Re-Defining “Using and Abusing”
Stooopid Democrat Woman ha ha
1. Dumped by her husband for a conservative younger woman during her breast cancer so now she is uninsurable. She quits being the Mayor, a position with health insurance, so now she will lose her insurance, figures. She needs to marry a man with a full time job and dependent coverage or she is toast, fat chance.
2. This conservative babe is not that smart either. This dumbass liberal boyfriend needs anti-rejection medication which probably costs $2,000 a month and of course he is uninsurable too. In 10 years his medication will be $50,000 a year. He will be arriving at Medicare then. So he should thank President Bush for Medicare’s RX passage. Now the most a Medicare person can owe is $3,600 a year plus 5% of total RX cost. The Liberals say $3,600 is too much for an old person, including Warren Buffett.
The same 2 workers paying the Social Security tax to support one Baby Boomer will also be paying that one Baby Boomer’s Medicare costs. Tax the f**k out of the young to pay for Liberal Democrat’s Socialist programs. The President gives them a bone, Medicare RX - Tax payer paid, only to inject free market enhancements and the tax free HSA in the health care system, and the Democrats scream it’s not enough and confuse everybody with their so-called Donut Hole, it’s enough to make you sick.
Should 4 young Americans be taxed up the Wazoo, their adult working lifetimes, to pay for these 2 Liberal leaches who will probably live to 110 years old?
Posted by Z Woof
03/18/2005 at 07:56 AM
When I saw the headline, Re-Defining “Using and Abusing” I thought it was referring to OldCatMan!
Posted by Oink
03/18/2005 at 08:27 AM
Three idiots as far as I’m concerned. 2 liberals + 1 conservative - 1 kidney = 2.5 working brain cells.
