Which Three?

 

1. Yeah, good luck with that one. At best you’d get some hemming and hawing and a big bloviation on “We’d have to look at all of them and see which ones have precedence” blah blah blah. Too bad, because there’s some easy low hanging fruit to pick here.

   My first pick would be the 50 caliber laws. If you can pick it up it’s a gun; if it’s so heavy it needs wheels then it’s artillery and might be covered under different laws (explosive projectiles etc). So no limits on caliber. That’s nonsense.

   Next I’d take on the “cop killer bullets” bullshit. Any decent deer rifle round will go right through any bulletproof vest ever made, maybe even two of them at once, even with cast lead bullets. So a bit of teflon on a pistol bullet don’t mean jack.

   My third pick would be NJ’s beyond idiotic hollowpoint bullet law. It’s just bass-ackwards. Shooting goblins with HPs is responsible. It drops the goblin faster and limits over-penetration.

   Fourth would be hi-cap magazines. Total pablum. If I can swap a new 10 round mag in and out in under a second, what difference is it going to make on my rate of fire if that mag holds 11 or even 15 rounds? Just about zilch.

   Fifth would be ... hey this is too easy!

   50 state Shall Issue CCW/OC with national reciprocity would be a real biggie. It would bring gun ownership/handgun licensing up to an equal legal level with driver’s licences and marriage licenses. National castle doctrine would be next up. I want a candidate with the cojones to push for those.

   Posted by Drew458       08/30/2007  at  11:43 AM  



2. This question is great!

   I hope it gets used!

   Think about how bad it would stump any candidate that wasn’t really pro personal freedom…

   mike in Kissimmee

   Posted by Phathonky       09/01/2007  at  01:19 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.