Bandwidth Hogs

 

1. Those nekkid wimmin will get you every time!

   Posted by wardmama4       07/25/2007  at  07:47 AM  



2. What, you mean there’s more to the Internet than porn?

   Posted by Josh C.       07/25/2007  at  09:55 AM  



3. Unfortunately, removal of nekkid women usually result in a similar looking graph for site visits.

   Posted by mojoe       07/25/2007  at  12:42 PM  



4. Allan is turning in his grave, or urn, or wherever he wound up.

   Posted by Yellow Dog       07/25/2007  at  05:11 PM  



5. So?
   Ok.
   Near the end of each month, then maybe conditions will allow a splurge! 

   Posted by Officer Pupp       07/25/2007  at  08:13 PM  



6. Censorship! First Amendment! Repression! Suppression!

   Miss them ta-tas…

   Posted by Rickvid in Seattle       07/26/2007  at  10:52 AM  



7. Alas, one of the captain’s favorites now gone....  I miss him even more.

   Posted by Conservative Nurse       07/26/2007  at  04:01 PM  



8. LOL...typical. Bandwidth wasted, and its not even really traffic to the site. Good save Mr. Christian!
   

   Posted by Agamemnon       07/27/2007  at  12:44 PM  



9. Allan is turning in his grave, or urn, or wherever he wound up.

   Hate to say it but the inadvertent deleting of a post of a naked woman by Vilmar is what led to their demise.

   Posted by BobF       07/27/2007  at  01:44 PM  



10. Statistically speaking, I’m not so sure the removal of the fine lasses can be correlated to the bandwidth usage.  We need to prove a stronger correlation of the bandwith consumption to the ‘Weekend Eye Candy’.  The only way to do this of course would be to restore the site to its former glory and see what happens.

    I’m no mathematician, “But I did stay at a Holiday Inn last night.”

    Posted by Fine Old Cannibal       07/27/2007  at  09:49 PM  



11. Bravo Mr. Christian.

    Surely there’s enough pr0n out there that BMEWS doesn’t need to provide it.

    I’ll even give y’all a free link: http://www.domai.com/news/

    Posted by Christopher       07/29/2007  at  01:24 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.