olympic team doesn’t want to return home, they want to stay here. of course they do.

 

1. At least they want to do something and be a part of the life of their new country.

   Posted by Dr. Jeff       08/14/2012  at  01:05 AM  



2. Doc .... I would not hold my breath on that or make any bets.
   And btw, it isn’t their ‘new country’ yet and hopefully won’t be. England’s reputation as a soft touch had no doubt reached them even in their primitive location.
   Yeah, I could be wrong and worse unfair. Can’t live here and not be cynical Doc.
   Ask LyndonB about that.

   Posted by peiper       08/14/2012  at  04:15 AM  



3. What I just read is that they are not seeking asylum (yet) but have visas that allow them to stay until Nov - so they are just out ‘wandering’ around. It is the Congo athletes that are seeking to stay in GB - isn’t lovely that all those AfriKan nations that the UN & world have poured zillions into over the decades are such cesspools that no one really wants to live there? Use to be communist countries people fled from - now it’s the 3rd world cesspool of dictator and civil war ridden AfriKa.

   Good luck in that and I hope that the US doesn’t have to deal with for years.

   R & R - just what America needs in Nov!

   Posted by wardmama4       08/14/2012  at  05:45 AM  



4. You’re correct peiper,

   Here’s their Modus Operandi:

   They’ll be housed better than most Brits, fed, clothed, given a healthy stipend weekly, a nice car to drive and lauded by the likes of George Galloway and other obnoxious, in-your-face Libtards. Of course, funded by the hard-working taxpayers.

   Then they’ll find some blonde, pale-skinned, fat, brainless Brit babe to start pumpin out little mulatto turds.

   That’ll guarantee them a fine life devoid of their former dirt-floor hut, clay walls crawling with 27 varieties of cockroaches and frequent “khat” binges.

   The UK be berry, berry nice to us!

   Posted by New Jersey Yankee       08/14/2012  at  07:04 AM  



5. Well the visas they were issued with typically are valid for six months. it is almost a given that they will ask for asylum but the very fact they applied for visas tends to undermine their case somewhat. They will lmos certainly be refuse asylum and they may be removed but I wouldn’t hold my breath on that.

   Doc J I do understand your point, but where do you draw the line? In 2002 the Brit government made an arrangement with the French to close Sangatte. There were over a thousand illegals living in an old warehouse about a mile from the French end of the Channel Tunnel. Mostly Iraqis, Iranians, Afghans and Somalis. They were shipped off to Britain, given homes and welfare. Ten years later there are around 1000 people living in the dunes around Calais trying to sneak into Britain.

   I have dealt with thousands of these people. Some of them genuinely want to better themselves, but most just want an easy life at my expense. My issue is that the majority of them are from the “religion of peace” I worked with people who manned the holding room at the British end of the tunnel. On September 11 2001 these people were cheering at the sight of the twin towers collapsing. These are not the kind of people we want frankly

   Posted by LyndonB       08/14/2012  at  01:35 PM  

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.