Weekly Top 10 List
on 10/06/2006 at 11:10 AM
How the hell could Clinton pardon that slime ball Reynolds? Could there have been a Quid Pro Quo?? Perhaps Reynolds and Billy shared some experiences??? Something smells
The Demoncrats learned a simple lesson in the old grade school rhyme,
I’m rubber, you’re glue,
Whatever you say, whatever you do,
Bounces off me and stick on you!Even I have to grudgingly respect these evil fucks. It’s their only trick but they make it work over and over again.
This is just a weak attempt at their version of an “October Surprise” which may well blow up in their collective faces..
Heck, even the “sainted” FDR had his girlfriends, and allegedly, so did Eleanor. (wink wink, nudge, nudge, know what I mean, eh?)
JFK was known to sow his wild oats a bit, too…
Now it’s the GOP’s turn… (heh heh heh heh heh muahahahah...)
-Ernst Stavro Rove Rumsfeld,
Supreme eader and chief poobah of the [B]Supreme Command Ruling Over The Unwashed Masses
Oops that’s Supreme Leader, and it was supposed to be in BOLD
Some underling shall pay the ultimate price…
Hark! An anonymous (scared, chicken little, whimpie) Clintonista has spoken!
All Hail Michael More, Heil Soros, and Praisedbe Noam Chomsky (PBUH)…
- or more like Chimpsky (BPUH)
Gerry Studds never needed to use bookmarks.
Why, you may ask ?
Because he was always bending over the pages.
Hey Anyonymous -
!!
Regular readers know I rarely even get peeved at outrageous comments, but you’re begging for a troll-smack. So bend over, I’ve got the cluebat all greased up and ready. Oh, you like it like that? Ok, I’ll give it a dip in gravel and sand first, for extra stimulus.
I doubt if even one regular reader of this blog ascribes to a single aspect of what you dribbled off your keyboard. So you’re wrong on all seven of your critiques. The Skipper is only pointing out that sex scandals are nothing new in government, and most of them are a whole lot worse than the Foley Flap. Notice also that he didn’t even mention former President Clinton, who had at least a dozen sex scandals of his own.
We don’t want any of these zipper heads in office if they can’t control their urges and prey on the vulnerable. That being said, so far nothing I’ve seen indicates that Foley actually got some action from these youngsters, which makes this a lesser scandal than 9 of the 10 outlined above.
”Worshipping Chimpletons”? My goodness! Let me write that one down and be sure to add it to my dictionary. It sounds like Anonymous has a real problem with the old “Do as I say, not as I do” rule, eh? Perhaps he didn’t get his ass beat often enough as a child?
Anon, I’m not permitted to “obfuscate” during Ramadan, the Great Ayatollah says it is forbidden!
Reference comment #5:
“When I was a kid,” is it? Do adults crap their pants in public as you did here?
And if you ever “got your ass beat,” obviously you didn’t get it enough.Go troll (i.e., go crap your pants) on some cyber-cesspool like DU, where soiled pants are badges of political respectability.
And many thanks, Skipper, for reassembling all these memories.
By the way, even if it had nothing to do with sex, let none of us forget the great Check Kiting Scandal. There were so many paperhangers running around Washington in those days that the most famous paperhanger of them all would have been green with envy.
Hey Tannenberg, I always wondered where that salute came from. It’s the “hold the wallpaper up until the paste dries” gesture!
Good shot, Drew! Keep up the good work.
You worshipping Chimpletons are worse than children. Instead of demanding better, you obfuscate, apologize, and lie.
Hmmmm, I won’t comment on the spelling, nor will I comment on the character of anonymous. Instead anon is in for a fisking.
1) Ad hominem attacks usually are a last resort because the slinger of the crap doesn’t either have a good argument or the intellect to state that argument.
2) Obfuscate? Care to point out where anyone has tried to hide the facts on this web site? We’ve had some pretty good arguments between conservatives debating over conservative issues. Unlike leftist liberals we do endeavor to debate honestly and when facts, however unpleasant (now remember I said facts-not fiction) are brought to light then the debate continues on without mud slinging.
3) Apologize? Got to do better than that. Suggest you read some of the archives to see if we’re apologetic when it comes to either sleaze, dirbags, or stupidity. Try again.
4) Lies? Damn, this isn’t Um Yeah is it? Nope, the spelling is too good and there aren’t any F*ck you all type comments. Got any proof about lying Chuckles? Point it out or leave.
