Cutting In Line

 

1. Wait a minute here. Only 20% of cooks are illegal aliens? Only 25% of construction workers are? How can this be? Didn’t the liberal media tell us that illegals only worked at jobs that no white American would ever do? Therefore, shouldn’t those numbers be 100% of illegals in every column??

   I guess I missed the latest news report telling me not to think so much...

   Posted by Jester       03/29/2006  at  10:36 AM  



2. Jester: My house cleaner is Hungarian.  We need to keep her.

   It’s the lazy ass Americans on welfare that we need to deport to Mexico.

   Posted by Z Woof       03/29/2006  at  10:53 AM  



3. Why haven’t we heard from the Jackson/Sharpton/Obama/Black Caucus front of the Donks on this issue?  American blacks stand to lose the most to illegal immigrants.  Adding 12 million Hispanics to the population already here should be close to putting them in the Number 2 spot in the Donks racist politics race.

   Since affirmative action has been enshrined in American law and Federal largess is doled out based on skin color and not by actual need, the Hispanics would seem able to claim the lion’s share of the welfare/entitlements pie now offered.

   Posted by rudebadger       03/29/2006  at  11:17 AM  



4. If you want to ban racial preferences then Zandstra is your man OCM.

   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
   2/2/06 Contact: John Patrick Yob
   (231) 519-1229

   Poll Results: Zandstra Skyrockets, Bouchard Drops Significantly When Racial Preference Position Known
   Zandstra also releases FEC Report showing over $400,000 total raised and FEC- mandated database in-kind donation

   Grand Rapids – Today the Jerry Zandstra for U.S. Senate campaign released a poll showing the candidates within the margin of error on the initial ballot test. Support for Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard drops tremendously when GOP primary voters learn he refuses to support the proposal to ban racial preferences.

   “All the money bet in Detroit this weekend can’t make up for their gamble in opposition to banning racial preferences,” said Jerry Zandstra. “This poll clearly shows that we will be successful once primary voters compare our principled positions on issues such as racial preference with the oppositions’ liberal stance.”

   The poll of likely GOP Primary voters was conducted by Strategic National Consulting from January 26-31 and has a sample size of 300. The results of the poll were as follows:

   If the Primary Election for U.S. Senate was held today, and the following candidates were running, whom would you vote for?
   17% Bouchard 16% Zandstra 15% Butler 52% Undecided

   There is a proposal on the Michigan ballot in 2006 that will read:

   A PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO BAN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS THAT GIVE PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT TO GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS BASED ON THEIR RACE, GENDER, COLOR, ETHNICITY OR NATIONAL ORIGIN FOR PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION OR CONTRACTING PURPOSES.

   Do you support this proposal?
   78% Yes 22% No

   If you knew that Jerry Zandstra supported the proposal to ban racial preferences in Michigan, and Mike Bouchard and Keith Butler opposed the proposal to ban racial preferences in Michigan, would that effect your vote?
   66% Yes 34% No

   Now that you know what you know, who would you vote for if the election was today?
   42% Zandstra 8% Bouchard 8% Butler 42% Undecided

   It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give racial preference.

   Vote Republican / Vote Zandstra for US Senate

   Posted by Z Woof       03/29/2006  at  12:54 PM  



5. Thank God for the InterNet or else we’d might actually believe that the illegals do the work that no one in America ‘will do.’ What garbage . . . I remember being educated, fluent in English, just out of a clerk/typist positon - trying to get a job and watching a Cambodian who did not speak English walk out with a job. What was wrong with that picture?!? Then being told a few weeks later, if I’d gone in with my application (physically carried it to person hiring) I’d have gotten the job - because I don’t look white. Made me love living in America . . . NOT.

   That is what is wrong with this issue - where color - is more important than education, experience or citizenship. That is WRONG. Sorry they are not migrants, not workers, not undocumented, not unauthorized (what euphemistic crappola) - they are criminals. 

   I have no problem with immigration - just with anyone being in America illegally. And you would think that after 9/11 everyone could get on board with that one. But not the Dems., calling Tancredo a racist. Pure political bs. Just go home.  Personally, I favor shooting on sight at the border - I believe that just might slow them down a bit.

   Posted by wardmama4       03/29/2006  at  01:58 PM  



6. 

   OCM: I LOVE that idea! And you are quite correct, we cannot let this go. We have to keep on this issue, or it will fade into the vast emptiness that is American’s VERY short lived memories.

   We MUST stop this, or our country will be in the same hole the Euro-peons find themselves in now.

   Posted by Agamemnon       03/30/2006  at  12:44 AM  



7. HE’S GOT MY VOTE How do you stand on Gov.?  Keep up the good work Z

   Posted by bat crusher       03/30/2006  at  05:14 AM  



8. bat crusher: I have the phone number of Dick Devos, a relative of the real Billionaire Dick Devos.  It was interesting talking with him and what he thought of his cousin.  I will just say that Devos is not as quick as Zandstra. 

   There is no choice for Gov in the primary because lazy ass Ted Nugent didn’t run with his Crowbar of Truth.  Everybody should support Republican Devos over Socialist Governor Granholm.  Granholm is a fine girl, but she is a Canadian FurTrapper who said, “It’s a Travesty we don’t have Socialized Medicine like Canada.”

   Maybe the rich Devos can ride the Zandstra Movement (ZM) into office.

   We need ONE smart Senator in Washington DC, Vote Zandstra for US Senate

   Posted by Z Woof       03/30/2006  at  06:40 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.