Wednesday - March 03, 2010

Just for the hell of it even if I don’t understand the need.

I think they look fine and I guess this is an after the boob-job photo. The paper didn’t publish any before shots.

Anyway, why do women do this?  I guess it’s strictly a female thing and if it makes em feel better about themselves, well heck. Go for it.
I just liked their looks and felt like posting them.  But golly, £4,800. Each.  That’s a pile of dollars.  I had no clue or if I had I forgot about it, just how costly this sort of thing is.  I think they should have spent it on computers and cars.  Shows how different women heaven bless em, are.
Example.  A guy with brother wins a lotto.  Kinda doubt he’d be willing to pay for those (cough,cough) male enlargements I’ve heard about.  Guy wouldn’t even discuss that sort of thing. Would we?  Just a though.  Oh yeah, another thought worth nothing.  Just when was it that women became convinced they needed bigger boobs?  And who convinced them? Was it a change in the culture, or had women always had this subject topmost in their minds but never discussed openly?

This isn’t a bad article actually.  Human interest for a change before getting back to the usual.

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 10:00 AM on 03rd March 2010

What would you buy if you won the lottery? It’s a question everyone has pondered.

Here, the Mail speaks to 11 winners to find out what they spent their cash on - including a girl who bought her two sisters breast enlargement operations.

Bonnier lasses: Sarah Cockings (centre) from Newcastle won £3million in May 2005 and treated herself and her sisters Emma (left) and Alex to boob jobs costing £4,800 each

MORE WITH PIX HERE

Posted by peiper     on 03/03/2010 at 06:49 AM   
Filed Under: • Daily Life • Miscellaneous • News-Briefs • UK •  
• Comments (10) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2008 Domain Owner