True humor works because it is always based on truth.
Is it not a house of ill repute? Is it not chock full of whores who will sell themselves to the highest bidders (and some exceptionally low ones, too)?
Hah!
Dems don’t have minds, wits or intelligence or they would not keep backing the wrong horse year after year. This last ‘election cycle’ (Nov 2006 to present) however may be the ultimate undoing of the entire DNC - Dean as the head screamer, Pelosi as the Shrieker of the House, Loser Reid as Head of the Senate and now a inexperienced empty suit with a lying stupid suit as their ticket for Nov.
I’m voting for what’s-his-name and Sarah Palin!
And I’m predicting a 50 (not 57) state loss for Obama - because for those who can’t bring themselves to vote for McCain there is always Bob Barr - or not voting. Lots and lots of choices to torpedo the Obama/Biden ticket.
"Dems.” I’m sick of that piece of slang. It sounds too much like a pet name, too damned friendly. Even “donks” is a little shopworn, even if they are not inappropriately represented by a jackass.
It will be a good thing if someone can produce a handle for those specimens that is descriptive, pungent, and applicable only to them.
Produce it and get it into the dialogue! Better today than tomorrow!
You mean there is some language that isn’t being used on a blog? Hell, look at the “Kos” and those other online urinals!
They can’t invent bad language fast enough to keep up with the demand at such places.
"Krock of shit,” probably.
Certainly for all practical purposes!
Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy and Johnson, what would any of them say if they were alive today? Then again, the current crop of “progressives” would probably call them reactionary conservatives and appoint a committee to investigate their activities.
Tannenberg, I hereby wish to propose the word Neofascist as the proper designation for the Democrats. They are certainly crats ,rhymes with bats, but there is nothing democratic about them.