Dickless Wonder
That slimy piece of communist dogshit. How many people that are/were our friends is he going to piss off? Is he TRYING to do this, or is he just fucking stupid? When is 1776 v2.0?
This is terrible, but I find myself bordering on hatred of O’dingbat and all who worship him. I have become convinced over the past few weeks that O’dingbat is not stupid. He is a marxist/communist who is PURPOSEFULLY and ACTIVELY working to destroy freedom and liberty. His actions and “programs” are unconstitutional, seditious and treasonous.
I haven’t paid much attention to the Birthers, generally considering this to be ridiculous, but I am starting to wonder. Nothing else that O’dingbat says or does has any truth to it. Why should his birthplace be any different?
I’m inspired to quote Clint Eastwood’s character: Dirty Harry Callahan, as this seems to apply to my attitude towards Obama:
Listen, punk. To me you’re nothin’ but dogshit, you understand? And a lot of things can happen to dogshit. It can be scraped up with a shovel off the ground. It can dry up and blow away in the wind. Or it can be stepped on and squashed. So take my advice and be careful where the dog shits ya!
The Big Eared one wants to curry favor with the Chinese so they will continue to carry our Debt,
So The Usurper in Chief can continue to destroy America’s economy in order to arrive at his Goal of a Marxist Utopia, Where everyone is Equal and Subjugated under the Boots of the Elite Commissars.So, how long until the Third World War starts?
And anybody know where I can get affordable material for a fallout shelter?
Though, to be perfectly fair, I can somewhat understand this from the Realpolitik level. Because bluntly, Tibet is all but dead. The Chinese morally wounded it while the West was busy fighting off its main force in Korea and Indochina, and it has been dying a slow death ever since.
By now, even if the Chinese regime’s dominance were to be broken, there is very little of Tibet left to save, if at all. The last bastion is the handful of exiles dedicated to a noble but dying cause.
Perhaps I am pessimistic, but the Peace movement has lost everywhere it has run against unrelenting martial force, and I cannot see a reason that Tibet will be ANY different.
But that still hardly can excuse cowering before the CCP.
And so the downfall continues…
Posted by Turtler
10/06/2009 at 09:22 PM
This was a comment made at the link Drew provided. I find it interesting.
Goes to show that China has the US by the balls; the American government now has to choose between meeting the unelected Dalai Lama who knighted himself “God” for life over the Chinese Tibetan minotrity or seeing US long term treasury rates skyrocket to 25% if China stops buying the freely printed American debt paper. If American homeowners desperately want to worship this unelected Tibetan “God” then they should pitch in and agree to pay 25% mortgage interest rates on their already devalued properties . In short- dont f..k with yr banker when the banker owns you.
Johan de Meulemeester on Oct 5th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
And I have to wonder because this topic has come up under other presidents as well you know.
Just why should Tibet or it’s self appointed ‘God for life’ be any concern to anyone in the west? I honestly don’t understand that. I’d like to understand it. Do we have national interests in Tibet? Have we signed a mutual defense treaty of some kind? An economic agreement that isn’t one way?
Geography was never an ‘A’ subject with me. Hell, had there been a lower grade then ‘F’ I’d have been awarded that. But it occurs to me that Tibet is closer to China’s back yard then it is ours. And btw ... I was cautioned some 16 or more years ago by a stockbroker with regard to the notes China was buying and the investment China had in the US. I have a feeling they’re businessmen before they’re communists no matter who the head of state is in modern China. Yeah. Still a red regime and no doubt but leans quite a bit toward capitalism minus the democracy we enjoy.Guess who else very quietly has HUGE investments in the USA. The Netherlands. Hardly ever hear about em cos they maintain a low profile. Which has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Just thought it was interesting. And unless I’m mistaken, I think I read somewhere that even Belgium companies now own major American beer companies. ??
Whether the Dali Lama is self-elected does not matter. While he may not be the titular head of international Buddhism, (I don’t think they have one) he is the #1 spoke in that karmic wheel. So he’s rather like the Pope in a way. Big time spiritual leader with tons of respect. So you meet with him, period. Plus he is the face of the Free Tibet movement, and it’s absolutely American to support a group like that, even if they don’t stand a snowball’s chance, or even if their motives aren’t utterly pure. (I can’t say that they aren’t, I just don’t know. As Peiper said, who knows what’s up in Tibet?) So you meet with him for that reason too.
Yes, the USA is sold out to the chicoms. Between Walmart and Obama they’ve got us over a barrel. A barrel they sold us, after we gave them the plans and funded building their factory. But that doesn’t mean we bow down to Ole Massah. We stand up for freedom, everywhere. Always. Which is why this is such a huge dis. But it’s no surprise, since we’ve elected a communist. Look at the BS in Central America. Way to go, 52ers. Asshats.
Stupidest move ever made was Nixon going to China and beginning the outsourcing of nearly all our production capabilities to a near-enemy nation. It’s going to take 150 years to get clean of that, especially since right now it’s still accelerating.
Christopher - what I dislike about ‘the birthers’ moniker is that this is not about being born in HA or AfriKa or anywhere else for me - and it certainly isn’t about ‘conspiracy theories’ - it is about the Constitutional requirement (Article 2 Section 1). That and that alone.
Since our vapidly idiotic Senate went apesh*t on McAmnesty for ‘not’ being born in the US - why did they accept a Certification of Live Birth (notice that the phrase, in Hawaii, is not present)for The Won? That is less than what McAmnesty presented, his FS-240 (Certification of American Born Abroad) - they insisted (since the date did not match his birth date by (I think) 11 months to see all documentation - it happens, our youngest’s FS-240 is about 1 year different - I had to get the divorce and marriage certificate from my first husband, like I carry that around with me. McAmnesty was born outside the US in 1935 so I imagine, if any little thing was amiss - they did not have the options I did (in 1988) to get the paperwork.
Yet, yet for a person who has one known not American citizen nor attempting to become one parent - they accept a Certification? When, The Won had gotten a Passport in 1981, hence one has to assume that he had the long form BC to do that - or of course that opens another ‘conspiracy’ can of worms - exactly what passport did he travel on?!?
There are too many valid Constitutional questions here - that have nothing to do with his actual birth place - and the fact that the DNC, the Senate, the House and the Supreme Court not to mention the msm has failed to even bother nor care to ask the questions is what bothers me most.
It is a simple question and has a simple solution which then leads to what is he hiding? And exactly who/how many know - and thus are complicit in this? And since when has the Constitution become ‘not important or the stuff ‘conspiracy’ theories are founded on’?
JayD I would just point out the comment you attached is from one Johan de Meulemeester. He is a turd of the first water. A “merchant banker” in cockney rhyming slang. If you follow the comments you may see some from a guy who calls himself 45Govt. He rips the mule a new one on a daily basis. The mule is constantly banging on about how great the EU is and how crap Britain and America are in comparison. There is some truth in his comments but it is more of a drug dealer-crack head relationship. The Chinese may hold billions in US dollar reserves and if they don’t buy US treasury bonds it will force up interest rates. However if they piss around too much the value of their dollars goes down. Ultimately the US actually has the Chinese over a barrel. They could potentially renege on their debts and refuse to honour the US dollar to overseas debtors. It is a the nuclear option but what could China do? At the moment China is desperately trying to get rid of it’s dollar holdings, but what to do with them? If they buy gold it pushes up the price. If they buy other currencies it pushes up the price and reduces the value of their dollar reserves. You would have to have a heart of stone not to laugh. All because they refused to allow their currency to float to a sensible level. They deliberately held down the value of their currency to make their exports cheap. Now they have billions of pieces of paper with “In God we trust” printed on them. Karl Marx must be revolving at 100,000rpm
Belgium http://www.ab-inbev.com/ and I think South Africa http://www.sabmiller.com/ own much of American beer manufacture today. Though ABInbev is described as a merger I think Inbev are the major shareholder.
Oh and I think it is shameful to kow tow to the Chinese. If you act weak you will be perceived as being weak.
Peiper:
Sorry old chap, but I’m going to have to ding you.
Just why should Tibet or it’s self appointed ‘God for life’ be any concern to anyone in the west? I honestly don’t understand that. I’d like to understand it
OK, so let’s start: all but the most ignorant of the “Free Tibet” advocates will recognize that Tibetan history is hardly the most enlightened or (classically) liberal on the planet, and indeed before the Chinese invasion, it was in large part a feudal hellhole (indeed, the one thing I must say about the Chinese invasion is that its ruthlessness at least knocked down the main pillars to reform so if Tibet is liberated again, it may be able to turn a new leaf). In addition, the Dali Lama’s long exile has brought the Tibetan government in exile into contact with the West, and it has reformed to a large degree from the West (it is now partially elective and far less tyrannical than it once was), and he promises to try and institute a far more enlightened system than there was previously before the invasion. Yes, this is no guarantee that he WILL, persee, but we can always apply.... slight pressure on him.
Do we have national interests in Tibet?
At this point, I think that anything that weakens Red China is a national interest.
Have we signed a mutual defense treaty of some kind? An economic agreement that isn’t one way?
The former no, and the latter maybe. But again, those may be forthcoming if the Red curtain is lifted from Llhasa.
Geography was never an ‘A’ subject with me. Hell, had there been a lower grade then ‘F’ I’d have been awarded that.
Fair enough.
But it occurs to me that Tibet is closer to China’s back yard then it is ours.
True, but again, here you are falling into the insidious logic of Yalta, where you can appease or come to an agreement with the villain if you feed it enough nations, recognize a large enough sphere of influence, to satiate it. The Russians have been arguing the same way to justify the decimation of Georgia, and so has Indonesia.
In addition, it is far closer to our Indian ally than it is to the Chinese heartland, and (as the Sino-Indian conflicts showed) its continued occupation means that China continues to pose a direct threat to Indian freedom, a threat we can hardly allow.
And btw ... I was cautioned some 16 or more years ago by a stockbroker with regard to the notes China was buying and the investment China had in the US.
And rightfully so.
I have a feeling they’re businessmen before they’re communists no matter who the head of state is in modern China. Yeah. Still a red regime and no doubt but leans quite a bit toward capitalism minus the democracy we enjoy.
Perhaps, but be careful, for whatever they are in practice, in ideology they still are the party of Mao, and think of themselves as his heirs. And that makes them a threat, for if they believe in it strongly enough, they may lash out in contradiction of all the “common sense” given by esteemed economists and the like who cannot comprehend the force of ideological fanaticism.
Guess who else very quietly has HUGE investments in the USA. The Netherlands. Hardly ever hear about em cos they maintain a low profile.
Apples and Trombones. The Dutch have no major ideological issues with us, and certainly no longstanding belief that they should challenge us for global primacy. Amsterdam has little reason to harm the US. Beijing just might.
Which has nothing to do with the subject at hand. Just thought it was interesting. And unless I’m mistaken, I think I read somewhere that even Belgium companies now own major American beer companies. ??
Again, those nations are not only far weaker than China, but also lack the ideological conflict Beijing has with us. From them, we have little to fear. From China, we have thew world to fear.
Posted by Turtler
10/08/2009 at 12:33 AM
10/06/2009 at 06:45 PM
10/07/2009 at 01:49 AM
