Saturday - March 05, 2005
Religion And Politics
A few days ago one of our readers advocated the taxing of churches and removal of all their tax exempt status.
I countered by saying that as soon as you tax churches then they have a Constitutional right to free political speech. (remember “no taxation without representation?") Churches do not have that right to political endorsements now because long ago the framers knew what they were doing. Yes, occasionally you will see politicians in churches giving sermons or whatever but technically they can not stump for themselves (although we know Jesse Jackson and the other race baiters, to include most Democrats do this.)
Well, as luck would have it I found some pieces that focus on this subject.
The first one deals with a bill proposed by North Carolina Republican Rep. Walter Jones called “the Houses of Worship Free Speech Restoration Act of 2005” would allow leaders of churches to endorse candidates.
You see, now, I have a problem with this. Churches are a very strong force to be reckoned with in the US and if this passes what’s to prevent a rich powerhouse like the Catholic Church to back an individual who would then favor only those issues relevant to Catholicism like abortion, marriage, contraception?
In time we’d have ourselves a theocracy because so few other churches could match the strength of the Catholic Church.
Now don’t go off half-cocked thinking I am against Catholics. I just used them as an example. I could have easily chosen Baptists or Mormons.
Furthermore, think about this: if the bill passes, what’s to prohibit BOTH parties from ALL OF A SUDDEN finding “one church” they prefer and through that “church” channel BILLIONS of dollars TAX FREE? What’s to prohibit anyone from leaving monstrous donations with no accountability?
“But”, you say, “Congress can make sure that does not happen by limiting those donations.”
If you, in fact, actually thought that, then think about it for a minute. How effective was McCain-Feingold? Look what the FEC is trying to do now--re-write the bill in order to stifle bloggers from being able to mention any candidate nor have any link on their site that endorses a candidate as that would be considered a “contribution” to that person’s campaign. Read more here.
Every time our fuckwadded Congress-critters write a law they put huge loopholes in them in order to guarantee themselves jobs by having to re-write those laws or close the loopholes with other loopholes further guaranteeing them semi-permanent employment. You need go no further than the latest immigration bill passed by the House and mentioned here. It’s so full of loopholes the entire country of Mexico could walk right through.
You think this would be any different? And why mess with it at all? Why change anything? Long ago it was decided the best way to keep our country from having a “state religion” was this tax exempt/no politics feature.
So, you see, passing this law is WRONG for our country and would start on us on the slippery slope of a “state religion.”
For more insight, here’s an article against the legislation and here’s one that has different ideas.
Posted by Ranting Right Wing Howler
Filed Under: • Politics • Religion •
• Comments (8)
Five Most Recent Trackbacks:
Interesting article for the gun fans among us...
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Signal94
This gets my old forensic juices going simply because so much work is involved in the investigation and prosecution of firearms cases.
On: 01/02/09 04:38
22 pounds of innefficiency
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Macker's World
Or, what the UAW foists on the Detroit automakers? I vote "Yes" because in both cases, it's so much regulatory bulls**t that it simply isn't funny anymore. In this case,…
On: 12/14/08 07:02
Bypass grandfather fights off Samurai sword post office raiders. Another battling Brit, in civvies
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Signal94
The British government's insistence on disarming law biding citizens is more like a plan to control health care costs by eliminating those pesky senior citizens who insist on getting old…
On: 12/05/08 05:29
SANDI TOKSVIG IS ANOTHER FAT CLUMSY CLOWN and SPOONS MADE ROSIE FAT.
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Democrat=Socialist
Fat blabber mouth, infected cyst of a human being Rosie tried to revive the Variety Show and America spoke. You suck Rosie! Just Jared Rosie O’Donnell tried to revive the…
On: 11/30/08 11:36
A little good news
(1 total trackbacks)
Tracked at Macker's World
Rosie O'Donnell, prominent member of the Film Actors’ Guild, has had her "variety show" cancelled after just one airing! Not that that's an unusual thing, it happens quite often in…
On: 11/29/08 12:57
DISCLAIMER
THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.
Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:
It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.
- Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
- Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
- Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
- Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere
THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.






