Monday - October 29, 2012

girl seduces older man who says he couldn’t fight her off. problem is, the girl is 7

I’m not sure if this article tells us enough. I don’t mean I want more but that something seems missing. However, I find it impossible to believe that a seven year old girl could do what he claims.  Which is basically, she forced herself on him and seduced him.  WTF???
That is unreal, but you ain’t heard nothin’ yet.

He is suing the young girl for making false accusations against him.
BUT .... he pleaded guilty to sexual assault.  Now has had second thoughts and claims he had bad legal advice.

I blame the hand wringing libtard leftists who all over Europe as well as here, ended the death penalty. I blame a system that appears to many to be way too soft and, understanding of criminals.

Recently, in a totally unrelated story, a fellow named Mustafa something er other, raped a woman who’d been drinking and left her in an alley.  Along came someone else who saw her helpless and crying and, he raped her as well. The report says he was found and arrested but then let go.  Don’t know why.
Mustafa, the first rapist, got 7 years.  Seven freekin years for rape.  Where’s the justice in that?  Where there is clear and honest evidence of a crime like that, the victim should be allowed to determine the penalty. Even if she requests a dull razor with which to perform surgery.
In the case of the rapist Mustafa, his lawyer says that this was really unlike him, and he acted out of character in a one off crime.

First, kill the lawyers.

Now back to the original story about a grown man sexually assaulted by a 7 year old.
God damn sick bastard.

Paedophile, 61, ‘plans to sue his seven-year-old victim for making up allegations against him’

John Thompson, 61, claimed he could not fight off victim and that she ‘flirted’ with him but still admitted the sexual assault

Now he denies it and plans to sue the girl, Teesside Crown Court heard

By Martin Robinson

A paedophile is planning to sue his seven-year-old victim despite admitting sexually assaulting her and being sentenced for his attack earlier this year, a court heard.

Manipulative John Thompson, 61, was spared jail in July after he insisted he was unable to fight off the young girl, claiming that she ‘flirted’ with him, pinned him to a bed and forced her tongue into his mouth.

He was given an eight-month suspended sentence, provoking condemnation from child protection officials who called his claims ‘outrageous’ and said he should have been jailed.

At his sentencing, Thompson, of Hartlepool, was also given a treatment order, supervision and a ban on contact with under-16s.

Within a month of his court appearance, Thompson failed to turn up at a meeting with a probation worker and when he attended others he was said to be uncooperative and hostile.

Nigel Soppitt, prosecuting, told Teesside Crown court on Friday that officials from the Probation Service consider the order to be unworkable because of Thompson’s attitude.

He has now said he is innocent, had received bad legal advice before he admitted the offence and is threatening to sue the schoolgirl for making the allegation against him.

udge Gillian Matthews, who passed the original sentence, told Thompson he was spared jail in the summer only because she wanted him to go on the treatment course.

She said: “Your approach to the Probation Service has been absolutely disgraceful...you have to engage with them.

‘If you do not, you will go to prison.

‘I am not having this attitude you have displayed at appointments. You have got
one more chance - that’s it.

‘If you do not turn up with a better attitude, you will then go to prison.’

Judge Matthews will have an update in a month, during which time Thompson, of Hartlepool, will have had another opportunity to take part in the programme.

She said: “He is already complaining about his legal team, saying he should not
have pleaded guilty and that he will sue the complainant - all classic traits of a paedophile.’

Lorraine Mustard, for Thompson, said he client struggled to understand the terms of the suspended sentence order, but that he was now in no doubt what would happen if he failed again.

She said: “He understands that the Probation Service have to confront him with some very difficult issues and the fact he feels uncomfortable about them is neither here nor there.

‘There seems to be some misunderstanding which has been underlined to him today, and the onus is upon him to apply himself.’

source

Posted by peiper     on 10/29/2012 at 01:56 PM   
Filed Under: • Outrageous • UK •  
• Comments (1) • Trackbacks(0)  Permalink •  

DISCLAIMER

THE SERVICES AND MATERIALS ON THIS WEBSITE ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE HOSTS OF THIS SITE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS ANY AND ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF SATISFACTORY QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, WITH RESPECT TO THE SERVICE OR ANY MATERIALS.

Not that very many people ever read this far down, but this blog was the creation of Allan Kelly and his friend Vilmar. Vilmar moved on to his own blog some time ago, and Allan ran this place alone until his sudden and unexpected death partway through 2006. We all miss him. A lot. Even though he is gone this site will always still be more than a little bit his. We who are left to carry on the BMEWS tradition owe him a great debt of gratitude, and we hope to be able to pay that back by following his last advice to us all:

1. Keep a firm grasp of Right and Wrong
2. Stay involved with government on every level and don't let those bastards get away with a thing
3. Use every legal means to defend yourself in the event of real internal trouble, and, most importantly:
4. Keep talking to each other, whether here or elsewhere

It's been a long strange trip without you Skipper, but thanks for pointing us in the right direction and giving us a swift kick in the behind to get us going. Keep lookin' down on us, will ya? Thanks.

THE INFORMATION AND OTHER CONTENTS OF THIS WEBSITE ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. THIS WEBSITE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ALL PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE AMERICAN COURTS. IF ANYTHING ON THIS WEBSITE IS CONSTRUED AS BEING CONTRARY TO THE LAWS APPLICABLE IN ANY OTHER COUNTRY, THEN THIS WEBSITE IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ACCESSED BY PERSONS FROM THAT COUNTRY AND ANY PERSONS WHO ARE SUBJECT TO SUCH LAWS SHALL NOT BE ENTITLED TO USE OUR SERVICES UNLESS THEY CAN SATISFY US THAT SUCH USE WOULD BE LAWFUL.

Copyright © 2004-2015 Domain Owner