Redefining Absurdity

 

1. Sometimes I think only “termination with extreme prejudice” of leftists is the only solution.

   I’ll play with them a little before that happens.
   They brey so confidently until someone points out the facts. Then, they make up $hlt and are easily made to look like the fools they always were.

   I had a dweeb call me a facist for mentioning my support for Rumsfeld. When I told him my father fought facism in WWII he walked away mumbling I was a neo-nazi to himself.

   As the socialist rectal-cranial inverted moonbats lose more and more of their following, the hate-filled core, will become increasingly desperate. Be prepared for some extreme hate-filled moments when the Islamonazis try to play both sides from the middle.

   Posted by Mikenchi       08/07/2004  at  12:59 PM  



2. The article didn’t mention exactly what was done to the posters.  How exactly were the posters defaced?

   Posted by MAJ Mike       08/07/2004  at  01:29 PM  



3. Maj Mike, Does it matter?

   Put fucking swastikas on them as far as I am concerned.

   I think “hate crime” laws are the stupidest perversion of justice there is.  If it is already a crime, prosecute that crime.  To add more penalty to the crime via a hate crimes statute because someone disagrees with the way you think is an abomination.

   Posted by Vilmar       08/07/2004  at  02:20 PM  



4. Just as liberal judges have the ability to sense that the thug who rapes and strangles his landlady was only acting out his trauma for being picked last for dodge ball, they also can sense when putting a slug into a parking meter is an insult to the meter maids.

   Posted by Walter E. Wallis       08/07/2004  at  02:37 PM  



5. So the cretins can burn flags on the courthouse steps, but if I rip down a political flyer on the telephone pole in front of my house I go to jail?

   I’m thinking criminal thoughts, but please don’t tell the mind police.  Bastards.

   Posted by dick       08/07/2004  at  11:06 PM  



6. Just was curious as to what exactly caused all of the fuss.

   I don’t like hate crime laws because they tend to cheapen the value of those who aren’t members of protected species groups.

   For example, my son’s life is cheaper than a so-called minority child’s life merely because of a difference of skin color or ethnic origin.  A crime should be treated as a crime regardless of the personal characteristics of the victim.

   I’d have thought the Donk’s would claim that defacing the political posters was an expression of free speech.

   Posted by MAJ Mike       08/08/2004  at  10:01 AM  



7. Recall the responses when “Hate Crime” legislation opponents said that it might come to this?  “Oh, no.  It would never be used for petty crimes...only for serious crimes that are clearly motivated by hatred.”

   Slippery slope, anyone?

   Posted by Chuck       08/08/2004  at  06:24 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.