And people want socialized medicine......having a Fake Press Conference with Fake Reporters is bad enough… Wait till your Surgery with Fake Doctors.......Yikes!!!
I dunno ... is it such a bad thing really? They made a press release statement, and answered a few questions, albeit in a prepared manner. Perhaps it would have been better to just answer the questions within the context of the statement.
Does it make any difference if there were no reporters there? ie., If a tree falls in the forest ...
Okay, they should have said “This is a prepared statement utilizing prepared questions” just for clarity. With that in mind,
1. Were the questions appropriate to the situation?
2. Were the answers honest and truthful?
Or is the objection simply the moonbat press wasn’t there to ask ‘penetrating questions’ like, “Do you still hate black people in Louisiana?” or “Why aren’t all the houses rebuilt already?” or “Could you explain why this happened during President Bush’s administration?”
As far as I can tell, it was an exercise in publishing information on the matter. What is the problem?
Can we look at this and say “fake but accurate”?
I think half the questions reporters ask are to show us what big deals they are, and half of the other half asked are asked to push their own biased agenda. So maybe 1 question in 4 is actually looking for more information.
FEMA got burned over Katrina but good. I think they fumbled the ball a bit there, but nowhere near as much as the media portrayed it. (Don’t forget that so many of those “the sky is falling!” MSM stories from NOLA were based on rumors or totally made up. And FEMA was lambasted because they didn’t respond to cure those non-existant problems.) I’d be a bit gun shy too if I were them.
But yeah, this time they shoulda said it was a prepared thingy.
Overall impact on the California disaster? 0.00000000000001%.
Next entry: News Release You Won't See
Previous entry: Thank You Senator McCain