"Could get.” Doesn’t mean will get. There’s a good chance that he will probably get 5 years with probation…
Bastard should be drawn and quartered, or run over multiple time calculated to take as long as possible.
I am sorry - but on this one - you are going into the hate crime/thought police area - and I can’t agree. While we know why this guy did it - and it is against most Americans view of family, punishment, religion et al - To set this up as ‘why’ he did it - making it worthy of more ‘punishment’ tracks into an area I am not for - that the ‘why’ becomes as/more important than the what.
And right now we are way beyond the what and who did it being more important than the victim or society.
Let’s not take us into areas where it becomes Your Values against Mine - and thought police/policies and PCness are the foot in the door to that dangerous power game - Where WHO is in control determines what is crime, or most important to charge.
Simple laws - made more complicated - Not to lessen crime - but to enact more control.
Murder should be murder - with the only distinction being between premeditated or accidental. Get rid of the damn ‘degrees’ - and Death for Death should be the sentence once adjudicated between premeditated or accidental (the only concept I would hold ‘prison’ time for). Sorry - how many people do you have to kill to become a murderer? One should be enough. And for society - One should be one too many.
Consider the murderer and their ‘culture’ and their childhood/how they were raised - Why did they consider their victim at all, even for a second? Where is the humanity in that, where is the civilized behavior in that - where is religion in that?
Read the Bible - God is not against Laws, not against setting up limits on civilized behavior - not about letting everyone/anyone off scott free - The verses on dealing with people from a Christian point of view - are of NOT letting the anger, the pain, the suffering, the hatred, the vileness - become a PART OF YOU AND YOUR SOUL.
Establishing laws and then enforcing them is not un-Christian - anti-God (10 Commandments, people) - un-religious - nor is it un-civil. Establishing laws and enforcing them are good things - and lead to a more civil and productive society - by removing the amoral, the violent, the killers among us. But of course that is exactly why liberals and muslims - pick and chose what laws to enforce, what laws to recognize and more importantly what laws to twist and distort.
May the all rot in hell. RIP Noor Faleh Almaleki.
[Where were the feminazis on this one??? Oh yeah too busy at the Buffalo trial for the guy who chopped off his wife’s head. NOT]
NOPE!!!!!!! Thst shit don’t work here.
It’s because of the proliferation of lawyers, Mama. In higher government moving down. Simple is not good. It must be verbose and add in all circumstances instead of relying on the wisdom of 12 jurors and a judge to figure things out.
Originally these were good things because there were a couple of exceptions and the law was clearly worded, however, lawyers started nitpicking them and fine-tuning them to the point where they got to be the Lawyer’s laws instead of laws to protect the people.
It used to be where a person could rely on a couple of books encompassing the range of laws from A to Z. Now, if you go to a law library, there are 2 completely different sets that need 3 books as an index!
There is only one kind of murder, where you take someone’s life. Period. This is how it should be. If you kill someone, you forfeit your life.
Simply put, court is a contest to see which lawyer has the better arguing powers, not what is right or wrong.