playboy bunnies and idiots on parade
on 06/06/2011 at 04:44 AM
I never have nor ever will achieve the rank of Goddess but I think that while I don’t agree with the Bunnies - they do have the right to do what they please (because once you start controlling activities such as this (censorship)) - it’s just a matter of time before we are all forced to buy health insurance and eat broccoli at every meal. . . Oh wait.
And yes, I too am not sure if the one pic is male or female.
Probably teh ghey. In any case, they’re all a bunch of jealous scrunts.
I had broccoli last night. If you cook it just enough to get it hot, dribble on some garlic juice, then dip it in BBQ sauce, it isn’t bad at all.
Not sure where I stand on the Bunny thing.
On the one hand, actual Bunnies working in an actual Playboy Club are waitresses. Hard enough work, but they probably make a damn good income in tips. To the best of my knowledge they aren’t pole strippers or lap dancers. They could do the same job at any bar or diner and not have to wear those “exploitative” outfits. Not that they really are; most women wear considerably less to the beach, or while shopping in LA.
On the other hand, an entire generation or two of women have come to the conclusion that public expressions of their sexuality are not exploitative if they seek them out and get paid for it. Case in point would be the millions and millions of skin pics online, from the professionally photographed ones on pay sites to the ‘self shot’ ones all over every social networking site. And all the starlets who are forever ‘leaking’ their own sex tapes and cell phone pics etc. I guess guys have also bought into that ... look at the Wiener ‘scandal’ going on right now, plus various ‘scandals’ with rock stars and athletes. Pretty sure it’s those same bunch of femiNazis with their degrees in Modern Sociology and Womyn’s Studies who are saying such things are natural, wholesome, and harmless expressions of self confidence. Can’t have it both ways, can you?
I knew a moderately pretty young woman a couple years ago who left her part time job doing kid’s parties at the bowling alley to work for a short time in a college-crowd bar. She was pulling in $600+ a night in tips, not wearing overly revealing clothes but only being slightly flirty with the customers. After a year it got stale and she quit and went to beauty school or something. But she bought a condo for cash and a new car. So who’s exploiting who?
On the third hand, probably the sexiest girl I ever saw was covered from neck to feet. Normal footwear, form fitting jeans, and a long sleeved T. Granted she had a ton of long hair, a cute face, and a killer youthful figure ... the well stretched lettering on the T read “Modest is Hottest”.
Yeah, and I agree with the modest thing as well. I don’t understand why girls think they need to let it all hang out to be desirable. A lot of that is conditioning I guess.
I always believed the sexiest images were the ones that teased a little bit. Which doesn’t mean my eyes won’t fall out looking at other images. But these harridans who think they have some kind of right to dictate are a bother.I think Heinlein said it best:
“A lady takes off her dignity with her clothes and does her whorish best” – Notebooks of Lazarus Long.
I have added to that:
Christopher’s Corollary: “A Gentleman ensures the lady enjoys taking off her clothes and dignity.”
My suspicion is that they’ve never had a ‘Gentleman’. Hence their outrage.
06/06/2011 at 06:27 AM
