Monday - June 25, 2012

un migration head says eu countries should be forced to accept multiculture

OK, I’ll be brief as possible.

Wish I’d seen this article in time to post the comment by NewJerseyYankee along with it.
Whatever ... my post below by NJY still ties in well. This article may not be on the exact same subject matter, but as you can see, the thinking is the same and by the same pc kind of ppl.

Take a look.

UN migration chief calls on EU to force member states to be multicultural as he says Britain’s quota ‘not legal’

By Daily Mail Reporter

The EU should make sure that its member states are multicultural to ensure the prosperity of the union, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.

Peter Sutherland also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.

He was being questioned by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.

Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.

He told the House of Lords committee migration was a ‘crucial dynamic for economic growth’ in some EU nations ‘however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states’.

He said that an ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the ‘key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states’.

‘It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.’

In evidence to the Lords committee, he urged EU member states to work together more closely on migration policy.

He criticised the UK’s attempt to cut net migration from its current level to ‘tens of thousands’ a year through visa restrictions.

read more, source

Here are a few comments from readers at the Mail On Line.  So far there are only 83 but I expect hundreds in a few hours. It touches a nerve.
It is true the native populations are getting older and the birthrate is and has been low for some time.  Except in the UK amongst those collecting more in benefits per child then can be made working for a living. But that’s just an aside. 
The kind of people generally migrating invading Europe and the UK, are not in the main, the same sort of people who in the past so easily integrated in, and helped make through their honest endeavors a better place then they found it.  That is NOT to denigrate the many honest and hard working migrants who have settled here and learned the language and raised their offspring to be lawful citizens.  We tend to hear about the bad ones because lets face it.  If it bleeds, it leads.

tell mr sutherland to take them to his home country

- m. martin, davod hungary,

When I was a child in Brierfield it was a close working community of native Lancashire people. Starting in the fifties the local cotton mill owners started encouraging people from (East & West) Pakistan to come over to work in the mills and undercut the wages paid to local Lancashire girls. Street by street the waves of immigrants took over the town. The locals and immigrants do not mix. The town is dominated by a large mosque and I no longer feel at home in my hometown. Peter Sutherland’s views (like the mill-owners of yesteryear) are just plain wrong.

- Nelly, Brierfield,

ANY CHANCE OF SECTIONING THIS IDIOT ?

- SARSFIELDS GHOST, LONDON,

Continued never-ending “economic growth” is as un-sustainable as the multi-culti societies these fascists insist that we establish. It simply makes a very few wealthier at the expense of the happiness and contentment of the many. This planet has finite resources and an increasing human population. You do not solve this problem by de-stabilising communities with settled populations (like the UK) with increased immigration from unstable third world countries. You solve this problem by reducing population in those third world countries to settled levels so that they too can become stable. This is not rocket science and is blindingly obvious. A failure to grasp this is not indicative of stupidity it is indicative of someone with an agenda that has little to do with the happiness of the many.

- Attila, Dundee,

source for more, especially the comments on line

Posted by peiper     on 06/25/2012 at 05:30 AM   
Filed Under: • DIVERSITY BS •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner