Polarization

 

1. The good thing about this is anti-dynasty people (who dislike Bush for that reason) are against her, the conservative and - gasp - religious base will push against her just to not have ole slick as ‘First Man’, fair tax/flat tax/tax cut supporters will be against her, a lot of the insurance/healthcare/medical legal will be against her (socialize medicine we can’t get those big awards anymore), and any person with functioning brain cells will be against her.

   But go for it dems - you’ll be assuring America of a Republican administration (again), probably a Republican controled House and Senate, a semblance of homeland security, a strong armed forces and your anger and vile will probably send you all over the cliff of self destruction.

   Those poll stats have to be a joke done on the Left East Coast and Left West Coast only (or perhaps DC dem interns) 69% believe she has strong moral values - what have they read about her that I haven’t - her self-absorbed re-write of her life? At least they got the would say or do anything to further her political ambitions correct (although I think it should be 95%) since you’d have to have not seen or read anything by her or about her in the past 10 years to not believe that little gem.

   Posted by wardmama4       08/21/2006  at  10:12 AM  



2. Hillary is trying to package herself as the next Maggie Thatcher, package she can try, but for anyone who knows the Hildebeast, she is as plastic and see thru as saran wrap, a Socialist with a BIG agenda. Although it might be a hoot to have Bill as first lady back in the white house as the countdown for self destruct would be a quick fuse! If people think Bush is having a hard time getting his agenda on track, just wait to see the wall Hillary would run into!

   Posted by Gizmo       08/21/2006  at  10:34 AM  



3. Man that vision (Bill as first lady) that creates - makes the phrase ‘entertaining at the White House’ a whole different concept. Wonder if the drive-by media would report when the Hildabest wanders in on the slickster ‘not having sex’ with some young woman in the Oval Office (you know for the memories). Kinda of like a twist on Murder at 1600 - wonder who would ‘fall on the sword’, you know around those two someone always has an accident if the heat gets too close.

   Posted by wardmama4       08/21/2006  at  11:36 AM  



4. Imagine the scene in late January, 2009 at the new Clintonista White House - daily deliveries of Viagra and pizza girls ----

   

   Posted by rudebadger       08/21/2006  at  11:48 AM  



5. You would think that most people could easily see that Hillary is simply a political panderer only out for self-aggrandizement.  Granted, that description applies to most politicians.  But Hillary just seems so...shameless about it.  The problem with all areas of our government is that only politicians run for office...not leaders.

   Posted by shinjinrui       08/21/2006  at  02:21 PM  



6. The very clever marketing types have set it up so that you can “vote” as to whether the Hildabeast should run for the big prize. They will then trumpet it that the “people” have spoken when the results come back positive. I am sure they will point out that because you have to be a subscriber to vote ( you send in the cover of your personal copy ), that this is likely to be a skewed sample. Most of the conservative folks I know gave up on Time years ago… Ergo, if you can vote, you probably are already in favor of Hillary.

   Posted by Spike72AFA       08/21/2006  at  02:40 PM  



7. No kidding, Spike!  I believe that Fox News ran these same poll results yesterday morning and (if it was the same online Time poll) the “representative” sample size was only a little over 500 people.  Not only skewed from the perspective of beinf comprised of “Time” subscribers only but, hell, “Internet” polls are super-flaky to begin with.  I’d be ashamed to tout that kind of poll as being meaningful at all.  But I’d be willing to bet that most Americans have never taken a course in statistics...so people, in general, will think the poll is “meaningful”.  Sad.

   Posted by shinjinrui       08/21/2006  at  05:09 PM  



8. Your point about panderers is well taken Shinjinrui.  For the life of me, I cannot see the attraction of the Hildebeast.  Even one of my co-workers who still worships Bill Clinton can’t stand Hillary.  Could liking Hillary be the ultimate expression of Bush Derangement Syndrome?

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       08/21/2006  at  07:21 PM  



9. Much as I dislike Hilary, I don’t think she’s necessarily the catalyst for a second civil war.

   Posted by CKO86       08/23/2006  at  11:19 AM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.