BMEWS
 

THE TIPPING POINT …. CONTINUED

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 05/18/2012 at 07:17 AM   
 
  1. This is all straight out of Mark Steyn; the muzzies DON’T NEED VIOLENT JIHAD to conquer Europe. They just need fertile women and another generation or two at most.

    For them, it’s a “Swipe Yo EBT” situation ...
    “all ya got ta do is fuck
    and 9 months later you’re in the big bucks”

    All they have to do is breed, whether their spawn sucks dry the teat of government largess or not. “9 months” might be another 18 years, but the point is the same, and it’s the same over here as well: a very large part of the white West has been raised on Zero Population Growth, and has seen the materialistic benefits of two career couples ... and they are living large, and not having a passel (or is it a “hassle”?) of children. In Europe, under statism ... especially in Russia under communism ... them whiteys ain’t hardly breedin’ at all. Enter the muzzies, brought into Europe to be the new semi-slave class. They come from nothing, and are used to it. Poverty is poverty with no children or 12 of them.

    In the USA a similar situation exists, but it’s an odd semi-reversal: the coastal white super-liberals are all into the Green stuff, ZPG, no impact low carbon footprint blah blah, one baby at 37 only if my 401K is fully loaded, and they are not really breeding a replacement population. It’s them damn cracker rednecks in flyover country who are having the kids, though they are losing the race to the blacks and the browns right now. A breeding race which would be over and the whites would win here ... and lessen the USA’s carbon footprint and “immoral” usage of so much of Mother Gaia’s resources ... if the anchor baby thing was taken away and the deportation of massive numbers of illegals was implemented. Cruel, evil, horrible and Nazi-ish of me to say it, but those browner breeders would still have just as many children back in the hot lands south of the border, but a much larger percentage of them would not survive. Because, you know, health care in the USA is really only 43rd in the world or whatever.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   05/18/2012  at  09:43 AM  

  2. Damn! Drew beat me to the Mark Steyn reference. But I bet Drew doesn’t have an autographed copy of Mark Steyn’s book ‘America Alone’. Personalized, based on an email conversation I had with Mr. Steyn when ‘America Alone’ was published. Imagineā€¦a famous guy like that answering his own emails.

    I fear I’m guilty of being a ‘non-breeder’. I thought I was making a decent contribution by being a step-father for my wife’s two boys. Her ex was a violent alcoholic and she finally left him when he threatened the boys. But I’ve no children of my own. She’d had her tubes tied, not wishing any more children by her (now deceased) ex. She was planning on leaving him anyway, his threats to the boys just advanced the schedule.

    I pretty certain that ‘anchor babies’ are unConstitutional. The Founders envisioned ‘natural born citizens’ to be children whose parents were both US citizens, with no allegiance to another country. B.O. fails this test, as his father was a Kenyan-born British citizen. Indeed, if you haven’t seen this today, observe:

    Obama-Closeup-2.png

    Apparently, in 1991, B.O. was born in Kenya. To a Kenyan father.

    Source article: http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

    Posted by Christopher    United States   05/18/2012  at  10:25 AM  

  3. I guess that means we can once again call the French Cheese-Eating Surrender Monkeys!

    Posted by Macker    United States   05/21/2012  at  12:37 PM  

  4. Here’s the key point in the whole thing.  Just the same as our “Dear Leader” is trying to do here with his lack of immigration control and refusal to implement clean voter roles for our elections.

    He also pledged to change French electoral laws so that Muslim residents without French citizenship would be allowed to vote in municipal elections as of 2014,

    What is it about Liberals these days that makes them so determined to destroy their own society and culture?

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   05/21/2012  at  06:20 PM  

  5. it wont be the first time (2 others in the last 70 years to my knowledge) that the left will be ruinous to the french, their bad, they deserve what they get, they vote for the left!

    Posted by Chris Edwards    Canada   05/21/2012  at  08:02 PM  

  6. Chris, what do you (and Lyndon if here)make of the recent advances by Labour under Miliband?
    Did you see Melanie Phillips column?  I think she understands and advances the argument very well. Scary.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   05/22/2012  at  02:53 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Past The Tipping Point And Down The Slippery Slope

Previous entry: Chess Problem #237

<< BMEWS Main Page >>