Abstinence, Evil; Promiscuity, Good!

 

1. Spell check the title Vilmar.

   Posted by Steel Turman       04/03/2005  at  09:33 AM  



2. Right on, Vilmar!

   Posted by lisar915       04/03/2005  at  10:50 AM  



3. very funny OCM.

   Posted by lisar915       04/03/2005  at  10:51 AM  



4. "The school was very supportive of my home-schooling efforts.  They mailed condoms to my son.” Mallard Fillmore (paraphrase)

   Off to Chicago to help the kids with a Grandson who has the flu.

   Posted by Oink       04/03/2005  at  11:30 AM  



5. Steel, why?  What’s wrong with it?

   Posted by Vilmar       04/03/2005  at  12:13 PM  



6. Vilmar: the question should be “what was wrong with it?” Methinks the automatic spell checker got to it.

   

   Posted by The Skipper       04/03/2005  at  12:30 PM  



7. I gotta wonder about the wisdom of installing condoms on cucumbers. If you need instruction then you are probably too stupid to need the condom in the first place. Then again, if you are in need of instruction, you should be the highest priority for contraception. What a dilema. Maybe testing is the answer. You fail to cloak the cuc and you loose your right to reproduce (sterilization)? Even Planned Parenthood should be able to get behind that proposition.

   Posted by yatalli       04/03/2005  at  12:46 PM  



8. A conversation I had with one of these lib-tards over values:

   Him:  “You can’t force your values on me!”
   Me:  “I’m not forcing them, I am stating my opinion.”
   Him:  “Well, when you talk that way, you are forcing your views of morality and values on me.”
   Me:  “So it’s OK for you to force your views of morality and values on me but not the other way around?”
   Him:  “My opinion is not morality or values.”
   Me:  “Exactly, your opinion has no moral values whatsoever.”

   He actually had to think about that for a minute then stormed off in a huff.  I laughed for 10 minutes.

   Posted by John C       04/03/2005  at  01:09 PM  



9. Good shot, JohnC!  I will add that one to the arsenal!

   

   Posted by Tannenberg       04/03/2005  at  02:00 PM  



10. Vilmar, if use of the word “hate” bothers those who actually do the hating around here (must be professional jealousy), then try “loathe” or “despise.”

    Knee-jerk reactions to those two words aren’t yet in vogue, so far as I know.

    

    Posted by Tannenberg       04/03/2005  at  02:05 PM  



11. Yes indeed.  The bigger the vocabulary, the better.  Make the opposition think and drive them nuts.  Never fails.

    

    Posted by Tannenberg       04/03/2005  at  02:39 PM  



12. So this guy crashes his car and suddenly he is in a mile-long line at the pearly gates.  Suddenly there is cheering, hugging, handshaking and high-fives—starting from the front of the line and working back.

    By the time the excitement reaches our guy nobody knows what it’s about.  So he yells, “WHAT"S THE NEWS?” Some guy yells back, ‘THEY’RE NOT COUNTING FUCKING!”

    Posted by Oink       04/03/2005  at  05:19 PM  



13. Why don’t we just round up all of the ACLU members’ children? Adorn them in t-shirts “Unrestricted Sex Available”, then drop them at the meetings of NAMBLA, GLADD etc; then we can watch the hypocrisy unfold before our eyes.

    Posted by Apathy or freedom       04/03/2005  at  09:26 PM  



14. Most ACLU types that I have seen are hardly the family type.

    Posted by Tannenberg       04/04/2005  at  07:33 AM  



15. More than I cared to.

    

    Posted by Tannenberg       04/04/2005  at  11:20 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.