Thursday - May 28, 2015

greece invaded by boat migrants as the EU demands britain take in thousands FU-EU

This is not how it’s supposed to be done.

Spent more than an hour going through this post and had my comments etc when .... I hit the wrong button and deleted everything.

Main story saved in Word thankfully.  But ... forgot to click quick save on bmews page.

I read Drews post and the time in early morning he was up.  I was up at the same time. Heck, if we were in the same time zone, I couldda called for a chat. So I’m asleep at the keyboard or I’d have clicked on the bmews quick save, and saved myself over an hour in time.

Anyway .....

Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti has called plans to axe the Human Rights Act the ‘gravest threat to freedom in Britain since the Second World War’.

Gosh. And she speaks such good English too. But at heart?  Why would anyone listen to someone with a name like hers and Cumberbatch?

Sherlock star Cumberbatch said: ‘It’s not for politicians to pick and choose when they [human rights] apply … Repealing it will mean less protection against state abuse or neglect, and weaken the rights of every single one of us – and the vulnerable most of all.’

He’s full of it and as stupid sounding as his name.
And as for that has been Redgrave, further left than Trotsky.
Anti American and all the way left.

Left-wing luvvies were lining up last night to oppose plans to scrap the Human Rights Act – as the full scale of how the reviled law is being used by dangerous convicts to avoid deportation was revealed.
Damning statistics showed the number of foreign offenders – including killers, rapists and paedophiles – on Britain’s streets has spiralled to a record high.
David Cameron will use today’s Queen’s Speech to put forward plans to scrap the Act, introduced by Labour.
That last part … keep in mind it was written yesterday. He didn’t far as I can see, “put forward” any plan.

HOW CHARITY LIBERTY’S LUVVIE ARMY ARE DEFENDING THE LOATHED LAW

From the left

The stars lining up to save the hated Human Rights Act have ‘lent their voices’ to the stories of ordinary people, according to the charity behind the campaign.

Luvvies including Benedict Cumberbatch, Vanessa Redgrave, and Four Weddings and a Funeral actor Simon Callow appear in a series of short films for Liberty.

The charity says they will help to highlight those who have ‘held the powerful to account using human rights laws’.
Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti said: ‘These films tell just a few of the stories of our Human Rights Act, giving a voice to some of the most vulnerable people in our country.’

She said that ‘soldiers, journalists, victims of rape, domestic violence and slavery had all found justice’ due to the legislation brought in under Tony Blair.

‘Government plans to scrap the Act play populist games with hard-won freedoms and undermine the United Kingdom at home and abroad,’ she added.

Game of Thrones star Indira Varma, who is also taking part, said: ‘Our Human Rights Act protects every one of us – young or old, wealthy and poor, civilian or soldier.

‘It is a cause for pride and celebration, not a pawn in a dangerous political game. It is ours and no one is taking it from us without a fight.’
One of the films will highlight the case of Jenny Paton, who was spied on by Poole Borough Council using anti-terror laws to check whether she lived in a school catchment area. With the help of Liberty, Mrs Paton used the Human Rights Act to take the council to an Investigatory Powers Tribunal where it was found to have had acted illegally.

10 cases that show they’re so wrong

The Human Rights Act has been used to justify many controversial rulings. IAN DRURY highlights ten of the most extraordinary:

PAEDOPHILE: Asylum seeker William Danga was jailed for ten years for raping a 16-year-old girl. The 40-year-old Congolese asylum seeker, who raped and molested two young girls while fighting deportation after his release, and is now serving a 15-year sentence, used the fact he has two children to stay in Britain.

RAPIST: Somali rapist Mustafa Abdullahi was jailed for ten years after holding a knife to a pregnant woman’s throat as he attacked her. He was ordered to be deported but immigration judges refused saying it would breach his family rights. He does not have a wife or children in Britain but his mother and other family members lived here.

KILLER: Iraqi Aso Mohammed Ibrahim left 12-year-old Amy Houston to die ‘like a dog’ under the wheels of his car after knocking her down in 2003 while banned from driving. Twice refused asylum, he was never removed by the Home Office and, after the killing, was allowed to stay in the UK after serving a mere four months in jail because he had fathered two children here, which judges ruled gave him a right to a ‘family life’.

WAR CRIMES SUSPECT: Serb Milan Sarcevic was accused of involvement in the 1991 Vukovar massacre of up to 300 men and women. The wounded Croat victims were beaten, executed and buried in a mass grave. A judge ruled evidence of his involvement was ‘not conclusive’ and did not warrant breaching his ‘strong family life’. The 62-year-old lives on a council estate in south-east London.

Why this guy is listed I’ve no idea. Does being a “suspect” make a person guilty? And if the evidence wasn’t “conclusive” then why is he here?

SEX OFFENDER: For years Mohammed Kendeh escaped removal to Sierra Leone despite convictions for robbery, burglary, arson and assaults on 11 women. An immigration judge ruled in 2007 that as Kendeh, 24, came to Britain aged six, and had almost no family in West Africa, he had effectively become ‘one of us’.

ALCOHOLIC: A Libyan convicted of 78 offences escaped deportation last month on the grounds he is an alcoholic. The 53-year-old man, who is protected by an anonymity order, successfully argued he would be tortured and imprisoned by the authorities in his homeland because drinking alcohol is illegal. He is now free to continue his drink-fuelled offending spree in Britain.

RAPIST: Akindoyin Akinshipe escaped deportation in September 2011 after judges said he had a right to a ‘private life’ in the UK. He was due to be sent to Nigeria after losing a series of appeals in Britain over his jailing for an attack on a girl of 13 when he was 15. But Strasbourg overruled, despite him not having a long-term partner or children in the UK.

FANATIC: In 1996, Strasbourg ruled over Karamjit Chahal, a separatist who was wanted for sedition in India. He argued that, even if somebody posed a grave threat to national security, they could not be sent back to a country where they might be ill treated. Since then, thousands of convicts and fanatics have been able to stay on these grounds.

VIOLENT MOTHER: A Bangladeshi woman jailed for five years for stabbing her baby daughter with a kitchen knife in East London in 2009 won the right to stay in Britain so she could rebuild her relationship with the child.

BURGLAR: Wayne Bishop, 33, from Clifton, Nottinghamshire, was let out of prison in May 2011 after just one month of an eight-month sentence so he could look after his five children on the grounds their rights were more important than those of his victims.

Now that’s just 10 as published in the paper yesterday.  There are further examples in today’s paper.

Ministers reject criticism that they are doing away with human rights. A source said: ‘The cause of human rights has been undermined in the last few years because of the Human Rights Act and some of the absurd judgments coming out of it … We want to restore credibility and ensure that human rights are no longer open to abuse.’

A British Bill of Rights would allow the UK to ignore verdicts by Euro judges and give our Supreme Court the final say, as well as making it easier to throw out foreigners convicted of the most serious crimes.

Tory MP Peter Bone said: ‘If people come to this country and do something so bad they get put in prison, then they should be deported as soon as they finish their sentence … Too many foreign criminals are making bogus and spurious use of family ties to get out of being deported by citing human rights laws.

‘We should get the proper balance back where the rights of the public to be protected override those of the criminal.’ Peter Cuthbertson, of the Centre for Crime Prevention think-tank, said: ‘These figures illustrate perfectly why the Government is right to begin long overdue reform of our human rights laws.

‘Every year more and more of the most contemptible foreign thugs are abusing badly drafted legal principles to win the right to stay in Britain.’

And on the subject of immigrants and refugees etc.
I have over the last few months shared the sorry news about Italy being flooded and overwhelmed with boat life forms. Some may even be human.
Well, now it’s the turn of Greece, as thousands are reported to be landing on those folks. Be interesting to see what the govt. there, which is left wing, does about it.

GREEK’S UNINVITED continues

EU PRESSURE OVER REFUGEES

Britain is under pressure from the EU to accept thousands of asylum seekers who have been forced from their homes by war and persecution.
Brussels has urged the Government to take some of the 20,000 people from Africa and the Middle East who the United Nations say urgently need international protection. These refugees are currently based outside Europe.
Under the one-off ‘resettlement plan’, the UK has been asked to house 2,309 asylum seekers – more than a tenth of the total. However, as the two-year scheme is voluntary, Britain is set to opt out – declining to have migration levels determined by Brussels.
Meanwhile, the EU has also asked nations to take in 40,000 migrants from Syria and Eritrea who have made the treacherous trip across the Mediterranean.

Posted by peiper     on 05/28/2015 at 07:05 AM   
Filed Under: • Democrats-Liberals-Moonbat Leftists • Illegal-Aliens and Immigration •  
• Comments (0) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner