Runnin With The Devil

 

1. Yeah he is good. I saw him often on TV in the last year or two before leaving the USA
   for Blair’s socialist paradise.

   Posted by peiper       08/17/2009  at  10:40 AM  



2. That is in fact the essence of what it means to be a radical — to be willing to destroy the values, structures and institutions that sustain the society we live in.

   A political kamakazie. How twisted do you have to be to destroy your own society and replace it with WHAT? Does he think that he will become the supreme poobah? Does he realize that he is expendable afterwards? There are no long lasting tangible rewards for the lesser, a moment of fame perhaps, only THE one will gain.

   Posted by harleycowboy58       08/17/2009  at  11:25 AM  



3. You know what a person who destroys simply for the purpose of destroying is called? A vandal. Pure and simple a criminal with a tendency toward psychotic - as there is no reason for what they are doing, other than an inability for empathy.

   I know these freaks ‘claim’ that ‘their ideals/system/policy’ will be ‘better/more just/cheaper’ than what is in place - even though throughout history - it has been proven a lie, a cause of millions of deaths, a worse political system - rampant with corruption, violence and poverty - yet they continue to attempt it again & now in the greatest and freest country in the history of the World.

   And isn’t that a symptom of mental illness - to continually do the same thing over and over again, expecting different results?

   There are no long lasting tangible rewards for the lesser, a moment of fame perhaps, only THE one will gain.

   That is the lie that is the basis of those who do not believe or even know God - here and now is it - the person who has the most toys wins - there is nothing after death.

   Won’t they be po’d when they realize that We were right all along - and their eternity is spent in hell!

   Posted by wardmama4       08/17/2009  at  01:24 PM  



4. wardmama4
   I wasn’t really thinking in religious terms. More of Lenin got the ball rolling and Stalin took over and got the “most toys”. As with most dictatorships you see this relationship. Che/Castro, Lenin/Stalin, the predecessor of Mao/Mao etc.

   I got into an discussion about errors and typos with an athiest once. I ask if any of them changed the context of the message given. He replied “None that I know of.” So given that the story line is true he still missed the elaphant in the room.

   Posted by harleycowboy58       08/18/2009  at  08:17 AM  



5. I had to go there - because even Alinsky went there - bowing to Satan is by simple virtue bowing to God. Can’t do Satan without God. They always are quick to point out the hypocrisy of a conservative/Republican/Right without even admitting to the hypocrisy of their own psychotic ideas/beliefs/policies. At.All.Ever.

   Posted by wardmama4       08/19/2009  at  12:18 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.