BMEWS
 

Teacher faces disciplinary action after parent uncovers racy lingerie photos online.

 
 


Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   on 03/31/2009 at 08:14 AM   
 
  1. Hot for teacher! Wow, yum!

    I think it’s about high time people got over this BS. Not only do we live in a totally oversexed society, we live in the instantaneous information age.

    If you want to hire young women to be teachers, then you are going to have to accept that they are young women. Healthy, energetic, sexual creatures in their own right. And like it or not, part of today’s youth’s expression of their sexuality is online. They ALL do this.

    Besides, hello knothead???, this particular woman is a MODEL. Duh? Double Duh? That means she’s pretty and has a nice figure and gets PAID to be photographed. In clothing. In swimsuits. In body paint. In “racy poses”. In feathers and a smile. It’s her JOB. So combine that with the digital revolution ... OF COURSE she has pictures on the internet. It’s called ADVERTISING. So STFU and sit down.

    Even the “adult model” category has melded into public respectability. Porn stars are no longer shunned, and kept off in their own little world. Why should they be, when that film industry outearns Hollywood 3 to 1? Adult actresses show up in music videos, hang out with celebrities, cross over into singing and regular acting careers ... just like anybody else.

    So get off your nose in the air high horse already. If you want asexual humans teaching your children, you’d better hire nuns. And Catholic priests. And even that leads to problems sometimes.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   03/31/2009  at  08:48 AM  

  2. Damn. I wish I’dda said all that.Wish I knew how.
    Kudos Drew.  I’m tempted to find that “knotheads” addrss and mail your comment to him with a request that it be passed on the the parent complaining.

    Posted by peiper    United Kingdom   03/31/2009  at  10:05 AM  

  3. If your standard of “proper” is to require a teacher to be a completely covered, shapeless lump with a face like a horse that’s been hit by a lorry.... sheesh, send your kids to a Muslim school or something, you’ll feel fine about it.

    Posted by GrumpyOldFart    United States   03/31/2009  at  10:43 AM  

  4. Or require the really hot teachers to wear the bag burkha on the job. With 4” strappy high heels poking out, just to drive the real muzzies bugshit.

    A little nip here, a little tuck there, maybe a belt, and your sackcloth burkha could be a whole lot more form fitting. Almost sexy.

    Me so bad.

    Posted by Drew458    United States   03/31/2009  at  12:32 PM  

  5. Inappropriate?  Let’s see now, homosexual teachers are out because children shouldn’t be exposed to homosexuals.  OK, homosexuals are a minority, considered to be deviant in most of the world.  Now it seems that heterosexual teachers are out because they are, well, um, heterosexual (and foxy to boot!).

    Should neutering be required of all teachers?  Castration and penile amputation for the men, with removal of the breasts and ovaries for the women?  Hey, that’s 4 parts to 3, obvious sexual discrimination!  If we added clitoral removal and we really should, the discrimination would be even worse, 5 parts to 3.  That seems to be about the only way that the current requirements for teachers could be met, at least according to the bozos making a fuss.

    So, since that’s all ridiculous, get a life.  If you don’t like seeing a picture of a beautiful woman, what do you like?  I don’t think I want to know, my personal taste begins and ends with women.  She’s actually posing tastefully in a beautiful costume, is exposing absolutely no body part that can’t be seen at any beach or swimming pool and isn’t touching herself or anyone else in anything near an inappropriate manner.  If this were pornography of some sort, the complaining folks might have a legitimate point.  Since it’s a beautiful picture of a beautiful lady, shut up and go do something useful.

    Some folks seem to have known all along.

    ‘From doing a bit of digging, it is apparently common knowledge about these photos, and has been for some time.

    Do you mean to say that most people didn’t think it was any big deal?  Has there been any indication that a problem has been created because of her posing?  Has she been known as a good or a bad teacher?  What a concept, judging someone on their job performance!

    So Dear Bozos, I recommend a good enema (clears the mind), followed by at least an hour in private with whatever it is that gets you off.  Don’t tell me what you did or claim you did, I don’t want to know. 

    Gaaagh, why is anyone wasting time on this?  Why am I wasting time on this?

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   03/31/2009  at  01:33 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: Five-foot female fitness fanatic pins knife-wielding attacker to a wall. And she's 50 too btw.

Previous entry: Their voices have not been heard since the First World War. With some help from a lipreader.

<< BMEWS Main Page >>