Something smells rotten… (updated!)

 

1. Somebody at the FBI needs to brace this Berger puke, and fast. Remember when Fawn Hall pulled the “hide the files in blouse” trick for Ollie North, and the LSM went nuts. Jamie Gorelick being on the commission was bad enough, but now this a--h--e is behind the scenes burying the evidence on Slick Willy’s dereliction of duty,and all we get from the alphabets is silence and organ music. How does one “inadvertently” stuff documents in ones pants? Did they look like your shirttails Sandy? He should be frogmarched into court, and then a jail cell.

   Posted by Big Digger       07/20/2004  at  10:05 AM  



2. Or he could also be SHOT....

   Posted by Macker       07/20/2004  at  11:42 AM  



3. New name for Clinton - The Cover-Up King, that guys has tried to cover-up more shit than a cat in a playground sandbox.

   Mr Minority

   Posted by Mr Minority       07/20/2004  at  12:39 PM  



4. Actually, Vilmar, Sandy Berger was National Security Advisor, on the NSC (National Security Council), an advisor committee to the President.

   The NSA is the National Security Agency (or No Such Agency), of Ft. Meade, MD, which oversees most of our sigint (signals intelligence).

   If there was a God, Berger would not be allowed within ten miles of the NSA.

   M

   Posted by Mark Alger       07/20/2004  at  12:39 PM  



5. Hmmm, NSA = National Security Advisor.  I must have missed something here as I never said he was the National Security Agency.  I referred to him as NSA.  NSA in the context of my rant stands for National Security Advisor, which we all know Sandy Burglar was.  What is it I am missing?  Sorry, just a bit confused right now.

   Posted by Vilmar       07/20/2004  at  02:38 PM  



6. The story was on the very bottom of the back page in the local liberal rag here. I was surprised they even carried it.

   Posted by Cryptomaniac       07/20/2004  at  03:08 PM  



7. Other blogs also report that some of the classified documents exited the security area in Mr. Berger’s socks. Hardly an inadvertent placement, if you ask me, more like actual knowledge of smuggling and intentional violation of security rules.

   And isn’t his socks where F. Lee Bailey said that Furman must have carried the bloody knife to plant as evidence against OJ? Or some such argument; I forget the details, but “socks as smuggling site” is the important point. Perhaps Michael Moore can connect the dots to explain how all these sock smugglers somehow document something against Bush. Or better yet, Cheney. Does Halliburton or any of its past or present or future subsidiaries make socks?

   Posted by Pat       07/20/2004  at  04:20 PM  



8. Notice how the headlines that do report it also only mention “aide” or “advisor”.  Hell, the NSA (advisor) is a MAJOR, MAJOR figure in any administration, ever since it was created in 1947!!!

   Posted by itismedavid       07/20/2004  at  05:38 PM  



9. I see Mr. Berger using “accidentally” and “inadvertently” in his explanations for his activities.  I also see that Clinton asked him to select documents for the 9-11 Commission. I have a couple of unanswered questions in mind:

   How does one “accidentally” stuff documents stamped TOP SECRET in inch high letters into one’s pants?

   Why does one of the subjects of the investigation, a key player in fact, get to cherry pick what goes to the Commission?  Why didn’t the Commission at least send a staffer with Berger?

   Berger and some others need to be tarred and feathered and jailed.  Isn’t he the same drone who recommended no armor for the Army at Mogadishu because it wouldn’t “look” good?  If so, tarring isn’t sufficient. A good ball-kicking and then jail would be appropriate.

   Posted by dick       07/20/2004  at  11:03 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.