Monday - April 29, 2013

council worries about causing distress to thug who beats up 10 yr old girl, leaves her for dead

They just can not help themselves it seems.
It’s always the rights and the feelings of the nasty folks must be protected and the general population can go screw themselves.
All in the name of “rights” of course.

How’s this for double speak ?  Welcome to our brave new world, where up is down etc. 

The bitch is worried about the harm it might do, the “distress” it may cause the miserable thug, the verminous sub human thug who almost killed a ten yr old girl. He beat the hell out of her, left her for dead, and the council responsible for the cretin had nothing more to say.

Take a look at this face.  Doesn’t just looking at this creep make you want to destroy it?

The council knew about his previous record, it wasn’t news to them.  But they allowed the creep freedom of movement and warned nobody of his record. 

Society stupidly thinks sub species like this can be cured of whatever it is that makes them evil.  The fact is, some are beyond any human understanding and are wasters of space.  They deserve to be euthanized.  No, I take that last one back. I want him to hurt.  Start with the rack and work from there.  It’s the very least he deserves.

In refusing to release the internal report, Julie Grant, a reviewing officer for Stockton Borough Council, wrote:

‘The review of procedures centred on an audit of social care intervention in respect of a living individual.
‘Given the passage of time and the fact that the criminal proceedings are concluded any disclosure of personal data arising from the councils audit is in my view unwarranted.
‘Disclosure would not cause any embarrassment for the council but it is likely to cause further harm and distress to Connor Hodgson.’

And just why the hell should anyone care about that?

Council refuses to publish report on vicious teenager who almost killed 10-year-old girl so as not to cause HIM any distress

· Report could ‘distress’ Connor Hodgson, who was jailed for attack
· MP says refusal to release report could be seen as a cover-up
· He admitted beating and throttling schoolgirl, before leaving her for dead
· Review said disclosure of personal details for living individual is unwarranted

By Anna Edwards

A council has refused to reveal a review’s findings into the care of a teenager who left a ten-year-old girl for dead - because it would cause the attacker ‘further distress’.

Stockton Borough Council has been accused of a ‘cover up’ because of its decision, which reviewed the care of Connor Hodgson, who lured the schoolgirl away from friends before beating her repeatedly, throttling her and leaving her on a river bank.

She was left covered in blood and beaten so badly part of her head had to be shaved and she needed stitches across her scalp.

A review was carried out by Stockton Borough Council after people on the close-knit estate demanded to know why such a dangerous youth had been allowed to live in council care in their midst.

However the anticipated publication of the report has been refused because officials are concerned about the effect it might have on the teenager.

Hodgson, who was 16-years-old at the time of the attack, was jailed indefinitely last July after he admitted causing the girl grievous bodily harm with intent.

Teesside Crown Court was told he throttled her and beat her around the head so viciously he could have killed her.

The brutal assault caused such outrage that police were forced to appeal for calm in the days following the incident.

the rest is here

When this monster is given a new identity and released in a couple of years - which he undoubtedly will - the cretinous Julie Grant should be forced to take him into her home.
- rfyorke , Yorks UK, United Kingdom

Posted by peiper     on 04/29/2013 at 10:36 AM   
Filed Under: • Crime • Daily Life • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner