The president needs to take the fight to the Democrats. They are not his friends, no matter how much he wishes they were. They are his enemies and he must remind the public exactly where the Democratic party stands and just how much more vulnerable their politically driven policies would make this nation.
With Democratic friends like this: http://newsbusters.org/node/7429
...who needs enemies? (Gotta’ love the whackos on the Left.)
Whoops! My mistake. McCourt is Green party.
Still, you hear this kind of rhetoric all the time from the Democrats and their supporters. (re: http://www.democraticunderground.com/ http://www.dailykos.com/)
Wrong, President Bush has been talking to the American people and that is what is po’ing everyone off. They want him to respond to all the lunatic left (Great piece on that Green Party wacko - 14 years ago or more - he’d been in jail before that interview was over). The administration is probably not doing it - because so much of the left would be in jail and they’d screed that the administration was silencing ‘dissent’. Although I do not know how advocating the murder of the Sitting President would ever be simply considered dissent. Treason, slander, libel, sedition - yes, but dissent. Nope.
I vote after 2008 the next President should advocate for all the ‘dissentors’ to be relocated to the Paradise of their choice (not America, American territory, or an American ally) - as a point that they wanted socialism, communism, totaltarianism, islamicfacism whatever they desire. Why sully America that has been doing well until these liberal freaks started foisting social failure programs, pc ‘thought’ police and institutional reverse racism. It is time to step up and say - you want it - go for it - somewhere else. Stop making everything protected by the Constitution that you can’t get through legislation or popular vote - makes you realize that the majority do not agree with it or hold it as a value.
On a side note, and totally unrealted to the discussion, does anyone else think that Michael Reagan looks more like Rene Auberjonois (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0041281/) than Ronald Reagan? heh, heh