Can’t imagine what Major Malik Nadal Hasan’s motivation could have been.

 

1. Of course we know what his motivation was. But there are still questions… like, “why Thursday? why that target? why didn’t you just resign?” But the questions about why he did it are there for anyone with eyes to see.

   Posted by Spike72AFA       11/10/2009  at  04:59 PM  



2. A couple of good links:

   Ace of Spades HQ:
   Everyone’s First Thought After Hearing About “Possible Muslim Backlash” in the Media? “My God, How Many Have They Killed This Time?”

   Doug Ross @ Journal: 
   Eyewitness account of Fort Hood shooting (unconfirmed)

   The motivation is incredibly clear for those who haven’t been hoodwinked, and spun around multiple times by the Dems/Media (Can you tell those groups apart anymore? I can’t...)

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       11/10/2009  at  07:01 PM  



3. Well, now it seems that he was trading emails with an imam known for terrorist activities… However, it has no connection! Really! It was part of his study on Muslims!

   Bunch of pandering media whores.

   Oh, and they are trying to make it look like it was all the military and the FBI’s fault too! What a disgusting crock of fetid animal waste products.

   bah…
   Bill

   Posted by Doctor DETH       11/11/2009  at  05:49 AM  



4. Certainly not all the fault of the military and FBI, no, though there are a couple of things each group could improve on to respond to attacks like this.

   Military:  Allow personal carry of sidearms on base by officers and NCO’s.  The Ft. Dix and Ft. Hood incidents should be sufficient to demonstrate that having weapons and ammo under lock and key is not a good policy when it comes to responding to a shooter (or group of shooters) intent on murdering many unarmed persons in a short period of time.  It is high time to learn that gun-free zones are seen as target-rich environments by attackers with murderous intent.  The devils are already armed and willing to break any law or regulation to achieve their goal.  All I’m asking is let’s re-arm the angels and give them a fighting chance.

   FBI:  Bureau REALLY needs to drop the knee-jerk “This is not an act of terrorism” statement that they make after a terrorist attack.  First, they’re making them so soon after the event that everyone’s left asking, “Based on what evidence?” They can’t possibly have facts to back up the statement so soon after an incident, so Bureau ends up looking ignorant and incompetent.  Second, if they later get disproven by a huge amount of evidence contrary to their initial statement, they look like they were trying to cover up for the terrorist attackers, making Bureau look complicit, conspiratorial, untrustworthy, and malevolent.

   Posted by Argentium G. Tiger       11/11/2009  at  07:05 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.