lets not forget British police tried to prosecute Channel four over the Dispatches program that showed mad mullahs inciting islamic droids to commit murder. You would like to think this was a case of Sun-tzu “keep your enemies close” but since Scotland Yard was until recently run by the muslim appeaser Ian Blair I have my doubts. What’s the betting this scumbag is a failed asylum seeker?
Near speechless, but LMAO!
Would it do any good to give Scotland Yard the benefit of the doubt? Is it possible that Harrath was “turned” and is actually a good resource for them? There’s the old saying about it takes a thief to catch a thief. Working with the Islam Channel would improve his cover.
That may be a bit much to hope, still, I’d like to believe that our allies in the war on terror aren’t as stupid as they often seem. A guy’s gotta have hope.
You would like to think that Scotland Yard are not this stupid, but as I say they are full up at the top with policemen who have never been policemen. They came straight from University with their social science degrees and were groomed for the top slots.
According to the Times this assclown’s TV channel has already been fined £30,000 for allowing a “Respect party” candidate (our old friend Galloway) to peddle propaganda. When Melanie Phillips put out her book Londonistan the righteous were horrified. Seems she underestimated just how bad it is.
This doesn’t surprise me at all. The bobbies are micromanaged to a degree not seen in our country. Everything is codified leaving no room for common sense - therefore it becomes uncommon. Alas, poor England, we knew ye well.
In the updated version of my book Londonistan, I wrote that the former Met officer Lambert has been going round telling counter-terrorism officers in other countries that terrorism could not be fought by contact with moderate Muslims but through partnerships with the Salafists. As a result, he said he actually employed a Salafist officer within the Metropolitan Police Contact Unit (I was subsequently told that in fact there were now two Salafist officers in that unit).
The implications are mind- blowing. The Muslim Contact Unit is part of the Met’s Counter-Terror Command. Even if – as I was assured – these officers have no access to counter-terrorist operational data, the fact that they are there at all, with whatever access they have to police information, is simply astounding. As I wrote in my book:
Commander Lambert believed that this would enable the police to understand the way extremists thought before they committed any acts of terror. But it surely goes without saying that a Salafist officer, who is committed to the overthrow of the west and its replacement by an Islamic society, poses a security risk of the first order. For a police counter-terrorism specialist to be promoting this situation beggars belief.
It’s all because of this extraordinary belief by the higher echelons of the British security world that Islamist extremism is the antidote to Islamist terrorism – that the Muslim Brotherhood are useful allies against al Qaeda. That utterly false belief derives in turn from the refusal by the establishment to accept that what we are facing is an Islamic jihad, a religious war against the non-Islamic world. They really think that Islamist terror has nothing to do with religion.
The result is as we can see today – Britain’s principal counter-terrorist force appointing a man with links to Islamist terrorism as an adviser on how to deal with Islamist terrorism.
Utter lunacy.
Madness
from the excellent Melanie Phllips here…
http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3088576/lunacy-at-the-yard.thtml#comments