have never heard the term, ‘pikey.’ I have no idea what it means.  Lyndon?  Chris E.?

I hate the idea that people also have to “strongly express” the idea that they are NOT RACIST?  Like they must prove something on the mere chance that someone in authority will accuse them of heresy and sentence them to the stake for burning.  The whole idea and workings of PC and use of the ‘R’ word is nothing short of a 21st century inquisition.

Posted by peiper     on 01/10/2010 at 09:45 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Government • Jack Booted Thugs • Outrageous • UK •  
• Comments (7) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

It would be a cool idea to read this with Loony Tune closing theme in background.

Cos that will help you get a grip while reading this nonsense.
Here I thought I was gonna get to my first coffee this morning, but when I saw the headline, I headed for the computer instead of the kitchen.

Aaaaaaaaaaaagggggggggggghhhhh!

Myleene Klass warned by police after scaring off intruders with knife

Myleene Klass, the broadcaster and model, brandished a knife at youths who broke into her garden – but has been warned by police that she may have acted illegally.

By Roya Nikkhah
THE SUNDAY TELEGRAPH

Miss Klass, a model for Marks & Spencer and a former singer with the pop group Hear’Say, was in her kitchen in the early hours of Friday when she saw two teenagers behaving suspiciously in her garden.

The youths approached the kitchen window, before attempting to break into her garden shed, prompting Miss Klass to wave a kitchen knife to scare them away.

Miss Klass, 31, who was alone in her house in Potters Bar, Herts, with her two-year-old daughter, Ava, called the police. When they arrived at her house they informed her that she should not have used a knife to scare off the youths because carrying an “offensive weapon” – even in her own home – was illegal.

Jonathan Shalit, Miss Klass’s agent, said that had been “shaken and utterly terrified” by the incident and was stepping up security at the house she shares with her fiancé, Graham Quinn, who was away on business at the time.

He said: “Myleene was aghast when she was told that the law did not allow her to defend herself in her own home. All she did was scream loudly and wave the knife to try and frighten them off.

“She is not looking to be a vigilante, and has the utmost respect for the law, but when the police explained to her that even if you’re at home alone and you have an intruder, you are not allowed to protect yourself, she was bemused.

“Her questions going forward are: what are my rights, and what are you actually allowed to do to defend yourself in your own house?”

The Sunday Telegraph’s Right to Defend Yourself campaign is seeking a change in the law to provide greater rights and immunity from prosecution for householders in dealing with intruders.

Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, said: “This incident just shows why things are still very confused on this issue and why we need a change in the law.”

A spokesman for Hertfordshire Police said: “We got a call at 12.45am on Saturday to reports of the owner of the property hearing noises outside their address.

“Officers were in attendance and checked the property.

“There was no one around although they could see footprints in the snow. No property had been taken and there were no intruders. It was treated as a trespass incident.

“Words of advice were given in relation to ensuring suspicious behaviour is reported immediately.”

SUNDAY TELEGRAPH SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 01/10/2010 at 04:38 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Insanity • Nanny State • Outrageous • Self-Defense • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (13) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - January 08, 2010

Cops spend way too much time talking to white,middle class, white folks. Hey, I just report it.

Do any of you recall a previous post I did about a national park?  The subject of which was, “Too many middle aged,middle class white people used the park.”

That seemed to upset the PC multi-cultural powers that be and so they closed it.  I don’t have any idea of what happed after that.
Well, this story IS NOT related to that but the idea that the police are talking to ,,, “too many white, middle class people” is in the news.  What is it with these ppl here?  Something in the water?  In their soup? What?

I spotted the article originally in the Telegraph this morning.  It’s interesting to see how the different papers cover the same topic, even when both are thought to be somewhat conservative in their editorial opinions. But no matter.  Once again there isn’t a link I could find to the Telegraph version.
Thing I found interesting was that in the Telegraph, which is less a tabloid then the Mail, which is far more right wing then the Telegraph, well the Telegraph had the statement about white folks almost at the top of their article while the Mail had the statement buried way down in the page.

The Telegraph headline read:

NEW POLICE TACTIC WITH PUBLIC. DON’T TALK ABOUT CRIME.
And they must stop meeting too many white people

So here’s the version as printed in the Daily Mail. 

Don’t talk about crime, police are told… it might scare the public!

By Daily Mail Reporter

Last updated at 10:12 PM on 07th January 2010

Police officers were once seen as reassuring figures, like the fatherly Dixon of Dock Green.

Now it seems they are more likely to have a quite different effect - so much so that officers have been told not to talk about crime in case they frighten the public.

Home Office officials say discussing crime rates may make it less likely that the public will think officers are doing a good job. And that will make it harder for forces to hit the Government’s target for increasing public confidence in the police.

As a result, they are told to keep quiet at community meetings. Last night, officers dismissed the instruction as ‘ridiculous’.

The Home Office research report says that when officers highlight crime and anti-social behaviour problems at community meetings it can lead to ‘ feelings of fear’ among the public.

Public confidence in the police - currently standing at 49 per cent - needs to be boosted to 60 per cent by 2012 to meet a Home Office target.

Shsh, don’t say too much: Officers have been told not to ‘promote fear’ when chatting to people on the street

But the study says that to achieve this target police officers need to ‘avoid four main pitfalls’. The first is highlighting crime and anti-social behaviour ‘too much’.

The report says: ‘Dialogue centred on the apparent pervasiveness of crime and insecurity may actually stimulate feelings of threat or fear, and in turn lower opinions of the police. There is also evidence that if people feel increasingly insecure they are likely to blame the police.’

Pitfall two is ‘talking down’ the police service. The report says police officers were the most likely of all public servants to ‘talk negatively’ about their job to the public.

Pitfall three is treating community policing as a ‘waste of time’ and pitfall four is not ensuring diversity in community meetings, which the study says are mainly attended by ‘older, white, middle-class citizens’.

Detective Constable Alex Challenor, of Lancashire Constabulary, said: ‘I can understand us being told to be careful about what we put on Facebook and things like that, but trying to control what we say to people in the pub is ridiculous.’

The editor of Police Review, Chris Herbert, said: ‘It is hard to know whether it is depressing or funny.’

Last night a Home Office spokesman said: ‘It is a core duty of the police to discuss crime with their local communities and there is no suggestion that the Government is telling them they should not.

‘This research is a tool, not an order, and shows that there is a balance to be found in how police communicate with their communities to build public confidence and tackle crime.’

SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 01/08/2010 at 03:29 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Thursday - January 07, 2010

Girls 12 hold up bank in USA, and some idiot comments “Only in America” when worse is done here.

OK so, there’s an article in the Mail about two young girls who walked into a bank in Ohio and held it up.  It might be surprising since they were about 12 to 14, according to reports.  I didn’t post it mostly because I think by its nature and age of the girls, you folks would already know about it. Even before I see the USA news.  But what made me see red was some idiot Brit in comments after the story saying, “Only in America.” I mean, what a jerk.  Like there isn’t any crime here in the UK.  GIRLS AGE 12 ROB BANK

Like this story.  Be prepared to be frustrated and angry and scratch your collective heads trying to figure this one out.

Sex attacker, 11, secretly sent to primary school

By Paul Sims

A boy of 11 who had been judged a serious risk to other children inflicted the most appalling sexual abuse on a classmate after he was secretly placed in a mainstream school.

The youngster, who was living in local authority care, had carried out sex attacks on children before but was never charged because he was too young.
sex attack boy

Previous attacks: the boy was judged a serious risk

Instead, social workers moved him into specialist care, where he should have been taught.

But despite a two-inch thick file on his disturbing behaviour, he was put in a mainstream school, where he began the chain of events that led to the attack on a nine-year-old fellow pupil.

Last night, his victim’s devastated parents, who cannot be named for legal reasons, said the move was an attempt by the council to save money.

And they demanded answers after it emerged the boy has since been placed in another mainstream school. They told how, despite complaining to officials, they felt ignored by authorities and were forced to remove their son after his attacker was allowed to remain in classes for eight months - even after admitting the offence to police.

‘We fear this boy still poses a serious danger to children,’ his heartbroken mother said. ‘He is predatory and displayed all the signs of adult-like grooming, using threats and intimidation.’

The mother, 43, said she only learnt about the boy’s past after her son was attacked.

Authorities were aware of his activity with other children but because at the time he was under ten - the age of criminal responsibility - he was never charged.

Within months of arriving at the school, the boy began grooming the younger pupil. Then, with the knowledge of his care workers, he was allowed to visit his victim’s home where the attack, in 2008, was carried out.

The victim’s mother said although the family were aware the 11-year-old was living in care, they believed it was because his parents had split up.

‘We obviously didn’t know then he had a history of sexual abuse against other children,’ she said. ‘He should never have been allowed to come to our home.’

The boy was charged with indecent assault but the case was dropped when he admitted the offence and was given a final warning - the youth equivalent of a caution. He was not placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register.

The local ombudsman is now re-examining the complaint.

MP Sir Alan Beith, chairman of the justice committee, called for an independent inquiry. He said: ‘I’m not satisfied that all necessary steps have been taken to learn lessons from the case.’

Northumberland council said the boy was ‘doing well with foster parents and at a new school’.

SOURCE

What possible reason could there be for keeping this less then human pile of garbage alive? For what purpose? Here’s just another case of a “youth” being given a warning, when what is so clearly required is the death penalty and a painful one at that!
I have NO patience for what some hand wringers think are poor little sheep who have lost their way. Oh baa,baa,baa.  Their death by any and all means will insure a safer society and possibly a better gene pool.

Posted by peiper     on 01/07/2010 at 01:53 PM   
Filed Under: • Crime • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • UK •  
• Comments (8) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - January 03, 2010

ANOTHER WORD BANNED?  YUP.  “ MOTORIST “ TO BITE THE DUST.  HEY, I JUST PASS THIS STUFF ON.

I’d bet money that not one single person at this site is surprised in any way.  And that fact alone says how bad things have become.  Surely there should be some things we can look at and be surprised by.  But these days?  Now if this isn’t stupid and made up by folks with nothing to do, I don’t know what else is.
And they get paid!  These loooney tunes get a salary.  Or the quango that dreams it up.  Was a time ppl like this would be tossed out on,, wait. No. Was a time they’d have never thought of it and if they did they’d be laughed at. 

There might be a few things here that make sense, but overall? Don’t think so.

Highways Agency staff told not to use word ‘motorists’

Government officials have banned Highways Agency staff from using the word ‘motorist’, saying they should say ‘road user’ or ‘driver’ instead.
By Ben Leach
03 Jan 2010

The edict is included in a lengthy set of guidelines issued by the Agency, setting out what language its employees should and should not use. Other terms to be avoided include “winter maintenance”, “off-peak hours” and “the travelling public”.

The move has brought an angry response from motoring campaigners.

“We’ve had years of increases on fuel duty and policies that have worsened road travel for the majority of people because ministers are wedded to the idea that public transport is good, while most forms of private transport are bad.”

James May, the television presenter, called the guidance a “complete waste of time and money”.

“It’s pretty preposterous,” he said. “It’s not the Government’s job to tell their staff how to speak. They should tell them not to be racist or not to incite murder, but not the correct word for someone who happens to be in a car. For God’s sake, we’re all grown-ups.

“The word ‘motorists’ covers people driving cars very well. Admittedly it doesn’t cover people on bicycles but then we have the word ‘cyclists’ for that, and ‘pedestrians’ for people who are walking.

“They’re very useful words with very definite meanings that have been worked out over many centuries so I’m quite happy to stick with them. With the weather we’ve been having they should spend the money on some more salt.”

Asked to justify the ban on “motorists”, a spokeswoman for the Department for Transport said: “The dictionary definition of a motorist is a car driver. As an agency we target all road users, including those in vans, buses and on motorcycles, not just those that travel in cares. The word ‘driver’ is a more inclusive term.”

The Highways Agency lexicon, released by the Department for Transport in response to a Freedom of Information request, also suggests that staff required to write about roadworks should avoid the word “works” as a general term and instead “describe what is happening so the reader can visualise it”.

Under a section entitled “Words and phrases to avoid” the guidelines state: “Don’t slip into jargon by thinking that’s how it ‘ought to’ be said. We are trying to get away from agency speak. Think of our customers out there on the network.

“Above all, if a word or phrase doesn’t make sense, or if it seems wrong, then don’t ignore it. Question it.”

The five-page note to Highways Agency staff advises that the phrase “winter maintenance” should be replace with “agency winter services”, “off-peak hours” with “outside of peak hours” and “the travelling public” with “road users”.

“Speed up” should be dropped in favour of “accelerate” and “manned” in favour of “staffed”.

The rule book also advises staff to avoid using “access” (to be replaced by “travel to"), “carriageway” ("lanes"), “improving congestion” ("reducing congestion") and “improve safety” ("make the route safer").

It also includes sections entitled: “How do we sound human?”, “How do we sound helpful?” and “How do we sound active?”

Guidance in the first section includes: “Empathise with your reader. Acknowledge their feelings and show we have them too,” “Include references to our concern for the environment where appropriate,” and “Choose active verbs to make us sound involved. Passive words can make us seem more distant.”

Meanwhile, staff at the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) have been told not to use the word “unfortunately” along with the phrases “I’m afraid ...”, “not possible” and “I can’t”.

Other words and phrases to be avoided include “no problem”, “yeah”, “bear with me”, “What’s your problem?” “I will pop you on hold”, “maybe”, “probably” and “basically”.
SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 01/03/2010 at 12:49 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Stoopid-People • UK • work and the workplace •  
• Comments (9) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - December 29, 2009

Are they ‘Martians’? or ‘Martinis’?

I stumbled across this old video of Alfred Hitchcock reporting on his trip to Mars. He did this in an attempt to spread the best of our ‘culture’. He reports the Martian...er...Martinis response.

How ‘gratifying’.

Now, just imagine the Martians...Martinis saying ‘Muslim Go Home’.

Posted by Christopher     on 12/29/2009 at 08:01 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Humor •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

BORDERS? WHAT BORDERS? I DON’T GOT TO RECOGNIZE ANYONES BORDERS. WHERE’S MY WELFARE CHECK?

Finland too?  Who’d have thought?
Checking in at Europe News tonight and I found this.  There may be a small sync problem but no trouble understanding what the guy is saying.

Hey, has it become racist to ask, why are countries traditionally white so willing to bend over so easily? But never mind that. It isn’t just muzzies or darker skinned ppls crowding the natives. Although those folks breed like mad. It’s just the idea that borders seem to mean little anymore.

A french judge has recently allowed this.

An Afghan migrant cannot be sent home from France because his claim for asylum must be considered, the country’s highest court has ruled - despite him admitting his only aim is to reach Britain.

Said Sultan Khail has now been freed and is expected to resume his bid to get to Britain illegally via Calais.

despite him admitting his only aim is to reach Britain to resume his bid to get to Britain illegally via Calais.

While every other ethnic group in the world seems to be making claims for special this and that, whites continue on the road to cultural suicide.

H/T EUROPE NEWS

One of the highest rates of immigrants in Europe is drawing fears from Finns. Some are concerned that immigrants, attracted by Finland’s generous welfare packages and high living standards, will overrun their country.

“We are faithfully repreating every mistake Sweden for example, has made before us.”

Posted by peiper     on 12/29/2009 at 02:24 PM   
Filed Under: • Border Security • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - December 25, 2009

Merry Christmas

A smorgasbord of Christmas music dedicated to all of the BMEWSed.

Mormon Tabernacle Choir at First Presidency Christmas Devotional 2008

Bing Crosby

Grandma Got Run Over by a Reindeer — The Irish Rovers

For those who enjoy a good barber-shop quartet:

I’ll end this with a special dedication to peiper. I feel your pain, peiper.

Merry Christmas to all, and you’re on your own.

UPDATE

Grumpy Old Fart posted this one in the comments. I thought it was Toto-ly awesome.

Yeah, you better not…in a Pear Tree.

Posted by Christopher     on 12/25/2009 at 01:47 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Fun-Stuff • Holidays • Humor •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Friday - December 18, 2009

BORDER CONTROL IN THE EUROPEAN UNION.  ZERO, AS IN, HUH?  WHAT BORDER?

Now then folks, about this really odd thing referred to in the old bygone days.

National Sovereignty.

Huh?  Say What?  How you spell that?

A gaping hole in our £1.2bn ‘eborder’ net: Crackdown is hopelessly diluted to meet EU law

By James Slack
Home Affairs Editor
Daily Mail
December 18, 2009

Labour’s £1.2billion ‘electronic borders’ scheme to protect Britain from illegal immigrants and terrorists descended into a shambles last night.

The project’s success depends on logging every passenger movement in and out of the UK so police, border guards and the security service know who is here.

But, in order for the scheme to be ruled legal by EU bureaucrats, the Government has been forced to make a raft of concessions to Brussels.

These include EU citizens and their relatives - regardless of nationality - being allowed to enter the UK even if they refuse to hand over their personal details in advance.

Effectively, the crucial compulsory element of the eborders scheme has been stripped away for millions of people.

Even non-EU citizens will be entitled to fly to Britain without providing the details in advance to eborders so they could be scrutinised. They could, however, then be refused entry.

There is also a promise that carriers - such as airlines - will not face sanctions if they do not pass on passenger data.

It leaves a potentially gaping hole at the heart of a flagship policy which was supposed to make borders secure.

The fiasco emerged on a day of drama for the Home Office, which had been insisting all was going to plan with the hugely expensive project.

The scheme involved forcing passengers to give a raft of details before making any journey via UK ports and airports so these could be shared among police and customs officials.

THIS IS A HUGE EMBARRASSMENT FOR GOVT. MINISTERS. THEY HAVE SET UP THIS ELABORATE, HUGELY EXPENSIVE SYSTEM AND THE COMMISSION IS TELLING THEM IT ONLY WORKS IF PEOPLE VOLUNTEER.

SOURCE

EU Related:  Microsoft (MSFT) which I know some folks pronounce as mis-fit, (ok. that was me) which isn’t really fair of me, has had to agree that furture releases of the OS MUST include 12 browser choices.  Freekin commie rat bastards.  We all know the top 4 or 5. Even someone as lo-tech as me. Has anyone here had any trouble ever, finding another browser to use because MSFT did not bundle it with their os?  Jeez.  These euro ass wipes get to me. They have nothing better to do.  They have already fined Microsoft millions, or is it billions? I forgot. They were fined for being a monopoly. I know some of you have had less then flattering things to say about MSFT in the past and I’m not suggesting they are above criticism. But I think the commission (EC) went after deep pockets in their case.  Now they make this dumb demand.  It’s a small thing I suppose and it probably bothers me more then it does MSFT.
I just think they get their jollies going after a large American company.

Posted by peiper     on 12/18/2009 at 01:35 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • EUro-peons • UK •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Tuesday - December 15, 2009

The UK under a Labour govt. Dedicated forever to anything stupid and when found, look for more.

Another tiring day as now we’ve had some electrical work done.  Something called RCD which is, Residual Current Device.  Has to do with preventing electric shock.  Ours apparently was not working, or at least not fully. Another box had to be installed up to code. Or near it for this old place. It’s just too long a story but it’s fixed now.  Guaranteed.  Stay Tuned.

So then, while the electric was off for two hours while holes drilled and and new wire installed and HEAT of course OFF ... I still managed to read some of the papers today and came across a continuing STUPID libtard thing I thought was settled back in 2005.  In fact, I’m certain I have the story saved somewhere on my computer. I saw the damn thing only a few months ago on one of my flash drives. But no matter. 

In todays Mail and reading Richard Littlejohn I see he has brought up the asinine story for the ridicule it deserves.
Here’s what I’m banging on about. It’s the same thing I had but a different source. BBC News. 2005. And dumb as a box of rox but what else can you expect from the left?

Some of you will remember this lunacy because I posted it long ago. Good grief. Have I been doing this stuff that long?

The original headline from another source read,

TOO MANY MIDDLE AGED, MIDDLE CLASS WHITE FOLKS USING NATIONAL PARKS.

Hey ... that is exactly how the left in power think.

Lake walkers too ‘middle-class’ Free, guided treks through Cumbrian beauty spots are facing the axe because they are not attracting people from all walks of life, it is being claimed.
BBC News, Tuesday, 4 January, 2005

The Lake District National Park says its programme, run by more than 100 rangers, currently attracts “middle-aged, middle-class white people”.

Managers want to spend the money they save on attracting ethnic minorities, disabled people and more children.

But the move has angered many volunteer rangers who give up their time to help.

Among activities facing the axe are walks, a magazine, informative talks and slide shows.
‘Middle-aged people’

The national park’s authority said it wanted to meet government targets to attract minorities, inner city children and disabled people.

More than 30,000 people take part in events every year, including 4,500 walks.

A spokesman for the authority, said: “Our research shows that the majority who do use the walks are white, middle-class, middle-aged people.

“The government is encouraging national parks to appeal to young people, to ethnic minorities and to people with disabilities.

“It is saying we ought to focus our activities on these kind of groups.”

But voluntary ranger Derek Lyon hit out at the plans.

He said: “What are they going to do, bus in these people, or open an office in Manchester?

“Why do we at least not stick with a programme that we have prepared and which we can run at no additional expense?”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cumbria/4144717.stm

Well apparently the stupid idiots in power haven’t given up on their all inclusive, multi cultural, diversity bullshit, cause here’s Littlejohn on the subject today.

Never mind racist sheep, beware of werewolves

Richard Littlejohn
Daily Mail
Dec. 15, 2009

The Government is recruiting a new standing army of Guardianistas to encourage members of ethnic minorities to explore the countryside.

Plans for 200 ‘community champions’ have just been unveiled. They have been instructed to increase the number of people from minority backgrounds using National Parks.
National Park Dartmoor

Beautiful: The Government have decided to champion the Dartmoor and other National Parks with ethnic minorities who ‘fear racist abuse’

Ministers claim that only one per cent of blacks and Asians walk Dartmoor and Exmoor because of lack of transport and fear of racial abuse.

Surely lack of transport affects everyone, not just minorities. And where does fear of racial abuse on Dartmoor come from - sheep?

One of the first ‘community champions’ in the West Country, Zainab Abubakar, said ‘Islamophobia’ was discouraging Muslims from walking the moors.

You’d be hard-pressed to find a more fatuous statement made by anyone all year.

You’re more likely to bump into a werewolf on Exmoor than a member of the BNP.

A new university study has concluded that the full moon is capable of bringing out the inner werewolf in us all.

Judging by Zainab Abubakar, werewolves aren’t the only ones howling at the moon.

LITTLEJOHN

Maybe Mr. Akbarsnackbar should change his name to conform to something that looks English. That would be a good start.  Jerk!

Posted by peiper     on 12/15/2009 at 12:17 PM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • DIVERSITY BS • Nanny State • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - December 13, 2009

When tolerance is taken too far.  America … please note.  That ocean is not a barrier anymore.

I was gonna take a day off today, which will be explained in my following post.  Been a fraught 24 hours.
Saw this earlier today and thought it was something that needed to be shared, most especially with fellow Americans.
It may not be this exact way in the US at this moment.  But my feeling is it isn’t too far away.
Simply change wording and maybe substitute towns or cities in the US.

This is just another example of what’s wrong here and why many feel the place is doomed.

Telegraph View: Haringey Council seems determined to evade its responsibility to ensure that Muslims are integrated into British society

Telegraph View

One of the most pressing challenges for Britain – not just for the Government, but for the whole of our society – is to find a way to integrate fundamentalist Muslims: to ensure that they embrace the basic values of tolerance, equality of the sexes, and the primacy of secular democracy as a way of making law.

Haringey Council currently provides an object lesson in how not to meet that critical challenge. As this newspaper reported more than six weeks ago, a Muslim school there, run by individuals with links to the extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir, received £113,000 of taxpayers’ money last year. After our report, state funding was suspended. Now it has been resumed: an investigation by Haringey Council found “no evidence to suggest inappropriate content or influence at the school”.

One of the school’s three trustees is Farah Ahmed. She has refused to deny membership of Hizb ut-Tahrir, and has also written a pamphlet attacking the National Curriculum for “pushing the idea of religious tolerance”. In it, she insists that “attempts to integrate Muslim children” into secular society are an effort to “produce new generations that reject Islam”. She attacks English literature as “one of the most damaging subjects”, and says democracy is a “corrupt tradition” and Western education is “a threat” to Muslims’ “beliefs and values”.

If those attitudes do not count as “inappropriate content or influence” when it comes to state funding, it is hard to see what does. Yet Haringey seems determined to evade its responsibility to ensure that Muslims are integrated into British society. As does the Government: Ed Balls, the Children’s Minister, has backed the council. There could be no more effective way of ensuring that religious minorities remain dangerously excluded from mainstream society.

SUNDAY TELEGRAPH

£113,000 of taxpayers’ money to dump on the host country.  And they put up with it. This is why islam will rule here one day.
The citizens don’t have guns. Bet ya the muzzies will when the time comes.

Posted by peiper     on 12/13/2009 at 09:42 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Editorials • RoPMA • UK •  
• Comments (6) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Monday - December 07, 2009

Drews post, Let’s Put Air Shocks On The Bus, and Abraham Lincoln

H/T Macker for this.

Until Drew’s post yesterday, I had never heard of this guy.  It’s so totally beyond the pale, as to be almost unbelievable.  That it’s beyond reason goes without saying.  I don’t get it. I don’t understand. I don’t accept this kind of public perversion, but then why not? Look at what passes for public entertainment these days.  Look what passes for acceptable and normal behavior. Look what passes for art and talent.  Look to the left and their values.  Things are accepted today that at one time would have shamed people.  But shame doesn’t seem to play a very large roll in public life anymore.  And to be very, brutally honest, conservatives have not been able to stem the tide. Have we?  And in our own defense I should also say we never really stood a chance of doing so.  Because the enemy is, and no surprise is it? Us.

I did see the links Drew provided and he was right.  Pretty damn sick stuff.

I had been going on about what I call our 5th column for so long, that even I got sick of it.  Doesn’t make it less true though.

Which leads me to this.  I found it in the preface to a book I read only in the last week.  It is credited to Abraham Lincoln. I thought it fit.

“At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means means shall we fortify against it?  Shall we expect some trans-Atlantic military giant to step the ocean and crush us at a blow?

Never!

All the armies of Europe, Asia, and Africa combined ...  could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.

At what point then is the appraoch of danger to be expected?

I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us.  It cannot come from abroad.  If destruction be our lot, we ourselves must be its author and finisher.  As a nation of free men, we must live through all times, or die by suicide.”

Abraham Lincoln
January 27, 1838

Posted by peiper     on 12/07/2009 at 08:29 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Judges-Courts-Lawyers • Outrageous • UK • USA •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

   Sunday - December 06, 2009

people making up their own health and dumb safety rules. lunacy limit not reached

I think I could fill this entire page with bats and just post the headline and of course the link, and let it go at that.
These folks clearly have not reached their loony limit as yet.  That’s one reason I try to avoid that old phrase, things can’t get any dumber, cos obviously they can and they alway do.  As in this case.

Sell you a sandwich? Sorry, you might choke, says train steward

By Luke Salkeld
The Mail

A train steward refused to sell a passenger an egg sandwich . . . because he might choke on it.

Chris Haynes had gone to the buffet car after the crew announced that everyone on board would get a free soft drink as compensation for the train breaking down.

After suffering the long delay and a lengthy queue to be served, Mr Haynes was understandably hungry.

He saw some egg sandwiches on sale behind the bar that looked appetising, but when the 58-year-old came to order he was astonished to be told he couldn’t buy one.

Mr Haynes explained that he was not trying to get a free meal and was happy to pay, but the steward again told him that he could not sell him a sandwich.

Recalling the bizarre exchange yesterday, Mr Haynes said: ‘When I asked the man why not he said it was for health and safety reasons.

‘I told him I didn’t understand how health and safety came into selling a hungry stranded passenger an egg sandwich on a broken-down train.’

A First Great Western train steward refused to serve Mr Haynes

Mr Haynes said that when he asked for an explanation a second time, the steward replied: ‘Don’t you see?

If the train has to be evacuated you could choke to death on the sandwich.’ Mr Haynes, a bar manager himself, said: ‘I’ve never, ever heard anything so ludicrous in my life. There was a queue of people behind me and they all looked shocked.’

The grandfather, who is about to emigrate to New Zealand to run a tour company, said he was astonished by the steward’s reaction to his simple request.

‘First Great Western were quite happy to give out free drinks but weren’t prepared to sell egg sandwiches for health and safety reasons,’ he added.

Mr Haynes had been travelling back to London from a day at Newbury-Racecourse in Berkshire when his packed evening train came to a standstill less than half way into the journey.

First Great Western run a special service to Newbury Racecourse on race days.

The train last Saturday, carrying racegoers from the Hennessy Gold Cup at Newbury Races, eventually arrived at Paddington Station two and a quarter hours late.

‘Everything was going well until we broke down somewhere around Reading,’ Mr Haynes said.

A spokesman for First Great Western said yesterday that she was not aware of the incident. She added: ‘It is not our policy to refuse to serve customers on these grounds.’

NO EATS SOURCE

Posted by peiper     on 12/06/2009 at 05:55 AM   
Filed Under: • CULTURE IN DECLINE • Daily Life • Stoopid-People • UK •  
• Comments (2) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner