Controversial anti-Muslim MP banned from the UK because of public order fears . (COWARDS)

 

1. I downloaded Mr. Wilders video right after it came out.  It’s interesting the Moslems find it offensive.  What the video shows is a passage from the Koran, followed by video of Moslems carrying out the directions given in the Koran.

   They may be ashamed of it.  They may not want people to see their real nature.  Whatever bothers them about it does not come from any distortion or lie about Islam, Mohamed or the Koran.  It’s presented very concisely. 

   So, do we have any Moslem readers out there?  I know I’ve written enough to piss you off.  Thank G-d you don’t know where I live.  What do you have to say?  Can you honestly show the Mr. Wilders is lying?  Can you say that he is misquoting the Koran?  You’d better be very exact with that one.  Some of the people here will tear your arguments apart if you even get a comma wrong. 

   You won’t respond honestly.  You won’t try to defend or enlighten.  You may try to divert attention to something else, Israel is popular these day.  You may gloss over key points rather than give a precise and direct answer to some of the issues.  We’ve seen it all from the Islamic community.  That’s why so many here hold you in such contempt.

   Hey Moslems, here’s you challenge.  I’ve called the very foundation of your belief and how you practice it into question.  What do you have to say for yourselves?  It’s an open forum, you can write pretty much anything you want.  Just be sure you’re ready to defend it, fact by fact, point by point.  Show us where we are wrong.  Despite our beliefs about you, we are also an honest bunch, willing to explore and learn.

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       02/10/2009  at  04:45 PM  



2. Dr. Jeff I’m sure I can hear crickets chirping!

   This is an interesting dilemma for the socialists. Do they pander to their voters? (Jack “man of” Straw represents a constituency which has a substantial muslim vote). Or do you make a stand for democracy? Well this is Labour remember. They have slumped to 28% in the latest polls and the real irony is their natural supporters are drifting towards supporting the odious BNP. Do they think bending over and grabbing their ankles for the “religion of peace” will endear them to their supporters? I think they have lost the plot. This all started when someone from the House of Lords invited Wilders to speak. One of the “Lords” called Ahmed (wonder what his religion is?) threatened anarchy by blockading parliament with ten thousand religion of <s>pissers</s> peace followers.

   http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2009/2/3/4079210.html

   Oh and what do we know about “Lord” Ahmed? Well he is this scumbag killer who like as not will get away with murder.

   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/labour/3539830/Lord-Ahmed-admits-sending-text-message-while-driving-just-before-fatal-crash.html

   I would just like to say that as far as I am concerned the present government of Britain does not represent me and the other 70% of the population that didn’t vote for these traitors.

   Posted by LyndonB       02/10/2009  at  05:38 PM  



3. What the hell is the UK paying their police for if not to keep order?  The UK gov’t sure doesn’t mind the Islamists offending everyone else, that’s for sure.  So what if they riot?  That’s what rubber bullets, tear gas and riot batons are for.

   Posted by Joseph       02/11/2009  at  12:21 AM  



4. Why rubber?

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       02/11/2009  at  12:46 AM  



5. Why rubber?

   Indeed. Using real bullets saves valuable resources. No need for nasty chemicals. And it keeps the undertakers employed. The use of real bullets creates jobs. Undertakers have to hire help… employers of the deceased have to hire replacement help… etc.

   A win-win situation!

   Posted by Christopher       02/11/2009  at  02:24 AM  



6. Oh, the mooselips are just worried that if enough attention is drawn to what they really are, those not of that ilk will turn on them.

   Posted by cmblake6       02/11/2009  at  09:18 AM  



7. He’s banned from Britain because the movie “Fitna” qualifies as “unacceptable behaviour”, “extremism”, and a threat to “public order”....
   Fitna, Fitna..... isn’t that the very film that several prominent Muslims have said could be used as a Muslim terrorist training film, without even any editing? That it’s exactly the kind of film THEY make?
   Why do I get the feeling that if Mr. Wilders was a Muslim himself, he’d be free to show that film anywhere?

   Posted by GrumpyOldFart       02/11/2009  at  11:40 AM  



8. A controversial Dutch politician has been sent back to Holland after trying to enter Britain to show his anti-Muslim film in the House of Lords.

   Is anyone surprised?  Thought not.

   Posted by peiper       02/12/2009  at  12:18 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.