Gird Your Loins

 

1. Let’s hope they do.  Should’ve done it last week when the iron was hot right after the disastrous “Kelo” decision.

   God, please give the R’s in congress some mutherfucking balls and put some duct tape over McCain’s mouth!

   Posted by ztucka       07/01/2005  at  02:38 PM  



2. Don’t recall that MoveOn PAC said a word when the Supremes pissed all over our individual property rights.  All these bastards want is an expansion of government power that suits their Liberal agenda and the Party of Treason will be right there with them.

   Posted by MAJ Mike       07/01/2005  at  02:45 PM  



3. They certainly won’t let facts get in the way of their arguments, that’s for sure.

   Take for example the recent medical marijuana decision. It was three “Conservatives” who dissented. The libs forsook what is generally considered a “Liberal/Progressive” cause.

   Of course, it was “Conservatives” who dissented on the stealing of private property for private use too. I suppose that’s to be expected.

   Roe v Wade, the “benchmark” of selection for some, was a 7-2 decision passed due to conservative-appointed justices. Abortions became more restricted and less available while Clinton was in office than when Reagan was in office.

   This factual history will be ignored in favor of partisan lies legend though.

   Posted by StinKerr       07/01/2005  at  02:48 PM  



4. The congressional decision to snap shut the purse on the land-grabbers demonstrates that they will pay attention when the voters point blowtorches at their butts.

   We are all part of the blowtorch.  Load and light!

   

   Posted by Tannenberg       07/01/2005  at  03:42 PM  



5. I say we need to have a ball check just to see who’s gottum and who ain’t!! So we’ll know who we can count on. No offense to you ladies even thought i’m sure Janet Reno had a set but were rarely used.  I think the Hilderbeast has probably got a set too (stolen from Slick) but we need to count the Repubic side first.

   Posted by texman0000       07/01/2005  at  04:55 PM  



6. Tex,

   You don’t really think Slick would give up his nuts, do you?  Hillary got her set when McCain gave his up for the bi-partisan happiness auction.

   Shew..  Lots of testosterone on this thread.  I’m leaving before I get some chest hair.

   ARR ARR ARRRR

   Posted by Phoenix       07/01/2005  at  10:29 PM  



7. I plan on nailing McCain’s Ass to the wall with my letter which I’ll write this weekend. I will also plan on being much kinder to Senator Kyl.

   As far as the MoveOn.org ad...par for the course from those motherfuckers!
   LET’S GET IT ON!

   Posted by Macker       07/01/2005  at  11:24 PM  



8. Senator Hagel (R-NE) is mad Moveon.ass is quoting him in their commercials.

   What did he expect?

   Posted by Z Woof       07/02/2005  at  10:46 AM  



9. Personally, I don’t think that Frist has the balls to go nuclear. Go jello, maybe but not nuclear. It is going to be u-g-l-y. It wouldn’t surprise me if several good nominees decline because they don’t want the anal examination. Remember Robert Bork? The dictionary now lists Borking as a word to denote character assassination.

   Some where I heard that El Jezerra is also quoting Durbin the Turbin and Hagel the Hack. Iffn I were inclined to run for Durbins seat in IL, that would be my lead.

   Posted by yatalli       07/02/2005  at  11:53 AM  



10. Yatalli,

    If you were inclined to run for President in 2008, in Ames, IA, in the Republican Party against Senator Hagel, you would say the exact same thing.

    I don’t think Tubin Durin will be running there.

    Senator Hagel used to be my Senator and he is a pretty smart guy.  He would be those Camel Jockey’s worst nightmare.  He is still in the running in my book.  Even though it’s tough for a Senator to be Prez.

    If you did use that arguement against Hagel I’m sure he will have a good come back.

    Posted by Z Woof       07/02/2005  at  12:13 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.