BMEWS
 

Quick, go to commercial!!!

 
 

Please resist the urge to make “Hassan, CHOP!” comments.



Posted by Drew458    United States   on 02/14/2009 at 12:28 AM   
 
  1. Drew, thanks to our wonderful NYS Assembly, we in NYS have no death penalty.  First-degree murder is only applicable in the murder of a LEO, IIRC.

    This guy should have his head sawed off.  An eye for an eye.  It’s not a very Christian thing to espouse, but if it stops the behaviour, then it’s a good thing.

    Posted by BlueStateSaint    United States   02/14/2009  at  04:29 AM  

  2. My first thought - Did The One (tm) have that plane flown into the house - to deflect this story off any front page?!?

    Second:

    She already had a restraining order/order of protection out on him. Which, thanks to NJ Senator Lautenberg, takes away any firearms he might have had. Didn’t seem to do much good, did it? If you really want to kill someone, you will. You don’t need a gun. A rock will work. So will a knife.

    On the first part (i.e. ‘domestic’ violence) - great book out there ‘Next Time She’ll Be Dead’ - points out just how pathetic the LEOs are about violence against women - standing over the body of a woman shot to death in a women’s shelter the one cop said - ‘She should have just left him.’ (And he probably voted for The One (tm)). On the second point - I think our fiberal moonbats need to look to Japan (isn’t it?!?) strictist gun laws in the World, highest crime/murder rate (or some such similar corollary). They need to come out of the ‘touchy, feely’ vapid stupidity and get a clue - crime/violence is not about the ‘weapon’ used - it is about the person who will commit it - no matter what laws there are.

    Thanks to The One (tm) being cheated into Office - I expect these kind of stories will be on the rise in the next few years.

    Combine that with the southern border struggling with kidnappings by all the Mexican drug cartels and pretty damn soon America will be wallowing down in the 3rd World status of Dafur, Gaza and Afghanistan. What fun, I look so forward to all the hopencchange The One (tm) is bringing our way - they already succeeded yesterday in insuring that the majority of Americans will have a 3rd World income. Forever.

    Posted by wardmama4    United States   02/14/2009  at  08:18 AM  

  3. A murder can be a crime of passion.  An impulse gone too far and in a moment, someone is dead.  Now on the other hand, to cut off someone’s head....  Seems to be popular in one particular culture.  Hmmmmm.

    Posted by Dr. Jeff    United States   02/14/2009  at  10:11 AM  

  4. Looks like Hassan made our point about the Religion of Peace(TM) better than anyone could.....

    Posted by TimO    United States   02/14/2009  at  11:27 AM  

  5. NYS has Murder in the 2nd Degree (PL 125.25), Aggravated Murder (PL 125.26) and Murder in the 1st Degree (PL 125.27). When the NYS Supremes threw out the death panalty they amended the law to make sure that anyone convicted of Murder Uno would never leave prison. Killing them is another way of making sure they never leave prison but our judges don;t have the stones for that.

    We just had two murder trials prosecuted by my office, one for Murder 2 and the other for Murder 1.

    The woman convicted of Murder Uno poisoned her husband with antifreeze in 2005 (she also killed her first husband in 2000 the same way) and then tried to pin it on her 17 yr old daughter by also poisoning her after writting a fake suicide note confessing to killing her father (Husband Uno). This monster failed and just made the poor kid incredibly sick.

    The guy convicted of Murder Deuce killed a woman while doing odd jobs for her around her house; she was trying to “be kind” to a poor homeless man.

    Murder 1st reads:
    A person is guilty of murder in the first degree when:
    1. With intent to cause the death of another person, he causes the
    death of such person or of a third person; and
    (a) Either:
    (i) the intended victim was a police officer as defined in subdivision
    34 of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law who was at the time of
    the killing engaged in the course of performing his official duties, and
    the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the intended
    victim was a police officer; or
    (ii) the intended victim was a peace officer as defined in paragraph a
    of subdivision twenty-one, subdivision twenty-three, twenty-four or
    sixty-two (employees of the division for youth) of section 2.10 of the
    criminal procedure law who was at the time of the killing engaged in the
    course of performing his official duties, and the defendant knew or
    reasonably should have known that the intended victim was such a
    uniformed court officer, parole officer, probation officer, or employee
    of the division for youth; or
    (iii) the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
    institution or was an employee of a local correctional facility as
    defined in subdivision two of section forty of the correction law, who
    was at the time of the killing engaged in the course of performing his
    official duties, and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known
    that the intended victim was an employee of a state correctional
    institution or a local correctional facility; or
    (iv) at the time of the commission of the killing, the defendant was
    confined in a state correctional institution or was otherwise in custody
    upon a sentence for the term of his natural life, or upon a sentence
    commuted to one of natural life, or upon a sentence for an indeterminate
    term the minimum of which was at least fifteen years and the maximum of
    which was natural life, or at the time of the commission of the killing,
    the defendant had escaped from such confinement or custody while serving
    such a sentence and had not yet been returned to such confinement or
    custody; or
    (v) the intended victim was a witness to a crime committed on a prior
    occasion and the death was caused for the purpose of preventing the
    intended victim`s testimony in any criminal action or proceeding whether
    or not such action or proceeding had been commenced, or the intended
    victim had previously testified in a criminal action or proceeding and
    the killing was committed for the purpose of exacting retribution for
    such prior testimony, or the intended victim was an immediate family
    member of a witness to a crime committed on a prior occasion and the
    killing was committed for the purpose of preventing or influencing the
    testimony of such witness, or the intended victim was an immediate
    family member of a witness who had previously testified in a criminal
    action or proceeding and the killing was committed for the purpose of
    exacting retribution upon such witness for such prior testimony.  As
    used in this subparagraph “immediate family member” means a husband,
    wife, father, mother, daughter, son, brother, sister, stepparent,
    grandparent, stepchild or grandchild; or
    (vi) the defendant committed the killing or procured commission of the
    killing pursuant to an agreement with a person other than the intended
    victim to commit the same for the receipt, or in expectation of the
    receipt, of anything of pecuniary value from a party to the agreement or
    from a person other than the intended victim acting at the direction of
    a party to such agreement; or
    (vii) the victim was killed while the defendant was in the course of
    committing or attempting to commit and in furtherance of robbery,
    burglary in the first degree or second degree, kidnapping in the first
    degree, arson in the first degree or second degree, rape in the first
    degree, sodomy in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree,
    aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree or escape in the first
    degree, or in the course of and furtherance of immediate flight after
    committing or attempting to commit any such crime or in the course of
    and furtherance of immediate flight after attempting to commit the crime
    of murder in the second degree; provided however, the victim is not a
    participant in one of the aforementioned crimes and, provided further
    that, unless the defendant`s criminal liability under this subparagraph
    is based upon the defendant having commanded another person to cause the
    death of the victim or intended victim pursuant to section 20.00 of this
    chapter, this subparagraph shall not apply where the defendant`s
    criminal liability is based upon the conduct of another pursuant to
    section 20.00 of this chapter; or
    (viii) as part of the same criminal transaction, the defendant, with
    intent to cause serious physical injury to or the death of an additional
    person or persons, causes the death of an additional person or persons;
    provided, however, the victim is not a participant in the criminal
    transaction; or
    (ix) prior to committing the killing, the defendant had been convicted
    of murder as defined in this section or section 125.25 of this article,
    or had been convicted in another jurisdiction of an offense which, if
    committed in this state, would constitute a violation of either of such
    sections; or
    (x) the defendant acted in an especially cruel and wanton manner
    pursuant to a course of conduct intended to inflict and inflicting
    torture upon the victim prior to the victim`s death. As used in this
    subparagraph, “torture” means the intentional and depraved infliction of
    extreme physical pain; “depraved” means the defendant relished the
    infliction of extreme physical pain upon the victim evidencing
    debasement or perversion or that the defendant evidenced a sense of
    pleasure in the infliction of extreme physical pain; or
    (xi) the defendant intentionally caused the death of two or more
    additional persons within the state in separate criminal transactions
    within a period of twenty-four months when committed in a similar
    fashion or pursuant to a common scheme or plan; or
    (xii) the intended victim was a judge as defined in subdivision
    twenty-three of section 1.20 of the criminal procedure law and the
    defendant killed such victim because such victim was, at the time of the
    killing, a judge; or
    (xiii) the victim was killed in furtherance of an act of terrorism, as
    defined in paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section 490.05 of this
    chapter; and
    (b) The defendant was more than eighteen years old at the time of the
    commission of the crime.
    2. In any prosecution under subdivision one, it is an affirmative
    defense that:
    (a) The defendant acted under the influence of extreme emotional
    disturbance for which there was a reasonable explanation or excuse, the
    reasonableness of which is to be determined from the viewpoint of a
    person in the defendant`s situation under the circumstances as the
    defendant believed them to be. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall
    constitute a defense to a prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of,
    manslaughter in the first degree or any other crime except murder in the
    second degree; or
    (b) The defendant`s conduct consisted of causing or aiding, without
    the use of duress or deception, another person to commit suicide.
    Nothing contained in this paragraph shall constitute a defense to a
    prosecution for, or preclude a conviction of, manslaughter in the second
    degree or any other crime except murder in the second degree.

    Posted by sig94    United States   02/14/2009  at  02:26 PM  

  6. “Obviously, this is the worst form of domestic violence possible,” Erie County District Attorney Frank A. Sedita III said today.

    It could have been worse. He could have gnawed her head off.

    Posted by sig94    United States   02/14/2009  at  02:31 PM  

  7. Any so called religion that condones this should be called a cult as in charles manson, except he is marginally better than a muslim. Islam must be the depths of human depravity.

    Posted by Chris Edwards    Canada   02/14/2009  at  04:36 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Next entry: The Most Transparent Government Ever

Previous entry: Don't You Believe It

<< BMEWS Main Page >>